logo
Harvard's Indian Students Are Trapped in Trump's Visa Crossfire

Harvard's Indian Students Are Trapped in Trump's Visa Crossfire

The Wire2 days ago

Menu
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
World
Harvard's Indian Students Are Trapped in Trump's Visa Crossfire
DW
16 minutes ago
Indian students at Harvard say they are experiencing heightened stress over potential changes to student visa programs. The uncertainty is affecting academic performance and future planning for hundreds of students on campus.
Harvard University. Photo: www.harvard.edu.
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Contribute now
The Trump administration's recent revocation of Harvard's student visa certification has left the elite university's international scholars wondering what the future holds.
Nearly 800 students from India are enrolled at Harvard. Parthiv Patel,* a 25-year-old predoctoral fellow at Harvard Business School, told DW that he has hardly slept since the visa revocation was announced last week.
'There is anxiety and fear amongst the international students,' Patel said. 'We do not know who to turn to and what lies in store. You can understand the concerns.'
Along with costing him his visa status, Patel said, The Trump administration's threatened funding cuts could jeopardize his research.
'I am navigating an uncertain future,' Patel said. 'My research is tied to Harvard's resources — access to datasets, my adviser's mentorship and the collective environment here.
'If funding gets cut and international students are pushed out,' Patel said, 'what's left?'
The revocation of Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification by the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) means the university can no longer issue or sponsor F-1 or J-1 visas, which are required for international students to study legally in the US.
According to Harvard University, the move affects more than 7,000 international students, most of them in graduate programs.
International students with an Optional Practical Training (OPT) or STEM OPT, which allows postgraduation work authorization for up to three years, face additional complications.
Transferring to another institution could automatically terminate their OPT work authorization and disrupt their ability to work legally in the United States.
Although a federal judge in Boston issued a temporary restraining order on May 23 to block the revocation pending further hearings, the looming threat of deportation or forced transfers continues to weigh heavily on students.
An 'emotional toll'
Ananya Shukla, a public policy student at the Harvard Kennedy School, told DW that she faces the possibility of having to transfer to other educational institutions or risk losing her legal status to remain in the United States.
'I came here to build a future,' Shukla said, 'but now I'm just trying to hold on to what I've got.'
'I keep thinking: What if I have to transfer?' Shukla said. 'Will my credits even count? Will I get a visa for another school? It's like my entire future is on hold.'
'Not only are we left in limbo, our parents are anxious when we can't predict what can happen,' Shukla said. 'It is an incredible emotional toll.'
Many students to whom DW reached out were hesitant to speak on the phone or online because they feared being monitored and that discussing the issue could lead to disciplinary actions and further loss of opportunities.
Harvard fights back
The dispute between Harvard and the DHS hinges on the department's request to access student records, which includes data on disciplinary history, involvement in violence or threats and participation in protests.
In a statement released last week, Harvard spokesperson Jason A. Newton called the DHS's move 'unlawful' and wrote that Harvard was 'fully committed' to enrolling international students.
'This retaliatory action threatens serious harm to the Harvard community and our country,' Newton wrote, 'and undermines Harvard's academic and research mission.'
Students on Harvard's campus have protested Trump's crackdown on international students. Image: Rick Friedman/AFP
US shutting the door for international students
On Tuesday, the Trump administration further ordered US embassies around the world to stop scheduling appointments for student visas as it prepares to expand social media vetting of such applicants.
Indian students represent the largest cohort of international students at US universities, with more than 331,000 enrolled at higher-education institutions, according to the State Department.
Sandeep Sharma, the founder of the Mumbai-based NextGen Education India, which has helped place students abroad and provided career guidance, told DW that the Trump administration's clampdown has created a climate of fear and uncertainty, potentially deterring future international students from choosing US institutions.
'The students are in deep shock and depressed,' Sharma said. 'The recent developments are a reminder that even the best-laid plans can be vulnerable to politics. But students are resilient, and, as a community, we must ensure their dreams do not end at a policy wall.'
This article was first published on DW.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
The Mystery of Trump Order: A Grand Depression Setting in?
Trump's Coercive Attack on Harvard is Part of a Deeper Crisis That Universities Face Today
Has Trump 2.0 Deprioritised India? The Evidence is Clear.
Trump Admin Revokes Harvard University's Right to Enrol International Students
US to Impose Visa Restrictions on Foreign Officials Accused of Censoring Americans Abroad
The Trump Policy Tsunami: More Shock than Therapy?
'Stopped India and Pakistan From Fighting': Trump Once Again Reiterates Claim of Mediating Ceasefire
Trump and the Fantasy of a 'White Genocide'
India Rejects Claim That Trump's Trade Threat Averted War With Pakistan
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Congressmen support India's right to respond to terrorism
US Congressmen support India's right to respond to terrorism

Hindustan Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

US Congressmen support India's right to respond to terrorism

A group of US Congressmen on Wednesday expressed unequivocal and bipartisan condemnation for the Pahalgam terror attack and extended support for India's right to respond to terrorism in the spirit of zero tolerance against terrorism. The lawmakers also hailed the strong strategic partnership between India and the US during a meeting with an all-party delegation led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, who briefed them on the cross-border terrorism faced by India and the country's strong and resolute stance in the fight against terror. 'Bipartisan co-chairs @RoKhanna & @RepMcCormick and vice co-chairs @RepAndyBarr & @RepVeasey of India Caucus in the House of Representatives met with the visiting Parliamentary delegation led by @ShashiTharoor today,' the Indian Embassy said in a post on X. The parliamentary delegation briefed the Caucus members on the cross-border terrorism faced by India and New Delhi's strong and resolute stance in the fight against terror, it said. 'The Congressmen expressed unequivocal and bipartisan condemnation for the terror attack in Pahalgam. They expressed support for India's right to respond to terrorism in the spirit of zero tolerance against terrorism,' the Indian mission said. The all-party delegation also held candid and fruitful exchanges with House Foreign Affairs Committee (HFAC) leadership. 'Chair @RepBrianMast, Ranking Member @RepGregoryMeeks, South and Central Asia Subcommittee Chair @RepHuizenga, Ranking Member @RepKamlagerDove, Ranking Member @RepBera and East Asia and Pacific Subcommittee @RepYoungKim greeted the delegation,' the Indian Embassy said in another post on X. The parliamentary delegation briefed the committee members on the success of Operation Sindoor in defining a new normal in India's fight against cross-border terrorism. The committee leadership condemned the Pahalgam attack unequivocally and said India and USA stand together in their unwavering resolve and fight against terrorism in all its forms. The delegation is one of the seven multi-party delegations India had tasked to visit 33 global capitals to reach out to the international community to emphasise Pakistan's links to terrorism. Other members of the delegation are Sarfaraz Ahmad (JMM), Ganti Harish Madhur Balayogi (TDP), Shashank Mani Tripathi (BJP), Bhubaneswar Kalita (BJP), Milind Deora (Shiv Sena), Tejasvi Surya (BJP) and India's former Ambassador to the US Taranjit Sandhu. The delegation has travelled to Guyana, Panama, Colombia and Brazil before arriving in Washington on the last leg of its tour. In its interactions in the US, the delegation will convey India's resolve against terrorism and emphasise Pakistan's links to terrorism. Speaking to PTI, delegation member Deora said that the group in the US, as well as those visiting other regions and countries, is telling the world that 'India has had enough.' He said that every country they visited so far 'issued very unequivocal, I would almost say, unconditional, statements in favour of India.' 'We want to live in peace. We would prefer it if we have a stable neighbour. Nobody wants an unstable lunatic living next to you,' he said. Another delegation member Surya told PTI that there is absolutely no sympathy towards Pakistani-originated terrorism. The countries the delegation visited have 'very clearly understood why India was constrained to respond militarily in the way it did, and have supported India's counterterrorism measure.' On a Pakistani delegation arriving in Washington the same day, Deora said, 'There is no doubt in anyone's mind in the United States that Pakistan is a banana republic, a failed state, a terror exporter, a country where the civilian government has no power, (it's) the army that controls the power. So I don't think that it matters to India that there's a Pakistani delegation trying to play copy and paste.' Surya also said that it was not the 'first time that the Pakistanis tried to copy India in what India tries to do, but they end up a cheap copy.' He said that the world has long observed what India stands for and what Pakistan stands for. Investing in India, he said, is seen as an investment in democracy, responsible civilian leadership and global progress. On the other hand, he noted that every terrorist attack in the last 20-30 years that has rocked the world has had investigations directly or indirectly leading to Pakistan. He added that over 50 UN-designated terrorists have formed a safe haven in Pakistan. 'So the narrative of a country like Pakistan cannot be salvaged by an accented English speaking suit-wearing ex-foreign minister. Pakistan's hands are too full in blood to be washed away by this overnight drama,' Surya said. Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, with India carrying out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in the early hours of May 7. Pakistan attempted to attack Indian military bases on May 8, 9, and 10. The Indian side responded strongly to the Pakistani actions. The on-ground hostilities ended with an understanding of stopping the military actions following talks between the directors general of military operations of both sides on May 10.

Judge blocks private prison operator from housing ICE detainees at shuttered Kansas center
Judge blocks private prison operator from housing ICE detainees at shuttered Kansas center

Hindustan Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Judge blocks private prison operator from housing ICE detainees at shuttered Kansas center

LEAVENWORTH, Kan. — A judge on Wednesday barred a major U.S. private prison operator from housing immigrants facing possible deportation in a shuttered Kansas City area detention center unless it can get a permit from frustrated city officials. Leavenworth County Judge John Bryant agreed after a packed hearing to grant the city of Leavenworth's request for a temporary restraining order against CoreCivic, one of the nation's largest private prison operators. CoreCivic had claimed in legal filings that halting the opening of the 1,033-bed facility on the northwest outskirts of the Kansas City area would cost it $4.2 million in revenue each month. City officials said they anticipated the arrival of detainees apprehended by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement was imminent under a Trump administration crackdown on illegal immigration. Leavenworth isn't the first city where controversy has surrounded the reopening of a private prison as an ICE detention facility. In Newark, New Jersey, Mayor Ras Baraka sued the state's top federal prosecutor on Tuesday over his recent arrest on a trespassing charge at a federal immigration detention facility in that state, saying the Trump-appointed attorney had pursued the case out of political spite. Scott Peterson, the city manager for Leavenworth, said he didn't know if the case in Kansas marked the first time a municipality had prevailed in court. 'I would point out that maybe the reason we have seen some success here today is this is not about immigration,' Peterson said. 'This is not about private prisons. This is about land use.' In late 2021, CoreCivic stopped housing pretrial detainees for the U.S. Marshals Service in the Leavenworth facility after then-President Joe Biden called on the Justice Department to curb the use of private prisons. In the months leading up to the closure, the American Civil Liberties Union and federal public defenders urged the White House to speed up the closure, citing inmate rights violations there along with stabbings, suicides and even one homicide. But with President Donald Trump pushing for mass deportations under a wide-ranging crackdown on illegal immigration, the facility that CoreCivic now calls the Midwest Regional Reception Center is in demand again. It is located just 10 miles west of the Kansas City International Airport. As part of his crackdown, Trump has vowed to sharply increase detention beds nationwide from the budgeted 41,000 beds this year. Tennessee-based CoreCivic initially applied for a special use permit from the city in February but then withdrew that application the next month, arguing in court filings that it didn't need the permit and that the process would take too long. 'It became clear to CoreCivic that there was not a cooperative relationship,' said Taylor Concannon Hausmann, an attorney for the private prison operator, speaking in court. The city sued CoreCivic, the lawsuit claiming that CoreCivic impeded the city police force's ability to investigate sexual assaults and other violent crimes. The lawsuit contended that the permitting process was needed to safeguard itself from future problems. 'Just follow our rules," an attorney for the city, Joe Hatley, said in court. 'Go get a permit.' The first version of the lawsuit, filed in March in federal court, was tossed out in May on technical grounds. But Bryant sided with Hatley in the case refiled the same month in state court, finding that the proper procedures weren't followed. Concannon Hausmann, CoreCivic's attorney, declined to comment as the crowd filtered out of the courtroom Wednesday. Norman Mallicoat held a sign reading, 'CoreCivic Doesn't Run Leavenworth' as he left. 'I see this as basically a large company trying to bully a small city into getting what it wants and not having to follow the rules and ordinances of the city,' Mallicoat said.

Columbia University's accreditation under threat says Trump Admin amid allegations of ignoring Jewish students
Columbia University's accreditation under threat says Trump Admin amid allegations of ignoring Jewish students

Mint

time21 minutes ago

  • Mint

Columbia University's accreditation under threat says Trump Admin amid allegations of ignoring Jewish students

The US Department of Education announced on June 4 that Columbia University violated federal anti-discrimination laws, failing to protect Jewish students amid pro-Palestinian protests on campus. The department said this breach places Columbia in violation of the standards required by its accrediting agency, the Middle States Commission on Higher Education. Education Secretary Linda McMahon issued a strong statement, saying, 'The school's leadership acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students on its campus' following the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel. The Department formally notified the Middle States Commission, stressing that Columbia's actions violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Federal law requires accreditors to notify member institutions of such violations and implement a plan to restore compliance. 'If a university fails to come into compliance within a specified period, an accreditor must take appropriate action against its member institution,' the department stated. 'Accreditors have an enormous public responsibility as gatekeepers of federal student aid. They determine which institutions are eligible for federal student loans and Pell Grants. Just as the Department of Education has an obligation to uphold federal antidiscrimination law, university accreditors have an obligation to ensure member institutions abide by their standards,' she said. Columbia already lost $400 million in federal grants and contracts earlier this year, prompting layoffs of nearly 180 staff. The potential loss of accreditation could have far-reaching impacts, particularly for students who rely on federal aid. According to Columbia's website, 21% of undergraduates at Columbia College and Columbia Engineering receive Pell Grants. Trump escalating his confrontation with Harvard University on May 29 accused the institution of disrespecting the country and singling it out as a hotbed of antisemitism linked to anti-Israel protests. But, Trump praised Columbia University for being cooperative, despite also calling it 'very, very bad.' 'Harvard has to understand the last thing I want to do is hurt them. They're hurting themselves. They're fighting,' Trump said. 'Columbia has been very, very bad — what they've done, they're very antisemitic and lots of other things — but they're working with us on finding a solution.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store