
Colorectal Cancer Linked With Adverse Sexual Health Outcomes
As new colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and related mortality continued to decline among Canadians older than 50 years, a new finding emerged: An increased risk for sexual health conditions in women with CRC, especially those with early-onset CRC (diagnosed in women younger than 50 years). These patients have as much as a 90% higher risk for dyspareunia compared with cancer-free peers.
Other striking findings of the recently published study included elevated risks for premature ovarian failure, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and endometriosis among women with CRC.
Study co-author Mary De Vera, PhD, a pharmacoepidemiologist and assistant professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of British Columbia (BC) in Vancouver, was diagnosed with early-onset CRC at age 36 years. 'The motivation for me to look at sexual and reproductive health outcomes stemmed from my own lived experience,' she told Medscape Medical News.
Mary De Vera, PhD
The study was published online on June 1 in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute .
Sexual Health Challenges
The researchers conducted a population-based cohort study to evaluate the impact of CRC on the following six outcomes: Dyspareunia, abnormal bleeding outside pregnancy, PID, endometriosis, premature ovarian failure (ie, early menopause in women younger than 40 years), and at least one hormone replacement therapy prescription.
Eligible participants were identified in BC administrative health data (which contains linked healthcare visits and the BC Cancer Registry) and included patients assigned female at birth who were diagnosed with CRC between January 1, 1985, and December 31, 2017 (n = 25,402). These participants were matched by age and sex 1:10 to cancer-free controls (n = 254,020). The participants were further stratified by age (≤ 39 years, ≥ 40 years), and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the association between sociodemographic and cancer-related factors (eg, cancer site or treatment type) on sexual health outcomes.
The most common cancer sites were the left colon (39.8%) and rectum (28.8%), and the most frequent treatments were surgery (42.9%) and chemotherapy (35.5%). Overall, participants with CRC had more healthcare encounters in the previous year than matched control individuals did (15.1 vs 10.9; P < .0001).
Women with CRC had a 67% higher risk for dyspareunia compared with women without cancer. 'When we further stratified them by age, the risk actually rose to 90% in females diagnosed before age 40,' said De Vera.
Treatment-related effects were common. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated an increased dyspareunia risk with surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23), chemotherapy (HR, 1.25), and radiation (HR, 1.24). Women receiving chemotherapy had an increased risk for abnormal bleeding (HR, 1.24).
CRC was associated with increased PID risk (HR, 3.42). Cancer site and treatment were independently associated with increased risk. For example, the risk for PID increased by 80% in participants diagnosed with CRC in the left colon and by 121% for rectal CRC. Radiation treatment was associated with a 56% increased risk.
Additional notable findings included a 95% higher risk for endometriosis across all ages, with an 80% increase noted in women who had received surgery. Risk for premature ovarian failure appeared to increase more significantly in younger women with CRC than in those without (HR, 1.75). Chemotherapy was associated with a 164% higher risk.
Causation Unclear
De Vera pointed to a surprising but important finding related to the timing of diagnosis. 'We were finding that a lot of sexual health issues were diagnosed in the 3-4 years after the original cancer diagnosis, which showed me that a lot of these issues were surfacing during the survivorship stage,' she said.
However, the study is not without limitations. Though findings suggested that there is an effect of cancer itself and that many of the conditions were being driven by cancer treatments, these effects have not been clearly delineated or defined.
De Vera also said that the increase in health encounters amongst women with CRC suggested that certain drivers (eg, pain during or after sex) might not have been captured in the medical records.
Jaclyn Madar, MD, assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at McGill University and clinician at Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital in Montreal, told Medscape Medical News that although pain disorders like endometriosis or dyspareunia can affect pleasure during intercourse, it's important to note that not all patients face the same situation.
Jaclyn Madar, MD
'When you have a woman with sexual pain, you really have to look into what the cause of it might be, regardless of age,' said Madar, who was not involved in the study.
'What's front of mind for a lot of these women is to treat the cancer, and then afterward deal with the aftermath,' she said. 'It doesn't seem to me that it is integrated into the care, and I believe that it's important to warn that when they go through certain types of chemo, for example, they'll probably enter early menopause or have menopause symptoms.'
Madar noted that the prevalence of many of these conditions is difficult to estimate, namely because patients don't always volunteer the information, and diagnosis is often delayed. For CRC in particular, radiation can have significant effects on vaginal tissues and cause vaginal stenosis, while surgical treatments have a domino effect: Post-op pain near the rectum can lead to pelvic floor muscle spasms and subsequent dyspareunia.
'The findings will lead to greater awareness and better communication,' said De Vera hopefully.
The study was funded by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. De Vera and Madar reported having no relevant financial relationships.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
5 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Health screening task force to relaunch next spring after report calls for reform
OTTAWA - The health minister is hoping to relaunch a federal task force responsible for providing health screening guidelines next spring, after an expert report said there is a pressing need for reform. The Task Force for Preventive Health Care provides clinical guidelines for primary care providers on screening and prevention measures for cancer and other diseases. The group came under fire in May 2024 for rejecting expert advice to lower the age for breast cancer screening. It maintained that routine breast cancer screening should start at age 50 and end after age 74, though it said younger women could seek a mammogram after weighing the risks and benefits of early screening. Experts and the Canadian Cancer Society had called for the minimum screening age to be lowered to 40. A number of provinces are already funding screening for women between the ages of 40 and 50. Mark Holland, the health minister at the time, called for the expert review last October and suspended the task force's work in early March while the review was underway. Health Minister Marjorie Michel said in a statement Friday that she's asked the public health agency to immediately begin work on implementing the report's recommendations, and to ensure the modernized task force is fully operational by next April. The expert report said the task force needs a clear mandate and should become an external advisory body with transparent governance and accountable processes. It calls for guidelines to be developed in co-ordination with provincial and territorial programs. It said health agencies, professional associations, specialist societies and the private sector all issue their own guidelines, creating uncertainty for health providers and patients alike. The report said the expert panel 'heard concerns that physicians with expertise in diagnosing and managing specific diseases were not consistently included in the task force's work' and called for greater engagement with subject matter experts. It also recommends changes to the membership of the task force itself. It said the Public Health Agency of Canada 'should launch open and transparent calls for nominations and conduct targeted outreach to engage professional, academic and community organizations identifying candidates from diverse backgrounds.' The report got positive reactions from advocacy groups, including the Canadian Cancer Society, which said it was pleased to see its recommendations included. 'This report reflects opportunities raised by many caring people and organizations who all share a common goal of making Canadians healthier and we're very hopeful for the future,' said the society's CEO Andrea Seale in a statement. Seale said the task force has a backlog of outdated guidelines that must be addressed and it's up to the government to ensure the reforms happen promptly. Dense Breasts Canada, an advocacy group that has been calling for revisions to the national breast cancer screening guidelines for years, said the expert panel's report is good news. 'The expert panel's recommendations set out a new direction for developing screening guidelines which reflect the latest evidence and are responsive to the needs of Canadians from all backgrounds,' said the group's executive director Jennie Dale, who made a presentation to the external review panel. The report said the task force should gradually adopt a 'living guidelines model' that responds continuously to new research findings. 'The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the importance of timely, evidence-based updates and highlighted the value of real-time synthesis and international collaboration in adapting to rapidly changing conditions and evidence,' the report said. Dr. Anna Wilkinson, an oncologist at the Ottawa Hospital, said in a media statement that by 'calling for formal expert involvement, the integration of diverse and evolving evidence, equitable care and ongoing evaluation,' the report paves the way for 'agile, 'living' guidelines that keep pace with scientific advancements.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 13, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trade bill could trigger 'race to the bottom' in health standards, health groups warn
OTTAWA — Anti-smoking groups are warning the Carney government that its legislation to eliminate interprovincial trade barriers could undermine health standards unless it's amended to add new safeguards. The legislation, which the governing Liberals intend to push quickly through the House of Commons next week, looks to do two things — break down interprovincial barriers to trade and labour mobility and speed up approvals for major industrial projects, such as mines, ports and pipelines. The bill would allow provincial standards to displace federal ones to make it easier to sell Canadian-made goods within the country. But Rob Cunningham, senior policy analyst at the Canadian Cancer Society, said the current wording could lead to unintended consequences since provincial rules are sometimes weaker. He warns that, for example, it could prompt the return of products banned by federal regulation, such as those containing asbestos. "There's a federal measure banning asbestos in products, but provinces allow up to a certain per cent of asbestos in products," he said. "So that would mean that despite asbestos being banned in products for some years now, you could have asbestos return to products. That's not good." He also suggested the legislation could give tobacco companies space to bring back menthol or flavoured cigarettes, something that "shouldn't be happening." Cunningham said the bill should be changed to exempt federal health and environment standards and noted multilateral trade agreements typically contain such clauses. 'We are worried the tobacco (and) vape industry could take advantage of a less strict provincial standard to erode a stronger federal regulation that is protecting the health of Canadians across the country,' said Manuel Arango, vice-president of policy and advocacy at the Heart and Stroke Foundation. Ottawa could still create an exception for health through regulations after the bill is passed. It has not yet indicated it will do so. Cynthia Callard, head of Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada, said she worries about the bill being rushed through Parliament since the devil "will likely be in the details in the regulations." "If these are not well constructed, there is a decided risk of health protection becoming collateral damage of a push for greater economic activity," she said. "Provincial and federal governments share jurisdiction for (health and environmental) issues, which is why it is important that there is a legal shield against a race to the bottom when it comes to protective regulations. I do not see this in the bill." The Bloc Québécois, NDP and Green Party are accusing Prime Minister Mark Carney's government of trying to ram the bill through Parliament too quickly without sufficient study. Carney promised to eliminate federal policies that act as a barrier to interprovincial trade by Canada Day. The Liberal government has not yet responded to requests for comment. On Friday, Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc laid out the economic case for the trade aspects of the bill during debate in the House of Commons. He said the bill will remove "useless costs" and "regulatory confusion" that "hobble Canadians' ability to trade, connect and work wherever opportunity calls across our country." 'If a good is produced in compliance with provincial standards, it can move throughout the entire country without again having to go up against federal standards,' he said. He pointed to various levels of energy efficiency requirements that can stop products from being sold across provincial lines. He said an Ontario-made product that meets the province's "stringent energy efficiency requirements" could still be blocked from being sold in Quebec or Manitoba if it also does not meet federal standards. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 13, 2025. Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Expert report an impressive first step to reimagine and modernize the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
Canadian Cancer Society recommendations deeply reflected in final report OTTAWA, ON, June 13, 2025 /CNW/ - A newly released Expert External Review report on the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care sets the stage for much-needed modernization and ensures their future work remains relevant, evidence-informed and inclusive. The Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) applauds the work of the review panel who invited and listened to feedback on the Task Force in developing their report. CCS provided 10 recommendations, all of which have been meaningfully addressed in the report or plans for next steps. These recommendations included strengthening its engagement with cancer experts, people eligible for cancer screening and people with lived and living experience, enhancing its structural foundation, and embracing modernization so that the Task Force can continue to play a relevant and respected role in preventive healthcare for decades to come. "We are very pleased to see our recommendations reflected in this report. Guidelines set and championed by the Task Force are essential for supporting people to reduce their health risks and find diseases like cancer early. But it's critical for the Task Force to have governance and processes that enable it to keep pace with changing perspectives, experiences and science," says Andrea Seale, CEO of the Canadian Cancer Society. "This report reflects opportunities raised by many caring people and organizations who all share a common goal of making Canadians healthier and we're very hopeful for the future." If implemented promptly, these reforms will produce a stronger, more inclusive Task Force capable of addressing longstanding challenges and taking preventive health care guidelines into the future. Implementing the changes in this expert report is not just about improving processes – it is about ensuring every person in Canada is supported with the best possible tools to live healthier lives. The Task Force has accumulated a substantial backlog of guidelines that are many years out of date. It is now up to the federal government to ensure the panel's recommendations are actioned and implemented to allow a refreshed Task Force, supplemented with the funding necessary to fulfil their mandate, to continue its valuable work. The proposed Implementation Advisory Panel will be integral to the success of this reform process. The Panel can aid in fostering public trust in the reform process and ultimately increase confidence in the Task Force's work going forward. The Canadian Cancer Society looks forward to working closely with this Panel to ensure the recommendations are implemented. About the Canadian Cancer Society The Canadian Cancer Society works tirelessly to save and improve lives. We raise funds to fuel the brightest minds in cancer research. We provide a compassionate support system for all those affected by cancer, across Canada and for all types of cancer. Together with patients, supporters, donors and volunteers, we work to create a healthier future for everyone. Because to take on cancer, it takes all of us. It takes a society. Help us make a difference. Call 1-888-939-3333 or visit today. SOURCE Canadian Cancer Society (National Office) View original content: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data