Himachal decides to ban use of PET bottles in govt. meetings, hotels with effect from June 1
Concerned over their high potential for littering, the Himachal Pradesh government has decided to prohibit the use of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in all indoor official meetings, conferences, and events organised by the government bodies, besides the government-run and private hotels.
The ban on the use of small PET bottles will come into effect from June 1.
'Keeping in view the environmental concerns, the State government, in exercise of powers under sub-section (1) of Section 3-A of the H.P. Non-Biodegradable Garbage (Control) Act, 1995, has issued a notification prohibiting the use of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles (up to 500 ml) in all indoor official meetings, conferences, and events organised by the government departments, boards, corporations, and other State government organisations,' an official statement said.
In Shimla, D.C. Rana, director (environment, science and technology), said the decision has been made keeping in view the widespread use of PET water bottles, which has raised significant environmental concerns due to their high potential for littering.
'This prohibition also applies to Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation (HPTDC) hotels and private hotels in the State. These entities shall adopt sustainable alternatives such as glass bottles, water dispensers-kiosks of steel containers. The State government has also authorised officials from different departments to compound offences in respect of these prohibited items,' he added.
Mr. Rana said that the State government has also imposed a ban on the use of certain non-biodegradable materials and littering of non-biodegradable waste in the State under the above mentioned Act to prevent pollution, save and protect the environment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Is a Costco Card valid ID for air travel? TSA sets record straight
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) had to clarify in a statement issued on June 4 that Costco membership cards are not acceptable forms of identification for air travel in the US. Although the retail giant regularly provides its members benefits in travel deals, rumors claiming that the card could be used for airport identification as well are completely false. 'We love hotdogs & rotisserie chickens as much as the next person but please stop telling people their Costco card counts as a REAL ID because it absolutely does not,' says a social media post released by the TSA. A federal order issued on May 7, 2025, re-invoked the Real ID Act passed by Congress in 2005 following a recommendation given by the 9/11 Commission. The Act regulates IDs issued by the federal government as well as their acceptance for official purposes. 'Starting May 2025, U.S. travelers must be REAL ID compliant to board domestic flights and access certain federal facilities,' says TSA's website. The rumor that Costco cards could be used for identification purposes likely arose due to the presence of a gold star on it- one that is usually found on Real ID-compliant driver's licenses. Many blogs and travelers started claiming how they had traveled using a Costco card. In reality, however, the inability to produce a federally recognized form of identification can stop you from crossing the security screening checkpoint. 'Passengers who present a state-issued identification that is not REAL ID compliant at TSA checkpoints and who do not have another acceptable alternative form of ID will be notified of their non-compliance, may be directed to a separate area, and may receive additional screening. This includes TSA PreCheck passengers,' TSA currently states on its website. Here are the acceptable forms of identification for air travel apart from a compliant state-issued driver's license or identification card: · State-issued Enhanced Driver's License (EDL) or Enhanced ID (EID) · U.S. passport · U.S. passport card · DHS trusted traveler cards (Global Entry, NEXUS, SENTRI, FAST) · U.S. Department of Defense ID, including IDs issued to dependents · Permanent resident card · Border crossing card · An acceptable photo ID issued by a federally recognized Tribal Nation/Indian Tribe, including Enhanced Tribal Cards (ETCs) · HSPD-12 PIV card · Foreign government-issued passport · Canadian provincial driver's license or Indian and Northern Affairs Canada card · Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) · U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Employment Authorization Card (I-766) · U.S. Merchant Mariner Credential · Veteran Health Identification Card (VHIC) This list is subject to change by the TSA. Travelers are advised to re-check the official website in case they are planning on travelling sans-driver's license.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Rs 78,213 crore in unclaimed bank deposits: Govt to speed up refunds
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Tuesday called on financial sector regulators to accelerate the refund of unclaimed deposits to their rightful owners and to simplify Know Your Customer (KYC) processes for citizens, including Non-Resident Indians (NRIs). Chairing the 29th meeting of the Financial Stability and Development Council (FSDC), the Minister emphasized the need to ensure a citizen-friendly financial system with greater transparency, ease of access, and digital efficiency. Reforms and KYC norms: The Finance Ministry highlighted that unclaimed bank deposits have soared 26% year-on-year, reaching Rs 78,213 crore as of March 2024, according to the latest RBI data. Deposits under the Depositor Education and Awareness Fund alone stood at Rs 62,225 crore by the end of March 2023. These figures include: Dormant bank accounts Unclaimed shares and dividends (handled by IEPFA) Lapsed insurance and pension funds (managed by IRDAI and PFRDA) Recognising this growing pool of unclaimed money, the Finance Minister instructed key regulatory bodies—RBI, SEBI, MCA, PFRDA, and IRDA—to launch district-level special camps aimed at returning unclaimed amounts to rightful owners quickly and efficiently. She exhorted the Council to take proactive steps to ensure that citizens should have a seamless experience with respect to KYC processes across the financial sector, the finance ministry said in a statement. There is a need for common KYC norms, simplification and digitalisation of the KYC process including digital onboarding for Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) including PIOs and OCIs, in the Indian securities market. The minister urged the regulators and departments to expedite the process of refund to rightful owners of unclaimed amounts by holding special district-level camps. 'We must ensure that the interest of the common citizen is at the centre of our efforts. Refunds must be made expeditiously,' Sitharaman stated. A push for Digital KYC Another major focus of the meeting was the simplification and digitalisation of the KYC process across sectors. The Minister stressed the urgent need for a common KYC framework that works seamlessly across banks, insurance companies, pension agencies, and the securities market. The KYC process, she said, must be especially accessible to NRIs, Persons of Indian Origin (PIOs), and Overseas Citizens of India (OCIs) through easy digital onboarding mechanisms. FSDC's Broader Agenda: Cybersecurity, Financial Stability & Regulation The FSDC also discussed macro-financial risks, emerging global trends, and India's preparedness to maintain economic stability. It called for proactive efforts to strengthen the financial system's resilience and emphasised the importance of inter-regulatory coordination to manage potential systemic risks. One of the key proposals discussed was the creation of a dedicated cybersecurity strategy tailored for the financial sector, in line with the Financial Sector Assessment Programme (FSAP) 2024–25. Key Takeaways from the FSDC Meeting: Regulators directed to refund unclaimed deposits quickly, using local outreach. Push for a unified, simplified KYC system, especially for NRIs. Focus on cybersecurity enhancements in financial institutions. Strengthening of inter-regulatory coordination for financial stability. Review of regulatory responsiveness to past policy and budgetary decisions. Who attended? The meeting was attended by top officials including RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das, SEBI Chairperson Tuhin Kanta Pandey, and IFSCA Chairperson K Rajaraman, along with senior representatives from IRDAI, PFRDA, IBBI, and various central government departments.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
DDA moves Delhi HC against RERA order for registering housing projects
The Delhi Development Authority has moved the Delhi High Court after the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) in the capital directed the registration of its housing projects. On May 28, the court issued notice to Delhi Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and the Centre on DDA's plea and asked for their responses. The court has posted the matter for hearing on July 7. Senior advocate Ramesh Singh and advocate Vrinda Kapoor Dev, representing DDA, referred to RERA's order directing it to register projects under Section 3 of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Section 3 of RERA mandates registration of real estate project by the promoter before any advertisement, marketing, booking, selling or offering for sale, or inviting persons to purchase in any manner. Further, Section 59 of RERA provides for penalty upon promoter in case of non-registration of the real estate project. Previously, DDA had filed an appeal before the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal challenging the December 20, 2021 order passed by RERA directing it to register all projects under the DDA Housing Scheme 2019 and 2021. The Real Estate Appellate Tribunal had on September 30, 2024 upheld the RERA's decision noting, 'there is a clear stand taken by the Government of India that the provisions of the Act are applicable to the DDA'. In its petition before the high court, DDA argued that it was not a 'promoter' of housing projects under the RERA Act and unlike other promoters and developers, it was not required to mandatorily register under the RERA Act. DDA argued the preamble of the Delhi Development Act established the authority to fundamentally differ from private developers' commercial and profit-motivated objectives and claimed having 'comprehensive in-house mechanisms' for quality control, grievance redressal, and accountability, making additional RERA oversight redundant. 'The statutory scheme of the Delhi Development Act keeps the petitioner distinct from the other developers and promoters of the real estate on account of the fact that the disposal of the developed land and built-up properties are governed by the statutory rules and regulations framed under the DD other promoters and developers as is commonly understood the petitioner does not require mandatory registration....,' the plea said.
