logo
‘Gandalf' accused of selling illegal medicinal cannabis in New Zealand

‘Gandalf' accused of selling illegal medicinal cannabis in New Zealand

The Guardian03-03-2025

Police have shut down the alleged medicinal cannabis operation of one of New Zealand's most renowned 'green fairies', prompting an outpouring of support from a prominent politician and the hundreds of people who rely on such products to ease their pain.
Police raided the rural Northland property of 66-year-old Paul Smith – more widely known as 'Gandalf' – last week, destroying plants and greenhouses and seizing cannabis products. Smith was charged with cultivating, possessing for supply and selling cannabis – which could carry an eight-year jail sentence – and was summonsed to court.
Medicinal cannabis has been legal in New Zealand since 2020, but patients are reliant on gaining a doctor's prescription to access it for treatment. So-called 'green fairies' provide cheaper, more readily available, hidden market products.
More than 50 protesters gathered outside Whangārei District Court on Monday where Smith pleaded not guilty to the charges.
'This isn't just an attack on one man, it's an assault on hundreds of patients who rely on … affordable relief,' said protest organiser Pearl Schomburg, who is a patient of Gandalf's and the convener of Auckland Patients Group – an advocacy group pushing for cannabis law reform.
About a dozen police officers arrived at Gandalf's property last week with sledgehammers and axes to destroy roughly 40 plants and greenhouses, Schomburg told the Guardian.
'They ransacked his house and took away all of his … thank-you cards and letters.'
Smith was 'no criminal mastermind' she said. 'He's a compassionate, barefoot hippy with a battered truck and a heart of gold.'
People wishing to access medicinal cannabis do not always succeed in obtaining a prescription or can feel discomfort asking their doctors for one, due to the stigma surrounding cannabis. For others, the up to $400 a month price-tag puts the legal products out of reach, Schomburg said.
'The only people that can access legal cannabis currently in New Zealand are the wealthy – there is not equality of access to these products,' she said.
Smith thanked his supporters in a short video shared to social media and a donations page set up to help pay for his legal fees.
'To all you lovely people out there, I give you a big hug, a heartfelt thanks for all your kind words and support … I've never experienced anything like this in all my life.'
Cannabis is New Zealand's most commonly used illicit drug, with over half a million adults having used it between 2023 and 2024, according to the NZ Health Survey. In 2020, the country narrowly voted against legalising cannabis.
Green Party co-leader, Chlöe Swarbrick threw her support behind the protesters, saying the raid on Smith was 'an absolutely abysmal waste of public resources'.
The costly 'war on drugs' had done little to reduce drug use or move addiction statistics, she said, adding that a new approach based in harm reduction and evidence was necessary.
Swarbrick – who has long advocated for the legalisation of cannabis – pointed to a recent Massey University study showing two-thirds of New Zealand's medicinal cannabis users still access it through the hidden market, mostly due to the expense of legal cannabis.
'That should be a really clear sign that the rules that we have in place right now are not working, and that we should do something about [them]… instead of terrorising a 66-year-old man.'
In a statement to the Guardian, the police said it would be inappropriate for them to comment on Smith's case, as the matter was before the courts.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘We don't want to go back to court', says women's group over gender ruling delay
‘We don't want to go back to court', says women's group over gender ruling delay

Rhyl Journal

time13 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

‘We don't want to go back to court', says women's group over gender ruling delay

For Women Scotland (FWS) challenged the meaning of a woman in the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act, with the UK's highest court ruling the definition in the 2010 Equality Act referred to biological sex. The decision is likely to have far-reaching implications for transgender people in accessing services, but the Scottish Government has declined to make changes to guidance until the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) issues its own guidance, which is expected to take place in the coming months. But speaking at a fringe event at the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, FWS co-director Susan Smith said the group was considering a further legal challenge against the Government. Speaking to journalists after the event, she said: 'We have spoken to the Scottish Government and asked them to withdraw some of this guidance, just to say that it's under review – they don't have to re-issue anything at this point – because it's clearly unlawful, we really do need some action. 'They're telling us they have to wait for the EHRC revised guidance and we don't believe this is true.' Ms Smith added that, if a woman were to be assaulted in prison by a transgender prisoner, the Government could be taken to court by the victim. 'I think they need to step up and take a bit of responsibility because these things are under their remit,' she said. She added: 'We don't want to go back to court, we really, really don't, but if we don't see some action that may be something we will have to consider.' Ms Smith said the group is speaking with its lawyers but she would not say if there was a timeline for action to begin. The co-director stressed that if ministers were concerned about a challenge to their guidance from the pro-trans rights side of the argument, they should be worried about one from FWS and other such groups too. 'They seem worried about a legal challenge from the other side,' she said. 'But my message to them would be they should be more worried about a legal challenge from the people who have the law on their side.' Ms Smith was joined at the fringe meeting – which was hosted by Tory MSP Pam Gosal – by former foreign secretary James Cleverly. Mr Cleverly was part of the Conservative-led government which blocked the Scottish Government's controversial gender reforms. The Government proposed removing the need for a diagnosis of gender dysphoria as a requirement for obtaining a gender recognition certificate – a process known as self identification. The move was scuppered by then-Scottish secretary Alister Jack, who used Section 35 of the Scotland Act to block the legislation. Mr Cleverly told attendees the move showed the 'importance of the union'. 'This issue was clearly spiralling out of control, badly out of control,' he said.

‘We don't want to go back to court', says women's group over gender ruling delay
‘We don't want to go back to court', says women's group over gender ruling delay

North Wales Chronicle

time13 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

‘We don't want to go back to court', says women's group over gender ruling delay

For Women Scotland (FWS) challenged the meaning of a woman in the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act, with the UK's highest court ruling the definition in the 2010 Equality Act referred to biological sex. The decision is likely to have far-reaching implications for transgender people in accessing services, but the Scottish Government has declined to make changes to guidance until the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) issues its own guidance, which is expected to take place in the coming months. But speaking at a fringe event at the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, FWS co-director Susan Smith said the group was considering a further legal challenge against the Government. Speaking to journalists after the event, she said: 'We have spoken to the Scottish Government and asked them to withdraw some of this guidance, just to say that it's under review – they don't have to re-issue anything at this point – because it's clearly unlawful, we really do need some action. 'They're telling us they have to wait for the EHRC revised guidance and we don't believe this is true.' Ms Smith added that, if a woman were to be assaulted in prison by a transgender prisoner, the Government could be taken to court by the victim. 'I think they need to step up and take a bit of responsibility because these things are under their remit,' she said. She added: 'We don't want to go back to court, we really, really don't, but if we don't see some action that may be something we will have to consider.' Ms Smith said the group is speaking with its lawyers but she would not say if there was a timeline for action to begin. The co-director stressed that if ministers were concerned about a challenge to their guidance from the pro-trans rights side of the argument, they should be worried about one from FWS and other such groups too. 'They seem worried about a legal challenge from the other side,' she said. 'But my message to them would be they should be more worried about a legal challenge from the people who have the law on their side.' Ms Smith was joined at the fringe meeting – which was hosted by Tory MSP Pam Gosal – by former foreign secretary James Cleverly. Mr Cleverly was part of the Conservative-led government which blocked the Scottish Government's controversial gender reforms. The Government proposed removing the need for a diagnosis of gender dysphoria as a requirement for obtaining a gender recognition certificate – a process known as self identification. The move was scuppered by then-Scottish secretary Alister Jack, who used Section 35 of the Scotland Act to block the legislation. Mr Cleverly told attendees the move showed the 'importance of the union'. 'This issue was clearly spiralling out of control, badly out of control,' he said.

‘We don't want to go back to court', says women's group over gender ruling delay
‘We don't want to go back to court', says women's group over gender ruling delay

South Wales Argus

time13 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

‘We don't want to go back to court', says women's group over gender ruling delay

For Women Scotland (FWS) challenged the meaning of a woman in the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act, with the UK's highest court ruling the definition in the 2010 Equality Act referred to biological sex. The decision is likely to have far-reaching implications for transgender people in accessing services, but the Scottish Government has declined to make changes to guidance until the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) issues its own guidance, which is expected to take place in the coming months. But speaking at a fringe event at the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, FWS co-director Susan Smith said the group was considering a further legal challenge against the Government. Speaking to journalists after the event, she said: 'We have spoken to the Scottish Government and asked them to withdraw some of this guidance, just to say that it's under review – they don't have to re-issue anything at this point – because it's clearly unlawful, we really do need some action. 'They're telling us they have to wait for the EHRC revised guidance and we don't believe this is true.' Ms Smith added that, if a woman were to be assaulted in prison by a transgender prisoner, the Government could be taken to court by the victim. 'I think they need to step up and take a bit of responsibility because these things are under their remit,' she said. She added: 'We don't want to go back to court, we really, really don't, but if we don't see some action that may be something we will have to consider.' Former foreign secretary James Cleverly was also in attendance at the event (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Ms Smith said the group is speaking with its lawyers but she would not say if there was a timeline for action to begin. The co-director stressed that if ministers were concerned about a challenge to their guidance from the pro-trans rights side of the argument, they should be worried about one from FWS and other such groups too. 'They seem worried about a legal challenge from the other side,' she said. 'But my message to them would be they should be more worried about a legal challenge from the people who have the law on their side.' Ms Smith was joined at the fringe meeting – which was hosted by Tory MSP Pam Gosal – by former foreign secretary James Cleverly. Mr Cleverly was part of the Conservative-led government which blocked the Scottish Government's controversial gender reforms. The Government proposed removing the need for a diagnosis of gender dysphoria as a requirement for obtaining a gender recognition certificate – a process known as self identification. The move was scuppered by then-Scottish secretary Alister Jack, who used Section 35 of the Scotland Act to block the legislation. Mr Cleverly told attendees the move showed the 'importance of the union'. 'This issue was clearly spiralling out of control, badly out of control,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store