U.S. consulate condemns Hong Kong's government for 'repression' of Independence Day celebrations
HONG KONG — The U.S. consulate in Hong Kong on Tuesday condemned the city's government for what it called repression of U.S. Independence Day celebrations after local education authorities reportedly cautioned teachers and students not to attend events marking the day and organized by American diplomats.
The consulate accused the Hong Kong government of interfering with U.S. Consulate General-hosted events, saying U.S. embassies and consulates worldwide celebrate Independence Day every year by hosting receptions and other festivities.
'We condemn the Hong Kong government's repression of U.S. Independence Day celebrations,' it said in an emailed reply to The Associated Press. 'Its attempts to characterize these activities as 'unlawful' only further reveals its insecurity and fear of freedom.'
The consulate's criticism came days after a Facebook page, 'Edu Lancet,' reported that the city's education authorities had sent 'friendly reminders' to multiple schools asking teachers not to 'casually join' the consulate's events and be cautious about violating the national security law. The reminder also asked the schools to discourage their students from joining the festivities, it said.
The Associated Press could not independently verify the claims by the Facebook page, which often provides updates about the education sector. A local English-language newspaper, the South China Morning Post, also reported that authorities had reminded schools to be vigilant about any attempts to promote U.S. Independence Day celebrations on campus.
The city's education bureau, in response to media queries, said it issued administrative and educational guidelines to schools, requiring them to take their own measures to safeguard national security, but did not confirm the reported nature of the reminders.
'Schools have the responsibility to be good gatekeepers and to enhance the sensitivity of teachers and students to national security,' it said.
Hong Kong Secretary for Security Chris Tang previously accused the founder of the Facebook page, Hans Yeung, of seizing opportunities to incite division in society in a media interview published in March.
Beijing imposed the national security law on Hong Kong in 2020 following massive anti-government protests in 2019, saying the legislation was necessary to return stability to the city.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economist
26 minutes ago
- Economist
A new Dutch museum tackles migration through art
Photograph: Adrian Paci Jun 25th 2025 | ROTTERDAM | 3 min read W ITH NATIVIST political parties riding high all over the world, it is not an easy time to celebrate immigrants. The Netherlands has had a reputation for welcoming refugees since the 16th century, but in the 21st it has been riven by arguments over Islam and multiculturalism. The Party for Freedom, led by Geert Wilders, a xenophobic rabble-rouser, came first in the most recent election; earlier this month Mr Wilders brought down the government in a spat over asylum-seekers. American and Irish writers dominate the list Rachel Zegler's streetside 'Evita' reveals a lot about fame and London In this week's list, the water is not so fine In a post-apocalyptic horror sequel, monsters and mockery co-exist A new book shows how the idea of a private sphere took shape over centuries A new book examines a much-worried-about phenomenon
Daily Mirror
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Daddy Donald' and the death of NATO dignity - How Rutte became Trump's puppet
A NATO Secretary General might endure many indignities in the name of diplomacy, including backroom compromises, bruising negotiations, and the occasional awkward photo op with despots in suits. But calling Donald Trump 'daddy' isn't one of them. At least, it never was until Mark Rutte arrived. The former Dutch prime minister and now NATO's top official referred to Trump as 'daddy' - a grotesque, grovelling gesture that might have raised eyebrows in a diplomatic dispatch but instead exploded into public farce during a high-stakes summit of alliance leaders. 'Sometimes daddy has to use strong words,' Rutte beamed, defending Trump's crude outburst in front of reporters, where the president shouted, 'They don't know what the f*** they're doing,'** in reference to the Iran-Israel ceasefire fiasco he claims to have masterminded. Forget diplomacy. Forget leadership. NATO, under Rutte, has started to resemble a glorified babysitting service for a toddler with nuclear launch codes. It would be laughable if it weren't so dangerous. Rutte's nauseating sycophancy is not just a personal humiliation; it's a strategic collapse. At a moment when the alliance should be asserting its independence and clarity of mission, it has instead wrapped itself around Trump's ego like a silk cravat on a noose. Gone is the guarded caution of past NATO heads. In its place, we now have something akin to Joseph Goebbels writing fan mail to Hitler - an image that feels uncomfortably close when you read the actual text message Rutte sent to Trump, which the president gleefully published. 'Congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran,' Rutte wrote, referring to Trump's unilateral bombing campaign. 'That was truly extraordinary, and something no one else dared to do. It makes us all safer.' It doesn't. And Rutte surely knows that. The strikes were condemned as reckless and 'unwise and unnecessary' by senior officials, who warned they could provoke the very conflict they were supposedly meant to deter. Trump's claim to have held the Israel-Iran ceasefire together lasted barely 24 hours. Rutte's message, meanwhile, read less like praise and more like erotic fiction. 'You are flying into another big success in The Hague this evening… Donald, you have driven us to a really, really important moment… You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done.' Who knew the nuclear deterrence strategy of the West hinged on breathless love notes? What makes Rutte's behaviour particularly grotesque is the sheer hypocrisy of it. As Dutch prime minister, he consistently failed to meet NATO's defence spending target of two per cent of gross domestic product. Now, in his desperate quest to stay in Trump's favour, he's bragging about getting European leaders to commit to a staggering five per cent of GDP on defence - a militaristic fantasy straight from Trump's own wet dreams. Rutte has gone from pragmatic European liberal to a kind of grinning courtier, performing loyalty rituals for an emperor with no clothes. He's not the only one, of course. NATO leaders have spent the latest summit tiptoeing around Trump like terrified interns trying not to spill coffee on a tantrum-prone CEO. The summit was stripped down to three hours. The official communique was slashed to a single page. Not to streamline diplomacy, but to avoid provoking Trump into one of his trademark rage exits. It would be comical if the stakes weren't existential. The alliance was forged to deter tyranny, defend liberal democracy, and confront authoritarianism. Under Rutte, it is flirting with all three. The Secretary General's job is to unify 31 nations in a common cause, not whisper sweet nothings to a man who once threatened to pull America out of the alliance entirely. What kind of message does this send to allies? To Russia? To Iran? To China? That NATO no longer leads, it follows - not strategy, not principle, but personality. And that the only way to hold the West together is to soothe the tantrums of a man who treats global diplomacy like reality TV. We can't afford this. NATO is not Mar-a-Lago with fighter jets. Its credibility is fragile, its mission vital, and its unity under threat from within. Mark Rutte was supposed to bring experience and backbone to the role. Instead, he's turned NATO into a stage for Trump's delusions. While porn star Stormy Daniels may have once called Trump 'daddy', Rutte's humiliation came without even taking off his clothes.
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Trump criticised for climate policy as William celebrates Earthshot finalists
Trump criticised for climate policy as William celebrates Earthshot finalists William met the 2024 cohort of his environmental award during an event marking London Climate Action Week, and said governments, businesses and innovators needed to work together to "fix" the problems affecting he globe. United States President Donald Trump (Image: Anadolu via Getty Images ) The Prince of Wales heard US President Donald Trump criticised for abandoning a major climate change agreement as he celebrated Earthshot Prize finalists. William met the 2024 cohort of his environmental award during an event marking London Climate Action Week, and said governments, businesses and innovators needed to work together to "fix" the problems affecting he globe. He described how he was "very excited" to be visiting to Rio de Janeiro in November, the host city for this year's Earthshot Prize, and praised the Brazilians, saying: "I think they epitomise the approach to what we can do more sustainably – the vibrancy, the energy, the enthusiasm." Rio's mayor Eduardo Paes told guests, including William during a discussion with his London counterpart, Sir Sadiq Khan: "Local governments are the ones that are going to deliver. "I mean, I don't want to do any politics here but we saw what Donald Trump did in his first term. If it were not for the local governments, the mayors, the US would be in big trouble." Mr Trump announced his decision to withdraw America from the Paris climate agreement at the start of his first term in 2017, a move that was countered by some US mayors. Article continues below Los Angeles's then-mayor Eric Garcetti helped to rally a number of his counterparts across the US to commit to the agreement that saw world leaders pledge to try to prevent global temperatures rising by more than 1.5C above "pre-industrial" levels. The event was hosted by former New York Mayor and business news mogul Mike Bloomberg, a global advisor to Earthshot Prize winners, at his landmark offices in the City of London. In his introductory speech, Mr Bloomberg also criticised the American administration but did not mention the president by name. He said: "There's a good reason to be optimistic, lots of problems around the world, America has not been doing its share lately to make things better, I don't think, nevertheless, I'm very optimistic about the future..." Rio's mayor announced his city's Museum of Tomorrow, a science museum, would host the Earthshot awards ceremony and it was later confirmed it would be held on November 5. Before the discussions the future king, Earthshot's founder and president, met some of the 2024 finalists and winners in the five categories, or Earthshots – Protect and restore nature; Clean our air, Revive our oceans; Build a waste-free world; and Fix our climate. William chatted to Francis Nderitu, founder and managing director of Keep IT Cool, a Kenya-based company using solar-powered refrigeration to help cut harvest waste for farmers, which won the Build a waste-free world award. When he asked the entrepreneur if he had "noticed more visibility in your products (because) of Earthshot", Mr Nderitu replied "of course!" William took part in a group discussion with Dara Khosrowshahi, chief executive of Uber, which is an Earthshot supporter. The prince told the guests: "A lot of people think the Earthshot Prize is just about climate change, it really isn't. "It's about waste, it's about plastic pollution, it's about the health of our oceans, about the air we breathe, it's all the things that we as human beings care about." He added: "And I think I'm really proud of how the solutions have come together and the impact they've had. "We've restored 170,000 square kilometres of land and ocean, we've sequestered 420,000 tons of CO2, and we've benefited 4.4 million people so far." Co-hosting the event was Earthshot ambassador Robert Irwin, the son of the late wildlife conservationist Steve Irwin, who later when asked about America's lack of leadership on the environment replied: "At the end of the day, if you're in the environmental space politics is going to play a role, in fact, a very big role. "And now more than ever before we need policymakers, we need governments to come on the journey with us, with the private sector, with technology, with transport, with businesses, with e-commerce, with individuals, with passionate advocates. Article continues below "They've got to come along on this journey with us and create incentives, create a reason, create a why for us all to buckle down and get the work done and face climate change."
