Nations meet at UN for 'killer robot' talks as regulation lags
GENEVA, May 12 (Reuters) - Countries are meeting at the United Nations on Monday to revive efforts to regulate the kinds of AI-controlled autonomous weapons increasingly used in modern warfare, as experts warn time is running out to put guardrails on new lethal technology.
Autonomous and artificial intelligence-assisted weapons systems are already playing a greater role in conflicts from Ukraine to Gaza. And rising defence spending worldwide promises to provide a further boost for burgeoning AI-assisted military technology.
Progress towards establishing global rules governing their development and use, however, has not kept pace. And internationally binding standards remain virtually non-existent.
Since 2014, countries that are part of the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) have been meeting in Geneva to discuss a potential ban fully autonomous systems that operate without meaningful human control and regulate others.
U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has set a 2026 deadline for states to establish clear rules, opens new tab on AI weapon use. But human rights groups warn that consensus among governments is lacking.
Alexander Kmentt, head of arms control at Austria's foreign ministry, said that must quickly change.
"Time is really running out to put in some guardrails so that the nightmare scenarios that some of the most noted experts are warning of don't come to pass," he told Reuters.
Monday's gathering of the U.N. General Assembly in New York will be the body's first meeting dedicated to autonomous weapons.
Though not legally binding, diplomatic officials want the consultations to ramp up pressure on military powers that are resisting regulation due to concerns the rules could dull the technology's battlefield advantages.
Campaign groups hope the meeting, which will also address critical issues not covered by the CCW, including ethical and human rights concerns and the use of autonomous weapons by non-state actors, will push states to agree on a legal instrument.
They view it as a crucial litmus test on whether countries are able to bridge divisions ahead of the next round of CCW talks in September.
"This issue needs clarification through a legally binding treaty. The technology is moving so fast," said Patrick Wilcken, Amnesty International's Researcher on Military, Security and Policing.
"The idea that you wouldn't want to rule out the delegation of life or death decisions ... to a machine seems extraordinary."
The New York talks come after 164 states supported a 2023 U.N. General Assembly resolution calling for the international community to urgently address the risks posed by autonomous weapons.
While many countries back a binding global framework, the United States, Russia, China and India prefer national guidelines or existing international laws, according to Amnesty.
"We have not been convinced that existing law is insufficient," a U.S. Pentagon spokesperson told Reuters, adding that autonomous weapons might actually pose less risk to civilians than conventional weapons.
The governments of India, Russia, and China did not respond to requests for comment.
In the absence of regulation, autonomous systems are proliferating.
Weapons experts at the Future of Life Institute think tank have tracked the deployment of roughly 200 autonomous weapon systems across Ukraine, the Middle East and Africa.
Russian forces, for example, have deployed some 3,000 Veter kamikaze drones - capable of autonomously detecting and engaging targets - to Ukraine, according to its data.
Ukraine has, meanwhile, used semi-autonomous drones in the conflict. The Ukrainian government declined to comment.
Israel has used AI-systems to identify targets in Gaza. Its mission in Geneva said it supported multilateral discussions and uses data technologies in full accordance with international law.
Human Rights Watch, however, said crucial questions of accountability under international law remain unresolved and warned in a report last month that unregulated autonomous weapons present a range of threats to human rights and could provoke an arms race if unchecked.
And campaigners like Laura Nolan of Stop Killer Robots worry there is currently little to ensure defence firms will develop AI-driven weapons responsibly.
"We do not generally trust industries to self-regulate ... There is no reason why defence or technology companies should be more worthy of trust," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Keir Starmer doubles down on Israeli ministers' sanctions despite being slammed by US
SIR Keir Starmer yesterday doubled down on sanctioning Israeli ministers, despite being savagely rapped by the US. Donald Trump 's administration hit out at Britain after the PM broke with tradition and imposed a travel ban and asset freeze on two far-right members of Israel's government, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich. 4 4 4 In a scathing attack on the move, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the sanctions 'do not advance American efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home and end the war'. Mr Rubio warned Britain 'not to forget who the real enemy is'. The US ambassador to the UK said he 'fully supported' Mr Rubio's slap down and warned the PM against 'impeding constructive dialogue'. Ben-Gvir, who is pushing to annex the West Bank and wants to permanently expel Palestinians from Gaza, said: 'The American administration is a moral compass in the face of the confusion of some Western countries that choose to appease terrorist organizations like Hamas. 'Israel is not afraid — we will continue to fight terrorism. 'History will judge the Chamberlains of our time.' At PMQs Sir Keir defended the sanctions as a bid to 'uphold human rights and defend the prospect of a two-state solution'. The PM said: "Acting alongside our allies, we have sanctioned individuals responsible for inciting appalling settler violence and expansion. "We will continue to support all efforts to secure a ceasefire, the release of all hostages despicably held by Hamas and the humanitarian aid that needs to surge in. Greta Thunberg's Gaza 'Freedom Flotilla' boarded & seized by Israeli forces 4
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Experts cast doubt on Reeves' plan to make her sums add up by saving billions through ‘technical efficiency gains', slashing admin spending and clamping down on tax
Experts have cast doubt on the Chancellor's plan to make her sums add up by saving billions through 'technical efficiency gains', slashing admin spending and clamping down on tax. The Treasury said it planned to make more use of artificial intelligence, reforming the workforce – including through job cuts – and selling off its London property portfolio. The plans are forecast to save £13.8 billion a year by 2028/29 – including £9 billion a year from the health and social care budget alone. At the same time, a drive to recover more owed taxes is predicted to deliver a £7.5 billion annual gain by 2029/30. And government department administration costs will be culled by 11 per cent by the time of the next election, the Treasury projects – with another huge cut pencilled in for 2026 which will take the savings to 16 per cent, or £2.2 billion. Raoul Ruparel, a former Downing Street adviser to Theresa May, said the latter were 'pretty brutal real-terms cuts across the board'. 'Traditionally, these sorts of cuts are very hard to deliver,' said Mr Ruparel, who is director of the Boston Consulting Group Centre for Growth. The plans for efficiency savings rely heavily on making the National Health Service more productive – that is, doing more with less. They assume annual productivity growth of 2 per cent a year in the NHS, which the Treasury admits would mark a 'substantial increase' on improvements achieved in past years. The productivity plan 'will deliver efficiencies across all healthcare services, primarily through the combined impact of operational and clinical improvements, technology and digital transformation and workforce initiatives', the Treasury said. They will include reducing the use of agency staff and levels of sickness absence. The Government also plans to relocate more civil servants out of London, cutting the number by 12,000 by 2030. But at the same time, its ambition to bring in more unpaid taxes will involve hiring more people – with 5,500 compliance and 2,400 debt management staff expected to be brought in. The closure of 11 central London offices will save £94 million a year by 2032 and the disposal of properties no longer needed will bring in £1 billion, the Government said. Julian Jessop, economics fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs think-tank, said: 'There is huge scope to boost productivity and make efficiency savings in the public sector. 'It is much less obvious that this Government will be the one to do it.' Also among the expected savings is the claim that the Ministry of Housing will use AI to speed up routine tasks such as checking errors and note taking. 'This will reduce demands on staff time by an estimated 500,000 hours per year,' the Treasury said. Ms Reeves also announced that she will tear up Treasury rules designed to safeguard value for money in order to pour money into infrastructure projects in the Midlands and the North, where Labour is under threat from Reform. Regional mayors have railed for years at the Treasury's so-called 'Green Book' rules which direct investment to areas where it will produce the most economic benefit. Under the new system, the Treasury will limit the use of 'benefit-cost reviews' which have been blamed for halting investment in the North. The new proposals will mean that even projects where the costs outweigh the benefits may not 'automatically constitute poor value for money'.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The betrayal of Gibraltar: Anger at Starmer's 'surrender deal' with EU that hands Spain control over territory's border
Sir Keir Starmer was accused last night of striking another 'surrender' deal after handing over control of Gibraltar's border to the European Union. The agreement means Britons travelling to the peninsula could be refused entry by Spanish guards enforcing the EU rules – despite it being a British Overseas Territory. The arrangement was made to enable the border to fully re-open between Gibraltar and Spain, which is crossed by thousands daily living either side to get to work or visit friends and family. Britons travelling to the territory at present face an initial passport check carried out by Gibraltar officials but they would face a second check carried out by Spanish border officials on behalf of the EU. It means Britons could be rejected if they do not meet strict Schengen Area rules. For instance, post-Brexit Britons cannot stay in the EU for longer than 90 days within any 180-day period without a visa. It raises the prospect of UK travellers needing to obtain an EU visa to visit a British territory if they have exceeded their 90-day allowance, or they face being refused entry at the border. A specific post-Brexit agreement, covering the territory and to keep the Spain-Gibraltar border open, was needed because, at Madrid's insistence, it was not part of the wider EU-UK trade pact struck after Brexit. It was also not included in Sir Keir's 'reset' deal unveiled last month. Foreign Secretary David Lammy and chief minister of Gibraltar Fabian Picardo agreed the new deal in principle in Brussels yesterday. Pictured: Lammy and Picardo in a social media clip Foreign Secretary David Lammy and chief minister of Gibraltar Fabian Picardo agreed the new deal in principle in Brussels yesterday. But Brexiteers warned that the Falklands could be next following Sir Keir's controversial Chagos Islands 'surrender' deal. Tory Armed Forces spokesman Mark Francois said: 'First Chagos and now Gibraltar – and then probably the Falklands, too. This Europhile, human-rights obsessed Government can no longer be trusted to robustly defend any of our overseas interests, as this further needless concession to Spain shows. 'Labour used to sing The Red Flag – now they just wave a big white one instead.' David Jones, former Brexit minister, said: 'There is no reason why British people visiting their own territory should be providing passports to foreign entities. This is contrary to Britain having sovereignty over Gibraltar. 'The Spanish have wanted to get their hands on Gibraltar ever since the Treaty of Utrecht [which handed Britain sovereignty in 1713] – it's a vitally important asset to us. 'It has thousands of our citizens living there and people visiting their own territory should not have to present passports to foreign officials.' Former home secretary Suella Braverman said: 'Another surrender and a hand-over in all but name. It is unforgivable. The Falklands will be next.' The text of the treaty is yet to be finalised and published. However, Government sources insisted 'nothing will compromise the way the Armed Forces operate' at the strategically important RAF Gibraltar military base next to Gibraltar Airport. They insisted residents of the Rock will not be affected by the changes. As well as re-opening the Spain-Gibraltar border for people, the deal also removes goods controls, allowing for them to be traded more smoothly. Mr Lammy said: 'This government inherited a situation from the last government which put Gibraltar's economy and way of life under threat. Today's breakthrough delivers a practical solution after years of uncertainty.' Downing Street said Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez had, in a phone call, congratulated Sir Keir over the Gibraltar deal, claiming 'his government had succeeded where others had failed'.
