logo
Volvo confirms 250+ layoffs coming to New River Valley truck assembly plant

Volvo confirms 250+ layoffs coming to New River Valley truck assembly plant

Yahoo28-02-2025

DUBLIN, Va. (WFXR) – Volvo plans to lay off at least 250 employees at its semi-truck plant in Dublin by the end of March, the company confirms to WFXR News.
The automaker previously said it would cut staff at the facility in Pulaski County but had not specified a number. Employees learned in a company-issued newsletter in late February that the cuts would range between 250 and 350 employees and are projected to be complete by the end of March; Volvo had previously indicated the layoffs would take place at or near the beginning of April.
Volvo's New River Valley assembly plant makes all of the company's semi-trucks sold in North America, including a new VNL model offering enhanced performance and comfort features for truck drivers, which began production last year.
According to the employee newsletter, expected impacts of tariffs on imported goods played a role in the decision to lay off staff. Volvo also said the completion of a key phase in manufacturing the new VNL trucks, among other factors, led to the need for staff reductions.
It remains unclear whether the layoffs will be temporary or permanent. Volvo says the cuts will be based on seniority.
According to Virginia Works, the commonwealth's workforce development agency, this is the third major layoff at the Dublin plant in the last decade. Volvo laid off 516 employees in February 2016 and cut some 700 staff in January 2020 just before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump wants a manufacturing boom. The industry is buckling.
Trump wants a manufacturing boom. The industry is buckling.

Politico

time37 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump wants a manufacturing boom. The industry is buckling.

President Donald Trump is vowing to spark a manufacturing boom with tariffs to protect American workers and industry. So far, it's manufacturers that have borne the brunt of the pain. The president's surprise decision to raise tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to 50 percent will hit domestic manufacturing just as a new report shows the industry is already contracting. Uncertainty about where tariff rates will ultimately land — or where they'll be applied — has forced businesses to make hard decisions that could cut into both profits and hiring. And a leading trade group on Thursday called on Trump to give the companies a break on the tariffs. 'For a president who is intent on building U.S. manufacturing, the tariff strategy he's laid out is remarkably short-sighted,' said Gordon Hanson, a Harvard Kennedy School professor whose groundbreaking 2016 research work, 'The China Shock,' was among the first to sound the alarm about the threat to American industry. 'It fails to recognize what modern supply chains look like.' 'Even if you're intent on reshoring parts of manufacturing, you can't do it all,' he said. 'Steel and aluminum are part of that.' If Trump's tariffs fail to result in a manufacturing renaissance — a central focus of his presidential campaign — it could weaken the prospects of a GOP coalition that's increasingly reliant on working-class voters who supported his protectionist trade policies. But as unanticipated tariffs continue to drive up input costs for companies that need steel and aluminum for production, the warning signs emanating from manufacturers are getting louder. An index published this week by the Institute for Supply Management, which tracks manufacturing, slipped for the third straight month in May as companies made plans to scale back production. A quarterly survey conducted by the National Association of Manufacturers reported the steepest drop in optimism since the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, with trade uncertainty and raw material costs cited as top concerns. Federal Reserve data this month reported weaker manufacturing output. The manufacturers' association on Thursday urged Trump to develop a 'speed pass' that would allow companies to avoid costly new duties on imported raw materials and components that are essential to U.S. producers. 'The steel and aluminum tariffs are almost custom-made to hurt American manufacturing,' said Ernie Tedeschi, a former top Biden administration economist who's now with the Yale Budget Lab. Trump and top administration officials argue that tariffs will encourage investment in domestic manufacturers, which should lead to better-paying jobs, a more resilient economy and more secure supply chains. Exports climbed in April as the president's tariffs took hold, which contributed to an eye-popping decline in the U.S. trade deficit. Indeed, the overall economy remains solid, and businesses are continuing to hire, according to Friday's jobs report for May. Despite the trade headwinds, employment in the manufacturing sector has remained steady since Trump took office. 'As the president says, if you don't make steel, you can't fight a war. He's protecting that industry and bringing it back,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Senate lawmakers this week. 'You're going to see more steel and aluminum furnaces and mills in the history of this country get built over the next three years.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Trump welcomed the monthly jobs report, posting on Truth Social: 'AMERICA IS HOT! SIX MONTHS AGO IT WAS COLD AS ICE! BORDER IS CLOSED, PRICES ARE DOWN. WAGES ARE UP!' Still, domestic manufacturers who rely on international supply chains for critical steel and aluminum inputs will face tough choices if they want to maintain their profits while keeping output steady. 'Higher costs are expected. Higher input prices. The question is, what do you do with those costs? How much can you pass along to the consumer? How much can you negotiate with your suppliers?' said Andrew Siciliano, a partner at KPMG who leads the consulting firm's trade and customs practice. The challenges posed by the increase in steel and aluminum tariffs are particularly acute because it's far from clear whether domestic suppliers will be able to meet the demands of domestic manufacturers. Almost half the aluminum used in the U.S. last year came from foreign sources, according to federal data, and roughly a quarter of all steel is imported. Either way, 'input costs are going to be higher,' Siciliano said. 'If they pass it on, it could affect demand. If they don't pass it on, it could affect profitability.' That isn't to say manufacturers won't benefit from tariffs in the long term. To the extent that Trump's overall tariff regime limits imports, U.S.-based industrial production could expand to address unmet demand. The Budget Lab's analysis of Trump's tariff regime — which includes the 50 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum — projects that manufacturing output could grow by 1.3 percent over the next five years if existing import duties are left in place. But Tedeschi cautioned that growth may exclude segments like electronic and semiconductor production — which tend to generate higher incomes for workers. Meanwhile, output in other sectors like construction or agriculture would likely contract. Julia Coronado, founder of MacroPolicy Perspectives, also said the flurry of new import duties may prompt some manufacturers to actually move their manufacturing facilities offshore rather than subject their supply chains and production processes to multiple tariffs. 'If I have to assemble a bunch of parts and inputs, why don't I just don't do that on the Canadian or Mexican side of the border and then pay the tariff on the final good?' she said. An even bigger challenge may involve finding and training workers who can staff up any facilities that reshore. Most Americans work in the service sector and, to the extent tariffs lead to reshoring, those facilities will likely rely heavily on automation, according to economists at the Bank of America Institute. Finding qualified workers in the U.S. is either too difficult or too expensive. 'Whatever manufacturing production comes back to the U.S. will require far fewer jobs than 30 or 40 years ago,' Hanson said. 'It's just the way the world has gone.'

Trump vs. Musk: Majority of Americans Side With Neither, Poll Finds
Trump vs. Musk: Majority of Americans Side With Neither, Poll Finds

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump vs. Musk: Majority of Americans Side With Neither, Poll Finds

Whose side are you on? When it comes to the suddenly erupted public feud between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, most Americans say they do not support either guy. That is according to a new poll released by YouGov on Friday, which found 52% of Americans polled the night before chose 'neither' when asked who they backed in the battle between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man. Still, Trump lapped Musk by comparison when it came to support, with 28% of respondents saying they sided with him — more than triple the amount of respondents (8%) who said they backed the Tesla boss. The approximately 12% of the rest of respondents said they 'don't know' who they support more between Trump and Musk. YouGov's poll included 3,812 Americans surveyed, ages 18 and older. The poll comes after Musk and the president set social media — as well as the media and political worlds — ablaze on Thursday, trading barbs that included Musk accusing President Trump of being named in the Epstein Files and saying he was in favor of impeaching the president. Trump, on his end, said he was 'very disappointed' in Musk and questioned whether the U.S. government should end its contracts with SpaceX, the rocket company Musk runs. The war of words started earlier in the week when Musk called Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' a 'disgusting abomination.' Meanwhile, Tesla's stock price took a massive hit as a result of the spat on Thursday, plunging more than 14% in what was the company's second worst drop since the COVID-19 pandemic rocked the market in 2020. Shares have rebounded a fair amount on Friday, climbing to $303 per share a few hours into trading, after dropping to $277 per share a day earlier. Politico late on Thursday reported a Musk-Trump phone call had been set up for Friday to help smooth things over between the two. But those plans went sideways, with President Trump telling ABC News he was 'not particularly interested' in speaking to his former head of the Department of Government Efficiency. As for what the future holds, respondents to YouGov were pretty much split on whether the two would reconcile and work together in the future; 28% of respondents said they believed Musk and Trump will be friends again, 31% said they will not, and 41% said they are 'not sure.' It will be worth keeping one eye on X, the platform Musk owns, and the other on Trump's Truth Social on Friday to see what comes next. The post Trump vs. Musk: Majority of Americans Side With Neither, Poll Finds appeared first on TheWrap.

Automotive Tariffs are Dramatically Shifting Buyer Habits, Study Says
Automotive Tariffs are Dramatically Shifting Buyer Habits, Study Says

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Automotive Tariffs are Dramatically Shifting Buyer Habits, Study Says

The fixation on international trade tariffs during President Trump's second term has created significant pressure for automakers and buyers alike, just as the auto industry was rebounding after the COVID-19 pandemic. In the past few months, some automakers have adjusted their pricing and/or limited the availability of some foreign-produced models, but there haven't been any major widespread disruptions regarding specific brands or models. Nonetheless, car shoppers are still anxious about any surprises or significant changes regarding their ability to get a new set of wheels. According to a recent survey by Edmunds, 44% of in-market shoppers said that tariffs would "definitely influence their purchase decisions," while 31% indicated they would have some influence. Only 17% said that tariffs would have no impact at all on their buying decisions. Actual data recorded by Edmunds shows that the impact of tariffs on the automotive market has had a far less significant effect on new car prices than expected, as the average transaction price (ATP) for new vehicles remained stable year-over-year. In April 2025, the ATP was $48,422, just a 2.2% increase from the exact figure in 2024. Despite this, some buyers strategically time their purchases in response to the ever-changing tariff situation. About 37% of buyers in the market for new cars told Edmunds that they plan to buy sooner to avoid potential tariff-based pricing issues, while 25% say they're waiting out their big purchases. At the same time, most new car buyers that Edmunds surveyed believe that they understand how tariffs will affect the market. Edmunds's survey data shows that 55% of buyers said they're either somewhat or very confident in knowing how tariffs affect vehicle prices, while 21% said that they weren't confident. With all the hubbub regarding new models, Edmunds observed that some buyers are opting to hit the tariff-free used market to get their fix of new-to-them sets of wheels. Alongside observing a surge in visitors to the used cars section of their website, 58% of respondents shared with Edmunds that they have developed a heightened interest in purchasing used vehicles. Within this group, 46% indicated they are particularly drawn to certified pre-owned (CPO) vehicles, highlighting a growing preference for these thoroughly inspected and warranty-backed options in the used car market. Despite this trend, Edmunds warns that there is a limited number of near-new used vehicles, which is a consequence of the reduced leasing and new inventory volumes that occurred as a result of the microchip shortage just three years ago. According to Edmunds's data released on May 22, the average price for a 3-year-old used vehicle was $30,522 during the first quarter of 2025, a 2.3% year-over-year increase from $29,844 in 2024. They also observe that used cars are taking longer to sell at dealerships. Currently, used vehicles sit on lots for an average of 38 days, four days longer than last year and tied with the record for the longest wait time since the first quarter of 2021. Although Edmunds' data only shows a 2.2% increase in new car prices from 2024, I believe a significant portion of this is due to automakers' efforts to maintain steady prices. Price guarantee programs like Hyundai and Genesis's Customer Assurance and Ford's Employee pricing programs have helped automakers keep punching a dent in sales. For instance, Ford saw a 16% surge in year-over-year sales in May 2025, while Hyundai saw an 8% increase during the prior month. However, time will tell when it comes to the response to auto tariffs and any developments regarding trade deals that could bring down potential duties on imported cars from specific countries. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store