Theatre and museum set to close in Cannock budget plans
Councillors have agreed a budget that could lead to the permanent closure of a theatre and museum in Staffordshire.Cannock's Prince of Wales Theatre and the Museum of Cannock Chase are set to close from the end of April. However, talks are continuing with other groups in an attempt to keep the venues open. The closures form part of Cannock Chase Council's attempt to close a £1.3m budget shortfall for the next financial year.
The theatre was set to be refurbished as part of the ambitious town centre regeneration project being part-funded by a £20m Government Levelling Up grant. And council leader Tony Johnson said keeping the Museum of Cannock Chase open at its current location had been one of the administration's priorities when he when he took on the leadership of the authority in 2023.He added: "We are working with local groups, supporting them to take up the running of the facilities, so they can continue to be run by local people for local people, even if the council's financial support has to be reduced."The decision also comes against the backdrop of the government pressing for district authorities like Cannock Chase to merge with neighbouring and county councils into unitary bodies. Johnson said its settlement from the government had been "less than generous".
Decommissioning plans
A member of the public asked what plans were in place for artefacts in the museum, to which the councillor said a detailed plan for decommissioning would be prepared. He added: "Provision has been included in the budget for such work and the digitalisation of the collection."We do not have current details of the ownership of the artefacts, but this will form part of the transition".The council was also asked what would happen to unused funds and grants awarded to the museum, to which Mr Johnson said it was working with funding partners to identify any requirements for returning monies.
This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations.
Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
6 days ago
- The National
Labour minister in 'jaw-dropping' U-turn on drug consumption rooms
Diana Johnson, for the Home Office, was confronted with her own words backing the facilities at a meeting of the Scottish Affairs Committee on Tuesday morning. LibDem Angus McDonald said his 'jaw had just dropped open' after Johnson repeatedly ruled out reforming drug laws and suggested that the UK Government would not consider changes even if the Thistle Centre trial in Glasgow proved a success. Asked what the Government's response would be if the facility showed a reduction in viruses such as HIV, she said: 'We do not support drug consumption facilities, it's not our policy, we do not want to, we will not be amending the Misuse of Drugs Act.' McDonald said: 'My jaw has just dropped open with that. If the Thistle turns out to be a great success within a year, I would be so excited about rolling that out everywhere and I wouldn't wait for two and a half years; 1100 people are dying per year. "It's working all round the world, as far as I understand it. I think it's the most wonderful way of cutting drug deaths and then we can work at rehabilitation. 'Why wouldn't we want to follow that?' Johnson said that the Glasgow scheme was a pilot and its results had to be evaluated, adding: 'This is not UK Government policy, it's obviously something that the Scottish Government have decided to do.' READ MORE: Labour MPs visit Israel on lobbying trip in middle of Gaza genocide McDonald said Labour's position was 'basically condemning thousands of people to death', to which Johnson replied: 'No, I don't accept that, with the greatest respect. 'This is not the only thing that can be done to deal with drug misuse.' Johnson also squirmed under questioning from the SNP's Stephen Flynn, who pressed her on what evidence had made her change her mind on drug consumption facilities. Before Labour came to power, Johnson (below) chaired the Home Affairs Committee, which produced a report which said the Scottish and UK governments 'must' work together on a drug consumption facility. (Image: BBC) Flynn asked repeatedly what evidence had changed, to which Johnson replied that her personal views were 'irrelevant', arguing that she was a mouthpiece for the Government position. The SNP's Westminster leader said: 'Do you think the public watching would regard it as acceptable that a government minister is quite happy to change their opinion on such a significant matter […] on the basis of no evidence changing whatsoever?' McDonald interjected to say he agreed with Flynn's point adding: 'I think this is a moral stance.' Johnson replied: 'With the greatest respect, as a member of the party that was in government that oversaw and joined in with the Conservatives the massive cuts to drug treatment services between 2010 and 2015, I think you should just reflect on the position that Scotland is in because of the decisions that your party took at that time.'
The Herald Scotland
6 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump lobbies GOP senators as sweeping tax package faces critics
It won't be easy. As in the House, the Senate has fiscal conservatives who are concerned that the bill will add to the federal deficit and moderates who have problems with the potential impact on Medicaid health coverage. Appeasing one camp will be hard without inflaming the frustrations of the other, forcing Republican leaders to strike a delicate balance to get the votes they need, as no Democrats are expected to support the proposal. Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters on June 3 that Republicans will "make some modifications to it, strengthen and improve it." But "at the end of the day, the math is very simple: It's 51 in the Senate and 218 in the House," Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota told reporters on June 3, referencing the majority needed in both the House and Senate. "So as we work through that process, we're going to have our eye on that prize." Deficit blues Several senators have said they're worried about the massive price tag of the legislation, which would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts and implement several new ones, including major campaign promises such as no tax on tips or overtime. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill would add more than $3 trillion to the federal debt over the next 10 years, adding to the country's already massive $36.2 trillion debt. The package also increases the debt ceiling by $4 trillion - another sticking point for some Republican senators. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, has drawn a red line over the boosted spending, saying he won't vote for the package unless it goes farther to cut spending and only raises the debt ceiling enough to avoid a default for a year. "We should be tying how much we increase the deficit to how much we actually get in terms of deficit reduction," Johnson said. Sens. Rick Scott, R-Florida, and Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, have similar concerns. "I support getting a bill done, I want to get the tax cuts permanent and the border money and military. But we've got to get spending under control," Scott said. Trump met with Scott and spoke on the phone with Johnson and Paul. Paul said the president didn't change his mind on the bill, and that the two "disagreed" on his stance on the debt ceiling. Trump lashed out at him on social media the following day. Johnson said his conversation with Trump was "cordial," but said he's still encouraging the White House to shift on his demands. Musk fans the flames While the fire of fiscal conservatives' concerns grows, Musk may have poured gasoline on it. Trump's billionaire former advisor, who led the Department of Government Efficiency, posted on X that the bill is "outrageous" and a "disgusting abomination," followed shortly by a threat to primary Republicans who voted for the bill. Musk has been critical of the legislation, despite his support for the president pushing it. Musk's post came in the middle of the Republicans' lunch meeting. Johnson said it was "passed around" and that he "texted it to a few people" to underscore his point. Thune told reporters he and Musk "have a difference of opinion." "My hope is, as he has an opportunity to further assess what the bill does, he'll come to a different conclusion," Thune said. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the billionaire's comments were "disappointing" and said Musk is "terribly wrong" about the bill. Medicaid concerns Some Republicans, meanwhile, are worried that the cuts are too deep and could impact healthcare for low-income Americans. The House-passed legislation would make major changes to Medicaid, saving $625 billion from the low-income healthcare program, while pushing an estimated 7.6 million Americans off of their coverage. Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, and Jim Justice, R-West Virginia, are worried about a provision in the bill the House passed that limits states from raising money to pay for their part of Medicaid spending through health-care-related taxes known as "provider taxes." Hawley is also concerned about a portion of the bill he's calling the "sick tax," which would require people who earn between 100% and 138% of the federal poverty level to pay up to $35 per medical service. That income range is currently a salary of $35,365 to $44,367 annually for a family of four. Trump and Hawley also spoke on the phone, during which Hawley said the president assured him that there would be no Medicaid benefit cuts in the final package. Both the provider tax and the "sick tax" could be considered a benefit cut, Hawley said on June 2, because the former could close rural hospitals and the latter would make it more expensive for people to see the doctor. Other senators, like Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, may also put up roadblocks over potential impacts to Medicaid. Green energy funding The House bill would cut off many renewable energy tax credits for projects beginning 60 days after the bill passes. It would also rescind several other climate change-related provisions of the IRA, including a $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles. It would pull back unspent money for several grant and loan programs at the Energy Department and the Environmental Protection Agency, delay methane fees for oil and gas companies, repeal additional rules encouraging the adoption of electric vehicles, and accelerate permitting for fossil fuel projects. While senators like Scott of Florida want to strip down the IRA's green energy boosters further, another group of senators thinks the changes go too far. Murkowski, Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kansas, and Sens. John Curtis, R-Utah and Thom Tillis, R-North Carolina, sent a letter to Thune in early April warning that rolling back the IRA's renewable energy tax credits could create major disruption to American businesses. "What we're trying to focus on is to make sure that if businesses have invested and have projects in progress, that we do everything we can to hold them harmless, whether or not we continue some of these programs out into the future," Tillis told reporters on June 2. What's next? Senators will begin introducing their own version of the bill text, beginning with the least controversial portions of the bill this week and ending with the most divisive. That means the changes to Medicaid and tax provisions - both overseen by the Senate Finance Committee - are likely to come later in the month. Whatever they craft will need to pass the Senate with at least 50 votes. If there's a 50-50 tie, Vice President JD Vance would be required to cast the tie-breaking vote. Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Oklahoma, said he thinks their product can pass the House again as long as it doesn't go below the House's $1.5 trillion in spending cuts and doesn't touch a deal struck with blue-state Republican House members who demanded changes to state and local tax deductions. Mullin has served as an informal liaison between the House and Senate as the two chambers struggle with differences. "As long as we leave those two things there and then we put our fingerprints on the rest of it," he told reporters in the U.S. Capitol, "I think we're in good shape."
The Herald Scotland
7 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Speaker Johnson defends Medicaid work requirements as 'commonsense'
The bill implements new requirements for able-bodied adults without children to show that they've worked, volunteered, or attended an educational program for at least 80 hours per month. Some researchers argue that millions of people eligible for Medicaid could lose coverage because they are unable to meet the bureaucratic requirements to prove they are disabled, working or going to school. Johnson defended the requirements in an interview with NBC News' "Meet the Press" on June 1, arguing that the bill would implement "common sense" requirements. "You're telling me that you're going to require the able-bodied, these young men, for example, to only work or volunteer in their community for 20 hours a week. And that's too cumbersome for them?" Johnson said "I'm not buying it. The American people are not buying it." He added that the requirements "should have been put in a long time ago." "The people who are complaining that these people are going to lose their coverage because they can't fulfill the paperwork, this is minor enforcement of this policy, and it follows common sense," he said. The bill will now be reviewed by the Senate, where it may undergo changes. Some Republican senators, like Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, and Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, have raised concerns about the depth of potential cuts to Medicaid. Democrats have argued that the legislation is cutting benefits for low-income Americans in order to deliver additional tax breaks to the wealthy. Johnson's comments come as some Republican lawmakers face pushback in their home states and districts over the proposed cuts. Rep. Mike Flood, R-Nebraska, Rep. Ashley Hinson, R-Iowa, and Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, faced angry crowds during town halls that raised concerns about the bill's impact on Medicaid. Republican lawmakers hope to pass the legislation by July 4, leaving them only four weeks to approve it in the Senate, reconcile changes between the House and Senate versions, approve it again in the House, and send it to the president's desk. However, the real deadline is the end of July. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned lawmakers that the U.S. will default on its debt in August if the debt ceiling is not raised. The bill also includes a $4 trillion increase in the debt ceiling.
