The health conditions most at risk from the DWP's controversial PIP changes
The government is reportedly looking at softening plans to restrict the eligibility rules for PIP assessments in the wake of a backlash over controversial welfare reforms being pushed through later this year.
In March, work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall revealed plans to slash £5bn from the benefits bill, with the mainstay of the savings coming from limiting the number of people who qualify for personal independence payments (PIP).
From November 2026, those claiming the "daily living element" of PIP – which provides financial support for individuals who need help with everyday tasks and mobility – face needing to score a minimum of four points during their assessment for the benefit in one single activity to qualify for support.
The move has sparked widespread criticism from campaigners - as well as causing a rift in the Labour party - over concerns about the potential impact on hundreds of thousands of disabled people.
On Thursday, the Financial Times reported that ministers are considering softening the stricter eligibility rules, which could lead to 195,000 people being prevented from losing their benefits payments.
But just who is set to miss out on claiming PIP?
According to data released by the DWP, the people most likely to miss out on their PIP are those who experience back pain.
To continue to be eligible after the new rules are brought in, the back pain a claimant experiences must significantly impact their ability to perform daily living activities or get around. As back pain can fluctuate, claimants may struggle to demonstrate consistent, severe limitations because of it to an assessor.
Campaigners have pointed out that those with other 'invisible' conditions that fluctuate are likely to be the hardest hit, and that some of the most common back pain injuries are caused by questionable work conditions.
Those with arthritis and chronic pain syndromes - second and third on the list - are also highly likely to miss out on support if the illness is listed as their primary condition.
Versus Arthritis, a charity dedicated to supporting people with the condition, said it was "hugely disappointed" by the government's reforms, adding that people with arthritis are one of the largest groups in receipt of PIP.
"These cuts will have a negative impact on their daily lives," the charity said. "Instead, what people with arthritis who are able to work need is timely access to treatment, tailored employment support and workplace adjustments to help them stay in, or return to, the right job."
Those with musculoskeletal conditions like fibromyalgia, carpal tunnel syndrome and tendonitis also look likely to be at risk of losing the benefit.
The government's own impact assessment calculates 800,000 people being affected by the cuts to PIP, while some campaigners have claimed the figures could be significantly higher.
Labour's planned changes would mean that anyone who doesn't score four or more points in one of the 12 assessment categories will lose their payments. (You can read more about the assessment criteria here.)
If ministers do soften their proposals as reported by the Financial Times, it would mean those who have a high total score could also still qualify.
These assessed categories are:
Preparing food
Eating and drinking
Managing treatments (e.g., medication)
Washing and bathing
Using the toilet and managing incontinence
Dressing and undressing
Talking, listening and understanding
Reading and understanding signs, symbols and words
Engaging with other people face to face
Making budgeting decisions
Planning and following journeys
Moving around
Each activity has descriptors that assess the level of difficulty or assistance needed, with points assigned accordingly to determine eligibility and payment rates
This would mean those who
Score eight points getting the standard rate of PIP
Score 12 points or more for the enhanced rate of PIP
The government is believed to be looking at ways to appease MPs who do not want to back the £5bn cuts, with Sir Keir Starmer expected to face the biggest backbench rebellion since he came to power.
According to the Guardian, more than 100 backbench Labour MPs have signed a letter criticising the government's planned benefits cuts, urging the government to delay the plans and rethink the proposals.
A parliamentary vote on the proposals is expected in June.
Earlier this week, disabled celebrities including Jack Thorne, Ruth Madeley, Liz Carr and Rosie Jones launched a new campaign criticising the cuts, named TakingthePip.
The group, led by over 100 disabled public figures, has come together to "speak out against the UK government's inhumane proposal to cut disability benefits, including PIP and the health-related component of universal credit."
In a letter to Starmer and Kendall, the group wrote: "There are over 16 million disabled people in the UK, yet not even a quarter of those receive PIP. Those who do are the most in need. For us, PIP is not a benefit – it is access to life. Without it, people are left housebound and isolated."
A government spokesperson told Yahoo News: 'The majority of people who are currently getting PIP will continue to receive it.
'We will never compromise on protecting people who need our support, and our reforms will mean the social security system will always be there for those who will never be able to work, and that their income is protected.
'We have also announced a review of the PIP assessment, and we will be working with disabled people and key organisations representing them to consider how best to do this.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reform UK to win majority of seats in Cumbria says poll
Reform UK could win a majority of seats in Cumbria at the next election according to the latest poll. The party, led by former UKIP leader, Nigel Farage, won 5 seats at last year's general election but picked up votes across the country in both rural seats and Labour's industrial heartlands. The latest poll would see the party win in Barrow, Carlisle, Penrith and the Solway and Workington and Whitehaven according to online analyst, Election Maps UK. Nowcast Update: Reform just shy of a Majority, Tories fall to 5th. RFM: 319 (+314), 29.6% - [7 Short] LAB: 134 (-277), 22.3% LDM: 80 (+8), 14.4% SNP: 44 (+35), 2.8% CON: 33 (-88), 17.9% PLC: 7 (+3), 1.1% GRN: 6 (+2), 9.3% Oth: 8 (+3), 2.7% — Election Maps UK (@ElectionMapsUK) May 25, 2025 In the 2024 general election, Reform beat the Tories into second place in Whitehaven and Workington whilst pushing them close in Penrith and the Solway and Carlisle. READ MORE: Warning issued after scam emails sent to musical organisations | News and Star Labour has had a difficult time in the polls since winning their historic election as they forced through some controversial legislation on cancelling winter fuel payments for pensioners and keeping the two-child benefit cap. According to Election Maps UK, the party would fall just short of a majority on 318 seats with Labour next on 134 seats.


Bloomberg
5 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Stephen Roach Now Says It's Too Early to Declare Hong Kong Over
Stephen Roach is revising his declaration that Hong Kong is finished. The former Morgan Stanley Asia chairman said the city is being reinvigorated by US-China tensions, something he didn't anticipate when he penned his column entitled 'It pains me to say Hong Kong is over' which was published in the Financial Times in February last year.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
UK to build up to 12 new attack submarines
The UK will build up to 12 new attack submarines, the prime minister will announce as the government unveils its major defence review on Monday. The review is expected to recommend the armed forces move to "warfighting readiness" to deter growing threats faced by the UK. Sir Keir Starmer will say up to 12 conventionally-armed nuclear-powered submarines will replace the UK's current fleet from the late 2030s onwards. The prime minister is also expected to confirm the UK will spend £15bn on its nuclear warhead programme. Sir Keir will say that, alongside the UK's nuclear-armed submarines, the new vessels would keep "Britain and Nato safe for decades". The Strategic Defence Review, commissioned by Labour, will shape the UK's armed forces for years to come. Led by ex-Labour defence secretary Lord Robertson it will make 62 recommendations, which the government is expected to accept in full. Defence review to send 'message to Moscow', says Healey Healey expects UK to spend 3% of GDP on defence by 2034 Other announcements in the review will include: Commitment to £1.5bn to build six new factories to enable an "always on" munitions production capacity Building up to 7,000 long-range weapons including missiles or drones in the UK, to be used by British forces Pledge to set up a "cyber and electromagnetic command" to boost the military's defensive and offensive capabilities in cyberspace Extra £1.5bn to 2029 to fund repairs to military housing £1bn on technology to speed up delivery of targeting information to soldiers Defence Secretary John Healey has signalled he is not aiming to increase the overall size of the Army before the next general election. On Sunday, he said his "first job" was to reverse a decline in numbers with a target to return to a strength of 73,000 full-time soldiers "in the next Parliament". Building the new submarines will support 30,000 jobs into the 2030s as well as 30,000 apprenticeships and 14,000 graduate roles across the next 10 years, the Ministry of Defence said. Healey said: "Our outstanding submariners patrol 24/7 to keep us and our allies safe, but we know that threats are increasing and we must act decisively to face down Russian aggression." The Astute class is the Royal Navy's current fleet of attack submarines, which have nuclear-powered engines and are armed with conventional torpedoes and missiles. As well as protecting maritime task groups and gathering intelligence, they protect the Vanguard class of submarines that carry the UK's trident nuclear missiles. In the Astute series, HMS Agamemnon, was launched last October and Agincourt is under construction. The next generation of attack submarines that will replace them, SSN-AUKUS, have been developed with the Australian Navy under a deal agreed in 2023 by the Conservative government. Meanwhile work on modernising the warheads carried by Trident Missiles is already under way. The £15bn investment into the warhead programme will back the government's commitments to maintain the continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrent. In his announcement on Monday, Sir Keir is to repeat a Labour manifesto commitment to deliver the Dreadnought class of nuclear-armed submarines, which are due to replace the ageing Vanguard fleet from the early 2030s onwards. The MoD's Defence Nuclear Enterprise accounts for 20% of its budget and includes the cost of building four Dreadnought class submarines. Commitments on military spending come against the background of the government's wider review of departmental spending due later this month and have also taken on renewed importance given the Ukraine war, and pressure from Nato and US President Donald Trump for European countries to step up defence spending. Sir Keir has committed the government to spending 2.5% of the UK's national income on defence by 2027, up from 2.3%, but has faced pressure to commit to 3%. Healey said the target will be hit by 2034 but the Conservatives say the threshold should be hit earlier. The Liberal Democrats have also argued for a 3% spending target. Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said Labour's review should be "taken with a pinch of salt" unless the government showed there would be enough money to pay for it. Head of NATO, Mark Rutte has called on allies to spend 3.5% of its GDP on defence, with a further 1.5% on defence related expenditure. The government has said it wants Britain to be the leading European nation within the NATO alliance but that might prove difficult when a significant number of allies exceed the UK's military spending. It says its review will reverse decades of underinvestment in Britain's armed forces. But it remains to be seen if the investment will be enough. The ambitions of past defence reviews have rarely been matched by resources.