With Francis, LGBTQ+ Catholics finally felt seen. Will new pope turn away from us?
With Francis, LGBTQ+ Catholics finally felt seen. Will new pope turn away from us? | Opinion Pope Francis' reforms led to increased visibility and acceptance of LGBTQ+ people within and beyond Catholicism. As we mourn his passing, there is anxiety about whether this progress will be reversed.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
What to expect at the funeral of Pope Francis
Pope Francis will be the first pope in more than a century to be buried outside of the Vatican.
After the death of Pope Francis on April 21, DignityUSA held a community gathering that night where LGBTQ+ Catholics, our family members, friends and allies could share their grief, hopes and fears. There were moving stories about how moments from Francis' ministry touched individual hearts, and how even glimpses of him during his visit to the United States moved people to tears. Some shared quotes from his writings.
Andrés Merino-Restrepo, a bisexual man from Colombia now living in Canada said, 'It always felt as if we had a room in the pope's heart.' Others spoke of their fear that the next pope might undo the progress made toward greater acceptance of LGBTQ+ Catholics in our church.
The outpouring of emotion in this quickly organized event testifies to the unprecedented connection between the LGBTQ+ Catholic community and Francis. During his 12 years as leader of the world's largest Christian denomination, Francis spoke about, met with, embraced and issued policies that supported LGBTQ+ people in ways that were unimaginable before his papacy.
Pope Francis treated LGBTQ+ people with humanity. Will the next pope do the same?
He used the words 'gay' and 'transgender,' rather than the more clinical or dehumanizing terms common to his predecessors. He met with LGBTQ+ people on many occasions, sending pictures from these meetings across the world. He famously placed transgender people under the Vatican's care during the COVID-19 pandemic. He allowed priests to bless same-sex couples and opened baptism and the role of godparent to transgender people.
The impact of these and other departures from tradition cannot be underestimated.
Further, when Francis called for a worldwide synod of the Catholic Church, he acknowledged that the church had wounded and excluded many – impoverished people, people with disabilities, addicts and LGBTQ+ people among them.
Unlike past synods, which involved only bishops, he called for the voices of those the church had failed to be included in listening sessions held in every diocese worldwide.
Many LGBTQ+ people, family members and others spoke about the gifts that LGBTQ+ people brought to the church and the many types of discrimination they had experienced within it. And while the LGBTQ+ community was not named explicitly in the synod's final report, these testimonies were included in documents that are now part of the permanent record of our church.
Opinion: Who will be the new pope? After Pope Francis' progress, expect a course correction.
Due to Francis' willingness to allow open discussion of controversial issues, LGBTQ-positive Catholic theologians felt freer to speak and to publish. He supported priests, bishops and colleges that initiated LGBTQ+ ministries and had close friendships with LGBTQ+ people.
All of this led to increased visibility and acceptance of LGBTQ+ people within and beyond Catholic institutions.
Even as we and our allies continue to mourn Francis' passing, there is anxiety about whether this affirming trajectory will be halted or even reversed. The concern is understandable.
Will the Catholic Church turn its back on LGBTQ+ community?
In many parts of the world, as well as in some U.S. communities, church officials and political leaders remain vocal proponents of the belief that living as gay or transgender is incompatible with God's plan for humanity. They lead or support efforts to restrict human rights of LGBTQ+ people, enforce celibacy for gays and lesbians, deny gender-affirming care to transgender and nonbinary individuals, allow the practice of conversion therapy and even criminalize people based on their identity or relationships.
Will the next pope support these harmful positions? Will he roll back the hard-won, if still incomplete, acceptance many LGBTQ+ Catholics have come to expect from our church?
I think not. The simplest hope I can offer anxious people is numeric.
Opinion: I'm a Catholic who craved spiritual connection. I found it in Pope Francis.
Francis appointed more than 80% of the cardinals who will elect his successor. While it is true that his appointments were driven less by ideology than by ensuring more geographic diversity in church leadership, he also tended to select men who were known as good pastors.
These are people who should prioritize caring for human needs over adherence to less inclusive church practices as they consider the direction a new pope may lead the church.
More important, perhaps, Francis inspired a greater sense of ownership of the church among regular believers. Through the global synod called to shape our church's future, millions of people shared their experiences of Catholicism, their struggles to remain in the church and their hopes for change.
Thousands of pages document these testimonies in reports from all around the world. I hope that the cardinal electors reflect on and pray over what Catholics want our church to be. If this happens, I am confident that our new pope will also be a shepherd and a clear moral voice in a troubled world.
No matter who is chosen to guide the Catholic Church in the years ahead, LGBTQ+ Catholics and those who love us have been empowered. We will continue to work toward full inclusion in our church and our world ‒ and for recognition that we are no more and no less than who we were created to be by a loving God.
Marianne Duddy-Burke is executive director of DignityUSA and co-chair of the Global Network of Rainbow Catholics. She has served in leadership positions in the Catholic LGBTQ+ movement since 1985.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
NY state Senate approves doctor-assisted suicide bill, sends it to Hochul's desk for approval
ALBANY – State Senate Democrats passed highly controversial legislation that would allow terminally ill people to take their own lives with the help of doctors in a razor-thin vote Monday — leaving it up to Gov. Kathy Hochul whether to sign it into law. 'This is one of the great social reforms of our state,' state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal (D-Manhattan), the bill's sponsor in the upper chamber, touted at a press conference earlier in the day Monday — putting the measure on the same tier as the legalization of gay marriage. 'This is about personal autonomy, this is about liberty, this is about exercising one's own freedom to control one's body,' Hoylman-Sigal continued. 3 The 'Medical Aid in Dying Act' passed the state senate Monday evening, meaning it only needs Gov. Kathy Hochul's signature to become law. Vaughn Golden The measure passed 35 to 27, with six Democrats – Senators April Baskin, Siela Bynoe, Cordelle Cleare, Monica Martinez, Roxanne Persaud, and Sam Sutton – voting against it. 'The governor will review the legislation,' a spokesperson for Hochul said. The bill's passage follows a years-long campaign that was fought tooth and nail by a diverse group of critics, including disability rights activists and the Catholic church, as well as many black and Orthodox Jewish communities. 'The Governor still has the opportunity to uphold New York's commitment to suicide prevention, protect vulnerable communities, and affirm that every life—regardless of disability, age, or diagnosis—is worthy of care, dignity, and protection,' The New York Alliance Against Assisted Suicide wrote in a statement following the vote. A Catholic group slammed the bill's passing as 'a dark day for New York' and also called on Hochul to refuse to sign it. 'For the first time in its history, New York is on the verge of authorizing doctors to help their patients commit suicide. Make no mistake – this is only the beginning, and the only person standing between New York and the assisted suicide nightmare unfolding in Canada is Governor Hochul,' Dennis Poust, Executive Director of the New York State Catholic Conference, wrote in a statement. 3 The state Senate voted 35-27 Monday night to legalize physician-assisted suicide for people with terminal illnesses. AP Ahead of the vote, the nearly three-hour debate on the Senate floor got emotional, with several lawmakers holding back tears as they explained their votes. Syracuse-area state Sen. Rachel May (D-Onondaga) shared the story of her late husband, who was receiving morphine in the final stages of his battle with cancer, which he eventually succumbed to at 32 years old. 'I don't know if the last largest dose he took also took his life, but I know that he died in peace,' May said. 'It isn't about controlling the disease or controlling the pain, it's about having control at the end of your life,' she said before voting in favor. Critics fear the legislation lacks critical safeguards over how doctors approve patients looking to receive the prescription for a lethal cocktail of drugs, such as a statutory waiting period, establishing clear chain of custody for the pills, mandating the doctor and recipient meet in-person, and requiring a disclosure that someone indeed used the drugs to take their own life. Under the bill, recipients would need approval from two doctors and a sign-off from two independent witnesses, after which they would receive a prescription for drugs they could use to take their life at a time of their choosing. 3 Gov. Kathy Hochul has not signaled whether she will sign the assisted suicide bill. Lev Radin/ZUMA / Doctors also do not have to conduct a mental health screening for each patient, but may refer a patient for one under the legislation. 'I don't think requesting end-of-life medication when an individual is suffering and in pain and dying suggests a mental health condition, if anything, I think it's quite rational,' Hoylman-Sigal said. Hoylman vowed the bill would not lead to such 'unintended consequences.' 'It was a professional organization that provided us crucial guidance, that helped us develop the state-of-the-art safeguards in this legislation that gave my colleagues and the general public, I believe, the assurance that there will not be unintended consequences,' he said. The legislation is referred to by its supporters as the 'Medical Aid in Dying' bill. 'The option of medical aid in dying provides comfort, allowing those who are dying to live their time more fully and peacefully until the end. I am profoundly grateful to Senate Majority Leader Stewart-Cousins for giving her conference the space to have this important and emotional discussion,' Corinne Carey, Senior Campaign Director of Compassion and Choices, the main group driving the effort to pass the bill, wrote in a statement.
San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Judge blocks Trump order cutting federal funds to LGBTQ nonprofits
President Donald Trump's war on 'DEI' — programs promoting diversity, equity and inclusion — suffered a setback Monday in a Bay Area federal court, where a judge blocked attempts to cut off federal funding to nine nonprofits serving the LGBTQ community unless they changed their practices and their vocabulary. 'These provisions seek to strip funding from programs that serve historically disenfranchised populations,' U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar of Oakland said in a ruling requiring continued funding of the Los Angeles LGBT Center, San Francisco AIDS Foundation and other organizations across the country while the case continues. It does not apply to other groups affected by Trump's orders. Those orders require federally funded programs to halt any 'equity-related grants or contracts' and 'programs promoting DEI,' apparently barring any aid to racial, ethnic or gender minorities. Another provision orders them to cut off funding for programs that 'promote gender ideology.' That would mean denying 'the very existence of transgender people,' Joe Hollendoner, executive director of the Los Angeles LGBT Center, said in a filing with the court. 'While the Executive requires some degree of freedom to implement its political agenda, it is still bound by the Constitution,' Tigar, appointed to the bench by President Barack Obama, said in his ruling. That means the administration 'cannot weaponize Congressionally appropriated funds to single out protected communities or suppress ideas that it does not like,' he said. A lawyer for the nonprofits, Jose Abrigo of Lambda Legal, said the ruling halts Trump administration orders 'that seek to erase transgender people from public life, dismantle DEI efforts, and silence nonprofits delivering life-saving services.' 'These policies threatened to erase access to lifesaving HIV and health services for transgender, nonbinary, and queer people across the country,' said Dr. Tyler TerMeer, chief executive officer of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation. 'The Court's action gives us the fuel to keep fighting.' Trump's Justice Department argued that transgender advocacy groups, and not the administration, were the ones violating civil rights by allowing people who were born male to compete with female athletes, use women's restrooms and identify themselves as female. Trump is entitled to 'align government funding and enforcement strategies with (his) policy priorities,' Justice Department attorney Pardis Ghelbi said in a filing asking Tigar to dismiss the lawsuit. But the judge said Monday that the administration's explicit goals — including the denial of transgender people's existence — were 'facially discriminatory' and 'not a legitimate government interest.' Trump's orders require federally funded organizations 'who provide specialized services to transgender persons to remove references to those persons — as well as the characteristics that caused those persons to need the services in the first place,' Tigar said. 'It is as difficult to imagine how this would work as it is to imagine a pediatrician not acknowledging the existence of children, or a gerontologist denying the existence of the elderly.'
Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
Scoop: Clearwater snubs Pride, backs faith month with anti-LGBTQ+ ties
After several years of commemorating LGBTQ+ Pride Month, Clearwater leaders skipped the recognition this year, instead designating June for the first time as "Faith and Family Month." Why it matters: While the celebration on its face seeks to strengthen families through religion, Faith and Family Month's website denies the existence of transgender people and defines marriage as between a man and a woman. It dismisses climate change and critical race theory — a concept that links racial discrimination to the nation's foundations and legal system — as "false doctrines." And it attributes that belief system to the American Pastor Project, a network of church leaders with a mission to "eradicate Wokeism from the American pulpit." What they're saying: The city "is making a statement that they don't want LGBTQ+ people to be acknowledged [or] respected," said Wendy Vernon, a Clearwater resident and the president and founder of LGBTQ+ advocacy group PFLAG Safety Harbor. "That's definitely very hurtful to the community when they're already being shunned away everywhere," Vernon told Axios. She also questioned why city leaders didn't issue a Pride Month proclamation in addition to Faith and Family Month, as was the case in Lakeland. Between the lines: Proclamations are largely symbolic and typically requested by community organizations or city staff. Clearwater's Diversity Leadership Council, made up of city employees, didn't request a Pride proclamation this year due to disruptive protests at a Pride event last year, city spokesperson Joelle Castelli told Axios. "It was very uncomfortable for the members of the committee as they were personally targeted," she said. Committee members instead invited their colleagues to participate in the St. Pete Pride parade this month and offered free tickets to a Clearwater Threshers game. Driving the news: Faith and Family Month was organized by Christian service nonprofit Somebody Cares Tampa Bay, co-founder Daniel Bernard told Axios. Bernard said he was inspired by a discussion with Clearwater Mayor Bruce Rector, who said he wanted to see a pro-family event in the city. At the request of Somebody Cares, Rector presented the proclamation at the May 15 City Council meeting. His support features prominently in promotional social media posts and on Faith and Family Month's website. "We look forward to … celebrating an entire month with family-friendly activities and talking about how faith can help families be stronger," he says in a promotional video. Reality check: Navigate to the website's "Statement of Faith" page, and a much broader belief system comes into focus. Zoom in:"We recognize God's created order, in making male and female, determined by divine imprint, genetically encoded at conception, and changeless," it says, echoing language used by the Trump and DeSantis administrations to deny rights to transgender people. It goes on to say that pastors have a role "to protect our nation from the deceptions of false teaching and anti-Christ agendas," including abortion, CRT and "climate alarmist theory." The statement is attributed to the American Pastor Project, an organization founded by Lucas Miles, an Indiana-based pastor, conservative activist and author of "Woke Jesus: The False Messiah Destroying Christianity." Rector said the purpose of the proclamation was to encourage people of all different faiths and belief systems to "celebrate the importance of faith and families." Had an organization approached the city with a Pride proclamation, he "probably" would have signed it, he said, adding that he presented one last year. He said he hadn't seen the statement of faith until an Axios reporter showed it to him. He also wasn't familiar with the American Pastor Project, Rector said. "We're not trying to come against anybody or do anything of that nature," Bernard said. "We are just promoting the truth as we understand it."
