Smoking doesn't explain greater COPD risk for women
May 9 (UPI) -- Smoking can't explain why women are more at risk for COPD, a new study says.
Women are about 50% more likely than men to develop COPD even though they are less likely to smoke, researchers reported Thursday in the journal BMJ Open Respiratory Research.
Smoking tobacco is the main cause of COPD, the umbrella term for chronic breathing problems like emphysema and bronchitis, researchers say.
But the COPD rate is higher among women than men, even though women don't smoke as much as men, results show.
The results refute the notion that women are more vulnerable to tobacco smoke than men, which had previously been floated to explain why more women suffer COPD, researchers said.
"The higher risk of COPD in women was not explained by higher susceptibility to cigarette smoke as measured by either smoking status or pack-year exposure," wrote a team led by Dr. Alexander Steinberg, an assistant professor of clinical practice at the University of Washington in Seattle.
"In fact, women had a nearly identical increase in risk of COPD for every 10 pack-years of cigarette use when compared with men," researchers wrote. Pack-years measure how much a person has smoked by multiplying the packs smoked per day by the number of years a person has smoked.
"This then begs the important question of what is driving high rates of COPD among women," researchers added.
For the study, they analyzed responses from more than 12,600 women and nearly 10,400 men 40 and older who participated in the National Health Interview Survey, an annual poll conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to track American health.
Women were less likely to be current or former smokers than men, and those who did smoke tended to burn through fewer cigarettes per day than men, researchers found.
Women also were more likely to have smoked for fewer years, and less likely to have started smoking younger than 15.
Nevertheless, just under 8% of women suffered from COPD compared to about 6.5% for men, results showed.
Women with COPD were more likely to have never smoked cigarettes than men with the condition, nearly 27% compared with just over 14%, researchers found.
They also were less likely to use other tobacco products except for e-cigarettes, nearly 27% compared with 20%, the study says.
Overall, women had a 47% higher risk of being diagnosed with COPD than men, after accounting for other risk factors, researchers concluded.
This gender difference persisted regardless of smoking history. Women who never smoked were 62% more likely to be diagnosed with COPD than men, and those who had ever smoked were 43% more likely, results show.
Several theories might explain why women are more at risk for COPD even though they don't smoke as much as men, researchers said.
"Studies have suggested that increased inhalation exposure from traditionally female-predominated occupations, home heating and cooking, aerosolized hair and beauty products and household cleaning products may contribute to higher rates of COPD in women," researchers wrote.
Women also tend to have smaller airways than men, which might make them more susceptible to breathing problems, researchers noted.
"Our research raises uncertainty about the common assumption that increased vulnerability to cigarette smoke is driving the gender divide in COPD," researchers concluded.
More information
Cleveland Clinic has more about COPD.
Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The wrestler in lipstick: Why Olympian Amit Elor prioritizes pre-match glam (and romance novels)
Amit Elor makes flourishing in a male-dominated sport look easy. As a 20-year-old competing at the Paris Olympics last year, she became the youngest American — male or female — to win a gold medal in wrestling. These days, the Gen Z-er can be found documenting her life on and off the mat on social media. Sometimes, that means lifting weights. Other times, it's wearing sheet masks. 'I feel feminine even when I'm wrestling,' Elor, 21, tells me during a conversation for Yahoo Life's OT Diaries. 'It's important for me to do things like paint my nails before every competition. I like to match the color of the rubber bands on my hair to my singlet or to my socks if I possibly can.' This isn't something that was always important to her. She recalls being a tomboy when she was younger and refusing to wear dresses or skirts. 'It's probably part of growing up with the sport and wrestling only boys, that I felt like I couldn't show that side of me,' she says. 'So it's kind of been a process of feeling comfortable with my femininity and feeling comfortable expressing it and looking girly and wearing dresses and putting makeup [on].' These days, applying lipstick and nail polish and having her mom help with braiding her hair are pre-competition rituals for Elor, who likes to bake and read romance novels in her downtime. Here's what she says about how these interests help her find balance as a young athlete. Well, first and foremost, I'm making sure to have fun every single practice, even if it's super-intense and it's not fun. I think the environment really helps, and when your teammates are messing around, your coaches are positive, that helps too. And then, of course, having things outside of the sport, like hobbies. I really love cooking and baking. I'm a huge foodie, so if I travel somewhere else and I know that this place is known for croissants or something like that, I'll go and give it a try. I love traveling too, and wrestling allows me to travel a lot. Recently, I also got into reading, and I've been on a romance streak, which has been great. Everybody says balance is key, but balance is hard. You have to put in effort to be able to balance something, but I think that truly is the best. You see a lot with high school wrestlers when they start wrestling, [that] sometimes they're too extreme. They'll not eat for a few days or they'll eat just one thing. My goal is to still get to eat my favorite foods. Unfortunately, when it is closer to the competition, I have to do that in moderation. And it's totally possible and it's actually the better choice, right, to be eating a lot throughout the day, fueling yourself and then putting the work out there on the mat. So obviously, I can't always eat exactly what I want and the amount I want. But I know it's a timing thing too, right? After the competition, it's really fun to go out to eat and really celebrate. It gets a little bit complicated. … If somebody is going up in a weight class, the goal will be to gain muscle and strength. But sometimes [it's the opposite]. I've had this personal struggle that I'm eating well, I'm training hard, but I'm lifting so much that I'm actually gaining muscle, and it's making it harder to drop down a weight. So I've had strength coaches tell me, 'Decrease your reps, go heavy weight, low reps.' So there's these alterations we'll make when we do have to be a certain weight class. And sometimes it's flexible and we can [compete at] our natural weight. But other times it is complicated because one [weight class] is closed, or we're trying to make the strongest team and stuff like that. I think the gym is my safe place, along with the wrestling mat. I enjoy lifting and working out just as much as I do wrestling. It's really fun. I love active recovery. On a rest day or when I have time, I really enjoy walking. I can lose myself during a walk and just walk forever. One thing I was doing a lot before the Olympics, actually, was walking while reading, like an actual book. And I would just do this for one to two hours every day. It was helping me a lot. I would do it on a walking pad. I did it once at this field outside my house, but I've gotten pretty good at relying on my peripheral vision. I have at least one full rest day a week. I'm also generally trying to get better at listening to my body. I recently got really into ice baths. I really enjoy it. I love the feeling after, that kind of high you get from enduring all the cold. … The longest I've done is 10 minutes. But just doing five [minutes], I get the benefits of it. The hardest part is the first 30 seconds to one minute, because your body is adjusting and you're breathing really hard. But then after that, you just feel coolness and your body adjusts. It's actually really cool how your body is able to adjust and then suddenly you feel fine. Wrestlers love the sauna. We go to the sauna probably almost every day for 15 to 20 minutes at least. It's awesome. Seeing all the women that are getting more comfortable flexing, working out, lifting and becoming stronger versions of themselves, it's really inspiring. And it makes me feel a little bit more confident to put myself out there too. Growing up, I was pretty lucky that I was never, never told to be a smaller version of myself. My parents never told me to cut weight. I always ate as much as I wanted and I always loved the feeling of being strong and looking strong. I think that's something that's really important for me to share with other girls, especially even within wrestling: that the smaller version of ourselves may not necessarily be the best version of ourselves. And we really need to pay attention to how we feel, and not just how we look. Life is worth living, and it's so, so fun doing all these things and getting to eat all these delicious things and all that. I've always been a huge fan of peanut butter or almond butter. I love dipping apples in almond butter. That's delicious. I'm crazy about Greek yogurt. I can have that for breakfast, lunch and dinner. It's the perfect snack with honey. I had a phase where I really liked protein oatmeal. So you blend oatmeal and protein powder with some almond milk and other things and you can microwave it or bake it or cook it, whatever. It's literally like a dessert. It's so delicious. I'm huge on dark chocolate. I need to have dark chocolate with me all the time. Sometimes I have like half a bar to a bar of dark chocolate every single day. It makes me happy. It's more of a ritual, you know. … That feeling when my hair is braided and I put my singlet on, nothing compares to it. It's that specific competition feeling. I'm ready to go. It's only my mom [that does my hair] just because I'm so used to it and I trust her. If something works for me in competition, I like to replicate it. Sometimes I've been fixated on the same pair of shoes, and if I lose wearing a pair of shoes, I probably won't compete in those again. So I get a little superstitious about that stuff. My strength coach gave me a very special bracelet as a gift. It had engraved on it something in Latin that meant 'I believe,' and it was just so meaningful to me. The night before I left for Paris, I spent like four or five hours looking all over my room and I couldn't find it. I had to leave for Paris without this bracelet that was so special to me, and I remember feeling really superstitious. I was like, I don't have the bracelet. How am I gonna perform? I'm probably not gonna win. They're little, little feelings. But I know at the same time that they don't mean anything as far as competition. But here and there, if I am feeling a superstition, I'm able to go with the flow with it. Always my mom. Probably Friends or Futurama. Ice cream. I can have ice cream for breakfast, lunch and dinner. My biggest fear is regret. I want to make sure I live life to the fullest. When people pick their nose or their ears, that gives me the ick. Greek yogurt. And I'm a water girl. I can say that I drink water every day. Probably food videos, like food reviews or 'what I eat in a day.' I just love it. And then I start looking at restaurants and then saving them. I'm a foodie. ChapStick, I can't go [anywhere] without ChapStick. I recently spent a month in Brazil, so I've been listening to an album of Brazilian funk music. I can't understand a lot of it. But the vibe gets me hyped up for a workout. I don't follow that many wellness trends. Always stretching before you work out. I'm probably the best baker my friends and family know. I played saxophone when I was in middle school and I'm trying to relearn and get better at it. This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.


The Intercept
an hour ago
- The Intercept
Whose National Security? OpenAI's Vision for American Techno-Dominance
OpenAI has always said it's a different kind of Big Tech titan, founded not just to rack up a stratospheric valuation of $400 billion (and counting), but also to 'ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity.' The meteoric machine-learning firm announced itself to the world in a December 2015 press release that lays out a vision of technology to benefit all people as people, not citizens. There are neither good guys nor adversaries. 'Our goal is to advance digital intelligence in the way that is most likely to benefit humanity as a whole,' the announcement stated with confidence. 'Since our research is free from financial obligations, we can better focus on a positive human impact.' Early rhetoric from the company and its CEO, Sam Altman, described advanced artificial intelligence as a harbinger of a globalist utopia, a technology that wouldn't be walled off by national or corporate boundaries but enjoyed together by the species that birthed it. In an early interview with Altman and fellow OpenAI co-founder Elon Musk, Altman described a vision of artificial intelligence 'freely owned by the world' in common. When Vanity Fair asked in a 2015 interview why the company hadn't set out as a for-profit venture, Altman replied: 'I think that the misaligned incentives there would be suboptimal to the world as a whole.' Times have changed. And OpenAI wants the White House to think it has too. In a March 13 white paper submitted directly to the Trump administration, OpenAI's global affairs chief Chris Lehane pitched a near future of AI built for the explicit purpose of maintaining American hegemony and thwarting the interests of its geopolitical competitors — specifically China. The policy paper's mentions of freedom abound, but the proposal's true byword is national security. OpenAI never attempts to reconcile its full-throated support of American security with its claims to work for the whole planet, not a single country. After opening with a quotation from Trump's own executive order on AI, the action plan proposes that the government create a direct line for the AI industry to reach the entire national security community, work with OpenAI 'to develop custom models for national security,' and increase intelligence sharing between industry and spy agencies 'to mitigate national security risks,' namely from China. In the place of techno-globalism, OpenAI outlines a Cold Warrior exhortation to divide the world into camps. OpenAI will ally with those 'countries who prefer to build AI on democratic rails,' and get them to commit to 'deploy AI in line with democratic principles set out by the US government.' The rhetoric seems pulled directly from the keyboard of an 'America First' foreign policy hawk like Marco Rubio or Rep. Mike Gallagher, not a company whose website still endorses the goal of lifting up the whole world. The word 'humanity,' in fact, never appears in the action plan. Rather, the plan asks Trump, to whom Altman donated $1 million for his inauguration ceremony, to 'ensure that American-led AI prevails over CCP-led AI' — the Chinese Communist Party — 'securing both American leadership on AI and a brighter future for all Americans.' It's an inherently nationalist pitch: The concepts of 'democratic values' and 'democratic infrastructure' are both left largely undefined beyond their American-ness. What is democratic AI? American AI. What is American AI? The AI of freedom. And regulation of any kind, of course, 'may hinder our economic competitiveness and undermine our national security,' Lehane writes, suggesting a total merging of corporate and national interests. In an emailed statement, OpenAI spokesperson Liz Bourgeois declined to explain the company's nationalist pivot but defended its national security work. 'We believe working closely with the U.S. government is critical to advancing our mission of ensuring AGI benefits all of humanity,' Bourgeois wrote. 'The U.S. is uniquely positioned to help shape global norms around safe, secure, and broadly beneficial AI development—rooted in democratic values and international collaboration.' The Intercept is currently suing OpenAI in federal court over the company's use of copyrighted articles to train its chatbot ChatGPT. OpenAI's newfound patriotism is loud. But is it real? In his 2015 interview with Musk, Altman spoke of artificial intelligence as a technology so special and so powerful that it ought to transcend national considerations. Pressed on OpenAI's goal to share artificial intelligence technology globally rather than keeping it under domestic control, Altman provided an answer far more ambivalent than the company's current day mega-patriotism: 'If only one person gets to have it, how do you decide if that should be Google or the U.S. government or the Chinese government or ISIS or who?' He also said, in the early days of OpenAI, that there may be limits to what his company might do for his country. 'I unabashedly love this country, which is the greatest country in the world,' Altman told the New Yorker in 2016. 'But some things we will never do with the Department of Defense.' In the profile, he expressed ambivalence about overtures to OpenAI from then-Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter, who envisioned using the company's tools for targeting purposes. At the time, this would have run afoul of the company's own ethical guidelines, which for years stated explicitly that customers could not use its services for 'military and warfare' purposes, writing off any Pentagon contracting entirely. In January 2024, The Intercept reported that OpenAI had deleted this military contracting ban from its policies without explanation or announcement. Asked about how the policy reversal might affect business with other countries in an interview with Bloomberg, OpenAI executive Anna Makanju said the company is 'focused on United States national security agencies.' But insiders who spoke with The Intercept on conditions of anonymity suggested that the company's turn to jingoism may come more from opportunism than patriotism. Though Altman has long been on the record as endorsing corporate support of the United States, under an administration where the personal favor of the president means far more than the will of lawmakers, parroting muscular foreign policy rhetoric is good for business. One OpenAI source who spoke with The Intercept recalled concerned discussions about the possibility that the U.S. government would nationalize the company. They said that at times, this was discussed with the company's head of national security partnerships, Katrina Mulligan. Mulligan joined the company in February 2024 after a career in the U.S. intelligence and military establishment, including leading the media and public policy response to Edward Snowden's leaks while on the Obama National Security Council staff, working for the director of national intelligence, serving as a senior civilian overseeing Special Operations forces in the Pentagon, and working as chief of staff to the secretary of the Army. This source speculated that fostering closeness with the government was one method of fending off the potential risk of nationalization. As an independent research organization with ostensibly noble, global goals, OpenAI may have been less equipped to beat back regulatory intervention, a second former OpenAI employee suggested. What we see now, they said, is the company 'transitioning from presenting themselves as a nonprofit with very altruistic, pro-humanity aims, to presenting themselves as an economic and military powerhouse that the government needs to support, shelter, and cut red tape on behalf of.' The second source said they believed the national security rhetoric was indicative of OpenAI 'sucking up to the administration,' not a genuinely held commitment by executives. 'In terms of how decisions were actually made, what seemed to be the deciding factor was basically how can OpenAI win the race rather than anything to do with either humanity or national security,' they added. 'In today's political environment, it's a winning move with the administration to talk about America winning and national security and stuff like that. But you should not confuse that for the actual thing that's driving decision-making internally.' The person said that talk of preventing Chinese dominance over artificial intelligence likely reflects business, not political, anxieties. 'I think that's not their goal,' they said. 'I think their goal is to maintain their own control over the most powerful stuff.' 'I also talked to some people who work at OpenAI who weren't from the U.S. who were feeling like … 'What's going to happen to my country?'' But even if its motivations are cynical, company sources told The Intercept that national security considerations still pervaded OpenAI. The first source recalled a member of OpenAI's corporate security team regularly engaging with the U.S. intelligence community to safeguard the company's ultra-valuable machine-learning models. The second recalled concern about the extent of the government's relationship — and potential control over — OpenAI's technology. A common fear among AI safety researchers is a future scenario in which artificial intelligence models begin autonomously designing newer versions, ad infinitum, leading human engineers to lose control. 'One reason why the military AI angle could be bad for safety is that you end up getting the same sort of thing with AIs designing successors designing successors, except that it's happening in a military black project instead of in a somewhat more transparent corporation,' the second source said. 'Occasionally there'd be talk of, like, eventually the government will wake up, and there'll be a nuclear power plant next to a data center next to a bunker, and we'll all be moved into the bunker so that we can, like, beat China by managing an intelligence explosion,' they added. At a company that recruits top engineering talent internationally, the prospect of American dominance of a technology they believe could be cataclysmic was at times disquieting. 'I remember I also talked to some people who work at OpenAI who weren't from the U.S. who were feeling kind of sad about that and being like, 'What's going to happen to my country after the U.S. gets all the super intelligences?'' Sincerity aside, OpenAI has spent the past year training its corporate algorithm on flag-waving, defense lobbying, and a strident anticommunism that smacks more of the John Birch Society than the Whole Earth Catalog. In his white paper, Lehane, a former press secretary for Vice President Al Gore and special counsel to President Bill Clinton, advocates not for a globalist techno-utopia in which artificial intelligence jointly benefits the world, but a benevolent jingoism in which freedom and prosperity is underwritten by the guarantee of American dominance. While the document notes fleetingly, in its very last line, the idea of 'work toward AI that benefits everyone,' the pitch is not one of true global benefit, but of American prosperity that trickles down to its allies. The company proposes strict rules walling off parts of the world, namely China, from AI's benefits, on the grounds that they are simply too dangerous to be trusted. OpenAI explicitly advocates for conceiving of the AI market not as an international one, but 'the entire world less the PRC' — the People's Republic of China — 'and its few allies,' a line that quietly excludes over 1 billion people from the humanity the company says it wishes to benefit and millions who live under U.S.-allied authoritarian rule. In pursuit of 'democratic values,' OpenAI proposes dividing the entire planet into three tiers. At the top: 'Countries that commit to democratic AI principles by deploying AI systems in ways that promote more freedoms for their citizens could be considered Tier I countries.' Given the earlier mention of building 'AI in line with democratic principles set out by the US government,' this group's membership is clear: the United States, and its friends. In pursuit of 'democratic values,' OpenAI proposes dividing the entire planet into three tiers. Beneath them are Tier 2 countries, a geopolitical purgatory defined only as those that have failed to sufficiently enforce American export control policies and protect American intellectual property from Tier 3: Communist China. 'CCP-led China, along with a small cohort of countries aligned with the CCP, would represent its own category that is prohibited from accessing democratic AI systems,' the paper explains. To keep these barriers intact — while allowing for the chance that Tier 2 countries might someday graduate to the top — OpenAI suggests coordinating 'global bans on CCP-aligned AI' and 'prohibiting relationships' between other countries and China's military or intelligence services. One of the former OpenAI employees said concern about China at times circulated throughout the company. 'Definitely concerns about espionage came up,' this source said, 'including 'Are particular people who work at the company spies or agents?'' At one point, they said, a colleague worried about a specific co-worker they'd learned was the child of a Chinese government official. The sourced recalled 'some people being very upset about the implication' that the company had been infiltrated by foreigners, while others wanted an actual answer: ''Is anyone who works at the company a spy or foreign agent?'' The company's public adoration of Western democracy is not without wrinkles. In early May, OpenAI announced an initiative to build data centers and customized ChatGPT bots with foreign governments, as part of its $500 billion 'Project Stargate' AI infrastructure construction blitz. 'This is a moment when we need to act to support countries around the world that would prefer to build on democratic AI rails, and provide a clear alternative to authoritarian versions of AI that would deploy it to consolidate power,' the announcement read. Unmentioned in that celebration of AI democracy is the fact that Project Stargate's financial backers include the government of Abu Dhabi, an absolute monarchy. On May 23, Altman tweeted that it was 'great to work with the UAE' on Stargate, describing co-investor and Emirati national security adviser Tahnoun bin Zayed Al Nahyan as a 'great supporter of openai, a true believer in AGI, and a dear personal friend.' In 2019, Reuters revealed how a team of mercenary hackers working for Emirati intelligence under Tahnoun had illegally broken into the devices of targets around the world, including American citizens. Asked how a close partnership with an authoritarian Emirati autocracy fit into its broader mission of spreading democratic values, OpenAI pointed to a recent op-ed in The Hill in which Lehane discusses the partnership. 'We're working closely with American officials to ensure our international partnerships meet the highest standards of security and compliance,' Lehane writes, adding, 'Authoritarian regimes would be excluded.' OpenAI's new direction has been reflected in its hiring. Since hiring Mulligan, the company has continued to expand its D.C. operation. Mulligan works on national security policy with a team of former Department of Defense, NSA, CIA, and Special Operations personnel. Gabrielle Tarini joined the company after almost two years at the Defense Department, where she worked on 'Indo-Pacific security affairs' and 'China policy,' according to LinkedIn. Sasha Baker, who runs national security policy, joined after years at the National Security Council and Pentagon. OpenAI's policy team includes former DoD, NSA, CIA, and Special Operations personnel. The list goes on: Other policy team hires at OpenAI include veterans of the NSA, a Pentagon former special operations and South China Sea expert, and a graduate of the CIA's Sherman Kent School for Intelligence Analysis. OpenAI's military and intelligence revolving door continues to turn: At the end of April, the company recruited Alexis Bonnell, the former chief information officer of the Air Force Research Laboratory. Recent job openings have included a 'Relationship Manager' focusing on 'strategic relationships with U.S. government customers.' Mulligan, the head of national security policy and partnerships, is both deeply connected to the defense and intelligence apparatus, and adept at the kind of ethically ambivalent thinking common to the tech sector. 'Not everything that has happened at Guantanamo Bay is to be praised, that's for sure, but [Khalid Sheikh Mohammed] admitting to his crimes, even all these years later, is a big moment for many (including me),' she posted last year. In a March podcast appearance, Mulligan noted she worked on 'Gitmo rendition, detention, and interrogation' during her time in government. Mulligan's public rhetoric matches the ideological drift of a company that today seems more concerned with 'competition' and 'adversaries' than kumbaya globalism. On LinkedIn, she seems to embody the contradiction between a global mission and full-throated alignment with American policy values. 'I'm excited to be joining OpenAI to help them ensure that AI is safe and beneficial to all of humanity,' she wrote upon her hiring from the Pentagon. Since then, she has regularly represented OpenAI's interests and American interests as one and the same, sharing national security truisms such as 'In a competition with China, the pace of AI adoption matters,' or 'The United States' continued lead on AI is essential to our national security and economic competitiveness,' or 'Congress needs to make some decisive investments to ensure the U.S. national security community has the resources to harness the advantage the U.S. has on this technology.' This is to some extent conventional wisdom of the country's past 100 years: A strong, powerful America is good for the whole world. But OpenAI has shifted from an organization that believed its tech would lift up the whole world, unbounded by national borders, to one that talks like Lockheed Martin. Part of OpenAI's national security realignment has come in the form of occasional 'disruption' reports detailing how the company detected and neutralized 'malicious use' of its tools by foreign governments, coincidentally almost all of them considered adversaries of the United States. As the provider of services like ChatGPT, OpenAI has near-total visibility into how the tools are used or misused by individuals, what the company describes in one report as its 'unique vantage point.' The reports detail not only how these governments attempted to use ChatGPT, but also the steps OpenAI took to thwart them, described by the company as an 'effort to support broader efforts by U.S. and allied governments.' Each report has focused almost entirely on malign AI uses by 'state affiliated' actors from Iran, China, North Korea, and Russia. A May 2024 report outed an Israeli propaganda effort using ChatGPT but stopped short of connecting it to that country's government. Earlier this month, representatives of the intelligence agency and the contractors who serve them gathered at the America's Center Convention Complex in St. Louis for the GEOINT Symposium, dedicated to geospatial intelligence, the form of tradecraft analyzing satellite and other imagery of the planet to achieve military and intelligence objectives. On May 20, Mulligan took to the stage to demonstrate how OpenAI's services could help U.S. spy agencies and the Pentagon better exploit the Earth's surface. Though the government's practice of GEOINT frequently ends in the act of killing, Mulligan used a gentler example, demonstrating the ability of ChatGPT to pinpoint the location where a photograph of a rabbit was taken. It was nothing if not a sales pitch, one predicated on the fear that some other country might leap at the opportunity before the United States. 'Government often feels like using AI is too risky and that it's better and safer to keep doing things the way that we've always done them, and I think this is the most dangerous mix of all,' Mulligan told her audience. 'If we keep doing things the way that we always have, and our adversaries adapt to this technology before we do, they will have all of the advantages that I show you today, and we will not be safer.'


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States Trying to Ban 'Chemtrails'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. At least eight states have introduced legislation about so-called "chemtrails"—a conspiracy about chemicals being released into the atmosphere by aircrafts. Newsweek has created a map showing the states that are considering legislations surrounding this unsubstantiated phenomenon. Why It Matters Chemtrail conspiracy theorists claim that the government or other groups are using aircrafts to release chemicals or metals into the atmosphere, visible in the white lines that aircrafts leave behind in the sky. People have claimed these are used for a range of things from weather modification to mind control. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the white lines observed behind aircraft are contrails—condensation trails—that form when hot exhaust from jets meets cold air at high altitudes. The EPA states these are a natural result of flight and pose no risk to weather patterns. Some flights do not produce them as they require specific humidity and temperature conditions. Federal agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), have publicly denied undertaking or planning any weather modification experiments such as those described by chemtrail conspiracy theorists. What To Know At least eight states have introduced bills regarding chemtrails. In Louisiana, Republican state Representative Kimberly Landry Coates defended a bill to ban chemtrails, which last week passed the state House of Representatives 58-32. The measure also directs the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality to record reported chemtrail sightings and pass complaints on to the Louisiana Air National Guard. In Florida, GOP state Senator Ileana Garcia introduced legislation in December 2024 to prohibit weather modification activities in the state. In May 2025, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said he would sign the law. In April 2024, Tennessee lawmakers passed a bill banning the release of chemicals into the air, however, the bill did not explicitly mention chemtrails. There are other bills under consideration in Kentucky, where a bill seeks to ban "any form of geoengineering activities" including polluting the atmosphere and Minnesota where a House bill introduced in March aims to ban weather-modifying substances. In Rhode Island, a Senate bill would ban certain weather engineering activities and in New Hampshire a bill proposes banning the release of polluting emissions. In South Dakota, a Senate bill also would ban polluting emissions and in Texas, state Representative Wesley Virdell introduced an anti-chemtrail bill. What People Are Saying Mark Shanahan who teaches American politics at the University of Surrey in the United Kingdom told Newsweek that the legislation on chemtrails showed a "disconnect from reality." "The norm in mature democracies is that voters elect skilled representatives who act in our best interest, and thus for very many decades potential legislators have striven to prove their intellect, their balance and their ability to weigh evidence," he said. "But that changed with Trump's election to a situation where politics is much more about celebrity than credibility and cranks from the margins of political ideas are now lauded front and centre. Whether it's RFK [Robert F. Kennedy Jr.] at Health, or [Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene] MTG in the House, wild and wacky ideas, with no basis in truth, are being raised and argued as if they were true - often with little or no media push-back. The president sets the tone, and so far, Donald Trump has encouraged and enabled the circus of craziness. While US government is more about ratings than effectiveness, this disconnect from reality is set to continue." GOP Louisiana state Representative Kimberly Landry Coates: "This bill is to prevent any chemicals above us in the air, specifically to modify the weather." Florida state Senator Ileana Garcia previously told Newsweek: "The bill essentially repeals outdated provisions related to various aspects of the weather modification law, including definitions, licensing requirements, and the processes surrounding the application and issuance of licenses." Robert F Kennedy Jr. on X in August about chemtrails: "We are going to stop this crime." An airplane leaves contrails in the blue sky on March 6, 2024, in Germany. An airplane leaves contrails in the blue sky on March 6, 2024, in Germany. Photo by: Robert Michael/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images What RFK Jr Has Said About Chemtrails Conspiracy Theory Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. hosted chemtrail activist Dane Wigington on his podcast in March 2023. The episode was titled "Are Chemtrails Real?" In the episode, Kennedy Jr. said he began to consider the issue of chemtrails when he and actor Woody Harrelson saw contrails from a plane transform into clouds. He asked Wiginton questions about the theory, asking him, "What proof do we have that chemtrails are happening?" and "How come we don't see more whistleblowers coming out?" Kennedy Jr. also speculated as to whether chemtrails are causing "accumulations of aluminum, even in places in very, very remote parts of the earth." Wigington said planes are spraying aluminum into the environment, adding: "What we're seeing in our skies are not condensation trails. In almost all cases they are sprayed particulate trails." Kennedy Jr. said it was "kind of frightening to think that somebody may be putting large amounts of bioavailable aluminum into the environment, spraying it in microscopic particulates from airplanes." Scientists surveyed in a 2016 study by Carnegie Science, University of California Irvine rejected the claim that excess environmental aluminum was the result of spraying. Most rejected that aluminum concentrations have increased at all. Of the experts who thought that aluminum concentrations might have increased, the increase was primarily attributed to changes in industrial, agricultural, or natural processes. Marjorie Taylor Greene's Weather 'Control' Comment After Hurricane Helene swept across the Southeastern U.S., killing at least 227 people, last year, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, wrote on X, formerly Twitter: "Yes they can control the weather. It's ridiculous for anyone to lie and say it can't be done." The congresswoman didn't specify who "they" were. She then posted an image of Helene overlaid on an electoral map, suggesting that the hurricane's path had been intentionally set in motion to target Republican-leaning counties. The map appeared to have been created by Matt Wallace, a crypto influencer and conspiracy theorist with over 2 million followers on X. Greene's posts quickly went viral, with one receiving a user-generated community note on X that clarified existing "weather control" technology is limited to small-scale cloud seeding and cannot generate large storms or hurricanes. What Happens Next? Whether or not other states try to pass similar legislation remains to be seen as legislative sessions continue.