India gives more punishment to Turkey for supporting Pakistan, Modi govt asks Indigo to...
(File)
New Delhi: The government on Friday, 30 May 2025, directed low-cost airline IndiGo to end its aircraft lease agreement with Turkish Airlines within three months. This move is being viewed as a stern message from India to Turkey for supporting Pakistan.
IndiGo had leased and operates two Boeing 777s from Turkish Airlines with the permit valid until May 31. The airlines had sought an extension from the Civil Aviation Ministry for six months. The ministry has now refused to allow this, according to multiple reports.
A statement from the ministry said: 'To avoid passenger inconvenience due to immediate flight disruption, IndiGo has been granted a three-month extension till August 31' adding that this will not be extended further.
'Indigo has been granted a one-time last and final extension of three months up to 31.08.2025 for these damp-leased aircraft, based on the undertaking from the airline that, they will terminate the damp lease with Turkish Airlines within this extension period, and shall not seek any further extension for these operations,' it said.
IndiGo also has a codeshare agreement with Turkish Airlines.
On May 15, the Centre revoked the security clearance for Turkish firm Celebi Aviation.
Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol had said: 'Turkey had openly supported Pakistan. In view of the current situation, this has become an issue of national security. Keeping security in mind, Celebi has been banned in the country'.
During and after the end of the initial phase of Operation Sindoor, Turkey expressed solidarity with Pakistan. Turkish drones were also extensively used by Pakistan in its counter-attack after India struck key terror bases in the neighbouring country.
IndiGo CEO Pieter Elbers last week said that the airline is fully compliant with all regulatory frameworks governing its operations with aircraft leased from Turkish Airlines, adding that the decision to renew these leases lies with the Indian government.
'It is important to recognise that the operation to Istanbul is taking place in the context of the Air Service Agreement (ASA) between India and Turkey. IndiGo is fully compliant with all regulatory frameworks and regulations which are there. We have thousands of Indian customers booked mostly beyond Istanbul,' Elbers said during a media interaction on the airline's fourth-quarter and full-year financial results for 2024-25.
'The decision to renew these leases lies with the Indian government,' Elbers noted.
(With IANS inputs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
31 minutes ago
- Hans India
Constituent Assembly and the British Influence
As the Vice-President of the Viceroy's Executive Council (equivalent to the position of a Prime Minister) from September 1946, Jawaharlal Nehru played a pivotal role in steering the Constitution's formation. On December 13, 1946, while moving the aims and objects resolution, Nehru acknowledged the British influence on the process: 'The British Government has a hand in [the Constituent Assembly's] birth. They have attached certain conditions. We accepted the State Paper … and we shall endeavour to work within its limits.' Though this statement highlights the constraints under which the Assembly operated, it conceals the 'understanding' between the Congress led by him and the British. Rau's appointment as Constitutional Adviser, likely influenced by his Cambridge education and connection with Nehru, facilitated the creation of a draft that aligned with British preferences to frame the Constitution that maintained continuity with colonial frameworks and thereby perpetuated British legacy. Nehru's role as a political intermediary was crucial in balancing Indian aspirations with British demands, raising questions about whether his actions were driven by pragmatism or a desire to secure political power for himself, especially given his appointment as the Vice-president before independence. Pseudo-secularism and minority appeasement: Nehru's vision of secularism, shared by Patel and others, prioritizes religious minorities like Muslims and Christians, often to the disadvantage of the Hindu majority, and is reflected in Articles 25–30 of the Constitution. These provisions grant minorities rights to establish and manage educational institutions, preserve their cultural practices, and expand their religious demography, while similar protections are denied to Hindus. Damodar Swarup Seth's 1948 critique in the Constituent Assembly argued that recognizing religious minorities as distinct entities undermined the very idea of secularism and national unity, potentially sowing the seeds of another partition. This Nehruvian framework of minority appeasement, continued by both pseudo-secular and pseudo-Hindutva parties instead of equal treatment for all, has sparked resentment about its impact on India's social cohesion. Emergence of the Ambedkar-centric narrative: The narrative attributing the Indian Constitution to Dr B R Ambedkar emerged from a confluence of historical, social, political, and Christian missionary factors. To deflect criticism of the Constituent Assembly's unrepresentative nature and protect Nehru's minority-centric secularism, Congress leaders, including Nehru, allowed the factoidal narrative of a 'Dalit-architected Constitution' to take shape. This framing served to shield the Constitution from scrutiny and silence critics by invoking Ambedkar's identity as a Dalit leader and symbol of social justice. Ambedkar's visibility in Assembly debates, coupled with his role as Minister for Law and Justice, made him a natural focal point for this narrative. The Ambedkarite movement, which gained momentum after his 1956 conversion to Buddhism, further promoted this narrative to inspire Dalit pride and empowerment. The emotional resonance of a Dalit shaping India's democratic framework amplified his symbolic importance, often at the expense of recognising Rau's technical contributions or Nehru's political leadership. The mischievous misnaming of the 'Committee to Scrutinize Draft Constitution' as the 'Drafting Committee' contributed to the misconception that Ambedkar authored the Constitution. Rau, a bureaucrat without a political constituency, and Nehru, already a towering figure in Indian politics, received less public recognition, allowing the Ambedkar-centric narrative to dominate. Political strategies aimed at wooing Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) further reinforced this narrative through statues of Ambedkar holding the Constitution, roads, colonies, public buildings, spaces, and educational institutions named after him, and media portrayals, such as the 2000 biopic Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, which cemented his image as the Constitution's sole architect and drafter. The narrative's alignment with Dalit empowerment goals further entrenched its dominance. Judicial reinforcement of the narrative: The Indian judiciary has played a significant role in perpetuating the Ambedkar-centric narrative. Statues of Ambedkar holding the Constitution, installed in the Supreme Court (1980) and some High Courts, symbolize his perceived role as the Constitution's architect. The 2025 Gwalior Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court controversy, where lawyers clashed over an Ambedkar statue, underscores the narrative's emotional and political weight. A registrar's order on April 21, 2025, justified the statue by citing Supreme Court precedent and Ambedkar's role as the 'maker,' despite historical evidence to the contrary. Judicial pronouncements, such as Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) and Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India (2008), frequently invoke Ambedkar's vision. Constitution Day speeches by Chief Justices often describe him as the 'architect,' reflecting cultural reverence rather than historical accuracy. Judicial training, focusing on case law rather than historical scholarship, and the inaccessibility of primary sources, like Rau's papers or Ambedkar's 1953 Rajya Sabha speech, perpetuate reliance on secondary narratives. The judiciary has reinforced a socio-political context making Ambedkar's legacy sacrosanct, particularly among SCs and STs. Questioning his role risks accusations of casteism, discouraging judges and scholars from challenging the narrative. Political promotion by Ambedkarite groups and government initiatives, such as Ambedkar Jayanti, amplifies this perception, as seen in the Gwalior controversy, where opposition to the statue was perceived as disrespect. Christian missionaries and Article 25: Christian missionaries have leveraged Ambedkar's prominence to promote conversions among SCs and STs, mistakenly attributing Article 25's right to 'propagate' religion to him. This provision was crafted by the Committee on Fundamental Rights, headed by Sardar Patel. Ambedkar's brief engagement with Christianity in the 1930s aligned with the missionaries' social reform agenda, but his 1956 conversion to Buddhism explicitly rejected Christianity's foreign ties. Nevertheless, missionaries continued to highlight his constitutional role to appeal to Dalits, reinforcing the Ambedkar-centric narrative for their own purposes. Restoring truth vis-à-vis Ambedkar-centric narrative: India's national motto, Satyameva Jayate—truth alone triumphs—etched at the base of the national emblem, demands unwavering commitment to historical accuracy. Yet, the pervasive narrative that B.R. Ambedkar was the sole architect of the Indian Constitution betrays this principle, perpetuating a myth that overshadows the collaborative efforts of B.N. Rau, Jawaharlal Nehru, and the 299 members of the Constituent Assembly. To honour the Upanishadic ideal and align public and judicial understanding with historical reality, a concerted effort to restore balance is imperative. Legal curricula must be reformed to emphasise the Constitution's collective genesis, correcting the misleading term 'Drafting Committee' and highlighting Rau's foundational draft and Nehru's pivotal role in shaping its framework under British oversight. Primary sources, including the Constituent Assembly Debates, Rau's papers, Nehru's Aims and Objects Resolution, and Ambedkar's 1953 Rajya Sabha speech—where he rejected sole authorship as a 'hack'—should be integrated into educational programs to foster a nuanced perspective. Archival accessibility must be prioritized to empower scholars, students, and the public with evidence-based insights. The judiciary, too, must uphold truth by avoiding rhetorical claims of Ambedkar as the sole architect, acknowledging the collaborative process in judgments and speeches. By embracing Satyameva Jayate, India can dismantle this false narrative, honouring all contributors to its constitutional legacy and reaffirming its commitment to truth over myth. (The writer is a retired IPS officer and former Director of CBI. Views are personal)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
42 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Defence, trade, tech discussed during foreign secy Misri's visit to US
Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri visited Washington DC from May 27 to 29, where he held a series of high-level engagements with senior officials of the US Administration. Foreign Secretary Misri held wide-ranging discussions with counterparts across the Department of State, National Security Council, Department of Defence, Department of the Treasury, and the Department of Commerce, the Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement. The visit was a follow-up to the Prime Minister's visit to the United States on February 13, during which both sides launched the India-US COMPACT (Catalysing Opportunities for Military Partnership, Accelerated Commerce & Technology) for the 21st Century. Deputy National Security Advisor Pavan Kapoor was also part of the Indian delegation. According to MEA, at a luncheon meeting with Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau, both sides reviewed the full spectrum of the bilateral agenda. They underscored that Technology, Trade, and Talent would be the key pillars shaping the India-US partnership in the 21st century. In meetings with Deputy Secretary of Defence Steve Feinberg and Under Secretary for Policy Elbridge Colby, both sides reaffirmed their commitment to a robust and forward-looking defence partnership. Discussions focused on co-production and co-development initiatives, sustained joint military exercises, logistics and information-sharing frameworks, and enhancing interoperability between the armed forces, MEA said. Vikram Misri met with Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Michael Faulkender, the Foreign Secretary and discussed ways to deepen economic and financial ties, including collaboration in international financial institutions and coordination in the upcoming Financial Action Task Force (FATF) processes. In his meeting with Under Secretary of Commerce Jeffrey Kessler, both sides reviewed progress on the India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement, cooperation in critical and emerging technologies, and the need to streamline ITAR and export control regulations. They agreed to convene the next meeting of the India-US Strategic Trade Dialogue at the earliest opportunity, according to MEA. Consistent with the vision outlined in the COMPACT, detailed inter-agency discussions were also held on a range of strategic areas, including defence cooperation, energy security, the TRUST initiative, counter-terrorism, the Indian Ocean Strategic Venture, and collaboration through platforms such as the Quad, I2U2, and IMEEC. Foreign Secretary Misri, along with DNSA Kapoor, jointly chaired a roundtable with industry representatives, focusing on deepening bilateral collaboration in critical and emerging technologies. Additionally, they held a substantive interaction with members of the think tank community, covering the full breadth of the India-US strategic partnership, MEA said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
42 minutes ago
- Business Standard
All-party delegation led by DMK MP Kanimozhi Karunanidhi arrives in Madrid
The delegation aims to engage with local government representatives, policy think tanks and Spanish parliamentarians during its visit ANI Europe Group 6 of the all-party parliamentary delegation from India arrived in Madrid on the final leg of its multi-nation outreach. Led by Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) MP Kanimozhi Karunanidhi, the delegation was received by Dinesh K Patnaik, India's Ambassador to Spain. Speaking in Madrid, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MP Dr Ashok Kumar Mittal outlined the purpose of the visit. "Our final stop on this journey is Madrid, Spain, and first of all, we are meeting with the Indian diaspora here. We want to understand their sentiments and also make them aware of the sentiments of the Government of India and our Prime Minister," he said. The delegation aims to engage with local government representatives, policy think tanks and Spanish parliamentarians during its visit. "We want to inform them about how we outmanoeuvred Pakistan in Operation Sindoor and how we brought India back from the clutches of extremism. Alongside this, we have meetings scheduled with the local government, with think tanks here, and with parliamentarians. In these, we will present India's stance -- that India has always been opposed to extremism." He also addressed the delegation's broader strategic message, saying, "Not only will India eliminate extremism within its own borders, but it is also committed to eradicating Pakistan-sponsored extremism in other parts of the world. Our government and our Prime Minister are fully determined and strongly committed to eliminating it." The delegation, led by MP Kanimozhi, also includes Rajeev Rai (Samajwadi Party), Mian Altaf Ahmad (Jammu and Kashmir National Conference), Brijesh Chowta (BJP), Prem Chand Gupta (Rashtriya Janata Dal), Ashok Kumar Mittal (Aam Aadmi Party), and Former envoys Manjeev S Puri and Jawed Ashraf. Meanwhile, the all-party delegation led by DMK MP Kanimozhi Karunanidhi saw fruitful outcomes as Indian delegations worldwide continued with their outreach program under Operation Sindoor. India's Ambassador to Latvia, Namrata S Kumar, noted that the visit conveyed India's message of how cross-border terrorism poses a threat not only to India but to the world at large. Speaking about the outcome of the visit of the all-party delegation from India, Ambassador Namrata S Kumar said, "The All-Party Delegation from India carried a strong message through Operation Sindoor, which I conveyed during meetings in Latvia. They engaged with Latvian parliamentarians... and key think tanks, where they clearly laid out the reality of cross-border terrorism that India has faced for decades, especially from Pakistan... They emphasised that the threats of cross-border terrorism are not confined to only India... They emphasised that these threats, particularly attempts to divide societies along religious lines, are not just regional but global in nature. This has ramifications on a global level, that's why a global alliance is crucial." India has sent several all-party delegations to showcase India's resolve against terrorism and garner international support for a united stand against this global threat. The Indian government's diplomatic outreach efforts aim to strengthen partnerships with countries in East and Southeast Asia, emphasising the need for a collective response to the threat of terrorism. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
