
Hegseth won't commit to following court rulings on troops in LA
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth refused to commit to following federal court or Supreme Court rulings regarding the Pentagon's extraordinary deployment of National Guard members and Marines into Los Angeles.
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pressed Hegseth on the question, which he repeatedly dodged.
'What I will tell you is my job right now is to ensure the troops that we have in Los Angeles are capable of supporting law enforcement,' Hegseth told Khanna.
After another effort, Hegseth said the U.S. should not have 'local judges determining foreign policy or national security policy for the country.'
Khanna pointed to signals from others in the Trump administration, specifically Vice President Vance, that it could ignore court orders it disagrees with.
'If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal,' Vance said in February on the social media platform X. 'If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that's also illegal.'
'Judges aren't allowed to control the executive's legitimate power,' he added.
Hegseth's reference to limits on the judiciary's power over foreign policy harkens to the administration's legal argument against returning Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia from a Salvadoran prison. Abrego Garcia was returned to the U.S. on June 6 and now faces charges over alleged smuggling crimes.
California quickly sued the Trump administration over the deployment of thousands of National Guard troops — and mobilization of hundreds of Marines. A federal judge declined to issue an immediate order removing the troops from Los Angeles, pending further consideration of the case.
Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) has also engaged in a war of words with Trump and Hegseth throughout the week, warning their overreach in California will spread to other cities and states — particularly those run by Democrats.
Hegseth, who is testifying in Congress for the third straight day, has sparred with Democrats over the deployments. He has said the troops are carrying out a constitutional duty to protect law enforcement agents carrying out Trump's immigration policies.
Protests in Los Angeles were spurred by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) carrying out workplace raids to arrest illegal immigrants in a heavily Hispanic part of the city.
Khanna on Thursday also grilled Hegseth over the U.S. military posture with Israel reportedly threatening an imminent attack on Iran.
Khanna repeatedly asked Hegseth whether he could commit to not directly attacking Iran unless the Islamic Republic first fired on the U.S. Hegseth would make no such assurance.
He said Trump is 'giving Iran every opportunity, with talks ongoing, but he also fully recognizes the threat that Iran, with a nuclear blow up, would exist,' Hegseth said.
'Will you commit to us not bombing them?' Khanna repeated, noting some prominent MAGA figures have spoken out against the risk of war with Iran.
'It wouldn't be prudent for me to commit or not to commit. My job is to be postured and prepared,' Hegseth said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


WIRED
23 minutes ago
- WIRED
Here's What Federal Troops Can (and Can't) Do While Deployed in LA
Jun 13, 2025 9:48 AM Pentagon rules sharply limit US Marines and National Guard activity in Los Angeles, prohibiting arrests, surveillance, and other customary police work. Marine recruits march during a training exercise at Camp Pendleton, California. Photograph: Michael Macor/AP Photo For the first time in decades, active-duty US Marines are rolling into Los Angeles—not for disaster relief or training drills, but to guard federal buildings during a protest crackdown that legal experts say threatens long-standing limits on military power at home. The deployment, announced by President Donald Trump on Monday, involves more than 700 Marines from the 2nd Battalion, 7th Regiment of the 1st Marine Division, based at Camp Pendleton and Twentynine Palms. Mobilized under Title 10 orders, the Marines have been commanded to protect federal property and personnel from mounting protests over aggressive immigration raids and neighborhood sweeps. It is a rare and forceful use of federal military power on US soil. The mobilization follows Trump's June 7 order that federalized as many as 4,000 California national guardsmen, overriding the objections of state officials and igniting a national debate over the constitutional limits of his authority and igniting a high-stakes legal fight. A US district judge on Thursday ordered Trump to return control of the guardsmen to the state of California, saying the takeover was unlawful, only likely to inflame tensions in the city, and had deprived the state of resources necessary 'to fight fires, combat the fentanyl trade, and perform other critical functions.' The injunction was quickly stayed, however, by a federal appeals court, pending a hearing next week. Protests began Friday in Westlake, an immigrant-heavy neighborhood near downtown LA, where residents rallied in response to sweeping ICE raids that targeted day laborers outside local businesses. Demonstrators marched, held signs, and chanted for several hours before tensions escalated after police declared an unlawful assembly and advanced on the crowd. LAPD officers and federal agents deployed a range of crowd control weapons, including batons, tear gas, pepper spray, and flash-bang grenades. Reports from journalists and observers describe nonviolent protesters—and members of the press—being struck by rubber bullets and stun devices during the crackdown. Widespread protests are expected in LA and at some 2,000 other locations around the US this weekend. While the president holds broad emergency powers, legal scholars say that without invoking the Insurrection Act—a statute that permits domestic troop deployments only in cases of a rebellion or civil rights violations—federal law sharply limits what active-duty forces can do. Marines may not act as a posse comitatus , or function as law enforcement. They're barred from arrests, surveillance, and crowd control, and may only support police in narrowly defined ways, according to Defense Department rules. Pentagon directives governing 'civil disturbance operations' reinforce these limits. Federal troops are prohibited from arresting civilians, searching property, and collecting evidence. They may not conduct surveillance of US persons. That includes not just individuals but vehicles, locations, and 'transactions.' They may not serve as undercover agents, informants, or interrogators. Unless a crime is committed by a service member or on military property, Title 10 forces are likewise banned from engaging in any kind of forensics for the benefit of civilian police—unless they are willing to put in writing that such evidence was obtained by consent. That said, there are numerous scenarios in which the military can provide assistance to police, including by giving them 'information' obtained 'in the normal course' of their duties, unless applicable privacy laws prohibit it. Military members can also provide police with a wide variety of assistance so long as it's in a 'private capacity' and they're off duty. Additionally, they can provide 'expert advice,' so long as it doesn't count as serving a function core to civilian police work. The Department of Defense did not immediately respond to a request for comment; however, a staff member in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy confirmed for WIRED by phone the current set of policies under which deployed federal troops must operate. There is one major caveat to the military's restrictions. During an 'extraordinary emergency,' military commanders may take limited, immediate action to prevent massive destruction or to restore critical public services, but only so long as presidential approval is 'impossible' to obtain in advance. And while military personnel are naturally expected to maintain order and discipline at all times, under no circumstances are they required to stand down when their lives, or the lives of others, are in immediate danger. Still, enforcement of these rules in the field is far from guaranteed. Legal experts warn that adherence often varies in chaotic environments. Trump administration officials have also demonstrated a willingness to skirt the law. Last week, homeland security secretary Kristi Noem asked the Pentagon to authorize military assistance in conducting arrests and to deploy drone surveillance, according to a letter obtained by The San Francisco Chronicle—a move experts say directly contradicts standing legal prohibitions. At a press conference on Thursday, Noem stated the federal government was on a mission to 'liberate' Los Angeles from 'socialists' and the 'leadership' of California governor Gavin Newsom and LA mayor Karen Bass. US Senator Alex Padilla, who represents the citizens of California, was forcibly removed from the press conference after attempting to question Noem. Outside the press conference room, federal agents forced the senator to the ground, where he was temporarily placed in handcuffs. Unlike the National Guard, which is well trained for domestic crowd control, active-duty Marines generally receive relatively little instruction in handling civil unrest. Those who do typically belong to military police or specialized security units. Nonetheless, the Marine Corps has published footage online showing various task forces training with riot-control tactics and 'nonlethal' weapons. Constitutional concerns do not arise, however, when Marines face off against foreign mobs—such as in civilian zones during the Afghanistan war or on the rare occasion protesters breach the perimeter of a US embassy. And wartime rules of engagement are far more lenient than the rules of force by which Marines must adhere domestically. In a statement on Wednesday, US Northern Command, which oversees military support to nonmilitary authorities in the contiguous 48 states, confirmed the Marines had undergone training in all 'mission essential tasks,' including 'de-escalation' and 'crowd control.' They will reportedly be accompanied by legal and law enforcement experts. Constitutional experts warn that deploying military forces against civilian demonstrators blurs the line between law enforcement and military power, potentially setting a dangerous precedent for unchecked presidential authority. The risk deepens, they say, if federal troops overstep their legal bounds. If lines are crossed, it could open a door that may not close easily—clearing the way for future crackdowns that erode Americans' hard-won civil liberties.


The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
Live updates: Trump advises Iran to make a deal hours after Israeli attack
Hours after Israel landed significant missile strikes against Iran, President Trump chided Tehran for not making a nuclear deal through several rounds of talks, but held out hope it still could do so. 'I told them what to do, but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!' Trump wrote Friday morning on Truth Social. Iran on Friday said it was pulling out of talks, with the next round originally set for Sunday. Those weeks of talks, however, appear to have given cover to Israel to prepare its attack. The president is set to meet with his National Security Council on Friday morning. In federal court in Tennessee, Kilmar Abrego Garcia will be arraigned on federal trafficking charges. The mistakenly deported man will face a judge a week after being returned to the U.S. from a Salvadoran prison. Washington is also in the final stages of preparation for its massive parade marking the Army's 250th birthday on Saturday, which is also Trump's 79th birthday. Nationwide protests in cities beyond D.C. are expected, part of the 'No Kings' movement. Other stories to watch: Follow along today for the latest on these stories and more.


Newsweek
39 minutes ago
- Newsweek
LA Taco Chain Closes 15 Locations Amid ICE Crackdown
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A popular taco chain in the Los Angeles area has temporarily closed all but one of its locations amid increased immigration enforcement operations. Newsweek reached out to the restaurant, Angel's Tijuana Tacos, for comment. Why It Matters Los Angeles has become a flashpoint in the nation's immigration debate after a weekend of unrest tied to opposition to President Donald Trump's mass deportation policy, with reports of arson and looting in downtown Los Angeles and 42 arrests. What To Know In a message shared Thursday night on Instagram, Angel's Tijuana Tacos announced that its Anaheim restaurant will remain open, while its other 15 locations—primarily taco trucks and stands—are closed until further notice. Though the statement did not explicitly cite U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity as the reason for the closures, the post appeared to reference ongoing enforcement actions across Southern California. "Anaheim is our only location open. ALL other locations will be closed until further notice. We hope to see you soon. Stay safe everyone," the business wrote in a social media post. Angel's Tijuana Tacos is a Southern California taco chain known for its authentic Tijuana-style tacos. Founded in 2018 by a 31-year-old taquero with roots in Guerrero, Mexico—known publicly as Taquero Angel—the business began as a single stand in North Hollywood and quickly expanded to 15 locations across Los Angeles. Just weeks ago, the chain opened its first brick-and-mortar restaurant in Anaheim, a city about 26 miles south of Los Angeles in Orange County. File photo of a taco at a restaurant in New Hampshire. File photo of a taco at a restaurant in New Hampshire. Matthew Mead/AP The move comes amid a backdrop of heightened concerns in California as Trump squares off against Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump ordered the deployment of approximately 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles in response to protests sparked by his intensified immigration enforcement policies. The demonstrations escalated following the troop mobilization and have since spread to other major cities, including New York, Boston, and Chicago. Newsom has asked a judge to block the deployment, arguing that the military presence has heightened tensions and is interfering with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in Los Angeles. On Thursday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily halted a lower court order that required Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California. The deployment was initiated in response to protests in Los Angeles over immigration enforcement actions. Earlier the same day, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled that the deployment was unlawful, stating it violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded the president's legal authority. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social early Friday: "Incompetent Gavin Newscum should have been THANKING me for the job we did in Los Angeles, rather than making sad excuses for the poor job he has done. If it weren't for me getting the National Guard into Los Angeles, it would be burning to the ground right now!" Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass wrote on X (formerly Twitter) on June 8: "This is a difficult time for our city. As we recover from an unprecedented natural disaster, many in our community are feeling fear following recent federal immigration enforcement actions across Los Angeles County. Reports of unrest outside the city, including in Paramount, are deeply concerning. She added: "Everyone has the right to peacefully protest, but let me be clear: violence and destruction are unacceptable, and those responsible will be held accountable." What Happens Next The locations could be reopened, as they are currently listed as temporarily closed.