Federal Judge Permits Deportation of Venezuelans Under Alien Enemies Act
In a significant legal development, U.S. District Judge Stephanie Haines has ruled that the Trump administration may utilize the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to expedite the deportation of Venezuelan nationals accused of affiliation with the criminal gang Tren de Aragua. This decision marks the first judicial endorsement of applying the historic wartime statute for peacetime immigration enforcement.
The Alien Enemies Act, enacted during President John Adams' administration, grants the U.S. president authority to detain and deport nationals from countries with which the United States is at war. The Trump administration invoked this law in early 2025, designating Tren de Aragua as a foreign terrorist organization and asserting that its members pose a national security threat.
Judge Haines' ruling specifically applies to Venezuelan non-naturalized and non-permanent residents aged 14 and older identified as gang members. While she affirmed the administration's authority under the Alien Enemies Act, Judge Haines emphasized the necessity of due process protections. She mandated that individuals facing deportation receive a minimum 21-day notice period, access to translation services, and the opportunity to contest their removal.
This decision contrasts with previous rulings from federal judges in New York, Colorado, and Texas, who opposed the administration's interpretation of the law. Civil liberties organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have expressed concerns over the potential for expedited deportations without adequate legal safeguards. ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt announced plans to appeal Judge Haines' decision, citing ongoing due process violations.
The ruling also raises questions about the administration's practices of conducting rapid deportations, sometimes within hours of designation. In one instance, a Venezuelan national was transferred to Texas Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody despite an existing restraining order, prompting further scrutiny.
The Trump administration has previously deported alleged gang members to El Salvador, paying $6 million as part of its broader strict immigration policies. However, these actions have been met with criticism from human rights advocates, who argue that the lack of transparency and due process undermines fundamental legal protections.
As the legal battle continues, the application of the Alien Enemies Act in this context remains a contentious issue, with implications for future immigration enforcement practices and the balance between national security and individual rights.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump's birthday horoscope has astrologers stunned — what the stars say about his fate will shock you
Astrologers are guessing what Donald Trump 's birth chart says as he turns 79 on June 14. From explosive planetary alignments to ominous health signals, his solar return paints a dramatic picture. What the stars say may surprise you, whether or not you believe in astrology. The astrologers discovered something quite "shocking" when they examined Donald Trump's birth chart ahead of his birthday. The most intriguing thing has already been written in the stars for astrologers, but Trump will celebrate his 79th birthday this weekend with a huge military parade. The president of the United States is a Gemini and will celebrate his birthday on June 14. ALSO READ: Donald Trump's birthday military parade to be cancelled? Reports suggest a strong possibility - all updates Why does President Trump's solar return matter this year? Astrology, which is the art and science of interpreting planetary and constellation movements, Gemini, the astrological zodiac sign for those born between May 21 and June 20, can tell you everything you need to know about why Trump is and will be the way he is. Trump has a "powerful chart," regardless of whether you like him or not, according to astrologer Lisa Stardust. She stated that Trump is a "full moon" person since his sun and moon are in opposition to one another in the sky. Those folks are very prominent and very energetic. Live Events Trump's solar return can reveal a lot about his and America's upcoming year, according to astrologers. According to Trump's solar return chart, he and America are in for a memorable year, as per a report by BuzzFeed. What do the stars predict for his health, fame, and fortune? Astrologers predicted that the coming year would be significant and that Trump's actions would have long-term effects. The fact that Trump's Gemini sun is at the most noticeable position on his solar return chart is important to astrologers like Catherine Urban. According to Urban, this indicates that Trump is "definitely in the spotlight this year." He might not want certain things to come to light, but this could reveal them. Similarly, according to astrologer Celeste Brooks, Trump's ego and identity are at the "midheaven" point because his sun is at 12 o'clock on his solar return chart. This chart position indicates that "the things he does this year are really going to leave a legacy," according to astrology. However, Trump must also be ready for the disruption caused by uranium energy. Stardust stated that because Uranus is a "planet of resistance," it is known as the "wild card planet," as quoted in a report by BuzzFeed. According to astrologers, tension is imminent because Uranus is in a square, or at a 90-degree angle, to Mars, the planet of action, in Trump's chart. This indicates that there is a lot of action and friction, as if he needs to change. Therefore, it will be interesting to see if he decides to change," Stardust stated. Which dates could bring big changes for Donald Trump? As an illustration of "Mars squaring Uranus energy," Stardust cited the protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Los Angeles, where Trump was going to carry out his actions but now faces a backlash. Look at or around July 5, November 9, and April 26 of next year to determine when there might be days to remember. Although the constellations are moving in his favor financially this year, Urban pointed out that there are other health risks as well. Trump's aggressive, fiery, and bombastic personality may be strengthened by the fact that Mars, the planet of action, is returning to its birthplace. It can be comforting to believe that at least the stars and planets above us are aware of what might occur in a year. FAQs Why are astrologers so focused on Trump's birthday this year? His solar return chart indicates significant turning points in both his personal legacy and the nation. Should President Trump be concerned about anything? Yes, there are hints of health issues and turbulent energy ahead, particularly around important dates such as July 5 and November 9.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Trump Can Keep Deploying Troops in LA for Now, Court Says
The Trump administration won a brief reprieve from a judge's order to pull back on its use of military troops in Los Angeles to deal with protests over the president's immigration raids. A three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco put the judge's order on hold and scheduled a hearing for Tuesday to discuss further action in the case. The move came hours after US District Judge Charles Breyer directed the federal government to return control of the California National Guard to state leaders and cease efforts to direct those troops to respond to protests while a lawsuit challenging the actions proceeds. Early Friday, President Donald Trump welcomed the ruling in a post on Truth Social, repeating his claim that if he had not deployed troops, Los Angeles 'would be burning to the ground right now.' 'We saved L.A. Thank you for the Decision!!!,' he wrote. The appeals court set a hearing for Tuesday to consider whether to continue to allow Trump to use troops in Los Angeles for longer. Written arguments from the administration and California are due before then. California officials didn't respond outside regular business hours to a request for comment. Lawyers for the state had urged the appeals panel to reject the federal government's request to pause Breyer's order, arguing that his ruling clearly identified the 'irreparable harm' the state would face if the deployment continued in LA. Demonstrators in Los Angeles have clashed for days with law enforcement, sometimes violently, while California Governor Gavin Newsom and Trump are at odds over how to restore order and who should do it. The activities spurred a dispute over the limits of Trump's executive powers after he federalized the National Guard over the objections of Newsom and other local leaders. In doing so, Trump issued a proclamation stating that the protests are a 'form of rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States.' Breyer said in his ruling that he 'is troubled' by the implication that 'protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion.' Attorneys for California had asked Breyer to bar the troops from helping federal law enforcement in immigration raids, though they would be allowed to protect federal courthouses, offices and personnel. In their request for an emergency order, the state's lawyers argued that the military deployment 'creates imminent harm to state sovereignty' and 'escalates tensions.' The president has called the demonstrations 'migrant riots' and said on his Truth Social platform that his decision to call in the troops has helped address unrest in the city. Without the military presence, he said 'Los Angeles would be a crime scene like we haven't seen in years.' Explainer: Why Trump's Use of Military in US Is So Controversial The government has maintained that Trump acted legally and lawyers said in a court filing that any order from Breyer limiting the scope of Trump's authority would 'jeopardize the safety of Department of Homeland Security personnel and interfere with the federal government's ability to carry out operations.' Hundreds of protesters have been arrested in the Los Angeles area this week. Local law enforcement has handled nearly all of the crowd control, as protests largely are confined to a few parts of the Los Angeles area and downtown. The past two nights have been relatively quiet after Mayor Karen Bass imposed a 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. curfew over a one-mile-square area of downtown to tamp down the protests. The case is Newsom v. Trump, 25-cv-04870, US District Court, Northern District of California . With assistance from John Gittelsohn. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'No specific power for President over election': Federal judge blocks Trump's executive order on voting laws; says it oversteps presidential powers
A federal judge on Friday blocked President Donald Trump's controversial executive order aimed at reshaping US election procedures, ruling that it likely violates the Constitution and infringes on states' authority over elections. US District Judge Denise J. Casper in Massachusetts granted a preliminary injunction against the March 25 directive, siding with a coalition of Democratic state attorneys general who argued that the order was an unconstitutional attempt to override state election laws. 'The Constitution does not grant the President any specific powers over elections,' Judge Casper wrote in her ruling. Trump's order sought to enforce several sweeping changes to federal elections, including mandating documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration, rejecting mail-in ballots not received by Election Day, and linking federal election grants to states' compliance with the new rules. The states challenging the order said it 'usurps the States' constitutional power and seeks to amend election law by fiat.' The Biden administration, which inherited the litigation, did not support Trump's order. However, Trump and his allies have maintained the directive is necessary to secure elections, with the White House at the time defending it as 'standing up for free, fair and honest elections.' Casper said the states had shown a 'likelihood of success' in their legal challenges and acknowledged their concerns about the administrative and financial burden the order would impose. She also noted that federal registration forms already require voters to affirm their US citizenship and that noncitizen voting is already illegal under federal law. This marks the second judicial blow to Trump's order. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., had earlier blocked parts of the directive, including the proof-of-citizenship mandate. The order was rooted in Trump's long-standing claims of voter fraud — assertions that have repeatedly been debunked by independent reviews and multiple state-led investigations. After losing the 2020 election, Trump has continued to promote baseless allegations about election integrity, including false claims about voting machines and illegal ballots. Critics argue the executive order threatens to disenfranchise voters, particularly in states like Oregon and Washington that rely heavily on mail-in voting. In a separate legal challenge, these states pointed out that the order would bar the counting of hundreds of thousands of ballots postmarked on time but received after Election Day. In Washington alone, more than 300,000 such ballots arrived late in 2024. Trump's order had found support among Republican election officials in some states, who said it could help prevent voter fraud and provide access to federal data for purging outdated voter rolls. But constitutional experts have warned that the president lacks the authority to impose such nationwide election rules — a power reserved for states, with Congress able to intervene only in federal elections. During a court hearing earlier this month, Department of Justice attorney Bridget O'Hickey argued the order aimed to create consistent standards across states and dismissed concerns about cost or feasibility as speculative. She also suggested that late-arriving ballots might be tampered with, although Judge Casper noted that such ballots already require a postmark before or on Election Day, and any received afterward with later postmarks are not counted. Friday's ruling leaves the future of Trump's order uncertain and bolsters state officials' efforts to maintain control over their own election procedures.
