Hawaii water commission nominee garners flood of support
COURTESY PHOTO Hannah Kihalani Springer COURTESY PHOTO Hannah Kihalani Springer A Hawaii legislative committee has made quick work recommending confirmation of a special state water commissioner after more than a year of controversy.
The Senate Committee on Water and Land voted 5-0 Friday for Hannah Kihalani Springer to be the traditional Native Hawaiian water management expert on the Commission on Water Resource Management for the next few years.
The committee's endorsement came just over two weeks since Gov. Josh Green appointed Springer to fill the vacant position subject to Senate confirmation.
Previously, Green passed over Springer twice as a candidate in favor of seeking more candidates, moves that drew criticism from environmental and Hawaiian cultural organizations as well as litigation.
Sen. Lorraine Inouye, chair of the committee, called Springer a qualified candidate deserving the consideration before this year's legislative session ends May 2.
'I think we're at the point today, and I'm happy, that before end of session we're able to have you here, ' Ino uye (D, Hilo-Pepeekeo ) said during Friday's hearing.
Don 't miss out on what 's happening !
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It 's FREE !
Email 28141 Sign Up By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser 's and Google 's and. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.
Having Springer serve through June 30, 2028, is subject to a vote by the 25-member Senate, though a favorable decision appears likely. No one opposed Springer's confirmation at the committee hearing where 308 people and organizations submitted supportive written testimony.
Supporters included Dawn Chang, director of the state Department of Land and Natural Resources, who chairs the water commission, and the commission's administrator, Ciara Kahahane.
'Miss Springer is highly qualified for this appointment, and she will bring to the commission an extraordinary record of public service, community advocacy and steadfast dedication to environmental and cultural stewardship, ' Kahahane told the committee.
The seven-member commission attached to DLNR governs the state water code, which can include determining how the public-trust resource is divided by competing interests such as developers, industrial agriculture, small farmers and natural ecosystems.
The seat on the commission being filled by Springer is referred to as the loea, or expert, seat and must be occupied by a person who has substantial experience or expertise in traditional Hawaiian water resource management techniques, including riparian use.
Springer is a former Office of Hawaiian Affairs trustee who also has served on numerous advisory councils, nonprofit boards and state commissions, including the Hawaii County Planning Commission, the Ka 'upulehu Marine Life Advisory Committee, the Akaka Foundation for Tropical Forests and the Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission.
Harley Broyles, an Earthjustice attorney, called Springer a 'true loea ' who will ensure the protection of traditional and customary rights of water users, including taro farmers. 'She is precisely what our wai (water ) and our community needs on the water commission, ' Broyles told the committee.
Earthjustice represented a group of Hawaii residents who filed a lawsuit against Green in January over his previous handling of the loea seat appointment.
The seat was vacated June 30 when Neil Hannahs finished his second four-year term, but Green didn't appoint anyone from a list of four candidates produced by a nominating committee in February 2024.
Green said he needed a new list because two candidates had withdrawn, though state law requires only that the nominating committee give the governor a list with at least three candidates. Springer was one of two remaining candidates from the list.
After the commission solicited new applications in September for a new nominating committee to consider, about 70 Hawaii environmental and Hawaiian cultural organizations expressed concern in a letter to Green about his do-over.
The new committee submitted a list of three candidates that again included Springer, and in October, Green appointed V.R. Hinano Rodrigues, a Native Hawaiian from Maui who grows his own taro and previously served as the History and Culture Branch chief at the State Historic Preservation Division of DLNR.
Then in January the community group Hui Kanawai 'Oia 'i 'o filed a lawsuit contending that Green unlawfully circumvented state law because he didn't want to appoint Springer or the second person remaining on the original recommendation list, Lori Buchanan, a former chair of the Molokai Planning Commission.
The lawsuit cited a Hawaii News Now interview in which Green referred to Springer and Buchanan as great people who would bring an 'ideological perspective that was going to cause chaos ' amid an effort to find compromises between competing interests that include restoring streams and building homes.
Green requested Jan. 23 that the Senate consider confirming Rodrigues, but no hearing was scheduled. On March 12, Green withdrew his request a day after DLNR announced that Rodrigues had resigned.
Instead of asking for another new candidate list, Green appointed Springer on March 27, and in a statement praised her for work championing the integration of traditional knowledge and community voices into decisions affecting land and water in Hawaii.
'Hannah Springer's lifelong commitment to aina (land ) stewardship, cultural wisdom and public service makes her an invaluable addition to the Commission on Water Resource Management, ' Green said in the statement. 'Her perspective will help ensure that our approach to managing water resources reflects the values and priorities of Hawaii's people and places. I am proud to appoint her to this important role.'
At Friday's hearing, Springer told the committee, 'Too often in this time as a citizen observing the goings on in Hawaii nei, I see responsible water resources management and progressive housing development being cast as mutually exclusive to one another, when rightfully so, they're mutually dependent upon one another. … We need to be better at siting land use that is appropriate to the water resources that are readily available and learn better how to grow the water and manage it with pono (righteousness ).'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more
Jun. 9—Families hoping to send money to loved ones in other countries may be hit with additional fees from a tax and spending bill proposed by the Trump administration that would slap a 3.5% tax on remittances sent by anyone who is not a U.S. citizen. The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" passed through the House in May and is now being debated by the Senate. The budget bill has several proposed tax changes, which include taxing money sent from an estimated 40 million non-US citizens — including green card holders, temporary workers and undocumented immigrants — to family and friends in other countries. The bill had a 5% tax but was reduced to 3.5%. The bill is another way the Trump administration is hoping to dissuade immigrants, both documented and undocumented, from coming into the country and moving money out of the U.S. economy. Republicans believe the bill would increase the average take-home pay of U.S. citizens, while Democrats believe the bill and increased taxes are "a transfer of wealth from the working class to the rich," said Daniel Garcia, spokesperson for the Democratic Party of New Mexico. What is a remittance? Remittances refer to sending money from one person to another and is typically done between family members from one country to another. A person living and working in the U.S. would send money to family members typically living in a developing country, where this money is a source of income that contributes to the country's gross domestic product (GDP). Payments are typically sent using an electronic payment service or a money transfer app. Banks, credit unions and money transfer services charge a fee for processing remittances, and fees average 10%, according to the International Monetary Fund. Cryptocurrency exchanges are not as heavily regulated and can be a way to avoid additional taxes and surcharges. "Taxing remittances would amount to a form of double taxation, since migrants already pay taxes in the country where they work," Esteban Moctezuma Barragán, Mexican Ambassador, wrote in a statement. "Imposing a tax on these transfers would disproportionately affect those with the least, without accounting for their ability to pay," Barragán added. However, some believe the 3.5% tax fee would give financial support to public services and is the most "pro-worker, pro-family and pro-American legislation we've seen in decades," said Amy Barela, chairwoman of the Republican Party of New Mexico. "Let's be clear, this measure is not about targeting individuals," she wrote in a statement to the Journal. "It's about ensuring the 3.5% fee, although modest, would also have a very meaningful impact in helping offset costs associated with public services, border security, and community infrastructure — relieving some of the financial pressure on hardworking New Mexicans who continue to bear the burden of an imbalanced system." Crucial source of revenue Mexico is the second-largest receiver of personally wired money behind India, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In 2024, Latin America received $160.9 billion, with the U.S. accounting for 96.6% of all remittances to Mexico. They also make up 20-30% of GDP in countries like El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti and Honduras. "Remittance is a very important source of revenue in our government," said Patricia Pinzón, consul of Mexico. "This would affect Mexican families and the economy in general, but I would say the basic needs of Mexican families is the most worrying thing." However, "whatever happens in one economy will affect the other," said Pinzón. "Our economies are so interrelated that everything that happens here has a consequence in Mexico," she said. "Mexicans will not stop sending money; they'll just look for alternative ways to send it." Mexican migrant workers sent 16.7% of their labor income back to their families, and more than 80% of the income remains in the U.S. economy. The average amount of remittance sent to Mexico is roughly $350 every one to two months, which "could seem like nothing for the U.S., but it's money that a whole family lives on and covers their basics in Mexico," Pinzón said.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP scores win as Legislature repeals health care for undocumented adults
GOP scores win as Legislature repeals health care for undocumented adults originally appeared on Bring Me The News. Minnesota lawmakers voted Monday to strip MinnesotaCare health insurance from undocumented adults. The measure, which was the most controversial of the legislative session, passed both the House and Senate after leaders reached a budget agreement to avoid a government shutdown. In the evenly-divided House, DFL caucus leader Melissa Hortman was the only Democratic lawmaker to vote for the bill's passage. In the DFL-controlled Senate, Majority Leader Erin Murphy, Sen. Ann Rest, DFL-New Hope and others joined Republicans in voting for the bill. "I cannot vote to shut down our state, I just can't," Rest said in brief remarks on the Senate floor. "I made an agreement, I gave my word," Murphy said shortly before the vote. "I will vote for this. And it's among the most painful votes I've ever taken." The move rolls back a 2023 legislative accomplishment for Democrats, handing a major win to GOP lawmakers who refused a series of offers from DFL leaders and continued to leverage the threat of a government shutdown to get the bill across the finish line. Around 17,000 undocumented adults are currently enrolled in MinnesotaCare, which offers state-subsidized health care plans for low income people who pay premiums in exchange for coverage. The move is expected to save the state $56.9 million in the 2026-27 biennium. Opponents of the bill decried the measure as shameful and several Democratic lawmakers have said the change will cause some undocumented immigrants to die as serious health issues go undetected or untreated. Democrats have also claimed fiscal responsibility is not the motive of the GOP, as the change could drive costs associated with emergency hospital care. This story was originally reported by Bring Me The News on Jun 9, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As Ohio budget process continues, educators, parents push for school funding
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — State lawmakers are working on the budget and the Ohio House and Senate disagree on public school funding. The House version of the state budget was criticized by school districts and the Ohio Education Association. The Senate's version would increase the total amount of money going to public schools, but some said it still isn't enough. Ohio State announces every student will use AI in class Despite the changes, local education leaders said they are still disappointed in the Senate's version. 'For us, bottom line is that public schools in Ohio are still shortchanged by the funding formula as being proposed by the Senate,' Scott DiMauro, president of the Ohio Education Association, said. The Fair School Funding Plan was created in 2021 to make sure public schools get enough money. DiMauro said the Senate's version includes the Fair School Funding Plan but does not update cost information based on inflation. 'If you have schools that are just short-funded, it means an increase in class sizes. It could mean a reduction in course offerings, cuts in other kinds of services. That's not good for kids,' DiMauro said. Westerville City Schools Treasurer Nicole Marshall said the state currently pays for 38% of the cost of public education while property taxpayers cover the rest. Marshall said it should be a 50-50 split. Dispensary reacts to Ohio marijuana limit changes 'I would venture to guess that our state share will continue to drop over the biennium under the Senate's proposal, which would mean that our community would be asked to pick up more of the share of the cost to educate students in our district,' Marshall said. With the Fair School Funding Plan not fully implemented in the Senate's version of the budget, Marshall said districts across Ohio are not able to adequately prepare for the future. 'We need to be able to understand what we'll have available so that we know what students, what services and programs will be able to offer to our students in the future,' Marshall said. Ryan Wynia, a parent of three students at Big Walnut Local School District, said he has been going to some of the hearings on the state budget. He said he is worried about how the Senate version could impact not only his kids, but students across Ohio. Parents of fallen Morrow County deputy speak out as suspect awaits new court date 'As a parent, I'm very frustrated. We've been waiting for the fair school funding plan to be funded,' Wynia said. 'The biggest fear that I have is kids not having what they need to make their way for the future.' DiMauro, Marshall and Wynia all said they are optimistic that the Senate's version of the state budget could change and improve before it is passed by the end of June. They all said they believe legislators will listen. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
