Supreme Court will hear case of Rastafarian whose dreadlocks were shaved by Louisiana prison guards
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear the appeal of a former Louisiana prison inmate whose dreadlocks were cut off by prison guards in violation of his religious beliefs.
The justices will review an appellate ruling that held that the former inmate, Damon Landor, could not sue prison officials for money damages under a federal law aimed at protecting prisoners' religious rights.
Landor, an adherent of the Rastafari religion, even carried a copy of a ruling by the appeals court in another inmate's case holding that cutting religious prisoners' dreadlocks violates the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act.
Landor hadn't cut his hair in nearly two decades when he entered Louisiana's prison system in 2020 on a five-month sentence. At his first two stops, officials respected his beliefs. But things changed when he got to the Raymond Laborde Correctional Center in Cottonport, about 80 miles (130 kilometers) northwest of Baton Rouge, for the final three weeks of his term.
A prison guard took the copy of the ruling Landor carried and tossed it in the trash, according to court records. Then the warden ordered guards to cut his dreadlocks. While two guards restrained him, a third shaved his head to the scalp, the records show.
Landor sued after his release, but lower courts dismissed the case. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals lamented Landor's treatment but said the law doesn't allow him to hold prison officials liable for damages.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments in the fall.
Landor's lawyers argue that the court should be guided by its decision in 2021 allowing Muslim men to sue over their inclusion on the FBI's no-fly list under a sister statute, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
President Donald Trump's Republican administration filed a brief supporting Landor's right to sue and urged the court to hear the case.
Louisiana asked the justices to reject the appeal, even as it acknowledged Landor's mistreatment.
Lawyers for the state wrote that 'the state has amended its prison grooming policy to ensure that nothing like petitioner's alleged experience can occur.'
The Rastafari faith is rooted in 1930s Jamaica, growing as a response by Black people to white colonial oppression. Its beliefs are a melding of Old Testament teachings and a desire to return to Africa. Its message was spread across the world in the 1970s by Jamaican music icons Bob Marley and Peter Tosh, two of the faith's most famous exponents.
The case is Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections, 23-1197.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
12 minutes ago
- News24
Zuma takes fight to Supreme Court over SABC's use of ‘GNU' term
Former president Jacob Zuma appeals a court ruling that dismissed his challenge to prohibit the SABC from using the term GNU He argues that the current status quo is in the coalition between the ANC and DA. He wants to take the matter to the SCA, argues that there are reasonable grounds for a review. Former President Jacob Zuma has filed a notice of leave to appeal a court ruling dismissing his bid to invalidate the SABC's use of the term government of national unity (GNU) The Umkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) leader filed his intention to appeal on 19 May, seeking to set aside the judgement that was granted in favour of the public broadcaster in January. In the document that was filed at the Johannesburg High Court, Zuma seeks to approach the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) after the ruling found that there was no legal framework for him and his party to contend that the SABC should be prohibited from using the term. However, in his intention to appeal, Zuma cites that there are reasonable grounds that the SCA would reach a different outcome. We note that there are reasonable prospects for the Supreme Court of Appeal to find differently from this court [Johannesburg High Court], and, as envisaged, we consider that there are other compelling reasons for the appeal to be granted. Court papers Zuma also cites that the judgment contained errors that could be corrected by a higher court. 'The application for leave to appeal primarily focuses on our contention that the judgment contains errors of reasoning in various aspects,' the court papers read. In the papers, the former ANC president also highlights that the MKP wants to demonstrate reasonable factors of constitutional violations in the public broadcaster's usage of the term GNU. 'It is incumbent upon us to demonstrate the existence of a bona fide constitutional question; they have failed to do so in the SABC's affidavit. Instead, they have raised a political question or debate about the meaning of the GNU, when such a government was formed, how it is formed, and whether the current South African government is a government of national unity, all of which we seek to dispute,' the court papers read. In the initial application filed in July last year, Zuma argued that the SABC, as a public institution, has a unique responsibility and cannot peddle false, inaccurate, and politically biased narratives to describe the current political arrangement. He previously indicated that the seventh administration constitutes a grand coalition between the DA and the ANC. In court, when the arguments from the two parties were heard by the same court in January, MKP's lawyer, Dali Mpofu, argued that a requirement for a GNU is that parties represent 85% to 90% of the electorate to form part of the government. Mpofu said two major parties representing approximately 25% of the electorate—the MKP and the EFF—were excluded as a pre-condition by the DA. 'This is because the GNU brings all political parties together, which would have to include the EFF and the MKP, which it did not. These parties were excluded. 'But it still gave the president the fig leaf he needed to bring in all sorts of smaller parties. The truth is that we are actually in a coalition because the coalition says if a party withdraws from it, the government fails,' he said.
Associated Press
37 minutes ago
- Associated Press
New York votes in mayoral primary as Cuomo tries a comeback. Zohran Mamdani stands in his way
NEW YORK (AP) — New York City Democrats will decide Tuesday whether to reboot Andrew Cuomo's political career, elevate liberal upstart Zohran Mamdani, or turn to a crowded field of lesser-known but maybe less-polarizing candidates in the party's mayoral primary. Their choice could say something about what kind of leader Democrats are looking for during President Donald Trump's second term. The vote takes place on a sweltering day about four years after Cuomo resigned as governor following a sexual harassment scandal. Yet the 67-year-old has been the favorite throughout the race, with his deep experience, nearly universal name recognition, strong political connections and juggernaut fundraising apparatus. The party's progressive wing, meanwhile, has coalesced behind Mamdani, a 33-year-old self-described democratic socialist. A relatively unknown state legislator when the contest began, Mamdani gained momentum by running a sharp campaign laser-focused on the city's high cost of living and secured endorsements from two of the country's foremost progressives, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders. While preliminary returns will be released after the polls close at 9 p.m. Tuesday, a winner might not emerge for a week because of the city's ranked choice voting system, which allows voters to list up to five candidates in order of preference. If a candidate is the first choice of a majority of voters, they win outright. If no candidate reaches that threshold, the tabulation of the rankings wouldn't begin until July 1. The primary winner will go on to face incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat who decided to run as an independent amid a public uproar over his indictment on corruption charges and the subsequent abandonment of the case by Trump's Justice Department. Republican Curtis Sliwa, the founder of the Guardian Angels, will be on the ballot in the fall's general election. The mayoral primary's two leading candidates — one a fresh-faced progressive and the other an older moderate — could be stand-ins for the larger Democratic Party's ideological divide, though Cuomo's scandal-scarred past adds a unique tinge to the narrative. The rest of the pack has struggled to gain recognition in a race where nearly every candidate has cast themselves as the person best positioned to challenge Trump's Republican agenda. Comptroller Brad Lander, a liberal city government stalwart, made a splash last week when he was arrested after linking arms with a man federal agents were trying to detain at an immigration court in Manhattan. It was unclear if that episode was enough to jumpstart a campaign that had been failing to pick up speed behind Lander's wonkish vibe. Among the other candidates are City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, state Sen. Zellnor Myrie, hedge fund executive Whitney Tilson and former city Comptroller Scott Stringer. Mamdani's energetic run has been hard not to notice. His army of young hipster canvassers relentlessly knocked on doors throughout the city seeking support. Posters of his grinning mug were up on shop windows. You couldn't get on social media without seeing one of his well-produced videos pitching his vision — free buses, free childcare, new apartments, a higher minimum wage and more, paid for by new taxes on the rich. He would be the city's first Indian-American and first Muslim mayor. Cuomo and some other Democrats have cast Mamdani as unqualified. They say he doesn't have the management chops to wrangle the city's sprawling bureaucracy or handle crises. Critics have also taken aim at Mamdani's support for Palestinian human rights. In response, Mamdani has slammed Cuomo over his sexual harassment scandal and his handling of the coronavirus pandemic. In one heated debate exchange, Cuomo rattled off a long list of what he saw as Mamdani's managerial shortcomings, arguing that his opponent, who has been in the state Assembly since 2021, has never dealt with Congress or unions and never overseen an infrastructure project. He added that Mamdani couldn't be relied upon to go toe-to-toe with Trump. Mamdani had a counter ready. 'To Mr. Cuomo, I have never had to resign in disgrace,' he said. Cuomo r esigned in 2021 after a report commissioned by the state attorney general concluded that he had sexually harassed at least 11 women. He has always maintained that he didn't intentionally harass the women, saying he had simply fallen behind what was considered appropriate workplace conduct. During the campaign, he has become more aggressive in defending himself, framing the situation as a political hit job orchestrated by his enemies. The fresh scandal at City Hall involving Mayor Eric Adams, though, gave Cuomo a path to end his exile.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House panel recommends Garcia to lead Dems on Oversight panel
A key Democratic committee voted Monday night to recommend Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) to lead the party on the powerful House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, lending a good deal of momentum to the second-term Californian heading into a vote of the full caucus on Tuesday. Huddled in the basement of the Capitol, the Democratic Steering and Policy Committee sided with Garcia over three other Democrats on the panel: Reps. Stephen Lynch (Mass.), Kweisi Mume (Md.) and Jasmine Crockett (Texas). The seat had been held by Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), 75, who died last month after a short battle with esophageal cancer. Lynch was the runner-up, followed by Mfume and Crockett. The vote is not binding. While the Steering and Policy Committee is an influential panel, its votes are merely recommendations to the broader caucus, which will meet to decide the ultimate winner. That vote, by secret ballot, is scheduled for Tuesday morning. In one prominent race in 2014, former Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) won the Steering panel's nod to lead Democrats on the Energy and Commerce Committee, but it was Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) who won the contest when the full caucus weighed in. Pallone remains in that seat more than a decade later. Still, the Steering Committee is led by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), and it's stocked with leadership allies, lending the panel outsized sway in the process of choosing committee heads to work with party leaders. In winning Monday's vote, Garcia bested two much more veteran members of the Oversight Committee — Lynch and Mfume — striking a blow to the seniority system that's long guided Democrats in picking committee heads. Lynch, 70, has been the interim ranking member of the panel since Connolly stepped out of that role in April, and he's made the case that his long experience of investigative work on the panel makes him the best fit for the permanent position. Garcia, 47, has been given a boost by an endorsement from the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, of which he is a member. He also has the advantage of hailing from California, which boasts the largest Democratic delegation in the House. From the minority, Democrats are powerless to steer the Oversight Committee, which has broad jurisdiction over the federal government and the subpoena power to advance investigations. But the winner of Tuesday's vote for the permanent ranking member spot would be in line to take the committee gavel in 2027 if Democrats can flip control of the House in next year's midterms — a scenario that would lend the new chairman enormous powers to investigate the many controversies of President Trump's second term. Leaving Monday night's vote, Garcia thanked his supporters but acknowledged that there was still one more vote remaining to seal the position. 'There's still an election tomorrow, and there's still obviously an important case to be made in the morning. And that's the case I'm planning on making,' he told reporters. 'And so we're going to run through the tape.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
