Football stadium bomb plotter appeals to stay in UK ‘because Albanian gangs will kill me'
A convicted terrorist who planned to bomb a football stadium is appealing against his deportation because he will be 'executed for revenge' by rival gangsters if returned to Albania.
Maksim Cela, 59, travelled to the UK on a fake passport to be with his family after serving 23 years in jail for killing a policeman and other gang-related activities in the Balkan country, an immigration tribunal heard.
The Albanian claims 'terrifying gang groups' will come after him to resolve a 'blood feud' if he is not allowed to stay.
Home Office lawyers say he is a 'violent terrorist' who should be deported.
At an upper-tier immigration tribunal in central London on Monday, Cela said he was wrongly convicted of the crimes, and that his prosecution had been politically motivated.
Lawyers for the Home Office said he invented the story after learning that his serious offending meant he would not be able to claim asylum.
Cela claimed he used to be a businessman, running a car dealership business in Germany, as well as having worked in a dental clinic and a hospital.
But the tribunal heard he was a 'violent terrorist' who planned to detonate a bomb at a 12,000-seat football stadium in 2000. After the plot came to light in 2001, an Albanian court jailed him for five years.
He was sentenced to 25 years jail in September 2006 for 'participation in criminal organisations', the murder of a police officer, and the manufacture and illegal possession of weapons and ammunition, the tribunal was told.
He was released in December 2022, having served more than 23 years of his 25-year sentence.
In December 2022 he left Albania for Spain, travelled to Italy and then flew to the UK on what he admitted was a false passport, arriving at Heathrow in January 2023.
When he was initially interviewed by the Home Office, Cela claimed that 'three terrifying gang groups' were 'coming after' him and his family because he was a member of the 'Lushnje gang', the tribunal heard.
Changing his story
A letter to the Home Office written on his behalf said rival gang members would 'execute him for revenge' if he returned to Albania.
Cela has since changed his story, Home Office lawyers have said, claiming he was never really a member of the gang but had been set up.
'It was politically motivated,' said Cela, who represented himself at the hearing and spoke through an interpreter.
'I was merely a businessman,' he added.
The Albanian told the tribunal there were four attempts to kill him while he was in prison.
The Home Office said he had exaggerated the threat from rival gangs, and could get protection from the Albanian authorities or relocate to another area of the country should he be deported.
Paul Skinner, representing the Home Office, asked Cela: 'It's right that you are someone who does and says whatever you want in order to get what you want, isn't it?
'You really want to be in the UK to be with your wife and daughter and you are willing to do whatever it takes in order to stay.
'The Albanian state is taking steps to obviate the risks that Mr Cela may face.'
Cela's asylum claim was rejected by a judge at the first-tier immigration tribunal, but a separate claim that his life was at risk from rival gangs was accepted.
His claim was based on the European Convention on Human Rights' Article Three which prohibits 'torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment'.
After an appeal by the Home Office, a panel of judges set aside the ruling, finding that there had been an 'error of law'.
The upper-tier tribunal will now make a decision on whether Cela can stay.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The dangerous new strategy used by people traffickers to outwit French police and smuggle boat loads of Channel migrants into the UK
People smugglers are adopting a dangerous new tactic of simultaneously launching multiple small boats at once to try and dodge French police, officials warn. EU border agency Frontex said in an official updated that traffickers were adapting their methods in an attempt to boost the number of successful crossings. EU border agency Frontex said in an official update that traffickers were adapting their methods in an attempt to boost the number of successful crossings. It said the tactic of 'simultaneous departures' was putting more lives at risk by overwhelming search and rescue teams. The risk is being compounded by smugglers packing more migrants into flimsy dinghies, with 54 people per boat in the year ending March 2025 compared with 50 in 2024, according to Home Office figures. Channel crossings continued today, with pictures showing new arrivals wearing life jackets being brought to shore in a Border Force boat in Dover, Kent and being driven away from the port. They are the first to make the journey to the UK so far this month after a record first five months of the year bringing the provisional total so far to 14,812 arrivals. This has also surpassed the highest total recorded for the first six months of the year, which was previously 13,489 on June 30 last year. In 2024, the number of arrivals did not reach more than 14,000 until July 9 (14,058). The surge in Channel crossings came despite Frontex recording a 20 per cent drop in irregular border crossings into the European Union in the first five months of 2025. A major point of contention between Britain and France has been the French authorities' refusal to turn back migrants who are already in the water. The French government has now indicated its willingness to change tactics and turn back boats in the shallows, but are demanding more money to do so. Representatives from both governments are currently negotiating a new deal aimed at cracking down on smuggling gangs which is said to be in the early stages. Since 2015, British governments have spent £800 million to France to stop the crossings of people across the world's busiest shipping lane in small boats. It comes as Rachel Reeves used her spending review to pledge to end the 'costly' use of hotels to house asylum-seekers – but not for up to four years. The Chancellor said migrants would be moved out of hotels by the end of the current Parliament, with the next general election not due until 2029. She also promised £1billion of savings by speeding up the asylum system, along with £280million more investment in future years for the new Border Security Command. 'The party opposite left behind a broken system: billions of pounds of taxpayers' money spent on housing asylum seekers in hotels, leaving people in limbo and shunting the cost of failure onto local communities. We won't let that stand,' Ms Reeves told the Commons. 'So I can confirm today that, led by the work of the Home Secretary, we will be ending the costly use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this Parliament.' But the Tories said taking asylum-seekers out of hotels would simply move them into rented accommodation across the country, while speeding up asylum decisions would mean more people granted leave to remain. Julia Lopez wrote on X: 'The Home Office just wants people off their books as fast as possible - straight onto the books of local councils. 'That means more positive asylum decisions - only making it more attractive to cross. And so it will go on.' Shadow Home Office minister Matt Vickers added: 'Rachel Reeves claims Labour will ' end the use of asylum hotels '. 'But if they won't commit to deport all illegal immigrants, where will they go? Coming to a house on your street?' Latest figures show £3.1billion was spent on housing asylum-seekers in hotels in 2023-24, out of a total asylum support bill of £4.7bn. More than 30,000 asylum-seekers are currently housed in about 200 hotels across Britain, and ministers are currently looking at moving them into derelict tower blocks and student digs instead.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Police leaders say they will struggle to fulfil Labour's promise to recruit 13,000 officers
Police forces will struggle to fulfil Keir Starmer's promise to recruit an additional 13,000 officers and the public will 'pay the price', police leaders have warned, after the chancellor outlined a decline in Home Office spending power on Wednesday. The National Police Chiefs' Council said it would be incredibly difficult to deliver the prime minister's election pledge within the lifetime of this parliament, with a projected £1.2bn shortfall in police funding expected to grow. The Police Federation said the consequences of the spending review were 'deeply worrying' and predicted cuts across the service. Rachel Reeves outlined plans for an average 2.3% rise in police spending a year, but the Home Office's spending will decline by 2.2% a year. Only two other departments will see a larger fall. Norfolk chief constable Paul Sanford, who is head of the finance coordination committee of the NPCC, said the 2.3% increase announced by the government covers last year, leaving a 1.7% increase in funding for this spending review period. 'It will be incredibly difficult for the commitment to deliver the additional 13,000 neighbourhood police officers to be delivered within this funding envelope,' he said. Forces were given £200m as a stand-alone grant this financial year towards the 13,000 recruitment, which will recruit 3,000 officer into neighbourhoods, he said. 'Any further progress that we make towards the 13,000 without new money would only come through delivering savings elsewhere in our budgets. We have had years of making savings from our budgets, and we think that that is remarkably challenging,' Sandford added. Before the election, Labour promised 13,000 extra police officers, PCSOs and special constables, which would bring the total police workforce to a level above its 2010 peak. Starmer repeated the pledge as a 'milestone' in December. Police sources told the Guardian there would be cuts in resources given to areas which have not been ringfenced by previous government pledges. Budgets to fight fraud, which makes up more than 40% of all crime affecting people over 16 in England and Wales, are vulnerable to cuts. One source said: 'This government has placed emphasis, quite rightly, on community policing, violence against women and girls, knife crime, county lines and violent crimes. You have to look at that and think that fraud, which is a growth area for criminals, is going to face cuts.' It will be decided in December how money will be shared between the 43 forces in England and Wales. The pay settlement to be given to officers is also not yet known. Acting national chair of the Police Federation, Tiff Lynch, accused Reeves of failing to listen to police officers or the home secretary in the lead up to the review. 'It is beyond insulting for cabinet ministers to call on police to 'do their bit' when officers are overworked, underpaid, and under threat like never before,' she said. 'The signs are deeply worrying; the consequences will be even more so. And those consequences sit squarely on the shoulders of the chancellor and the prime minister.' Police 'core spending power' will increase by 1.7% a year over the course of this parliament, according to the spending review. The Liberal Democrats claimed that the government was relying on a 'hidden council tax bombshell' because chief constables will be forced to seek rises in the PCC council tax precept to ensure that forces can maintain a service. Lisa Smart, the Liberal Democrat's home affairs spokesperson, said: 'The government is relying on a hidden council tax bombshell to fund their half-hearted rise in police funding as they pass the buck to local families.' Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, said: 'I remain concerned that this spending review could result in insufficient funding for the Met and fewer police officers. 'After frontline policing was neglected for years under the Conservatives, local communities deserve better than this sleight of hand.'
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Lord Hermer handed biggest increase in spending review
Lord Hermer has emerged as one of the big winners from Rachel Reeves's spending review. The budget for the Government's law officers will soar by 5.3 per cent between 2025-26 and 2028-29, at a time when many of his colleagues are facing real-terms cuts. It comes despite the Home Office facing a cut of 1.4 per cent over the same period, putting plans to increase the number of police on the streets at risk. The Attorney General has attracted huge controversy since he was unexpectedly appointed to the post after Labour's election victory last July. During his time as a barrister, he defended Abid Naseer, the Islamist terrorist who plotted an attack on a Manchester shopping centre, and Gerry Adams, the former Sinn Fein leader. The peer was recently forced to apologise after seeming to compare those who want to leave the European Convention on Human Rights with Nazis. He has also angered Cabinet colleagues by taking a long time to sign off legislation to show it complies with human rights and other laws. As Attorney General for England and Wales, Lord Hermer advises the Government on the way its legislation is framed. He also has other powers, such as being able to increase the length of a prison sentence he believes is 'unduly lenient'. The Telegraph reported earlier this week that Lord Hermer declined to review at least three sentences given to a rapist, a paedophile and a terrorist sympathiser. All three had received shorter sentences than Lucy Connolly, who had been jailed for 31 months for a tweet about last year's Southport attacks. But the peer was happy to sign off on her prosecution, even though he had the constitutional power to prevent it. He did not have any say over her sentence. Although Lord Hermer's budget has increased, the actual amount given to the law officers' department is much smaller than some of the larger departments. It is believed some of the rise is down to the fact that the Government has decided to bring more legal work in house rather than outsourcing it to external consultants. Although the number of lawyers will increase, the department is expected to save money on consultants in the long term.
