Ukraine war latest: Russia reports 2nd consecutive day of Ukrainian drone attacks on Moscow
Russia reports 2nd consecutive day of Ukrainian drone attacks on Moscow, building damaged on the outskirts
Rubio, Lavrov discuss next round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks in Istanbul
'No one has seen it yet' — Zelensky slams Russia for stalling on ceasefire memorandum ahead of Istanbul talks
Russia amassed enough troops to attack Ukraine's Sumy Oblast, Border Guard warns
Next Ramstein summit to take place on June 4 in Brussels
A building was reportedly damaged on the outskirts of Moscow following a Ukrainian drone attack on the Russian capital overnight on May 29, Mayor Sergei Sobyanin reported.
This marks the second consecutive day of attacks on Moscow Oblast, with multiple industrial facilities targeted by Ukrainian drones and several unmanned aircraft reportedly downed on approach to the capital on May 28.
Videos and photos posted on social media by local residents purportedly show damage sustained by a residential building on Vernadsky Avenue in Southwest Moscow. Explosions were heard in the area around 1:40 a.m. local time.
Sobyanin claimed that no one was injured in the attack that occurred as a result of falling drone debris.
The full extent of the damage was not immediately clear. Ukraine's military has not commented on the reported attack.
Russian air defenses shot down 48 Ukrainian drones overnight, including three over Moscow Oblast, Russia's Defense Ministry claimed.
The Kyiv Independent cannot independently verify reports or claims made by Russian officials.
The previous night on May 28, Russian air defenses shot down 296 Ukrainian drones across multiple regions overnight, Russia's Defense Ministry claimed, potentially marking one of the heaviest drone attacks against Russia during the full-scale war.
Read also: How much does a Russian drone attack on Ukraine cost? The question is more complicated than it sounds
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov presented to U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio Moscow's "specific proposals" for the next round of peace talks with Ukraine, Russia's Foreign Ministry announced on May 29.
The two diplomats held a phone call on May 28, the day when Russia proposed holding negotiations with Ukraine in Istanbul on June 2 in a follow-up to the first round on May 16.
Lavrov also "informed Marco Rubio about implementing the May 19 agreements between President of Russia Vladimir Putin and President of the United States Donald Trump," the Russian Foreign Ministry said.
Trump and Putin held a phone call on May 19, during which the Russian leader again rejected a truce and pushed for maximalist demands, but also voiced his readiness to negotiate a "memorandum regarding a potential future peace treaty."
During the call with Lavrov, Rubio stressed Trump's "intention to quickly bring the Ukraine conflict to an end and expressed Washington's readiness to help the sides to bring their positions closer together," according to the Russian readout.
While initially reluctant to criticize Putin, Trump adopted an increasingly critical tone toward the Russian leader in recent days as Russian attacks on Ukrainian cities intensify and the Kremlin continues to reject calls for a ceasefire.
Kyiv and its European partners have urged the U.S. to impose additional sanctions to pressure Moscow to agree to a truce. Trump has refused to take the step so far, saying he is "close to getting a deal" and does not want to "screw it up" by fresh sanctions.
Read also: Europe's 'Trump shock' is opportunity to forge 'new West,' Timothy Garton Ash says
President Volodymyr Zelensky on May 29 accused Russia of stalling the peace process by failing to deliver a promised negotiations memorandum, warning international partners that Moscow is trying to deceive those still relying on diplomacy over pressure.
"Even the so-called memorandum they promised and claimed to be preparing for more than a week — no one has seen it," Zelensky said. "Ukraine hasn't received it. Our partners haven't received it. Even Turkey, which hosted the first meeting, hasn't received the updated agenda."
Russia's Foreign Ministry previously claimed its delegation, led by presidential aide Vladimir Medinsky, would present the ceasefire framework at the June 2 talks, proposed by Moscow.
Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova confirmed on May 29 that the same Russian delegation, led by Medinsky, will attend the new round of peace talks in Istanbul.
Ukraine's Defense Minister Rustem Umerov said Ukraine has already shared its position paper with Russia.
Speaking after a high-level meeting with Umerov, Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha, and presidential chief of staff Andrii Yermak, Zelensky said Ukraine is maintaining daily coordination with allies ahead of another round of talks in Istanbul.
Zelensky called for renewed international pressure on Russia, saying, "Words don't work with Moscow. They are doing everything to make these meetings meaningless. That is why sanctions and real pressure on Russia are essential."
Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, whose country hosted the May 16 negotiations, said Ankara expects Ukrainian and Russian positions to come closer.
"If there's a diplomatic achievement here, it's not just thanks to Turkish diplomacy, but to the fact that both sides have been willing to talk and that these talks have led to tangible outcomes," Fidan said on his way to Kyiv, where he is expected to meet Sybiha and Zelensky.
Read also: 'Shooting Russia in the back' — Serbian companies supplying ammunition to Ukraine, Moscow claims
Russia has concentrated a sufficient amount of forces in Kursk Oblast to potentially launch an attack on Ukraine's Sumy Oblast, State Border Guard Service spokesperson Andrii Demchenko said on May 29.
The statement comes amid warnings of a new possible Russian offensive this summer as U.S.-mediated peace efforts have failed to produce a ceasefire deal.
Russia has become increasingly active in Sumy Oblast after mostly pushing out Ukrainian forces from Kursk Oblast. Ukrainian authorities recently confirmed that Russian forces captured four Sumy Oblast villages close to the border: Novenke, Zhuravka, Veselivka, and Basivka.
Speaking on national television, Demchenko said Russia began amassing forces when it attempted to push Ukrainian troops out of Kursk Oblast, where Ukraine launched its operation in August 2024.
Russia continues to maintain a force in Kursk Oblast, and Ukraine periodically detects a "certain change in the number of both soldiers and equipment in this area," the spokesperson said.
Russia "has enough forces there (in Kursk Oblast) to carry out operations against our border and attempt to attack the territory of Ukraine," he continued.
The remarks came days after President Volodymyr Zelensky said that Russia is accumulating 50,000 troops near Ukraine's northeastern Sumy Oblast, seeking to create a 10-kilometer buffer zone in the area.
Read also: Infighting around EU rearmament undermines grand ambitions for European defense
The upcoming Ukraine Defense Contact Group (UDCG) meeting in the Ramstein format will be held on June 4 in Brussels under the chairmanship of the U.K. and Germany, NATO announced on May 29.
The Ramstein summit will take place as Washington is trying to broker a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia to end Moscow's full-scale war.
In the meantime, Russia is amassing forces for a new offensive against Ukraine while continuing its attacks on civilians across the country, straining Ukrainian air defenses.
The last Ramstein-format meeting took place in Brussels on April 11 under the chairmanship of London and Berlin — a position previously held by the U.S.
Leadership over Ramstein transitioned following the inauguration of U.S. President Donald Trump.
During the previous meeting, NATO allies committed more than 21 billion euros ($23.8 billion) in long-term military aid to Ukraine.
The move came amid growing uncertainty over U.S. support for Ukraine and efforts by European allies to close the gap as Kyiv resists Russia's ongoing war.
Ukraine War Latest is put together by the Kyiv Independent news desk team, who keep you informed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If you value our work and want to ensure we have the resources to continue, join the Kyiv Independent community.
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why ALSO Holding AG (VTX:ALSN) Could Be Worth Watching
ALSO Holding AG (VTX:ALSN), might not be a large cap stock, but it saw a decent share price growth of 20% on the SWX over the last few months. The company is inching closer to its yearly highs following the recent share price climb. As a mid-cap stock with high coverage by analysts, you could assume any recent changes in the company's outlook is already priced into the stock. However, could the stock still be trading at a relatively cheap price? Let's take a look at ALSO Holding's outlook and value based on the most recent financial data to see if the opportunity still exists. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. The share price seems sensible at the moment according to our price multiple model, where we compare the company's price-to-earnings ratio to the industry average. We've used the price-to-earnings ratio in this instance because there's not enough visibility to forecast its cash flows. The stock's ratio of 29.59x is currently trading slightly below its industry peers' ratio of 29.85x, which means if you buy ALSO Holding today, you'd be paying a reasonable price for it. And if you believe that ALSO Holding should be trading at this level in the long run, then there's not much of an upside to gain over and above other industry peers. Furthermore, ALSO Holding's share price also seems relatively stable compared to the rest of the market, as indicated by its low beta. This may mean it is less likely for the stock to fall lower from natural market volatility, which suggests less opportunities to buy moving forward. View our latest analysis for ALSO Holding Investors looking for growth in their portfolio may want to consider the prospects of a company before buying its shares. Buying a great company with a robust outlook at a cheap price is always a good investment, so let's also take a look at the company's future expectations. ALSO Holding's earnings over the next few years are expected to increase by 97%, indicating a highly optimistic future ahead. This should lead to more robust cash flows, feeding into a higher share value. Are you a shareholder? ALSN's optimistic future growth appears to have been factored into the current share price, with shares trading around industry price multiples. However, there are also other important factors which we haven't considered today, such as the track record of its management team. Have these factors changed since the last time you looked at ALSN? Will you have enough confidence to invest in the company should the price drop below the industry PE ratio? Are you a potential investor? If you've been keeping an eye on ALSN, now may not be the most advantageous time to buy, given it is trading around industry price multiples. However, the optimistic forecast is encouraging for ALSN, which means it's worth further examining other factors such as the strength of its balance sheet, in order to take advantage of the next price drop. Diving deeper into the forecasts for ALSO Holding mentioned earlier will help you understand how analysts view the stock going forward. Luckily, you can check out what analysts are forecasting by clicking here. If you are no longer interested in ALSO Holding, you can use our free platform to see our list of over 50 other stocks with a high growth potential. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Maryland's credit downgrade can be blamed on actions in Washington, not Annapolis
Maryland maintained a AAA bond rating from Fitch and Standard & Poor's, but was downgraded to Aa1 by Moody's. (Maryland Matters file photo) In his coverage of the downgrade of Maryland's credit rating by Moody's from the coveted AAA to AA1, Bryan Sears pointed to Moody's acknowledgement of Maryland's 'wealthy and diverse economy,' solid financial planning and proactive management by officials, including slowing expenditures and raising new funds. But the report also noted that Maryland was particularly vulnerable to 'shifting Federal policies and employment' in comparison to other states with triple-A ratings: Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Virginia. In plain-speak, Maryland's administration was well equipped to handle any organic financial issues arising from budgetary deficits, and/or ambitiously funded programs. But our reliance on federal jobs meant that no one could foresee or plan for such eventualities. Maryland Matters welcomes guest commentary submissions at editor@ We suggest a 750-word limit and reserve the right to edit or reject submissions. We do not accept columns that are endorsements of candidates, and no longer accept submissions from elected officials or political candidates. Opinion pieces must be signed by at least one individual using their real name. We do not accept columns signed by an organization. Commentary writers must include a short bio and a photo for their bylines. Views of writers are their own. Among all the states with a triple-A rating, Maryland's economy is the only one which is dominated by the government sector. Being a small state and adjacent to the nation's capital, Maryland's largest source of income is income tax. Almost one in 10 Maryland workers is a federal employee. The only variable NOT in control of the state administration is the employment of federal workers. It isn't hard to see the connection. Republican delegates and senators who tout Moody's warnings about Maryland's rating prior to this current federal administration taking charge are forgetting that the programs with high price tags, like the Blueprint for Maryland's Future, were hit because of the COVID-19 economy. We barely had time to come up to the surface to take a breath of air before being submerged again by this second Trump administration! The GOP needs to take a hard look at themselves, and their blind obeisance to the walking body of malfeasance they regard as their president. Here is the bottom line: Moody's downgraded Maryland's credit rating because, despite the Moore administration's best efforts, they could not fix the damage done by DOGE and their dismantling of federal government. Maryland, D.C. and Virginia have the maximum number of federal employees – both Maryland and D.C. had their ratings downgraded. Virginia is a much larger state and has other economic avenues to offset the loss of federal jobs, even though it, too, has taken a substantial hit to its economy. Blame, if it is to be assigned, lies with the Trump administration and its hatchet approach to federal infrastructure. Believe me, the damage goes far beyond a credit rating — the United States will be feeling the effects of this sabotage for decades to come. Fitch has since released its ratings on Maryland, and Standard & Poor's followed on Wednesday. Maryland continued to maintain a triple-A ratings with both firms. So let's all take a deep breath, and return to resisting the illegal and unconstitutional actions of this federal administration.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump announces new steel and aluminium tariffs in blow to global markets
Donald Trump has announced plans to double tariffs on steel imports from next week, intensifying his trade war and unsettling global markets. Addressing a rally of steel workers in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, on Friday, the US president revealed that tariffs would rise from 25% to 50%, claiming the measure "will even further secure the steel industry in the United States." Mr Trump later confirmed on Truth Social that the new tariffs, which also apply to aluminium imports, would take effect from Wednesday. He declared that American "industries are coming back like never before." "This will be yet another BIG jolt of great news for our wonderful steel and aluminum (sic) workers," he wrote, adding: "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" In a separate statement, he said: "We don't want America's future to be built with shoddy steel from Shanghai - we want it built with the strength and the pride of Pittsburgh!" However, a UK government source told Sky News that Britain will remain exempt from the new tariff rates, following the signing of a US-UK trade deal earlier this month. The source highlighted this agreement as evidence of why reaching an early arrangement with the Trump administration had been critical. Under the deal, the US agreed to "promptly construct a quota at most favoured nation (MFN) rates" for British steel, aluminium and derivative products. The escalation follows Mr Trump's claim earlier that China had "totally violated" an agreement designed to mutually roll back tariffs and trade restrictions on critical minerals. "So much for being Mr Nice Guy," he wrote on his social media platform. Initially, Mr Trump imposed a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminium imports in March as part of an effort to protect US manufacturing and jobs, making foreign imports less appealing to domestic industries. These increased tariffs threaten to raise costs for American consumers, affecting products from cars to canned soft drinks. Trump previously warned Canada it could face tariffs of up to 50% on steel imports, prompting Ontario's provincial government to threaten to increase electricity charges by 25% to American customers. Ontario supplies electricity to more than 1.5 million US homes and businesses in Minnesota, New York, and Michigan. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney previously described the potential tariffs as an "attack" on Canadian workers, families, and businesses. Currently, roughly a quarter of steel used in the US is imported, predominantly from countries including Canada, Mexico, Japan, South Korea, and Germany. In 2024, the US imported 6.6 million tonnes of steel from Canada and 3.5 million tonnes from Mexico. The US also heavily relies on imported aluminium, receiving 3.2 million tonnes from Canada last year.
