logo
Houthi missile attack: How tech-savvy non-state actors are posing a major global security threat

Houthi missile attack: How tech-savvy non-state actors are posing a major global security threat

Business Mayor06-05-2025

On 4 May, the Houthis — Yemen's Iranian-backed rebel group — launched a hypersonic ballistic missile targeting Tel Aviv's Ben-Gurion International Airport, in a bid to demonstrate their ability to strike critical infrastructure. This once again marks a dramatic escalation in the capabilities and threats posed by the Houthis in particular and non-state actors in general in the modern security landscape.
The Benjamin Netanyahu-led government has vowed a 'sevenfold retaliation' against the rebel group. Within hours of the announcement, Israeli forces launched airstrikes on Yemen's Hodeidah port—a vital lifeline for the country that handles the bulk of humanitarian and commercial supplies. Strategically located, Hodeidah is also widely believed to be a key conduit for Iranian arms shipments to the Houthis.
Despite this swift response, the effectiveness of the Houthi missile strike cannot be overlooked. Their projectiles not only reached central Israel but also managed to evade some of the world's most advanced air defence systems, including Israel's Iron Dome and Arrow systems, as well as the US-deployed THAAD anti-missile batteries, raising serious questions about the evolving capabilities of non-state actors.
The strike by the Houthis not only disrupted flight operations and brought Israel's Airport to a temporary standstill, but also triggered a wider aviation alarm, prompting several international airlines to re-route or suspend flights to and from Israel amid fears of further missile attacks. The incident underscored how a single, well-timed strike by a non-state actor can send shockwaves through global air travel networks, altering flight paths and insurance risk assessments almost instantaneously. Such long-distance precision strikes have raised serious concerns across regional and global security establishments. It underlines a grave new dimension wherein a non-state actor has demonstrated precision-strike capabilities over nearly 2,000 kilometres which is roughly the distance between Yemen and Israel's airspace.
The Houthis' growing mastery of technological improvisation often optimised through their do-it-by-yourself (DIY) techniques and their access to state-of-the-art weaponry often beyond the reach of many conventional state militaries marks a remarkable and alarming evolution in the nature of asymmetric warfare. This shift demonstrates that non-state actors, once dismissed as guerrilla insurgents, can now deploy advanced systems such as hypersonic missiles, precision-guided drones, and naval strike assets with a level of coordination and effectiveness that challenges the monopoly of state power on high-end military capability. It also amplifies that battlefield is no longer defined by state boundaries or formal armies, but by networks, proxies, and technological adaptability.
The Houthis, formally known as Ansar Allah, are a Zaydi Shia minority and Islamist political and military organisation which emerged from northern Yemen in the 1990s. They rose to prominence during the Arab Uprisings of 2010-2011 when the fragility of the Yemeni state was exposed by street protests against the regime. With significant support from former President Ali Abdullah Saleh who openly allied with them during May 2015 civil war, the Houthis steadily gained ground, but their alliance fractured in 2017. Saleh's subsequent killing by the Houthis only underscored their growing influence and capacity to eliminate even their former allies.
Allegedly backed militarily, financially, and ideologically by Iran, the Houthis overthrew the internationally recognized Hadi government in 2014, taking control of Sanaa and prompting a Saudi-led coalition intervention. Since then, they have entrenched themselves in Yemen's political and military fabric, transforming from a local insurgency to a regional Middle Eastern threat. If left unchecked, days are not far when they will transform into a global threat.
The first major global alert about Houthi capabilities came in September 2019, when they attacked Saudi Arabia's Abqaiq and Khurais oil processing facilities which served as the key nodes of Aramco's production infrastructure. These installations, guarded by advanced US-supplied Patriot missile systems and the French-supplied Thales radar networks, were penetrated using a combination of drones and low-flying cruise missiles.
UN investigations and open-source intelligence pointed to Iranian origin of components and Chinese-supplied drones that had been reassembled and modified in Yemen. What alarmed defence analysts worldwide was the precision of the strike. As many as 17 critical points were hit with near-perfect accuracy, temporarily cutting Saudi oil production by half and causing a 5% spike in global oil prices.
Following the Aramco strike, the Houthis targeted the UAE in early 2022, using drones and missiles to strike oil storage facilities near Abu Dhabi. These attacks shocked the Emirati leadership, which had until then considered itself relatively insulated from the Yemen conflict.
Parallelly, the rebel group expanded their naval warfare capabilities, deploying anti-ship ballistic missiles, explosive-laden drone boats, and sea mines. In the aftermath of the Israel-Hamas war in 2023, they launched a de facto naval blockade in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, targeting Israel-bound and Israel-flagged commercial ships. The group even fired upon US and UK warships, prompting retaliatory strikes that failed to decisively neutralize their operations.
Their use of water-borne improvised explosive devices (WBIEDs), advanced radar-guided missiles, and Iranian-provided Noor and Qader anti-ship systems elevated them from regional irritants to serious maritime threats. The recent strike on Israel reveals yet another leap in capabilities. This marks the first time a non-state actor has used such a platform against a modern air defense-protected airport. Hypersonic missiles, defined by their ability to travel at speeds exceeding Mach 5, have evasion and manoeuvrability features that even sophisticated systems like Israel's Iron Dome or Arrow-3 may struggle to intercept.
The targeting of Israel's largest International Airport disrupted not just Israeli civilian life but also international travel routes. Airlines from India, the EU, and other nations cancelled flights to and from Israel for at least three days. The economic and strategic costs of such attacks are also considerably high and are felt far beyond immediate war zones.
Iranian support to the Houthis—while officially denied—has further included smuggling networks for arms, missile blueprints, UAV components, and technical training. Several UN reports have confirmed the expanding inventory of the Houthis from Burkan and Quds missiles to Shahed drones. Moreover, US Navy seizures during 2022 and 2023 intercepted Iranian shipments including over 2,000 assault rifles, UAV parts, and missile guidance systems en route to Yemen, highlighting the scale of assistance and threat convergence.
This trajectory demonstrates how a non-state actor can evolve into a technologically sophisticated proxy with regional and even global impact. The convergence of ideology, technological sophistication, and proxy geopolitics in the Houthi case should serve as a wake-up call. Their successful strikes have already targeted three of the region's most powerful countries—Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and now Israel—revealing systemic vulnerabilities in even the most advanced defence architectures.
If these nations do not coordinate their efforts to contain the Houthis' growing capabilities, they risk further erosion of their regional security. More than ever, states must further invest cohesively in intelligence-sharing, maritime domain awareness, and missile defence integration. Beyond hardware, a coordinated and precise counter-terrorism approach is critical. Without such recalibration, states will continue to be consistently out-manoeuvred by such sophisticated technologically advanced proxies.
More alarmingly, what is today a threat to regional actors could tomorrow be a global menace. The growing sophistication of non-state actors like the Houthis holds significant implications beyond the Middle East. India, too, must remain vigilant in the face of this evolving threat landscape.
There is increasing evidence that insurgent tactics are being diffused across regions; for example, T he Resistance Front (TRF) operating in Kashmir has reportedly drawn operational cues from Hamas, adopting similar asymmetric and propaganda-based strategies. It is not implausible that such groups could seek logistical or ideological inspiration or even material support from actors like the Houthis in the future.
As the boundaries between local insurgencies and global terror networks blur, India must also enhance its threat-mapping and counter-terrorism posture, particularly in tracking transnational linkages that may empower domestic adversaries. The challenge posed by technologically advanced non-state actors is no longer geographically confined; it requires early intelligence, regional coordination, and global policy alignment to prevent these groups from becoming emboldened and replicating the Houthi model elsewhere. There is a need of a strategic imperative to prevent the rise of non-state actors who, if left unchecked, could outpace traditional threats posed by state adversaries.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel backs anti-Hamas militia known for looting aid in Gaza. Here's what we know
Israel backs anti-Hamas militia known for looting aid in Gaza. Here's what we know

Los Angeles Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Israel backs anti-Hamas militia known for looting aid in Gaza. Here's what we know

JERUSALEM — Israel is supporting armed groups of Palestinians in Gaza in what it says is a move to counter Hamas. But officials from the U.N. and aid organizations say the military is allowing them to loot food and other supplies from their trucks. One self-styled militia that calls itself the Popular Forces, led by Yasser Abu Shabab, says it is guarding newly created, Israeli-backed food distribution centers in southern Gaza. Aid workers say it has a long history of looting U.N. trucks. Gaza's armed groups have ties to powerful clans or extended families and often operate as criminal gangs. Aid workers allege Israel's backing of the groups is part of a wider effort to control all aid operations in the strip. Israel denies allowing looters to operate in areas it controls. Here's what we know about anti-Hamas armed groups in Gaza: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a social media video Thursday that Israel had 'activated' clans in Gaza to oppose Hamas. He didn't elaborate how Israel is supporting them or what role Israel wants them to play. Netanyahu's comments were in response to a political opponent accusing him of arming 'crime families' in Gaza. Clans, tribes and extended families have strong influence in Gaza, where their leaders often help mediate disputes. Some have long been armed to protect their group's interests, and some have morphed into gangs involved in smuggling drugs or running protection rackets. After seizing power in 2007, Hamas clamped down on Gaza's gangs — sometimes with brute force and sometimes by steering perks their way. But with Hamas' weakening power after 20 months of war with Israel, gangs have regained freedom to act. The leadership of a number of clans — including the clan from which the Abu Shabab group's members hail — have issued statements denouncing looting and cooperation with Israel. Besides the Abu Shabab group, it is not known how many armed groups Israel is supporting. The Abu Shabab group went public in early May, declaring itself a 'nationalist force.' It said it was protecting aid, including around the food distribution hubs run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a mainly American private contractor that Israel intends to replace the U.N.-led aid network. Aid workers and Palestinians who know the group estimate it has several hundred fighters. The Abu Shabab group's media office told the Associated Press it was collaborating with GHF 'to ensure that the food and medicine reaches its beneficiaries.' It said it was not involved in distribution, but that its fighters secured the surroundings of distribution centers run by GHF inside military-controlled zones in the Rafah area. A spokesperson with GHF said it had 'no collaboration' with Abu Shabab. 'We do have local Palestinian workers we are very proud of, but none is armed, and they do not belong to Abu Shabab's organization,' the spokesperson said, speaking on condition of anonymity in accordance with the group's rules. Before the war, Yasser Abu Shabab was involved in smuggling cigarettes and drugs from Egypt and Israel into Gaza through crossings and tunnels, according to two members of his extended family, one of whom was once part of his group. Hamas arrested Abu Shabab but freed him from prison along with most other inmates when the war began in October 2023, they said, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals. Abu Shabab's media office said he was summoned by police before the war but wasn't officially accused or tried. It also said claims the group was involved in attacking aid trucks were 'exaggerated,' saying its fighters 'took the minimum amount of food and water necessary.' The head of the association in Gaza that provides trucks and drivers for aid groups said their members' vehicles have been attacked many times by Abu Shabab's fighters. Nahed Sheheiber said the group has been active in Israeli-controlled eastern parts of Rafah and Khan Younis, targeting trucks as they enter Gaza from the Kerem Shalom crossing with Israel. Troops nearby 'did nothing' to stop attacks, he said. Sheheiber said that when Hamas police officers have tried to confront gangs or guard truck convoys, they were attacked by Israeli troops. One driver, Issam Abu Awda, said he was attacked by Abu Shabab fighters last July. The fighters stopped his truck, blindfolded and handcuffed him and his assistant, then loaded the supplies off the vehicle, he said. Abu Awda said nearby Israeli troops didn't intervene. These kinds of attacks are still happening and highlight 'a disturbing pattern,' according to Jonathan Whittall, from the U.N. humanitarian coordinator, OCHA. 'Those who have blocked and violently ransacked aid trucks seem to have been protected' by Israeli forces, said Whittall, head of OCHA's office for the occupied Palestinian territories. And, he added, they have now become the 'protectors of the goods being distributed through Israel's new militarized hubs,' referring to the GHF-run sites. The Israeli military did not reply when asked for comment on allegations it has allowed armed groups to loot trucks. But the Israeli prime minister's office called the accusations 'fake news,' saying, 'Israel didn't allow looters to operate in Israeli controlled areas.' Israel often accuses Hamas of stealing from trucks. Muhammad Shehada, a political analyst from Gaza who is a visiting fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said he doesn't believe Israel's support for armed groups is aimed at directly fighting Hamas. So far there has been no attempt to deploy the groups against the militants. Instead, he said, Israel is using the gangs and the looting to present GHF 'as the only alternative to provide food to Palestinians,' since its supplies get in while the U.N.'s don't. Israel wants the GHF to replace the U.N.-led aid system because it claims Hamas has been siphoning off large amounts of supplies. The U.N. denies that significant amounts have been taken by Hamas. Israel has also said it aims to move all Palestinians in Gaza to a 'sterile zone' in the south, around the food hubs, while it fights Hamas elsewhere. The U.N. and aid groups have rejected that as using food as a tool for forced displacement. The Abu Shabab group has issued videos online urging Palestinians to move to tent camps in Rafah. Israel barred all food and other supplies from entering Gaza for 2 ½ months pending the start of GHF — a blockade that has brought the population to the brink of famine. GHF started distributing food boxes on May 26 at three hubs guarded by private contractors inside Israeli military zones. Israel has let in some trucks of aid for the U.N. to distribute. But the U.N. says it has been able to get little of it into the hands of Palestinians because of Israeli military restrictions, including requiring its trucks to use roads where looters are known to operate. 'It's Israel's way of telling the U.N., if you want to try to bring aid into Gaza, good luck with this,' said Shehada. 'We will force you to go through a road where everything you brought will be looted.' Frankel, Mednick, Magdy and Keath write for the Associated Press. Magdy and Keath reported from Cairo.

Trump warns of possible military action if Iran enriches more uranium: ‘We're going to have no choice'
Trump warns of possible military action if Iran enriches more uranium: ‘We're going to have no choice'

New York Post

time36 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump warns of possible military action if Iran enriches more uranium: ‘We're going to have no choice'

WASHINGTON — President Trump warned Friday that Iran will not be allowed to enrich uranium — hinting at possible military strikes following the revelation that Tehran has been secretly building out a near weapons-grade nuclear program for months. 'They won't be enriching. If they enrich, then we're going to have to do it the other way,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday. 'And I don't really want to do it the other way but we're going to have no choice,' he added. 'There's not going to be enrichment.' 5 'They won't be enriching. If they enrich, then we're going to have to do it the other way,' President Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday. AP Israel also reassured the White House earlier this week that it won't launch an attack on Iranian nuclear sites unless Trump signals that ongoing talks with Tehran about its nuclear program have failed, Axios reported. 'He may go into a war. But we're not getting dragged in,' Trump had said of Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a Time magazine interview in April to mark his first 100 days in office. 'I may go in very willingly if we can't get a deal. If we don't make a deal, I'll be leading the pack.' In May, the president said he'd warned Netanyahu not to bomb Tehran's nuclear facilities because the US had been 'having very good discussions with' Iranian negotiators. But Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Wednesday that ending uranium enrichment was '100%' against his country's interests — and lashed out at the US for being 'arrogant' in its proposal for a revamped nuclear deal. That drafted agreement, submitted by Special Envoy for the Middle East Steve Witkoff on May 31, permitted low-level uranium enrichment for civilian use. 5 Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Wednesday that ending uranium enrichment was '100%' against his country's interests. via Getty Images 'Who are you to decide whether Iran should have enrichment?' Khamenei said in a televised speech. 'If we had 100 nuclear power plants while not having enrichment, they are not usable for us.' On Tuesday, the State Department clarified that the US did not support Iran enriching uranium at any level. 5 Levels of 90% uranium enrichment are considered weapons-grade. REUTERS 'The fact is, President Trump tweeted that there is going to be no uranium enrichment,' spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters. The US and Iran have already gone through five rounds of talks over the nuclear issue — without any breakthroughs. The UN's International Atomic Energy Agency last week reportedly disclosed that, in the background, Tehran had been upping its 60%-enriched uranium stockpile — from 274.8 kilograms to 408.6 kilograms between February and May — a roughly 50% jump between February and May. 5 A nuclear deal proposal, submitted by Special Envoy for the Middle East Steve Witkoff on May 31, would permit low-level uranium enrichment for civilian use. Getty Images Levels of 90% are considered weapons-grade, and US officials have warned that Iran could convert their stockpile to reach that threshold needed for a single weapon in two weeks' time. That prompted Netanyahu to call on international allies 'to stop Iran,' sounding the alarm about the uranium enrichment levels being only appropriate for 'countries actively pursuing nuclear weapons.' Trump previously revived a 'maximum pressure' of sanctions on Iran after returning to the White House — and European nations privy to the UN nuclear report's findings may also be considering further snapback sanctions previously lifted under former President Barack Obama's nuclear agreement with Tehran. 5 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last week called on international allies 'to stop Iran,' sounding the alarm about the uranium enrichment levels being only appropriate for 'countries actively pursuing nuclear weapons.' AP That 2015 deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, was supposed to reduce Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium by 98%, though the UN findings have undercut that. Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal in 2018.

Elon Musk deletes anti-Trump posts as president warns of ‘serious consequences'
Elon Musk deletes anti-Trump posts as president warns of ‘serious consequences'

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Elon Musk deletes anti-Trump posts as president warns of ‘serious consequences'

Elon Musk has quietly removed several high-profile posts on his social media platform, X, that directly criticized President Donald Trump, signaling a possible deescalation in a feud that exploded into public view this week. Among the deleted posts were Musk's accusations linking Trump to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, as well as a now-vanished endorsement of a user's call for Trump's impeachment and replacement with Vice President JD Vance. The deletions were discovered Saturday morning, though it remains unclear why Musk removed the posts. On Thursday, Musk claimed that without him, Trump would not have secured the presidency, setting off threats from Trump to cut off government contracts with Musk's companies, including Starlink and Space X. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk replied. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' The X page that once hosted Musk's post now displays a generic error message: ' page doesn't exist. Try searching for something else.' Musk had also replied 'yes' to a user's post calling for Trump's impeachment. By Saturday morning, that post had also been removed. The posts had marked a sharp escalation in the rift between Musk and Trump, who were once closely aligned. Trump purchased a red Tesla Model S in March and, just last week, appeared at a White House event alongside Musk, where he presented him with a ceremonial golden key to the nation. The alliance began to crack after Musk publicly criticized a sweeping GOP-backed budget measure, the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which he said did not include the reforms he had championed while leading the Department of Government Efficiency under Trump. On Thursday, Musk called on Trump to 'ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' Trump, in turn, dismissed Musk's opposition and suggested cutting off federal subsidies and contracts with Musk's companies. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' the president wrote on Truth Social. In an interview with NBC News on Saturday, Trump warned of 'very serious consequences' if Musk were to fund Democratic candidates in retaliation. 'He'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump said, though he declined to elaborate. Trump added that Musk was being 'disrespectful to the office of the President.' He added, 'I think it's a very bad thing.' Asked whether he intended to mend the relationship, Trump responded simply: 'No.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store