Brazil confronts military officers accused of plotting a coup in historic trial
When Lt. Col. Mauro Cid arrived at Brazil 's Supreme Court on Tuesday to testify against his onetime ally, former Defense Minister Gen. Walter Braga Netto, he did not salute the senior officer.
It was a departure from military protocol that underscored how the country's once hugely popular military has been divided and roiled by scandal as Brazil tries an explosive case in which top military officers are accused of helping former President Jair Bolsonaro attempt a coup to remain in power after losing an election.
Analysts said that the two men's appearance in a civilian court marked a historic departure from the impunity senior military officers have enjoyed since the country underwent two decades of military rule.
'Putting a colonel up against a general levels the playing the field and signals that for the justice system, all defendants are equal,' said Lucas Figueiredo, the author of several books about Brazil's dictatorship. "The truth will prevail.'
Accusations of a coup
Cid, a former aide-de-camp to Bolsonaro who signed a plea bargain to cooperate with authorities, has already testified that Braga Netto took part in a meeting in November 2022 during which military officials discussed plans to stop current President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva from taking office.
Braga Netto is a close ally of Bolsonaro who also served as the former president's chief-of-staff and his 2022 running mate.
The officers are standing trial alongside Bolsonaro, several other officers, and a few civilians. They face five charges including attempting to stage a coup, involvement in an armed criminal organization, attempted violent abolition of the democratic rule of law, aggravated damage and degredation of listed heritage.
A verdict is expected by the end of 2025.
Cid says that in the days after Bolsonaro lost to Lula, he was called to Braga Netto's office and handed a bag of cash to distribute to Bolsonaro supporters camped outside the military headquarters. Braga Netto denies the account and calls Cid a traitor.
The two men were summoned to the Supreme Court on Tuesday for a confrontation, a step in Brazilian legal procedure in which the judge and both parties can interrogate witnesses about discrepancies in their testimony.
The examination was conducted behind closed doors by order of Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is chair the coup probe and did not provide more details about the decision. Brazilian law allows closed court hearings when matters of national security or deeply personal matters are involved.
Braga Netto arrived at the court in the country's capital of Brasilia from his jail cell in Rio de Janeiro, where he has been detained for obstructing investigations since December.
A staffer of the Supreme Court who observed the testimony told The Associated Press that both Braga Netto and Cid mostly stuck to their contradictory versions of events and avoided even looking at each other despite sitting opposite one another.
The staffer spoke on condition of anonymity as they were not authorized to brief the media.
In a heated exchange, the former defense minister shot back that Cid was a 'liar,' said Braga Netto's lawyer, José Luis Oliveira.
Moraes' decision to call both men for questioning at the same time signaled the judge's lack of confidence in their testimonies, legal experts and officials said.
Brazil's military has long enjoyed impunity
The fact that the two men appeared in a civilian court at all was a break from decades of impunity enjoyed by Brazilian senior officers.
No one in Brazil has been sent to jail on charges related to the 1964-1985 military dictatorship, unlike in neighboring countries Argentina and Chile. And Bolsonaro, despite facing a tangle of serious legal charges, remains the face of the country's opposition to President Lula.
The last Brazilian general to be jailed was Argemiro de Assis Brasil, who was arrested in 1964 for opposing the coup d'etat in which the military seized power.
Since the beginning of the proceedings, members of the military establishment have claimed the Supreme Court trial is an embarrassment to the armed forces.
'Such questioning doesn't help the armed forces,' said Gen. Roberto Peternelli, a former congressman affiliated with Bolsonaro's Liberal Party. 'In my perspective, it ends up harming the country.'
The accused sought to avoid civilian court by seeking a trial at the country's Superior Military Tribunal, where legal experts say they were more likely to find sympathy.
The military court, which handles only a few dozen cases a year, refused the cases.
'Members of the military court understood that, though perpetrated by military personnel, these are not military crimes,' said Alexandre Knopfholz, a law professor at UniCuritiba.
Millions of Brazilians have seen the case play out on TV over the past two years, from raids in which federal police arrest suspects and seize documents to court testimony.
Still, some experts doubt that Cid and Braga Netto would end up serving out full sentences behind bars, even if they are found guilty.
'This is the middle of the probe. We should not forget that every coup-mongering military man in Brazilian history was pardoned,' said Fabio Victor, author of a book about the links between the military and politics after Brazil's transition to democracy in 1985.
But he acknowledged: 'The fact that generals have become defendants for an attempted coup does show some evolution.'
____
Hughes reported from Rio de Janeiro.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Andrew Tate's UK civil trial over abuse, coercive control allegations moved to 2026
LONDON, June 25 (Reuters) - Andrew Tate, an internet personality and self-described misogynist, faces a trial in Britain next year in four women's civil lawsuits for alleged physical and sexual abuse, after the case was brought forward on Wednesday. The four claimants, who have been granted anonymity, allege Tate subjected them to physical or sexual violence between 2013 and 2015. Two say they were in an intimate relationship with Tate, while two worked for his online webcam business. The women's lawyers say in court filings that one woman was threatened with a gun as Tate said "you're going to do as I say or there'll be hell to pay", while another alleges Tate strangled her until she was unconscious during sex. Tate, 38, denies the allegations and his lawyers say in his written defence that the claims are false and that all sexual activity was consensual. During a preliminary hearing at London's High Court on Wednesday, the trial was brought forward to June 2026, having previously been due to start in early 2027. "It's not in anyone's interest that this case goes into the long grass of 2027," judge Christina Lambert said. The claimants' lawyer Anne Studd said that, in addition to the four women, there would be a further six to eight witnesses. The four British claimants welcomed the decision. "We've already spent years waiting for justice, and so it's of some comfort to hear that Andrew Tate will face these allegations in a court earlier than the original plan of 2027," they said. Tate did not attend Wednesday's brief hearing and was not required to do so. His lawyers previously said he intends to give evidence in his defence at the trial. Tate and his brother Tristan are under criminal investigation in Romania and face a criminal case in Britain. Their lawyers said last month the pair will return to face those charges once proceedings in Romania conclude.
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Nuke-laden jets, new submarines, £1bn for bio labs and the 'Blitz spirit': How Britain is readying itself as chilling report warns country should 'actively prepare' for war on British soil
The UK is buying a fleet of nuke-laden jets, building new attack submarines, establishing a network of bio labs, and reviving the 'Blitz spirit' amid growing threats. As Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer attends a NATO summit in The Hague, it was confirmed Britain is set to buy 12 F35-A fighter jets. The £80million jets, a variant of the F35-Bs the UK already uses, can carry conventional weapons but can also be equipped with nuclear bombs. They are expected to carry American B-61 nuclear gravity bombs, capable of killing thousands. It follows the recent announcement that the UK will build up to 12 new attack submarines. The new conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarines will replace the seven-strong Astute class from the late 2030s onwards. The bolstering of Britain's military kit comes as a chilling new report outlined the growing threats faced by the UK. The national security strategy, published yesterday, warned of a direct attack on British soil. 'For the first time in many years, we have to actively prepare for the possibility of the UK homeland coming under direct threat, potentially in a wartime scenario,' it said. In his foreword to the report, Sir Keir set out an 'historic commitment' to spending 5 per cent of Britain's GDP on national security by 2035. This is as has been agreed by NATO leaders at this week's summit. The national security strategy also set out how £1billion is being invested in a new network of 'national biosecurity centres'. These willl bolster the UK's defences against biological incidents, accidents and attacks. The report included a call for Brits to revive the 'Blitz spirit' as it warned 'the years ahead will test the UK' in the face of 'radical uncertainty' across the world. 'We do not need to look too far into our history for an example of a whole-of-society effort, motivated by a collective will to keep each other safe,' it added. 'We can mobilise that spirit again and use it both for our national security and the rebuilding of our country.' Ministers said the UK now finds itself in 'an era in which we face confrontation with those who are threatening our security'. The report highlighted Russian cyber attacks and sabotage against the UK, Iranian hostile activity on British soil, and other adversaries 'laying the foundations for future conflict'. This includes them 'positioning themselves to move quickly to cause major disruption to our energy and or supply chains,' the strategy said. The strategy aims to protect the UK at home and abroad, and also invest more in artificial intelligence (AI) and defence. Sir Keir said the UK is 'facing daily challenges on the home front' with Britain targeted by 'very, very frequent and very, very serious' cyberattacks. The PM, speaking to Sky News at a NATO summit in The Hague on Tuesday, added: 'We have to guard properly against those threats, and we will do so.' While the national security strategy outlined the threat from Russia, Iran and North Korea, it also highlighted the 'challenge' of China as a global actor. Sir Keir said 'every element of society' must be mobilised towards a 'collective national effort' to keep the UK safe. In a foreword to the national security strategy, the PM said: 'Russian aggression menaces our continent. 'Strategic competition is intensifying. Extremist ideologies are on the rise. 'Technology is transforming the nature of both war and domestic security. Hostile state activity takes place on British soil. 'It is an era of radical uncertainty and we must navigate it with agility, speed and a clear-eyed sense of the national interest. 'That is what keeping the British people safe demands.' Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden told MPs on Tuesday the whole country must now be 'clear-eyed and hard-edged' about the threats it faces. In a statement to the House of Commons, he said the strategy would aim to deliver 'three crucial things'. The first of these is to 'protect security at home', by bolstering the borders and making the UK 'more resilient to future threats'. Ministers are stepping up calls for the whole of society to become more resilient and plan to carry out a cross-government exercise of how to deal with crises – such as a future pandemic – later this year. The UK must also work to 'promote strength abroad' with allies in order to defend their 'collective security', Mr McFadden said. The third step Mr McFadden set out was for the UK to increase its 'sovereign and asymmetric capabilities', including by rebuilding its defence industries and building 'advantages in new frontier technologies' like AI. China is a 'sophisticated and persistent threat' but freezing the UK's relations with Beijing is 'not an option', Foreign Secretary David Lammy told MPs later. In his own statement to the Commons on Tuesday afternoon, Mr Lammy outlined the findings of the Government's examination of the UK-China relationship. The 'China audit' recommended increasing Britain's 'resilience and readiness' towards the Asian superpower and the Government's ability to engage with Beijing. As part of the national security strategy, a summary of the audit set out how 'China's espionage, interference in our democracy and the undermining of our economic security have increased in recent years'. But it also noted how ministers are seeking a 'trade and investment relationship' with China to boost the UK economy. Mr Lammy told MPs that in the past decade China has delivered a third of global economic growth, becoming the world's second largest economy. Together with Hong Kong, it is the UK's third largest trading partner, the Foreign Secretary added. 'Not engaging with China is therefore no choice at all,' he said. 'China's power is an inescapable fact.' Mr Lammy said the audit painted a 'complex picture' but 'the UK's approach to China will be founded on progressive realism, taking the world as it is, not as we wish it to be'. The Foreign Secretary faced claims that the Government was going 'cap in hand' to China to bail out the British economy. Tory shadow foreign secretary Priti Patel said: 'It has taken the Government a year to produce this audit, which seemingly fails to set out any kind of serious strategic framework. 'I think it's fair to say we know why: because the Government – and in fact the Foreign Secretary has touched on this – has gone cap in hand to China to bail out its terrible handling of the British economy. 'It is setting up its closer economic ties with China while knowing very well that British businesses here are struggling, not just when it comes to competing against China, but actually struggling to absorb the weight of Labour's own regulatory costs in this country.' Mr Lammy was also forced to assure MPs that there are 'no grubby deals' with China on any issue, including the proposed 'super-embassy' in London. Former Conservative leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith told the Foreign Secretary: 'I'll give him a quick audit now of exactly what should have been. 'China threatens Taiwan, has invaded the South China Sea, it's having massive disputes with the Philippines, genocide, slave labour, organ harvesting, transnational repression, taxes Hong Kong dissidents here, Hong Kong dissidents under threat constantly, cyber-attacks on the UK, supports Myanmar in their oppressive military regime, supports Russian's invasion of Ukraine, it also supports North Korea and Iran and has trashed the Sino-British treaty on Hong Kong, it has arrested Jimmy Lai, it has sanctions on UK MPs and it thieves all the IPs on private companies. 'What a record to balance, what? Against some potential trade?' He added: 'In the course of this embassy decision, it was said quite clearly in the media that China would not apply again after the refusal of Tower Hamlets (Council), unless they received assurances from the UK Government. 'Can he now tell me that they have not received any assurances, or have they received private assurances that they will get what they want and get this embassy?' Mr Lammy responded: 'Let me just express respect for (Sir Iain's) experience in relation to the China threat and also that he is subject to sanctions that I have consistently raised with China, noting that recently it lifted sanctions against members of the European Parliament and I pressed them recently to do the same. 'Let me assure him that there are no grubby deals on any issues and certainly not in relation to the embassy – and I reject any suggestion of anything other.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
IMF wild child Argentina seeks waiver on FX reserves misses - and will probably get it
BUENOS AIRES, June 25 (Reuters) - Argentina, the International Monetary Fund's long-term problem child and biggest debtor, once again needs to seek forgiveness: this time for falling short on foreign currency reserve build-up targets linked to a new $20 billion deal. The South American country is likely to get it, too, analysts and former officials said. Argentina struck its latest deal - its 23rd - with the Washington-based lender in April, needed to help roll over an earlier $44 billion deal and give the government of libertarian Javier Milei financial firepower to undo capital controls. The front-loaded deal came with economic targets attached to unlock further funds, including on inflation and rebuilding depleted central bank foreign currency reserves, that were deep in the red when Milei took office in late 2023. Milei has tempered inflation with tough austerity and guided the country out of a recession, but accumulating dollars has proven tough, leaving levels short of those demanded by the IMF. However, former government and IMF officials said that Milei had done enough to gain some leeway, with his cost-cutting having overturned years of deep fiscal deficits, winning over markets and gaining plaudits from IMF leaders. "I think they will forgive them even if they (the IMF) then ask for more later," Claudio Loser, former IMF director for the Western Hemisphere, told Reuters. That would likely come in the form of a waiver, approving the first program review despite missed targets on reserves. An IMF team arrived in Argentina on Tuesday for that review. Daniel Marx, former Argentine finance secretary from 1999 to 2001, told Reuters that the next disbursement - some $2 billion - would require the IMF to give special dispensation. "Most likely, the disbursement won't be automatic, but it will require a waiver," he said. "It was thought that the central bank would have intervened by accumulating reserves. This hasn't happened, at least until now." The Ministry of Economy and presidency did not respond to a request for comment. The central bank declined to comment and said talks with the IMF technical team were just starting. The IMF pointed to a statement about its team arriving in Argentina. Key to the waiver is Milei's strong record on the fiscal surplus with his tough "deficit zero" drive. Last week the government said it would deepen cost cutting in order to hit a surplus target of 1.6% of GDP. Minister of Economy Luis Caputo said earlier this month reserves accumulation was no longer as important as before with a freer float for the peso currency and the central bank better financed. He flagged IMF backing for Milei's reforms. Aldo Abram, director of the Fundación Libertad y Progreso in Buenos Aires, estimated that the country might be $500 million to $1 billion below the agreed reserves target, but it shouldn't block new funds being disbursed. "That won't cause major problems for the Fund," he said. "I think forgiveness (the waiver) will be approved quickly and the disbursement may take a week or two."
