Animal medicine NI: Concern over lack of agreement post-Brexit
A House of Lords committee has written to the government amid continuing concern about the supply of veterinary medicines in Northern Ireland post-Brexit.The Northern Ireland scrutiny committee says it has "further questions" that have not been addressed in full.While human medicines are covered by the Windsor Framework, animal medicines are instead subject to an extended grace period that expires at the end of this year.The British Veterinary Association (BVA) has warned that a failure to reach an agreement could have "potentially devastating consequences".
The letter to Thomas Symonds, the minister for the Constitution and European Union Relations, asks for "urgent clarity" on matters including what adjustments are being made to ensure supply of veterinary medicines and what the government's current assessment is of products at risk of discontinuation.
The BVA has said it does not believe agreement will be achieved within the remaining grace period.Its president Elizabeth Mullineaux said: "A veterinary agreement with the EU could have an incredibly positive impact on so many different areas of concern, but in particular, could finally lead to a permanent resolution to the long-standing question of future access to vital veterinary medicines in Northern Ireland."Without a solution, there are serious implications not only for animal health and welfare, but also for public health."The BVA has proposed a series of short-term solutions and mitigations while negotiations continue.They include re-routing supply through the Republic of Ireland, creating exceptions for medicines that were aligned with regulation pre-Brexit and developing a special import certificate to allow the import of medicines from outside the European Economic Area.The Northern Ireland scrutiny committee was appointed in January 2025, after the dissolution of the former Windsor Framework Sub-Committee at the end of the last parliament.It examines the Windsor Framework, complementing the work of the Democratic Scrutiny Committee of the Northern Ireland Assembly and the House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
House of Lords removes ‘provocative' Pride flags from canteen
The House of Lords has removed Pride flags from its canteen following a complaint by a peer. At the start of June, the River Restaurant was decked out in the banners to celebrate the beginning of Pride month. However, among the banners used was the ' Progress Pride ' flag, which includes the colours of the trans movement and is seen by many as indicative of support for gender ideology – the idea that sex is a spectrum and that people can change their identity. Baroness Nicholson, a Tory peer, complained to the Lord Speaker, Lord McFall, and officials agreed that they should be taken down as they had not been sanctioned by the authorities. Similar flags were not displayed in the House of Commons canteen. Helen Joyce, the director of advocacy at the Sex Matters charity, said the decision to display the flags was 'provocative and inappropriate', and that it was 'reassuring' they had been taken down. 'The baby blue and pink of trans activism, which features in the flag, signals support for a harmful fringe ideology that justifies a wide range of human rights abuses, including puberty blockers for minors, surgeries that leave people sterile, the placement of rapists in women's prisons, and the destruction of single-sex services and spaces,' she said. Critics advocate separating trans and gay rights The Progress Pride flag, designed in 2021, is replacing the traditional rainbow Pride flag in many venues. It includes an extra triangle of colour on the left hand side, made up of stripes including white, pink and light blue – the colours of the trans movement. But many critics say the trans rights movement should be decoupled entirely from the gay rights movement, using the phrase 'LGB without the T'. The flag also includes a yellow triangle with a purple circle to represent 'intersex' people – a classification which is rejected by many. On Wednesday, Lady Nicholson tweeted pictures of the flags in the River Restaurant, which were displayed over the cooked breakfast items on sale, on the social media platform X. When one user replied to say that they supported 'LGB without the T', she tweeted: 'Exactly.' The flags had been removed by Friday lunchtime, following Lady Nicholson's complaint to the Lord Speaker's Office. On Friday, she tweeted: 'The superb River Restaurant in the House of Lords has had the decorations that I pictured removed. 'The food remains as stunning as before. I am most grateful to the Lord Speaker for his swift and thoughtful response to my request. I respect all people in all walks of life always.' Lady Nicholson was a Conservative MP between 1987 and 1995, when she made a high-profile defection to the Liberal Democrats in protest at John Major's policies. She was made a peer in 1997 and later served as a member of the European Parliament for the Lib Dems. She returned to the Tory fold in 2016. During her time in Parliament, she voted in favour of Section 28, which banned the 'promotion of homosexuality' by local authorities, and against gay marriage. 'Do pronouns get you a bigger plate of beans?' A number of users on X responded to her picture of the flags. Sean Ako said: 'As a gay man I find this to be incredibly dehumanising. Can't I have my breakfast in peace without having a flag waved in my face? I don't need to be celebrated first thing in the morning. I need to be caffeinated.' Clean City Bird wrote: 'Honestly, what has the progress flag or same-sex attraction got to do with having breakfast? Do you get a bigger portion if you state your pronouns while they plate your beans?' Margaret Kearney said: 'Think about the flags as you eat breakfast or have tea and toast. For some it could be a turn-off to eat anything. These flags have taken over everything. Thanks Emma for letting us know about this.' A spokesman for the House of Lords said it had not been the Lord Speaker who had personally intervened. 'Informal decorations were put up locally to mark the beginning of Pride month,' he said. 'These were taken down at an appropriate point due to their unofficial nature.'
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
SNP must turn support for independence into 'real political action'
The First Minister said he would put building support for independence at the 'heart' of his party's 2026 Holyrood manifesto. It comes after the latest polling put support for Scottish independence at 54%, and even higher if Nigel Farage and Reform UK took power in Westminster. Following the SNP's loss to Labour in the Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse by-election, the First Minister was quizzed about anger within the Yes movement that he had not 'done enough' to promote the cause of independence since he took over the leadership of the SNP. READ MORE: SNP 'demeaned themselves' with focus on Reform UK at by-election Appearing on BBC Scotland's Sunday Show, Swinney was asked if he was alert to the displeasure of activists over his strategy for independence. 'Of course, I hear that, I listened very carefully to all that is said in political debate in Scotland, particularly debate amongst those who share my objective of winning Scottish independence,' he said. 'When I became First Minister a year ago we were in a very difficult situation, as demonstrated by the poor election result that we got last summer, and I had to rebuild our position so that we could get a hearing from the public within Scotland, and I've been doing that by trying to improve the performance of the Scottish Government on delivering on the priorities of the people. "I focused our agenda directly on the concerns of the public in Scotland.' Swinney insisted it was 'always' a part of his plan to set out 'where the hope comes from' in politics, and that this is from Scottish independence. He added: 'Because all the challenges we face in society today, whether it's about Brexit or about an immigration policy that from the UK government is going to be disastrous for the Scottish economy, or the spike in energy prices are all a product of Westminster decision making. (Image: BBC) "And what I've got to do is I've got to relate all those issues to the concerns of people in Scotland, and set out that the answer to that is Scottish independence, and that's the agenda that I set out to my party I would take forward in the run up to the 2026 election.' Asked what the SNP will be putting in their Holyrood 2026 manifesto in regards to independence, such as a bid for a new referendum and what would equate a mandate for Scottish independence, Swinney said: 'What should be in our manifesto is the arguments why Scotland should be an independent country, and how we can build the future of our country based on the opportunities of independence. 'Fundamentally, Scotland will only become independent when the people of Scotland want that to be the case. 'And we saw in the course of the last few weeks, strengthening of the opinion poll position in favor of Scottish independence.' Martin Geissler pointed out that while support for independence was high, the SNP had recently lost the Hamilton by-election, with less than 30% of the vote. READ MORE: Scottish independence 'already begun as UK political culture diverges' 'That's exactly the point I was coming on to,' Swinney replied. 'My challenge is to make sure that we can turn that aspiration in the public for Scottish independence into a real political action to make sure it happens. 'And that comes about by the SNP performing much better, of getting into a commanding position in Scottish politics, and making sure that we can deliver on the expectations and aspirations of the people of Scotland. 'That's what I'm focused on, about making the argument, because if we make the argument and build support for Scottish independence, I think it is absolutely impossible to stand in the way of the democratic will of the people of Scotland if they want Scotland to be independent, and that will be at the heart of the thinking that I bring to the SNP manifesto in 2026.' Swinney also hinted that there could be a reshuffle on the horizon for Scottish Government ministers. Noting that Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero and Energy, Mairi McAllan, is due to return from maternity leave, he would 'have a look at the team' in 'due course'. The First Minister also defended his tactics of calling out Reform in the Hamilton by-election instead of focussing on Labour as the SNP's main rival. We previously told how party activists said they were shut down by SNP HQ for questioning the strategy. Swinney told the BBC that Labour's vote was collapsing while Reform support was 'surging'. 'I said to people the best way to do that was to vote SNP, to stop Farage, because the Labour vote was collapsing on its performance last year, and it did," he said.
The National
8 hours ago
- The National
Swinney must throw off shackles of platitudes and demand our freedom
Most people recognise that Britain is broken but the BBC's blatant stage-management of public discourse on behalf of the UK Government and the British Establishment echoes George Orwell's dark warnings of media control, where a Hamilton by-election 'Debate Night Special', conveniently given the apparent debating skills of the Labour candidate, did not include any of the candidates. This was followed on Thursday night by another 'BBC Special' focusing on Glasgow with two Labour Party representatives but only one SNP representative and no representative from the Scottish Greens. This blatant bias is a democratic outrage from a proclaimed 'impartial' public broadcaster where polls consistently show support for independence at greater than 50%. Through partial and slanted 'news', the public is being deliberately misled into thinking that the Labour Party can fundamentally 'change' broken Britain and that if more radical 'change' is necessary we should listen to the 'voice of Brexit'. The incessant denigration of all areas associated with the Scottish Government, especially the NHS, does not cease at the end of First Minister's Questions but is repeated nightly in Reporting Scotland bulletins while the fourth largest party at Westminster is rarely represented on the BBC's Politics Live panels which often include 'Brexit voices' now in Brexit denial. So how can the people of Scotland give voice to their aspirations within the democratically decadent structures of the UK? Where the SNP appear to be erring is in believing that the public who have been condemned by Westminster to austerity and failing public services for more than decade can see through the British Establishment mirage and realise that the 'fundamental change' that is necessary for Britain can only be delivered through Scottish independence. John Swinney may have steadied the SNP ship (which still disturbingly for any semblance of genuine UK justice has the cloud of Branchform hovering over it) but can he now assertively steer the ship through choppy waters to a new harbour beyond the control of London? Being honest and respecting your opponents are admirable personal qualities but Keir Starmer has demonstrated, in spite of his initial warm words, that he does not respect Scotland as evidenced through repeated decisions made at Westminster without consultation with the Scottish Government, even in a devolved area such as fishing. In other words, Starmer is treating Scotland with the same contempt as his Tory predecessors. Swinney's recent call for Starmer to honour the previous commitments of those PMs to Scotland on funding for the Acorn carbon capture project will regrettably only be advanced when Starmer sees political advantage to UK Labour at Westminster. Starmer's declaration that no matter the wishes of the people of Scotland, there will be no referendum as long as he is prime minister, demonstrates that democratic principles mean nothing to a prime minister who has already abandoned any social or moral principles he may have held with policies that have enriched the wealthy while the poor and disadvantaged, along with the people of Gaza, have been left at the mercy of those without any principles. This humanitarian scourge must be ended through robustly presenting the many arguments favouring independence which show that there is a better path for our people and for our children. For the SNP, this means recognising that the time has come to start acting in the manner of which they have misleadingly been persistently accused by their political opponents of focusing all their efforts on independence. The time for the First Minister being 'Mr Nice Guy' with the UK Government has passed as the Scottish public want the 'real change' that can only be delivered by the people of Scotland determining their own future. It's time for John Swinney to throw off the shackles of political courtesy and parliamentary rectitude within a manifestly corrupt UK political structure serving the British Establishment and refocus the efforts of the SNP and the Scottish Government on the critical fight for Scotland's future. Stan Grodynski Longniddry, East Lothian IN the two glossy flyers I delivered on behalf of the SNP in the Hamilton by-election with 300 to 400 words in each, there was NO mention whatsoever of the word Independence. Why no independence from the SNP? Are they ashamed of the word? It is the only idea that generates optimism and hope and breaks down the apathy and disillusionment currently around. 9000 SNP voters didn't vote for the party this time over 2021. That's more than the total SNP vote this time. SNP managerialism fixing rotten Labour policies won't cut it. Thom Cross Carluke
