A47 snails not blocking economic growth
Nature should not be seen as a "blocker" of economic growth, despite a group of endangered snails pausing progress on a major road scheme, a wildlife trust boss has said.The presence of Little Whirlpool Ramshorn snails in ditches surrounding the A47 Acle Straight near Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, is contributing to delays in upgrading the single-carriageway road.Eliot Lyne, chief executive of Norfolk Wildlife Trust, said: "I find it a bit of a stretch that we're saying one of the reasons why we don't have great economic growth is there's a snail that's holding up the A47 dualling."National Highways said it took its responsibility to the environment "very seriously" and would continue to assess where improvements could be made.
The rare snails, which measure just 0.2 in (5mm) across, are known to exist in only three locations across the United Kingdom, and are legally protected. Studies have been ongoing for almost a decade into whether the snails would survive being relocated.In a speech on Wednesday, the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, outlined how the government intended to achieve economic growth. "So we are reducing the environmental requirements placed on developers when they pay into the nature restoration fund that we have created so they can focus on getting things built, and stop worrying about bats and newts," she said.
But Mr Lyne said nature was what made Norfolk a "special place". He said: "Nature is not a blocker of economic growth; nature is an enhancer of economic growth... we should be thinking of nature as an investment, not a blocker." Norfolk County Council recently withdrew its planning application for the Norwich Western Link, which would connect the Northern Distributor Road (NDR) to the A47, due to rules protecting Barbastelle bats that live on the proposed route.
Graham Plant, Conservative councillor and cabinet member for highways, infrastructure and transport, said the wait for Acle Straight improvements was "not good enough". He said: "Humans are animals, too, and they don't deserve to die because of the state of the roads that were built 100 years ago. "It seems they are putting unreasonable objects in the way of safety and people's lives... this is a main link through Norfolk from the coast to the Midlands and it's archaic and we need to make it safer and better. and the only way to do that is dual it." A National Highways spokesperson said: "Preserving this endangered species, which is only found in three locations across the country, is just one among a number of factors surrounding any possible upgrade of the A47 Acle Straight. "Our commitment to improving the A47 in terms of safety and reducing congestion can be seen with major construction currently under way on two large-scale projects to dual different sections of the road."
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
44 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Peers debate change to 105-year-old law so children can work on steam trains
Labour's Lord Faulkner of Worcester proposed an amendment to the Employment of Women, Young Persons, and Children Act 1920, which barred children from work in any 'any industrial undertaking', including in mines, construction or transport. If agreed, his change would have exempted voluntary work on heritage railways and tramways from the ban. Government whip Lord Katz cautioned there 'may be unintended consequences' by amending the 'old legislation', but Lord Faulkner indicated he could push for a vote on his proposal before the Employment Rights Bill becomes law. Supporting the proposals, independent crossbench peer the Earl of Clancarty said: 'Steam railways are an important part of this country's heritage, and as every year passes that importance surely grows. 'We are getting closer to a time when there will be no-one with a personal memory of such trains in their working life, so as well as being an enjoyable activity for interested, enthusiastic children and young people, this is also an educational opportunity for the next generation.' Lord Faulkner said the ban was from a 'very different era' and told the Lords it 'languished unknown on the statute book for many years'. He said: 'Heritage railways managers, not surprisingly, do not wish to break the law, even if it is moribund and other safeguards exist.' Training on heritage railways 'has led to many seeking careers on the national rail network and in some cases have provided training and apprenticeships appropriate to their future career choices', Lord Faulkner added. He warned that even where regulators have said they would not prosecute a child who volunteers on a heritage railway, a legal challenge 'could be brought by a local authority or by a relative of a young people, regardless of the assurances given'. Historic England chairman and Conservative peer Lord Mendoza said: 'One of the most difficult things in the heritage sector is to encourage young people to come into it, to learn the skills, to learn the trades that we need in order to keep our heritage environment going for as long as we can.' In his response, Lord Katz said 'regulators should and do take a proportionate approach to enforcement action'. He offered a meeting with peers who wanted to change the law, adding: 'The 1920 Act is old legislation and amendment of it should only be considered after a thorough review upon other areas of law, as there may be unintended consequences.' Withdrawing his amendment to the Employment Rights Bill, Lord Faulkner said he would 'take up the minister's kind offer' but added that without solution, he believed 'the House as a whole would like the opportunity to express its view on the report' as the draft new law progresses.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer to pursue bereaved families for tax after winter fuel U-turn
Sir Keir Starmer could pursue bereaved families for tax after his about-turn on winter fuel payments. The Prime Minister promised to make more pensioners eligible for the winter fuel allowance after Rachel Reeves removed it from nearly 10 million people in 2024. Ministers are looking at restoring the payments as a universal benefit and then recouping the money from high-income pensioners when they fill in their tax returns. They have been forced down that route because creating a new means test would be highly complex. However, some in the Government are concerned about a time lag of at least six months between the payment of up to £300 being made and then clawed back. Thousands of people could die in that period, leaving grieving families to pick up the bill. Helen Whately, the shadow work and pensions secretary, said: ' Chaos reigns in Number 10 with pensioners picking up the bill again. It beggars belief that they're considering slapping a stealth tax on pensioners to clear up their winter fuel mess. 'Not content with that, they're going to come after the bereaved families of deceased pensioners for the money. This is the party that wouldn't stand up to the unions demanding inflation-busting pay rises. 'It's clear there is no plan, Labour just lurch from one disaster to the next. It seems that whichever way they go, pensioners end up battered.' In July 2024, the Chancellor announced that pensioners would not receive the winter fuel payment of up to £300 if they had incomes of more than £11,500. After a disastrous series of local election results, Sir Keir announced plans to hand the payment to more people but did not give any details on numbers. The Chancellor has said she will outline how the new system will work next week when she unveils the spending review, and promised the new system will be in place by this winter. A government source told The Guardian: 'We should never have scrapped the winter fuel payment in the first place, but the whole process of reinstating it has been completely chaotic. 'The optics of us demanding the money back from grieving families are just dire.' Asked on Wednesday about the winter fuel payment, Ms Reeves said: ' We have listened to the concerns that people had about the level of the means test, and so we will be making changes to that; they will be in place so that pensioners are paid this coming winter. ' We'll announce the detail of that and the level of that as soon as we possibly can. But people should be in no doubt that the means test will increase and more people will get a winter fuel payment this winter.' The option of paying to all then asking wealthier people to repay is a similar approach to that taken by Tory chancellor George Osborne when he reduced child benefit eligibility for better-off parents. A senior official at HMRC, Jonathan Athow, told the Treasury select committee that if the tax system were used to make the changes, it would not be possible until 2026. 'We'd have to get to April next year before we knew somebody's income, before we could then make any decisions about how [recouping the payment] would then be implemented,' he told MPs.
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Peers debate change to 105-year-old law so children can work on steam trains
Labour's Lord Faulkner of Worcester proposed an amendment to the Employment of Women, Young Persons, and Children Act 1920, which barred children from work in any 'any industrial undertaking', including in mines, construction or transport. If agreed, his change would have exempted voluntary work on heritage railways and tramways from the ban. Government whip Lord Katz cautioned there 'may be unintended consequences' by amending the 'old legislation', but Lord Faulkner indicated he could push for a vote on his proposal before the Employment Rights Bill becomes law. Supporting the proposals, independent crossbench peer the Earl of Clancarty said: 'Steam railways are an important part of this country's heritage, and as every year passes that importance surely grows. 'We are getting closer to a time when there will be no-one with a personal memory of such trains in their working life, so as well as being an enjoyable activity for interested, enthusiastic children and young people, this is also an educational opportunity for the next generation.' Lord Faulkner said the ban was from a 'very different era' and told the Lords it 'languished unknown on the statute book for many years'. He said: 'Heritage railways managers, not surprisingly, do not wish to break the law, even if it is moribund and other safeguards exist.' Training on heritage railways 'has led to many seeking careers on the national rail network and in some cases have provided training and apprenticeships appropriate to their future career choices', Lord Faulkner added. He warned that even where regulators have said they would not prosecute a child who volunteers on a heritage railway, a legal challenge 'could be brought by a local authority or by a relative of a young people, regardless of the assurances given'. Historic England chairman and Conservative peer Lord Mendoza said: 'One of the most difficult things in the heritage sector is to encourage young people to come into it, to learn the skills, to learn the trades that we need in order to keep our heritage environment going for as long as we can.' In his response, Lord Katz said 'regulators should and do take a proportionate approach to enforcement action'. He offered a meeting with peers who wanted to change the law, adding: 'The 1920 Act is old legislation and amendment of it should only be considered after a thorough review upon other areas of law, as there may be unintended consequences.' Withdrawing his amendment to the Employment Rights Bill, Lord Faulkner said he would 'take up the minister's kind offer' but added that without solution, he believed 'the House as a whole would like the opportunity to express its view on the report' as the draft new law progresses.
