logo
ICE's tactics draw criticism as it triples daily arrest targets

ICE's tactics draw criticism as it triples daily arrest targets

Yahoo5 hours ago

By Ted Hesson and Kristina Cooke
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Migrant workers picked up at a well-known Italian restaurant in San Diego. A high school volleyball player detained and held for deportation after a traffic stop in Massachusetts. Courthouse arrests of people who entered the U.S. legally and were not hiding.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers have been intensifying efforts in recent weeks to deliver on Republican President Donald Trump's promise of record-level deportations.
The White House has demanded the agency sharply increase arrests of migrants in the U.S. illegally, sources have told Reuters. That has meant changing tactics to achieve higher quotas of 3,000 arrests per day, far above the earlier target of 1,000 per day.
Community members and Democrats have pushed back, arguing that ICE is targeting people indiscriminately and stoking fear.
Tensions boiled over in Los Angeles over the weekend when protesters took to the streets after ICE arrested migrants at Home Depot stores, a garment factory and a warehouse, according to migrant advocates.
'It seems like they're just arresting people they think might be in the country without status and amenable to deportation,' said Julia Gelatt, associate director of the U.S. immigration policy program at the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute.
The apparent shift further undercuts the Trump administration message that they are focused on the "worst of the worst" criminal offenders, and suggests they are pursuing more people solely on the basis of immigration violations.
Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, told Reuters in late May that the administration had deported around 200,000 people over four months. The total lags deportations during a similar period under former President Joe Biden, who faced higher levels of illegal immigration and quickly deported many recent crossers.
ICE's operations appeared to intensify after Stephen Miller, a top White House official and the architect of Trump's immigration agenda, excoriated senior ICE officials in a late May meeting over what he said were insufficient arrests.
During the meeting, Miller said ICE should pick up any immigration offenders and not worry about targeted operations that focus on criminals or other priorities for deportation, three people familiar with the matter said, requesting anonymity to share the details.
Miller said ICE should target stores where migrant workers often congregate, such as the home improvement retailer Home Depot and 7-Eleven convenience stores, two of the people said.
The message was 'all about the numbers, not the level of criminality,' one of the people said.
Miller did not seem to be taking into account the complexities of immigration enforcement, one former ICE official said.
In Los Angeles, for example, a 2024 court decision limits ICE's ability to knock on doors to make immigration arrests and local law enforcement does not cooperate fully with federal immigration authorities.
"The numbers they want are just not possible in a place like L.A. unless you go to day laborer sites and arrest every illegal alien," the former ICE official said.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson defended Trump's enforcement push.
'If you are present in the United States illegally, you will be deported,' she said in a statement to Reuters. 'This is the promise President Trump made to the American people and the administration is committed to keeping it.'
A DHS spokesperson said ICE officers executed criminal search warrants at the restaurant in San Diego; that the high school volleyball player in Massachusetts was subject to deportation; and that courthouse arrests were aimed at speeding up removals of migrants who entered under Biden.
ARRESTED AT CHECK-INS
On Sunday, more than a hundred people gathered outside the jail in Butler County, Ohio, to protest the detention of Emerson Colindres, 19, a standout soccer player from Honduras who graduated from high school in May.
Colindres, who has been in the U.S. since he was 8 years old, was being monitored via an ICE 'alternatives to detention' program that uses cell phone calls, ankle bracelets and other devices to track people.
He received a text message to come in for an appointment last week and was taken into custody on arrival.
Colindres was ordered deported after his family's asylum claim was denied, but he had been appearing for regular check-ins and had a pending visa application, his mother, Ada Baquedano, said in an interview.
"They want to deport him, but he knows nothing about our country,' she said. 'He's been here since he was very little.'
The DHS spokesperson said Colindres had a final deportation order and that too many people with such orders had previously been placed on alternatives to detention.
'If you are in the country illegally and a judge has ordered you to be removed, that is precisely what will happen,' the spokesperson said.
The Migration Policy Institute's Gelatt said detaining people at ICE check-ins will help the agency boost arrest numbers. But these are often people who are already cooperating with ICE and could cost more to detain.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will the U.S. bomb Iran?
Will the U.S. bomb Iran?

Washington Post

time25 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Will the U.S. bomb Iran?

President Donald Trump supervises the installation of a new flagpole on the White House South Lawn. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images) Six days into the exchange of blows between Israel and Iran, President Donald Trump is weighing a direct attack on Iran. The decision would have massive implications — entangling the United States in yet another foreign conflict that some members of Trump's base say would be a betrayal of his 'America First' campaign promise. Trump says he's issued an 'ultimatum' to Iran to dismantle its nuclear program. How would American involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict further inflame hostilities in the region — and what could retaliation against the U.S. look like? Host Elahe Izadi speaks with Pentagon reporter Dan Lamothe and investigative reporter Carol Leonnig about this pivotal moment for Trump, the United States and the world. Today's episode was produced by Laura Benshoff with help from Emma Talkoff. It was edited by Ariel Plotnick and Maggie Penman. It was mixed by Sean Carter. Another story we're following today: The Supreme Court has ruled that states can ban some gender transition treatments for minors. In December, when the court heard arguments in U.S. v. Skrmetti, Post Reports followed a family at the center of the case. Listen to that episode here. Subscribe to The Washington Post here.

Will Israel-Iran war make US safer — or less safe — in long term? What poll says
Will Israel-Iran war make US safer — or less safe — in long term? What poll says

Miami Herald

time26 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Will Israel-Iran war make US safer — or less safe — in long term? What poll says

Few Americans believe the Israel-Iran war will ultimately be good for U.S. and global security, according to new polling. In the latest YouGov survey, respondents were asked whether 'recent attacks by Israel and Iran on each other will make' the U.S., Israel, the Middle East and the world safer or less safe 'in the long run.' On all four counts, pluralities or majorities of respondents said they think the recent conflict will reduce safety, rather than bolster it. The survey comes after Israel launched a preemptive strike on Iran on June 13, which Israeli officials justified by saying Iran's nuclear program posed an imminent threat. Iran — which denies pursuing nuclear weapons — responded by carrying out its own missile strikes on Israel. Following this, President Donald Trump, who said he had advance knowledge of the attack, suggested he may ramp up American involvement by instructing the U.S. military to strike nuclear sites in Iran. 'I may do it, I may not do it,' Trump told reporters on June 18, according to The Hill. 'I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' In the poll — which sampled 3,471 U.S. adults on June 17 — just 14% of respondents said the Israel-Iran conflict will make the U.S. more safe in the future, while 37% said it will make the country less safe. When asked about Israel, responses were similar. Just 19% said the recent attacks will make the Middle Eastern nation safer, while 40% said they will reduce safety. When it came to the broader region and the world, Americans were even more pessimistic. A slim majority, 51%, said they believe the conflict will reduce safety in the Middle East, while 15% said it will bolster safety. And, on the global scale, 50% said the fighting will reduce safety, while 15% said it will increase it. Republicans were significantly more likely than Democrats to believe the Israel-Iran conflict would shore up safety in the long term, according to the poll, which has a margin of error of 2.1 percentage points. For example, 27% of GOP respondents said the war will ultimately make the U.S. safer, while 4% of Democrats and 13% of independents said the same. And 28% of Republicans said it will make the world safer, compared to 5% of Democrats and 14% of independents.

Key prosecution witnesses in Karen Read trial call verdict "devastating miscarriage of justice"
Key prosecution witnesses in Karen Read trial call verdict "devastating miscarriage of justice"

CBS News

time29 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Key prosecution witnesses in Karen Read trial call verdict "devastating miscarriage of justice"

Several key prosecution witnesses in the Karen Read trial released a statement on Wednesday, saying the verdict that acquitted her of the most serious charges is a "devastating miscarriage of justice." Read was found not guilty of second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol, and leaving the scene of bodily injury and death in connection to the death of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe. She was found guilty of operating under the influence and sentenced to one year of probation. Statement from Karen Read trial witnesses Shortly after the verdict was announced, a statement was released by several people involved in the case who are friends of the O'Keefe family. The statement was issued on behalf Jennifer McCabe, Matthew McCabe, Chris Albert, Julie Albert, Colin Albert, Nicole Albert, Brian Albert, Kerry Roberts, and Curt Roberts. "Today, our hearts are with John and the entire O'Keefe family. They have suffered through so much and deserved better from our justice system. While we may have more to say in the future, today we mourn with John's family and lament the cruel reality that this prosecution was infected by lies and conspiracy theories spread by Karen Read, her defense team, and some in the media. The result is a devastating miscarriage of justice." Brian and Nicole Albert owned the Canton home where O'Keefe's body was found. Jennifer McCabe and Kerry Roberts were with Read when O'Keefe's body was discovered on January 29, 2022. Read's defense attempted to show, more during the first trial than in the retrial, that O'Keefe was not hit by Read's SUV and was instead killed during a fight involving Brian Albert, his nephew Colin Albert, and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agent Brian Higgins. Canton Board of Selectman response John McCourt, chairman of the Board of Selectman in Canton, also released a statement. Brian Albert's brother, Chris Albert, is a member of the board. The Town of Canton acknowledges today's verdict in the Commonwealth's case against Karen Read. The Town respects the legal process and the role of the jury in weighing the facts and rendering a verdict. We thank the members of the jury for their service and attention over the past several weeks. This case has been the subject of intense public interest, scrutiny and speculation for three years. Our community has been deeply affected. Today's outcome may bring a sense of relief to some and continue to raise questions for others. We encourage members of the community to move forward together, treating one another with respect through civil, constructive dialogue. Members of O'Keefe's family have not yet commented. The Norfolk Country District Attorney's office has also not yet released a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store