
Tyranny of television
It's 2025, and yet prime-time Indian television continues to glorify cruelty against women under the garb of 'traditional values'. There is a deeply disturbing serial currently airing on a Hindi general entertainment channel, centred on the character of a kind, talented, and good-hearted young woman who is relentlessly humiliated because of her weight.
From the very beginning, she is taunted by her mother and grandmother for not being slim — despite their knowledge that a pregnancy-related medicine made weight loss impossible for her. Then follows not just casual body shaming, but sustained psychological torment, emotional degradation, and outright abuse by her in-laws — presented as a woman's duty to 'adjust' and 'win hearts'.
A wealthy businessman arranges her marriage to his son, praising her sanskaars. But the groom, diabetic and secretly in love with the bride's model cousin, refuses to accept her. He avoids her, sleeps on the sofa, while his mother and aunt connive to frame her as clumsy and incompetent. They engineer her every mistake, then punish her for it — all the while she tries to prove her worth like the archetypal docile bahu, with a bowed head and a constant stream of apologies.
In a recent and deeply disturbing episode, she is forced to pose as a servant when a domineering relative visits. She is insulted, spanked with a rod, and nearly trapped into spending the night with a hired actor posing as her husband — all in a calculated scheme to drive her out. Yet, she endures this cruelty in silence, convinced that suffering is the road to love.
A new episode reached a new low. It humiliated not one, but two women, turning their pain into a farce for viewer amusement. A village girl chosen by the visiting grandaunt to marry the hero (unaware he's married) is pitted against the wife. The episode ends without justice or consequence — only the image of a woman broken by public mockery. One feels sick watching it.
Evil message
What are we teaching viewers — especially young women — through such shows? That if you are overweight or from a rural background, you must grovel for love and acceptance? That abuse by in-laws must be endured in the name of parampara? That silence, shame, and submission are signs of virtue? And what message are we sending to in-laws — that cruelty is permissible as long as it's cloaked in tradition?
This is not entertainment. This is emotional abuse disguised as morality. The show doesn't challenge oppression, but romanticises it. It rewards toxic behaviour, even painting abusers as concerned, well-meaning elders.
Worse, it normalises violence. Every humiliation the young woman suffers is presented as a test of character. But acceptance by whom? A mother-in-law who hires a man to seduce her daughter-in-law? A grandaunt who hits her with a rod for minor mistakes? These aren't 'family trials' — they are criminal acts.
In the real world, any woman subjected to this level of abuse would suffer long-lasting psychological damage. But on TV, these acts are framed as character-building, as if pain is the price of acceptance.
If the show truly intended to critique social cruelty, it could have shown the young woman resisting, reclaiming her dignity, or getting in-laws who value her. The message could have been one of strength, not submission.
This show is a regressive, damaging portrayal of Indian womanhood. We cannot let mainstream media glorify abuse in the name of sanskaars.
As viewers and citizens, all should strongly protest the normalisation of familial abuse, and call for a boycott of such content.
Channels must rethink their programming. They cannot promote humiliation, cruelty, and misogyny as tradition.
The show must be stopped before it harms.
vineykirpal@gmail.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
Bookrack for the week (June 8 to June 14)
An Invitation To pp 288, Rs is a culinary romp through the length and breadth of India. The writer follows eleven classic Indian dishes to their Lessons.S V pp 320, Rs book paints in marvellous detail the entangled world of the shepherds, their sheep and the beings they meet, while tracing Ravi's journey through the forest of his pp 464, Rs this work, the author shows how a city more associated with Thomas Jefferson than civil unrest became a flashpoint in a continuing struggle over a nation's founding pp 496, Rs book chronicles the history of cricket, and history means little without the people. And what better way to tell the story of people than in their own words?.Dial pp 232, Rs using narco-analysis to unlock a long-buried murder secret to tracking a ruthless predator through DNA profiling and gait analysis, this book takes you into the heart of complex cases where every clue matters.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Karan Johar Reportedly Gets A Face Insurance; What Does It Really Mean?
Last Updated: Karan Johar has reportedly insured his face, inspired by a friend. Find out what does a face insurance really mean. Karan Johar has reportedly insured his face. Well, the filmmaker-producer has yet to confirm the development, but a viral Reddit post claimed so. Insurance of one's face or other bodily assets is becoming a popular trend. But what exactly does face insurance mean? Let's find out. What does face insurance mean? For actors, models, and high-profile influencers, appearance is more than just aesthetics – it's a crucial part of their brand and a main source of income. In these cases, the face becomes an asset worth protecting, and insurance companies are now offering specialised policies. Face insurance generally covers injuries, disfigurement, and other facial damages –whether from accidents, botched cosmetic procedures, or unexpected health issues – that could impair a celebrity's ability to work. This financial protection compensates for potential loss of earnings and, in some instances, medical expenses. Celebrities find it a logical progression for those whose careers heavily depend on their appearance. If an actor or model loses a significant endorsement due to facial damage, the financial impact can be substantial. Insurance also provides peace of mind and is often required by studios or brands. While the practice may seem extreme to some, it is similar to other forms of body-part insurance already popular among celebrities – from singers insuring their vocal cords to athletes covering their legs or hands. What is the rumour about Karan Johar's face insurance? A recent viral Reddit post claims KJo recently insured his face. The post recently caught everyone's attention by stating that KJo flew to South Korea to get his face insured. Reportedly, the filmmaker was 'inspired' by a close friend from the South film industry to take this step. 'Rumour has it Karan Johar secretly flew to South Korea multiple times to get… his face insured. Yup, inspired by a close friend, and apparently it's a trend there. Insiders say he's been way more chill since—smiling more, less snappy, even gave a rare compliment at work. No word from him yet, but now we're all wondering: does this cover acne, sunburns, wrinkles? And how much is that premium?!" the post read. Amitabh Bachchan, Anil Kapoor, John Abraham have insured their assets Karan Johar is not the first Indian celebrity to insure a body part. Amitabh Bachchan has his voice insured, and it is said that John Abraham has insured his buttocks. Hollywood celebs, too, have spent exorbitant amounts to insure their precious assets. Jennifer Lopez have reportedly insured her curves for a reported $27 million, while Mariah Carey insured her legs and vocal cords for an astonishing $70 million. David Beckham, renowned for his football skills and marketability, insured his legs for about $70 million during his career. Supermodel Heidi Klum insured her legs, with one leg reportedly valued higher due to a scar on the other. First Published:


Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
India's highest-paid OTT actor earned ₹125 crore for 7 episodes, more than Shah Rukh Khan or Salman Khan's salary
Streaming platforms are undeniably reshaping the definition of stardom. Gone are the days when people thought OTT was for unconventional actors. In fact, this A-list Bollywood actor has broken all boundaries, outshining Bollywood biggies like Shah Rukh Khan and Salman Khan. Earning a staggering ₹ 125 crore for a single show, he's the highest-paid actor on OTT with a net worth of ₹ 427 crore (approximately $50 million USD), as per multiple reports. Ajay became the highest-paid OTT actor in 2021 when he signed for the Hindi adaptation of the hit British series, Luther, Rudra: Edge of Darkness. Starring as the cop with a dark history, he reportedly charged more than ₹ 100 crore for the seven-episode show. As per a report of Bollywood Hungama, Ajay was paid almost ₹ 18 crore per episode of the show. In total, he took home ₹ 125 crore and became the highest-paid actor in Indian entertainment history. His salary beats big players like Shah Rukh Khan who reportedly charged between ₹ 90 and ₹ 100 crore for his films Raees and Zero. Salman Khan is believed to charge a similar amount for his film, Bharat. Around the same time, Salman reportedly received a payment of approximately ₹ 50 crore for his 2021 film Antim: The Final Truth. He is likely to earn a little more for his film Radhe which was also released in the same year. Besides them, Saif Ali Khan who became the first superstar of Bollywood to foray into OTT with Netflix's Sacred Games, charged way less than Ajay. He was reportedly paid ₹ 15-20 for the latest, Sacred Games season 2. Even, Varun Dhawan earned between ₹ 12-15 crore for Citadel: Honey Bunny, reported Hindustan Times. As per a report of GQ, other promiment OTT stars such as Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Pankaj Tripathi, Ali Fazal, and Samantha Ruth Prabhu have received payments between ₹ 5-10 crore for their OTT shows. Jaideep Ahlawat reportedly received ₹ 20 crore as his salary for Patal Lok Season 2. Ajay was last seen in Raid 2. He has several projects in the pipeline, including Son of Sardaar 2, De De Pyaar De 2 and Dhamaal 4. However, all of these will see a theatrical release.