Anti-domestic violence groups are suing over the Trump administration's grant requirements
Seventeen statewide anti-domestic and sexual violence coalitions are suing President Donald Trump's administration over requirements in grant applications that they don't promote 'gender ideology' or run diversity, equity and inclusion programs or prioritize people in the country illegally.
The groups say the requirements, which Trump ushered in with executive orders, put them in 'an impossible position.'
If they don't apply for federal money allocated under the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, they might not be able to provide rape crisis centers, battered women's shelters and other programs to support victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. But if the groups do apply, they said in the lawsuit, they would have to make statements they called 'antithetical to their core values' — and take on legal risk.
In the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island on Monday, the coalitions said that agreeing to the terms of grants could open them to federal investigations and enforcement actions as well as lawsuits from private parties.
The groups suing include some from Democratic-controlled states, such as the California Partnership to End Domestic Violence, and in GOP-dominated ones, including the Idaho Coalition against Sexual and Domestic Violence.
The groups say the requirements are at odds with federal laws that require them not to discriminate on the basis of gender identity, to aid underserved racial and ethnic groups, and to emphasize immigrants with some programs and not to discriminate based on legal status.
The U.S. Department of Justice, which is named as a defendant in the lawsuit, did not respond to a request for comment.
The suit is one of more than 200 filed since January to challenge President Donald Trump's executive orders. There were similar claims in a suit over anti-DEI requirements in grants for groups that serve LGBTQ+ communities. A judge last week blocked the administration from enforcing those orders in context of those programs, for now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
21 minutes ago
- CNN
Senate GOP hits roadblocks in push to pass Trump's tax and spending bill by July 4
Top Senate Republicans are running into some resistance from several key senators about the details of President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' potentially complicating plans to deliver that package by their own July 4 deadline. Hours after unveiling central tenets of the Senate GOP's measure, at least one GOP senator – conservative Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin – said he is currently opposed to the bill, saying it doesn't do enough to control US spending. He added there's 'no way' the bill can be fixed in time to pass by July 4. 'Not by July 4th. No way. We haven't had the discussions we need,' Johnson said. Two more GOP senators were noncommittal on the bill but raised issues with one major piece of it – a crackdown on the so-called provider tax that some states rely on to help fund their Medicaid programs. Those included Sens. Josh Hawley of Missouri and Susan Collins of Maine. Hawley said he was taken 'completely off-guard' by the change to the provider tax rate in the Senate version of Trump's bill. 'This is a major departure from the House framework. This took me totally by surprise,' Hawley told reporters after he stepped out of a meeting on the bill with his fellow Republican senators. Collins confirmed to reporters that she also has problems with the provider tax, but declined to go into the details of the bill. Asked if she had been consulted throughout the process and had been listened to, she said: 'Sometimes yes and sometimes no.' And it's not just those three: Sen. Rick Scott of Florida wouldn't say he is a yes, signaling he wants to see even more reforms to Medicaid. And Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, too, was noncommittal, saying, 'I'm still reading.' The early reactions from those senators previews a tricky battle ahead for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who can afford to lose only three GOP votes on Trump's final tax and spending bill. Thune and his leadership team must satisfy their hard-right members, like Johnson and Scott, without losing equally vocal Republicans like Hawley, who has vowed to tank any bill that cuts Medicaid benefits. GOP leaders are racing to put their bill on the floor next week, eager to deliver Trump a win on tax breaks, spending cuts and additional military money, particularly as he faces a quickly escalating international crisis in the Middle East. But multiple rank-and-file Republicans are eager to make their own changes to Trump's bill, aware that the giant policy measure may be their only chance to get their own priorities passed. Ultimately, GOP leaders are betting that there aren't enough Republicans in their chamber willing to defy Trump and that they will get the votes they need, even if it takes more time. 'Everybody's got an opinion, and I think it's gonna be that way right up until we vote,' Sen. John Hoeven of North Dakota told reporters.
Washington Post
22 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Pr. George's County judges select Tara Jackson as interim state's attorney
Prince George's County Circuit Court judges selected Tara H. Jackson (D) on Monday evening to be acting state's attorney for Prince George's County, according to two people familiar with the decision who were not authorized to speak publicly. This will be the second time that Jackson has served in a role triggered by a special election and a vacancy.
Fox News
25 minutes ago
- Fox News
Former Coast Guard officer arrested after allegedly threatening to assassinate Trump: FBI
WARNING: This article contains disturbing details. Reader discretion is advised. A former Coast Guard lieutenant was recently arrested for allegedly making threats to kill President Donald Trump, according to court documents obtained by Fox News. The suspect, Virginia resident Peter Stinson, served as an officer in the United States Coast Guard from 1988 to 2021. He was a sharpshooter as well as a FEMA instructor during that time. In an affidavit filed on Friday, a task force officer from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) revealed details about the myriad of online threats that Stinson allegedly made. In one instance, Stinson reportedly wrote that Trump needed to be "[L]uigied," on May 9. The post was a reference to Luigi Mangione, who is accused of killing United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson last year. Stinson allegedly made graphic threats aginst Trump involving guns, poisoning and even knives on multiple social media platforms. Stinson also allegedly referenced "not having the necessary skills," to successfully complete an assassination, but also eerily suggested that he wasn't being entirely truthful. The document also alleges that Stinson made several references to 8647, which government officials say "is likely in reference to an Instagram post made by former FBI Director James Comey." "The post by Comey was interpreted in the news media as a violent threat to President Trump and prompted an investigation by the Department of Homeland Security and the United States Secret Service. STINSON has since made 13 additional posts on Bluesky including the text, '8647'," the document states. The affidavit also alleges that Stinson "has self-identified as a member of ANTIFA." On Feb. 2, Stinson allegedly posted on his X account, "Sure. This is war. Sides will be drawn. Antifa always wins in the end. Violence is inherently necessary." The most recent post referenced in the document was published on BlueSky on June 11, when Stinson allegedly wrote, "When he dies, the party is going to be yuge." Stinson was charged with making threats to kill the president and is slated to make an initial appearance in federal court on Wednesday.
