As an Historic Olympic Games Milestone Nears, the Architect of its Triumphant PR Campaign Reflects on its Lessons
Rally International Public Affair's Mike Holtzman Was Named "PR Professional of the Year" for His Role in China's 2008 Games Bid
NEW YORK, June 23, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- When Beijing won the hosting rights for the 2008 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games on July 13, 2001, it was a pivotal moment not only for the Olympic movement but in China's development, signaling the country's growing stature and readiness to be a major global player.
Mike Holtzman, the architect behind the unlikely international public relations campaign that propelled China's historic win, was named "PR Professional of the Year" by PR Week Magazine in recognition of his sophisticated, globe-trotting strategy to build a new bridge between China and the world.
Today, Holtzman reflects on his game plan, and the long term-impact the Games have had on China, sport, and the world.
"At the time, there was a significant debate about whether the west should engage or isolate China, which was operating largely outside of global institutions and norms," said Holtzman. "I had just spent some time as an Advisor to the US Trade Ambassador helping anchor China to the west by joining the World Trade Organization, and the feeling was that hosting the Olympic Games would throw open a window on China, get them further bound to the rule of law, and on the track to modernization."
Holtzman, who now leads Rally International Public Affair's roster of international clients across the developing world, was a young executive with PR powerhouse Weber Shandwick when the Chinese, facing serious diplomatic headwinds to its nascent 2008 Olympic Games bid, came knocking. Beijing had lost a previous bid for the 2000 Games due to geopolitical factors.
"The Olympic Games are not about politics, but friendship. Still, a nation's bid does not exist in a vacuum," Holtzman said. "There needed to be this undertone that hosting the Olympics would somehow change China for the better. This would give IOC voters and critics a reason to champion the Chinese bid. Paris (another 2008 competitor) would always be Paris, but a vote for China could change history."
A team of professionals was assembled —including the global sport marketing team of Terrence Burns and George Hirthler, who were among the creative forces behind Atlanta's successful bid for the 1996 Games, plus sports branding specialist Jon Tibbs in the United Kingdom, to deliver this message of change to a skeptical global community.
"China was the second most populous country in the world and had never carried the torch of the Games. Tens of millions of young Chinese had never been imbued with the values of Olympism," Holtzman said. "This made a very compelling case to the International Olympic Committee."
When framed as an opportunity to spread and achieve the ideals of the Games and to modernize China, support for the bid grew, even among critics.
"When the Dalai Lama and Luciano Pavarotti both jumped on board, we knew we had a winning message," Holtzman laughs.
But what of the end game, where today's modernized China is now a global economic power and seen by some as a geopolitical competitor?
"The Olympic movement did its job. The Games helped open China and allow the world in. They served as a catalyst for lasting change in Beijing's physical infrastructure and environmental sustainability. The question today, as it was then, is, 'what will you do with this newfound goodwill and clout? How will you use it?' And that is a question for others to answer."
Media Contact:Julia@rallyir.com917-587-3226
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/as-an-historic-olympic-games-milestone-nears-the-architect-of-its-triumphant-pr-campaign-reflects-on-its-lessons-302488810.html
SOURCE Rally International Public Affairs
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
31 minutes ago
- Newsweek
The U.S. Patent Office Should Not Let Itself Be Used for Litigation Gamesmanship
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Over a decade ago, I co-authored the bipartisan Leahy-Smith America Invents Act to modernize our patent system. One of its key reforms was the creation of a streamlined panel inside the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) called the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to resolve patent disputes more quickly and affordably than drawn-out court battles. Some patent infringers have figured out how to use the PTAB as a backchannel for relitigating resolved disputes, draining American innovators of resources, and giving competitors a second shot after losing in court. The PTAB's recent ruling against Efficient Power Conversion Corporation (EPC), a California-based semiconductor firm, in favor of a Chinese infringer is a prime example. United States Capitol building is pictured. United States Capitol building is pictured. Getty Images EPC holds patented technology for a next-generation power chip, the kind of high-efficiency semiconductor used in electric vehicles, data centers, and aerospace systems. When a Chinese-based competitor named Innoscience began importing products into the United States EPC believed copied its technology, EPC filed a petition with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) asking the U.S. government to block those copycats imports. The ITC responded with a full investigation, including depositions, expert testimony, and a trial before an independent administrative law judge. After months of briefing, the judge ruled that EPC's patent was valid and infringed. When the full bipartisan commission composed of presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed officials upheld that decision, Innoscience's copycat products were blocked from being imported into the U.S. market. That should have been the end. An innovator company followed the ITC's rigorous, multilayered process, proved its case, and won. Instead, as the ITC was concluding its own investigation, with post-trial briefing underway, the PTAB granted Innoscience's request to institute a brand new review of EPC's patent. Mere weeks after the ITC's order blocking Innoscience's products took effect, the PTAB issued a contradictory decision invalidating key patent claims the ITC had just found valid and infringed. This kind of inconsistent outcome was never what Congress intended when we created the PTAB. The board was meant to resolve disputes efficiently, not reopen cases already settled by another expert agency. And it certainly wasn't meant to undermine the ITC by creating conflicting rulings that foreign infringers can exploit to re-enter the U.S. market. These repeated challenges drain inventors' time and money. Deep-pocketed large corporations—foreign as well as domestic—can wear down smaller firms through sheer volume and cost. Defending just one PTAB challenge can cost patent owners $500,000, and challengers often file multiple challenges against a single patent if they think it poses a competitive threat. Just 10 companies account for nearly a quarter of all PTAB petitions. The consequences are impossible to ignore. An American company that successfully defended its patent in court is still struggling to defend its rights. Meanwhile, a Chinese infringer has been handed another chance to potentially re-enter the U.S. market. In an effort to prevent this kind of overreach, a bipartisan group of lawmakers recently introduced the PREVAIL Act. One of its key provisions could stop duplicative patent challenges by preventing the PTAB from undermining cases already decided by other forums like the ITC. That change would reaffirm that the PTAB exists to streamline justice, not undermine it, and safeguard inventors from facing endless litigation loops after winning in court. I knew when we passed the America Invents Act that we were creating a program with the potential to be used for gamesmanship through repeated litigation and administrative attacks on the validity of a patent. That is why I wrote at the time that the Judiciary Committee I chaired "intend[ed] for the USPTO to address potential abuses and current inefficiencies under its expanded procedural authority." Acting USPTO Director Coke Morgan Stewart could exercise her expanded procedural authority to reverse the PTAB's decision in the EPC case. USPTO policy is that the PTAB should not relitigate cases already nearing resolution in another forum. That safeguard seems to apply here. The ITC had already fully tried and decided this case. Reversing the PTAB's ruling would mark an important step toward restoring accountability within the board and reaffirming that the U.S. patent system exists to protect American innovation. America's patent system should not give deep-pocketed infringers multiple chances in different forums to invalidate patents. The PTAB was created to resolve patent disputes more quickly and at less cost, not encourage infringers. Lamar Smith represented the 21st Congressional District of Texas in the U.S. House from 1987 to 2019 and served as chairman of the Judiciary Committee. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Acrylic and Polycarbonate Sheets Market worth $14.49 billion by 2029 - Exclusive Report by MarketsandMarkets™
DELRAY BEACH, Fla., June 24, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The report "Acrylic and Polycarbonate Sheets Market by Material (Polycarbonate, Acrylic), Type (Solid, Multiwall, Corrugated, Cast, Extruded), Application (Building & Construction, Automotive, Medical, Packaging, Electronics), and Region - Global Forecast to 2029", acrylic and polycarbonate sheets market is projected to reach USD 14.49 billion by 2029 from USD 10.74 billion in 2024, registering a CAGR of 6.2% during the forecast period. Browse in-depth TOC on "Acrylic and Polycarbonate Sheets Market" 649 – Tables 58 – Figures 441 – Pages Download PDF Brochure: The market for acrylic and polycarbonate sheets is primarily driven by escalating demand across key industries, including oil & gas, automotive, chemical processing, and construction. In these industries, the requirement for corrosion-resistant and durable materials is critical. Additionally, the high focus on infrastructure development, particularly in emerging economies, significantly contributes to market growth. Strict adherence to safety regulations, robust quality standards, and a commitment to environmental sustainability further fuel the demand for high-performance piping solutions. Moreover, advancements in technology enhance both production efficiency and product quality. The shift toward alternative energy sources and the increasing adoption of advanced pipeline systems for electricity generation and water desalination are also pivotal in fostering industry growth. Request Sample Pages: "Solid polycarbonate sheets to be fastest-growing type segment in acrylic and polycarbonate sheets market" Solid polycarbonate sheets is projected to be the fastest-growing segment in this market. These sheets offer a unique combination of exceptional strength, versatility, and lightweight characteristics. They are highly regarded in applications demanding durability and safety, as they are approximately 250 times stronger than glass. Key application areas for solid polycarbonate sheets include construction, automotive, and packaging, utilized in skylights, greenhouses, roofing, cladding, architectural glazing, automotive glazing, headlamps, and protective coatings. Recent advancements in the production process, particularly in extrusion techniques, have significantly improved their weatherability, durability, and resistance to fire and scratches. These enhancements render solid polycarbonate sheets increasingly attractive to end-user segments, including medical, automotive, construction, packaging, and electronics. Consequently, these combined advantages position solid polycarbonate sheets as the fastest-growing sub-segment within the industry. Request Customization: Key players Key companies in the acrylic and polycarbonate sheets market include EXOLON GROUP (Germany), UVPLASTIC Material Technology Co., Ltd. (China), TEIJIN LIMITED (Japan), MITSUBISHI GAS CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. (Japan), Palram Industries Ltd. (Israel), Trinseo (US), AGC Inc. (Japan), Arlaplast (Sweden), Plaskolite (US), and 3A Composites GmbH (Germany). Get access to the latest updates on Acrylic and Polycarbonate Sheets Companies and Acrylic and Polycarbonate Sheets Market Size Browse Adjacent Market: Advanced Materials Market Research Reports & Consulting Related Reports: Methanol Market - Global Forecast to 2030 Polycarbonate Sheets Market Cast Acrylic Sheet Market About MarketsandMarkets™ MarketsandMarkets™ has been recognized as one of America's Best Management Consulting Firms by Forbes, as per their recent report. MarketsandMarkets™ is a blue ocean alternative in growth consulting and program management, leveraging a man-machine offering to drive supernormal growth for progressive organizations in the B2B space. With the widest lens on emerging technologies, we are proficient in co-creating supernormal growth for clients across the globe. Today, 80% of Fortune 2000 companies rely on MarketsandMarkets, and 90 of the top 100 companies in each sector trust us to accelerate their revenue growth. With a global clientele of over 13,000 organizations, we help businesses thrive in a disruptive ecosystem. The B2B economy is witnessing the emergence of $25 trillion in new revenue streams that are replacing existing ones within this decade. We work with clients on growth programs, helping them monetize this $25 trillion opportunity through our service lines – TAM Expansion, Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategy to Execution, Market Share Gain, Account Enablement, and Thought Leadership Marketing. Built on the 'GIVE Growth' principle, we collaborate with several Forbes Global 2000 B2B companies to keep them future-ready. Our insights and strategies are powered by industry experts, cutting-edge AI, and our Market Intelligence Cloud, KnowledgeStore™, which integrates research and provides ecosystem-wide visibility into revenue shifts. To find out more, visit or follow us on Twitter , LinkedIn and Facebook . Contact:Mr. Rohan SalgarkarMarketsandMarkets™ INC.1615 South Congress 103, Delray Beach, FL 33445USA: +1-888-600-6441Email: sales@ Our Website: Logo: View original content: SOURCE MarketsandMarkets Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
The Inflation Time Bomb—Trump's Policies Will Hit Your Wallet Soon
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. With inflation hovering modestly above 2 percent despite President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff increases and immigration enforcement, some might wonder whether warnings about his policies driving up prices were overblown. They weren't. The inflationary pressures are building beneath the surface, masked by timing, supply chain buffers, and massive corporate stockpiling ahead of policy changes. The time bomb is ticking—and consumers should begin bracing for the explosion. Trump's most disruptive policies didn't begin in earnest until months after his January inauguration. While he announced a 10 percent tariff on Chinese goods in late January, the real escalation came in March when rates jumped to 20 percent, then spiked to 145 percent by April before being partially rolled back. The administration's "Liberation Day" universal tariff on April 2 marked the broadest increase since the 1930s. Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City on June 18, 2025. Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City on June 18, 2025. TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images Immigration enforcement followed a similar pattern. Though raids began in January, the most aggressive workplace operations didn't intensify until late May, when Trump aide Stephen Miller pushed for 3,000 arrests per day—triple the early administration pace. Only recently have we seen dramatic workplace disruptions that at one point caused Trump to pull back on raids of farmers, hotels, and other key industries that rely on immigrants for labor. However, that pause proved to only be a brief reprieve, guaranteeing that the inflationary pressures from this aggressive immigration policy will continue to build. What truly delayed the impact of Trump's most inflationary policy was an unprecedented wave of corporate front-loading in late 2024 and early 2025. Companies rushed to import goods before tariffs took effect, creating exactly the buffer that's now insulating consumers from immediate price shocks. These panic purchases were so intense it caused the U.S. economy to contract 0.3 percent in Q1 despite robust domestic demand. By May, container imports fell 9.7 percent as the stockpiling surge ended and higher tariff rates took hold. By stocking up as they did, companies bought themselves time to ride through a few months of high tariffs without it affecting their bottom line. As Trump's trade war drags on, those Q1 stockpiles dwindle as companies forestall replenishing their inventories in the hope that tariff rates will suddenly come down. Freight bookings for April dropped 41 percent month-over-month as businesses adopted this "wait and see" approach. The gap between inventory levels and inventory costs has expanded to the third highest in the index's history. In essence, it is becoming increasingly expensive to store inventory while simultaneously becoming more expensive to replace it. The Federal Reserve's stance reveals perhaps the clearest evidence that policymakers anticipate the inflationary surge ahead. Despite months of consistently lower inflation readings and unprecedented presidential pressure to cut rates, Fed officials have held interest rates steady—a decision that only makes sense if they're bracing for future price pressures. By keeping rates elevated despite political pressure and recent good inflation data, the Fed is acknowledging their belief that current price stability is temporary. They're positioning for the inflationary impact they know is coming rather than reacting to the deceptively calm present. The ingredients for an inflationary surge are now in place: depleted inventory buffers, supply chain disruptions in essential industries, elevated tariffs on a vast array of goods, and increasingly fragile inflation expectations. When companies exhaust their stockpiles and face the choice between absorbing higher costs or passing them to consumers, the answer isn't just predictable, it is a necessary function of the corporate mandate to maximize shareholder value. Food prices are particularly vulnerable. With agricultural raids creating labor shortages during peak growing season and tariffs raising input costs, the sector faces a perfect storm. The lag between policy implementation and consumer impact is ending. Trump's own acknowledgment of economic "harm" from his policies—and his scramble to dial them back—suggests the administration has already seen internal projections of what's coming. The question isn't whether Trump's policies will drive inflation, but when Americans will feel it at the grocery store. The time bomb is real, and the fuse is shortening. Nicholas Creel is an associate professor of business law at Georgia College & State University. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
