logo
Why Donald Trump and the right have already lost the support of young male voters

Why Donald Trump and the right have already lost the support of young male voters

Independent13-05-2025

'I'm gonna roll with him for a couple days, a couple weeks, see how this pans out.' Barstool Sports owner Dave Portnoy's ambivalence on Trump's tariff plan feels broadly reflective of young men's approach to politics. He's an unlikely canary in the coal mine – but he's not alone.
Social media influencers and public figures like Portnoy are part of a growing wave of long-time Trump supporters turning into sceptics – on the very platforms once credited with helping Trump win.
Inconsistent yet observant, young men have become a fixation across the political spectrum. The left are scrambling to find a role for progressive masculinity, and on the right, approval ratings among 18- to 29-year-olds have collapsed. So what's going on?
Young men are a swinging voting bloc – and they're already rebounding. The Young Men Research Initiative, which tracks their political sentiment, recently speculated that Trump's honeymoon with young men could be "over".
I've spent the last two years talking to young men across the US, and what I've consistently heard is their desperation for agency in a world that feels like it's removing it. The more both sides strategise to control them, the more they will pull away: fewer young men report acting on influencers' political content than on topics like fitness or self-improvement.
The 'manosphere' feels like an easy answer. Netflix's Adolescence – where a boy is seduced by this type of rhetoric and kills his female classmate – triggered what Richard V Reeves of the American Institute of Boys and Men called a 'moral panic'. The manosphere influence is real, with six in ten young men engaging with "masculinity influencers" regularly – but the story of disaffection is far more complex.
It's not so much that they're falling into extremism – it's that they're falling out of belief in the world around them. Perhaps they have been 'red-pilled' by the manosphere, enlightened by societal truths about men's place in the world – or perhaps it's the negative content they're being shown to chase engagement. Either way, it's not the story we've told ourselves: those most engaged in this content are 'more likely to be highly educated, employed, financially stable, and partnered,' according to the Movember Institute of Men's Health.
Gen Z exhibits unusual cross-partisan alignment on seeing jobs and the economy as the most important issue. They share the same anxiety: that the economic system that worked for their parents won't provide the same security or opportunity for them. Four in ten young Americans under 30 say they're 'barely getting by' financially. Labour conditions for recent graduates have deteriorated noticeably and only 56 per cent feel confident in their financial futures.
Covid only deepened this uncertainty. One man I interviewed described feeling two years behind in how he sees himself. Gen Z 1.0 – those in college during the pandemic – in particular feel they've lost the years that should've set them up for long-term financial and social success. It's no wonder that less than half of young men feel connected to community.
As traditional life goals shift across the gender spectrum, it's unclear where they should dedicate their energy. Only 48 per cent of young Americans say having children is important. For some, new ideals are taking hold: a hyper-masculine, 'tech bro' masculinity. 'Entrepreneur' is now the most admired profession among young men, ranking above athletes and musicians. And romantic insecurity is also growing: 10 per cent fewer men than women feel confident they'll find a long-term partner. This may partly reflect women reporting that it's harder to find someone who meets their expectations – an expectation gap men aren't sure how to meet.
So what role is the US government supposed to play for them? Young men increasingly doubt it will act in their best interest – disillusioned, perhaps, by growing income inequality and social fragmentation. Elon Musk is a case in point: his approval rating among millennial men has dropped in line with his perceived connectedness to the establishment from 51.5 per cent to 34.7 per cent between January and April.
No longer expecting the government to deliver solutions, young men are looking elsewhere. Enter the manosphere, which urges them to 'sigma male' their way to self-sufficiency. When faith in collective solutions erodes, adversarial thinking emerges – producing a generation increasingly fragmented by gender. Without belief in a system that can address it, they're compelled to fend for themselves.
In reality, the values young men admire most are often rooted in responsibility to others. The co-founder of the Young Men Research Initiative, Aaron Smith, tells me that improving messaging around protecting and providing could offer a meaningful way to connect.
Young men aren't driven by ideology, but by real fears that the future they want is unclear or untenable. Winning them back won't take quick fixes – like gendered zero-sum thinking, better channels, or a return to manufacturing jobs. Instead, leaders must dedicate real policy space to co-create futures young men actually want – and really listen to them.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk takes Trump feud to next level with more Epstein files claims as aides try to broker peace: Live updates
Elon Musk takes Trump feud to next level with more Epstein files claims as aides try to broker peace: Live updates

Daily Mail​

time34 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Elon Musk takes Trump feud to next level with more Epstein files claims as aides try to broker peace: Live updates

Donald Trump branded Elon Musk 'the man who has lost his mind' as the world's richest man escalated his feud with the president. Musk continued firing insults at Trump on Thursday evening on his X platform, with insiders said to be losing hope that a truce between the men can be brokered. Trump says he's 'not particularly' interested in peace talks with Musk Donald Trump was reportedly 'not angry or even concerned' about his escalating feud with Elon Musk in a phone call with reporter Jonathan Karl. Karl wrote on X that Trump branded Musk 'the man who has lost his mind', but was not concerned with speaking with the former 'First Buddy.' 'As for reports that there is going to be a Trump/Musk call scheduled for today, Trump told me he is 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk although he says Musk wants to talk to him,' the ABC News correspondent said.

Republican senator employs aide fired by DeSantis over neo-Nazi imagery
Republican senator employs aide fired by DeSantis over neo-Nazi imagery

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Republican senator employs aide fired by DeSantis over neo-Nazi imagery

A staffer for Missouri Republican senator Eric Schmitt was previously fired from Ron DeSantis's unsuccessful presidential campaign after making a video containing neo-Nazi imagery, and later peddled far-right conspiracy theories in a Marco Rubio-linked thinktank. Nate Hochman's job in the hard-right senator's office, along with earlier Trump appointments to executive agencies, suggest to some experts there are few barriers to far-right activists making a career in Republican party politics. The Guardian contacted Eric Schmitt's office for comment. Heidi Beirich, the co-founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, told the Guardian: 'Hochman's position shows once again that there are no guardrails against extremists in the GOP nowadays.' She added: 'Racism, antisemitism and other abhorrent beliefs don't seem to stop extremists from appointments with far-right politicians, including in the highest office of the presidency.' Hochman, 26, has worked for Schmitt since February, according to congressional information website LegiStorm, a development that was first noted on political newsletter Liberal Currents. He has also posted dozens of times to X to publicize Schmitt's initiatives, media appearances, and speeches. The Guardian reported last September on Hochman's previous job at America 2100, an organization founded in 2023 as a thinktank. The organization was founded by Mike Needham, who served as Marco Rubio's chief of staff from 2018 to 2023 when Rubio was a senator and who is once again his chief of staff at the state department. In that and subsequent reporting, it was revealed that Hochman's work for America 2100 was focused on producing videos, some of which targeted Haitian migrants in Charleroi, Pennsylvania, and others that rehearsed conspiracy theories about LGBTQ people and human rights organizations. This was the latest in a string of scandals in the young operative's political career. In July 2023 he was fired from the presidential campaign of Florida governor Ron DeSantis after retweeting a pro-DeSantis, anti-Trump video. As the Guardian reported, the video portrayed a ''Wojak' meme, a sad-looking man popular on the right, against headlines about Trump policy failures before showing the meme cheering up to headlines about DeSantis and images of the governor at work', all to the tune of Kate Bush's Running Up That Hill. Finally, it superimposed DeSantis on to ranks of marching soldiers and a Sonnenrad – a Norse symbol frequently appropriated by neo-Nazis. As Hochman departed the campaign, Axios reported he had made the video but endeavored to make it 'appear as if it was produced externally'. Just a year earlier, Hochman seemed a rising conservative star, with a clutch of prestigious fellowships, a staff position at National Review, and a growing media profile as a key spokesman of the national conservative movement. That trajectory shifted after never-Trump conservative outlet the Dispatch revealed details of a Twitter spaces recording of a 2022 conversation between Hochman and white supremacist Nick Fuentes. In that exchange, Hochman complimented Fuentes, saying, 'You've gotten a lot of kids based' and calling him 'probably a better influence than Ben Shapiro on young men'. Following his DeSantis exit, beyond America 2100, Hochman's writing at a paleoconservative and other far-right outlets embraced the extreme positions characteristic of the so-called new right. In the American Spectator during 2024, he heaped praise on Salvadorian dictator Nayib Bukele; endorsed far-right publisher Jonathan 'L0m3z' Keeperman arguing that masculinity is under feminist attack; and echoed the 'Sailer strategy' first coined by neo-eugenicist writer Steve Sailer, proposing that Republicans should ignore minority voters and 'go where the ducks are' by maximizing white turnout. Another column entitled 'Was it Worth the Empanadas?' portrayed immigration in the terms of the 'Great Replacement' style conspiracy theory, asserting that it would 'dismantle and replace both America and the civilization that gave birth to it, affecting (sic) perhaps the first transfer of power from one people and civilization to another'. Liberal Currents first noted rhetorical parallels between Hochman and his new boss since he joined Schmitt's staff. For example, while Hochman wrote in May last year that America 'is not an 'idea', or a 'universal nation', or an economic zone, or a low-tax parking space for global capital – it is our home', on 30 April Schmitt delivered a Senate floor speech decrying 'the international elite – the so-called 'citizens of the world' – who see our country as a global economic zone, a giant shopping mall with an airport attached', and deployed similar rhetoric in an X post earlier that month. And after Hochman tweeted about federal border czar Tom Homan as 'the perfect embodiment of the middle American radical' – a term popularized by white nationalist writer Sam Francis – Schmitt began posting about how the government 'has been at war with middle America'. On the other hand, Schmitt – as a US senator, and previously as Missouri attorney-general – occupied hard-right positions long before Hochman joined his team. In a 2022 interview with Glenn Beck, Schmitt echoed the 'Great Replacement' conspiracy theory, claiming that Democrats and the Biden administration were 'fundamentally trying to change this country through their illegal immigration policy'. He later dismissed reporting on the comments as 'woke journalism'. Hochman is just one activist with far-right links who has found employment in the second Trump administration. Darren Beattie, for example, served as a speechwriter in the first Trump administration but was fired in 2018 after CNN revealed he had spoken at a 2016 HL Mencken Club meeting also attended by white nationalists including Richard Spencer and Peter Brimelow. Despite this dismissal, Trump appointed him in late 2020 to the US Commission for the Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad, though Biden dismissed him from the commission in early 2022. After leaving the White House, Beattie launched the rightwing media outlet Revolver News, raising funds by selling pro-Trump merchandise including shirts that read 'It's OK to deny 2020' and promoting conspiracy theories that January 6th was an 'FBI setup'. Then in February, Beattie was appointed to the state department's top public diplomacy role as acting under-secretary for public diplomacy and public affairs. Beirich, the extremism expert, said 'It's a sad, shameful fact that the GOP now mainstreams extremist ideas – and harbors those that proliferate them.'

If Trump cuts funding to NPR and PBS, rural America will pay a devastating price
If Trump cuts funding to NPR and PBS, rural America will pay a devastating price

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

If Trump cuts funding to NPR and PBS, rural America will pay a devastating price

When Hurricane Helene walloped North Carolina last fall, residents were hit by a second threat at the same time: the dire need for accurate information. The loss of electric power amid the widespread flooding meant that people – especially those in isolated areas – were deprived of basic news. They needed to know about everything from road closures to the whereabouts of their family and friends to sources of drinkable water. Blue Ridge Public Radio stepped into the breach. Residents used car batteries or crank-powered radios to listen to the station's daily broadcast, as the editorial staff stayed on the air for long hours, sometimes sleeping on the floor of the Asheville-based newsroom. It was one example of how public media serves its viewership, especially those in rural or small-town America, and especially at times of crisis. But with the Trump administration's draconian push to 'claw back' more than a billion dollars in already approved funds for public radio and television, that service is threatened as never before. It's up to Congress to decide whether to agree to that demand or to allow the next two years of funding to stand. 'This would disproportionately harm rural areas and smaller communities, where public media really is a lifeline,' said Tim Richardson of PEN America, the non-profit organization that advocates for press rights and free expression. It's not only at times of crisis that public radio and TV make a difference. It's every day, particularly in places that don't have a lot of other news sources. With the sharp decline of the local newspaper business over the past 20 years, many parts of America have turned into what experts refer to as 'news deserts'. These are places that have almost no sources of credible local reporting. As local newspapers have shuttered or withered – at a rate of more than two every week – news deserts have grown. The effects are sobering. People who live in news deserts become more polarized in their political views and less engaged in their communities. One of the foundations of democracy itself – truth – begins to disappear. People turn to social media for information and lies flow freely with nothing to serve as a reality check. Right now, many small and rural communities that are on the brink of becoming news deserts do still have access to public media – particularly to National Public Radio's network of member radio stations, which employ dedicated local reporters. But the Trump administration's new effort targeting public radio and television is a serious threat. Katherine Maher, the chief executive of National Public Radio, was right when she warned this week that the loss of funds 'would irreparably harm communities across America who count on public media for 24/7 news, music, cultural and educational programming, and emergency alerting services'. With few exceptions, Democrats oppose the demand, but Republicans in Congress – as usual – are largely in favor of giving the president whatever he wants. The House speaker, Mike Johnson, a loyal Trump acolyte, claims that news coverage from public radio and TV is biased, telling reporters that 'there is no reason for any media organization to be singled out to receive federal funds'. And Trump, showing his usual lack of restraint, has described NPR and PBS (public television) as 'radical left monsters'. That's wrong. Public radio and television in America are notable for their lack of bias; in fact, both organizations bend over backwards to present all viewpoints. The only prejudice they have is for traditional objectivity in their news gathering and presentation. If there's a more balanced and thoughtful news report on TV than the nightly PBS NewsHour, I don't know what it is. There are excellent reasons to maintain this funding – primarily to give people the information they need to function in their lives and as citizens. One Republican who has stepped outside the party line is the Alaska senator Lisa Murkowski. She has reiterated her longstanding support for public broadcasting in recent days, arguing in an opinion piece in the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner that the proposed cutbacks would be devastating to communities in her state. 'What may seem like a frivolous expense to some has proven to be an invaluable resource that saves lives in Alaska,' Murkowski wrote. In the past, when federal funding for public media has come under fire, Congress has repelled the threats. But Richardson is far from certain that that will be true this time, given Trump's iron grip on the Republican party and its weak-willed elected officials. 'We're in a different situation, a more dangerous moment now,' Richardson told me. But there is an escape hatch. Republican officeholders do have to listen to their constituents or run the risk of being voted out. Voters – especially those in rural areas, small towns and red states – should let their elected representatives know that they need public radio and television to continue. That public media may even be their lifeline. Margaret Sullivan is a Guardian US columnist writing on media, politics and culture

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store