Diplomatic outreach revives memories of ‘dream teams' that got India out of tight corners
The multi-party delegation being dispatched across the globe after Operation Sindoor has revived memories of a similar phase in Indian diplomatic history when a sustained cross-party campaign was carried out to project a 'one India' approach to important issues like Kashmir and the communal situation. The context for the previous effort, which took place in the early 1990s, was the demolition of the Babri Masjid, a spike in violence in Kashmir, and anti-insurgency operations in Punjab.
To make matters worse, there were frequent communal riots that culminated in the 1992-93 Mumbai riots that formed the backdrop of Mani Ratnam's famous film Bombay.
The neighbourhood was equally challenging, with Pakistan under the leadership of Benazir Bhutto and Bangladesh under Prime Minister Khaleda Zia. Both Benazir Bhutto and Khaleda Zia wanted to take on India, given regional conditions. The regional and domestic situation quickly morphed into a diplomatic challenge for India when Western powers and major international human rights watchdogs turned human rights into a major tool of diplomacy. This was the first time that human rights were being used as a major diplomatic initiative as the post-Cold War world order acquired a unique diplomatic alphabet.
In this context, both Pakistan and Bangladesh highlighted the treatment of the Muslim minority inside India and blended that issue with other matters on their agenda. Bangladesh raked up the Farakka Barrage controversy and argued that the barrage denied human rights to the Bangladeshi people, and Pakistan wanted to corner India on human rights because of the police actions unfolding in Kashmir and, more importantly, in Punjab, where K.P.S. Gill was carrying out anti-insurgency operations. This was the backdrop to the June 1993 United Nations International Conference on Human Rights organised in Vienna.
Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao chose a delegation led by Finance Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh. The other members were Dr. Farooq Abdullah, Indian High Commissioner, jurist L.M. Singhvi, Permanent Representative of India to New York, Hamid Ansari, and Permanent Representative to the U.N. in Geneva, Satish Chandra. The Pakistani delegation was led by the mother of the Prime Minister, Ms. Nusrat Bhutto, who launched a scathing attack on India. Dr. Farooq Abdullah resorted to some tactics that the late Foreign Secretary J.N. Dixit described as 'shock therapy' in his book My South Block Years.
Diplomatic battle
Recounting the meeting, Mr. Ansari, who later became Vice-President of India, said that Dr. Singh, on reaching Vienna, immediately summoned a meeting of the team members in the hotel room and said that he did not agree with the draft provided to him by the Ministry of External Affairs. 'It was a draft made by the MEA, and Dr. Singh felt the statement was a bit defensive. He wanted to be less defensive. Finally, our team made a good impression and foiled the attempts of our neighbours,' said Mr. Ansari, recollecting the diplomatic battle. The June meeting provided the backdrop for the prolonged human rights campaign that India had to face.
Next came the General Assembly session in September in New York, where External Affairs Minister Dinesh Singh was to lead the delegation. However, he fell ill, and Minister of State for External Affairs Salman Khurshid was diverted from a trip to Latin America and sent to New York to lead the Indian delegation. The meeting turned acrimonious as the Pakistani delegation wanted to corner India in front of the global community. Having been unsuccessful in the first two attempts, Pakistan next planned to float a resolution at the Human Rights Council in Geneva in March 1994. The idea was to first float a resolution on Kashmir at the U.N. International Conference on Human Rights, and then humiliate India by putting the resolution to a vote. A defeat in the vote would have dented India's diplomatic stature in the world.
PM Rao sent a delegation led by the former External Affairs Minister and leader of the Opposition in the Parliament, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, to the HRC in Geneva. He was joined by MoS for External Affairs Salman Khurshid, Vajpayee's adviser on foreign affairs Brajesh Mishra, Dr. Farooq Abdullah, and Hamid Ansari.
Pakistan tried its best to take the resolution to a vote, but the Indian team lobbied with Iran to prevent the vote, and finally Iran's influence over the West Asian and North African countries prevailed, and Pakistan's attempt at creating a diplomatic embarrassment for India was foiled. During the meeting, a senior member of the Pakistani delegation came to Mr. Ansari and said, 'We know we cannot snatch Kashmir away.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
R&D? Rarely
Dependence in critical areas makes the nation vulnerable. Strategic interest must prevail over economic sense Germany's crude reserves are so small, they won't last three months in an emergency. So how did Hitler wage war for five years? By turning coal into petrol. Over 92% of the Luftwaffe's aviation fuel was synthetic. As the world grapples with China's rare earth curbs, there's a useful lesson here. While the rare earths crisis that started with China's export curbs on April 4 may be blowing over – Trump announced on Truth Social yesterday, 'Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China' – it will have a once-bitten-twice-shy effect. Over the past few weeks, Western carmakers have considered producing cars minus some components that use rare earths. At home, Maruti's had to scale back production plans for its first EV due to a global shortage of rare earth magnets. As our second Op-Ed explains, these magnets contain about 25% of a rare earth element called neodymium. It's one of the so-called 'light' rare earths that are available in India, but we don't produce enough of it because cheap Chinese supplies made investment in this area unattractive. While you can make motors without rare earths, other devices like TV screens, computers and MRI machines can't do without them. That's why India needs to build a large rare earths industry. And with the world's fifth largest rare earth reserves, it's well-placed to do so. Likewise, it needs to end its dependence on China for 70% of active pharmaceutical ingredients or APIs, because while buying from the cheapest supplier makes economic sense, it's a strategic risk. The aim must be to reduce dependence because dependence, especially in critical products, is vulnerability. About 90% of our crude is imported. An electric future will take care of that, but not if it means 100% dependence on China for lithium batteries. To find alternatives – like Germany's WW-II 'synfuels' – we need big investments in R&D, which is not our strong suit. As a nation, we invest only 0.6% of our $4tn GDP in research. China invests 2.4% of $18tn, US 3.5% of $29tn. And our private sector is even stingier, accounting for only a third of the national R&D spend, as against 70% in US and S Korea. The rare earth crisis is a brief distraction, the real issue is India's rare investment problem, and it needs national attention now. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Iran warns it will target US bases if conflict erupts over nuke talks
If nuclear negotiations fail and conflict arises with the United States, Iran will strike American bases in the region, Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said on Wednesday, days ahead of a planned sixth round of Iran-US nuclear talks."Some officials on the other side threaten conflict if negotiations don't come to fruition. If a conflict is imposed on us ... all US bases are within our reach and we will boldly target them in host countries," Nasirzadeh said during a weekly press President Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened Iran with bombing if it does not reach a new nuclear deal. The next round of talks is due this week, with Trump saying negotiations would be held on Thursday while Tehran says they will take place on Sunday in is expected to hand a counter-proposal to a previous US offer for a nuclear deal it rejected, with Trump saying on Tuesday that Iran was becoming "much more aggressive" in nuclear and Washington have clashed on the issue on uranium enrichment on Iranian soil, which Western powers say is a potential pathway to the development of nuclear weapons. Iran holds that its nuclear programme is purely for civilian purposes."As we resume talks on Sunday, it is clear that an agreement that can ensure the continued peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program is within reach — and could be achieved rapidly," Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said in a post on X on sticking point in the talks has been Iran's missile programme. Ballistic missiles form an important part of Iran's said that Tehran recently tested a missile with a two-ton warhead and does not accept Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had said in February that Iran should further develop its military, including its missiles.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Increase in anti-dumping duty by U.S. on Indian shrimp a cause for concern
Andhra Pradesh has requested the Government of India (GoI) to solve the problem caused by an increase in anti-dumping duty imposed by the U.S. on Indian shrimps from 1.35% to 3.96% with retrospective effect from 2023-24, which entails a burden of ₹600 crore on seafood exporters from the State. Addressing a press conference here on Wednesday, AP Legislative Assembly Deputy Speaker and State Aquaculture Advisory Committee (SAAC) member K. Raghu Ramakrishna Raju and AP State Aquaculture Development Authority (APSADA) Co-Vice-Chairman Anam Venkata Ramana Reddy said Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu requested the Union Ministers of Finance, and Industry & Commerce to resolve the issues faced by seafood exporters in India by diplomatically engaging with the shrimp importing countries, particularly the U.S. He insisted on inclusion of harmonised system codes of Indian shrimp under the exemption list in order to protect the livelihood of lakhs of farmers and workers, and prevent the collapse of the sector that significantly contributed to the Gross State Domestic Product. SAAC recommendations They said the SAAC studied the issues that cropped up after the U.S. imposed the reciprocal tariffs on seafood exports from India, and came up with short, medium and long-term strategies for sustainability of the sector. The short-term measures included a reduction in the input costs such as lowering the power tariffs, waiver of import duties on brood-stock and feed to ease production pressure, waiver of 5% GST on packaged shrimp to unlock local consumption, stabilising farm gate prices, securing access to the European Union (EU) and small markets, enhancing export compliance by ensuring strict implementation of traceability for the sake of reducing export rejections, and leveraging re-export potential by activating fish re-export hubs and streamlining the port clearances. Mr. Ramakrishna Raju said the medium-term strategies recommended were to enforce 100% registration of farms, tackle trade barriers, promote cluster farm management, and expand product lines by incentivising ready-to-eat / cook shrimp for premium global markets. The long-term strategies included achieving brood-stock sufficiency, species and market diversification, and strengthening bio-security institutional reforms quality compliance. Mr. Venkata Ramana Reddy said the department had completed geo-tagging of all the existing 2.07 lakh aquaculture ponds and 3,800 aquaculture business units in the State and assigned 11-digit unique codes. A traceability app intended to create a digital platform with a central dashboard, real-time monitoring and analytics was in the process of development. APIIC Chairman M. Rama Raju was among others present.
