Why we shouldn't let Noor Deros bring race and religion into politics
Noor Deros, a religious teacher, is bringing his views on Islam into the political sphere, arguing that it should shape who Malay/Muslim Singaporeans vote for. PHOTO: BERITA HARIAN FILE
Follow our live coverage here.
SINGAPORE - Recent remarks by a religious teacher, seeking to be an influencer in this general election, worry me.
Noor Deros may not be a name familiar to many. By way of background, he was the Muslim religious teacher who started the Wearwhite movement in 2014, a pushback on the Pink Dot rallies.
Two years later, it was led by a Christian pastor, who argued that the movement was about promoting traditional family values.
Noor denied his involvement in the campaign that year, saying he was focusing on education. But he is back, this time bringing his views on Islam into the political sphere, arguing that it should shape who Malay/Muslim Singaporeans vote for.
Noor draws a clear line in the sand. He says Muslims should only vote for candidates who agree with his interpretation of religious responsibilities.
Among other things, he says the candidates should not advocate for the rights of the LGBTQ+ community.
Writing his posts in a mix of Malay and English, he also says Muslims should only support the political party and candidate who agree to end diplomatic ties with Israel over the Palestine-Israel war, and change the narrative on the War on Terror to blame the United States and Israel for their role in conflicts in the region.
He writes like an academic, peppering his comments with religious passages to remind his followers of their responsibilities. But the postings are inflammatory - there is no room for compromise, he says.
While he speaks of seeking out people willing to sit down for a debate or discussion, he makes it clear he will not budge. Noor is now bringing his views into the political sphere in the midst of a general election.
It is by design.
Noor says a Muslim candidate is only worthy of his vote if the candidate is aligned with his hardline views on the role religions play in politics. Muslim Singaporeans should pick a candidate along the same lines, he argues.
This Us vs Them scenario can result in serious blowback.
I saw first-hand while I was in Sydney when Australia held the Indigenous Voice referendum in 2023. The referendum sought to weave into the Australian constitution a body that would advise the Federal Parliament and executive government on policies affecting Aboriginal and Torres Straits Islander peoples.
It was extra privileges most Australia disagreed with, based on the outcome of the vote.
The campaign split the country into the Say Yes groups against the Say No campaigners, with tensions close to boiling over.
A report by the University of Technology Sydney found that there were more than 400 validated reports of racism directed at First Nations People as a result of the referendum. More than a third of the reports involved physical violence, hate speech, threats, intimidation, verbal abuse, bullying and property damage.
The report also noted that influencers, including media personalities, were the driving force of mis and disinformation that fuelled the pushback.
Noor, the influencer, is throwing religion into the Us vs Them mix. History tells us when religion is drawn into politics in Singapore, there can be dire consequences.
I was involved in the writing and editing of five books that traced tumultuous events in Singapore post-WWII. One of the books looked at the race riots in Singapore in the 1960s.
On July 21, 1964, about 20,000 Malay-Muslims from political parties and religious organisations gathered at Padang to mark the Prophet's birthday.
Speakers at the event delivered speeches that reminded attendees of their religious obligations, and the failings of rival organisations. The speeches were filled with inflammatory language, designed to stir the crowd.
Soon after, the crowd marched towards Kallang gasworks and violence erupted, prompting a curfew which was only lifted in August.
Simmering tensions continued, with bloodshed and violence returning to Singapore in September. In total, more than 20 people were killed and more than 400 suffered injuries.
Noor is working to influence the election and politics in Singapore not as a Singaporean Muslim, but as a hardliner insisting on dragging religion into the political sphere, never mind the consequences.
But he does it from a safe distance - he preaches in Malaysia.
Noor's comments about PAP MPs not being Malay or Muslim enough echo comments made before the 1964 race riots by an extremist chief of UMNO.
In a fiery speech, Syed Ja'afar accused all Malay PAP members of being un-Islamic, anti-Islam, anti-Malay, and traitors to their own community.
He worked the crowd into such a frenzy that chants of 'Kill him!... Kill him!... Othman Wok and Lee Kuan Yew' resonated through the theatre. Othman Wok was the Singapore Minister for Social Affairs then.
While he claims to be a religious teacher, I understand that Noor had applied to be a certified religious teacher in Singapore but this was not accepted. Either way, his intentions should be exposed.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
As birthrates fall, Turkey's government steps in
[ISTANBUL] Alarmed by the fact that Turkish women are having fewer children, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has moved to tackle falling birthrates – 'a threat greater than war' – through policies designed to bring on the babies. After declaring 2025 Turkey's 'Year of the Family', Erdogan last month announced 2026 would mark the start of the 'Decade of the Family'. But his pleas for women to have at least three children and offers of financial incentives for newlyweds may not be enough as Turkey grapples with a deepening economic crisis. Official figures show Turkey's birthrate has fallen from 2.38 children per woman in 2001 to 1.48 in 2025 – lower than in France, Britain or the United States – in what Erdogan, a 71-year-old pious Muslim and father-of-four, has denounced as 'a disaster'. During his 22 years in office – first as premier, then president – fertility rates have dropped sharply in this country of 85 million people. Erdogan has blamed both women and LGBTQ 'perverts'. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Women and LGBTQ+ individuals are considered the only culprits for the declining population growth rate, with no acknowledgement of political mistakes,' said retired academic and feminist activist Berrin Sonmez. 'People might be hesitant to have children in this chaotic and uncertain environment. Additionally, child support is almost non-existent and education has become the most expensive sector,' she said. High inflation has raged in Turkey for the past four years, forcing education costs up by more than 70 per cent over the past year, official data shows. In the first quarter, unemployment stood at 8.2 per cent, or 15 per cent among 15- to 24-year-olds. Researchers with the DISK union say the real rate is 28.5 per cent, and 37.5 per cent among young people. But the government seems bent on fixing other issues, such as Turkey's record number of elective Caesarean births – which stands at 61 per cent, rising to 78 per cent in some private hospitals. In April, Turkey banned C-section births at private healthcare facilities 'without a medical justification'. The procedure generally limits the number of pregnancies to two, or a maximum of three. Medical professionals say the high number of C-sections is linked to the rampant privatisation of the healthcare system since the late 1990s. C-sections are more time-efficient for medical staff – 30 minutes, versus 12 hours for a traditional delivery – and lower the risk of legal action over complications, said Hakan Coker, an Istanbul-based gynaecologist. 'Ultimately, C-sections are perceived as a guarantee of safety' for doctors and women alike, he said. Dr Harika Bodur, an obstetrician at a major Istanbul hospital, said some women ask for a C-section 'at the first appointment for fear of pain'. 'If you refuse, they'll go elsewhere,' she said. The fear is rooted in a lack of education and discomfort with sexuality, she said. The health ministry says it is now 'aiming for a target rate of 20 per cent (of C-sections) by encouraging normal childbirth through education of future parents'. But the word 'normal' has raised hackles – notably last month when a football team carried a huge banner promoting vaginal births onto the pitch before a top-flight clash, which read: 'Natural birth is normal.' 'If I don't want to, I won't have any children at all, it's my right,' said 23-year-old chemistry student Secil Murtazaoglu. 'Access to abortion is already difficult. Now they want to limit C-sections. It's all about the oppression of women,' she said. In 2012, the Turkish president described abortion as 'murder', but stopped short of banning it. By offering interest-free loans of 150,000 Turkish lira (S$4,900) for newlyweds and a monthly allowance of 5,000 lira from the third child onwards, Erdogan was trying 'to turn women into birthing machines', Murtazaoglu said. Feminist activist Sonmez said women were subjected to huge pressures, both within their families and within society, when the much more pressing issue was the need to tackle gender violence. 'We must start by combating violence against women: such policies have been eradicated and protections seriously undermined,' she said. AFP


AsiaOne
8 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Trump signs proclamation banning travel from 12 countries, CBS News reports, World News
WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump signed a proclamation on Wednesday (June 4) banning travel from certain countries citing national security concerns. The proclamation fully restricts and limits the entry of nationals from 12 countries: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The entry of people from seven other countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela, will be partially restricted, the official said. The travel proclamation was first reported by CBS News. "President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm," Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, said on X. The countries facing the total ban were found "to be deficient with regards to screening and vetting and determined to pose a very high risk to the United States," according to a statement provided by the White House. During his first term in office, Trump announced a ban on travellers from seven majority-Muslim nations, a policy that went through several iterations before it was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. Former President Joe Biden, a Democrat who succeeded Trump, repealed the ban in 2021, calling it "a stain on our national conscience". [[nid:718640]]

Straits Times
10 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump signs proclamation banning travel from 12 countries, CBS News reports
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a swearing-in ceremony for the new U.S. ambassador to China, former U.S. Senator David Perdue, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 7, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo WASHINGTON - U.S. President Donald Trump signed a proclamation banning travel from certain countries, CBS News reported on Wednesday, citing administration officials. The proclamation fully restricts and limits the entry of nationals from 12 countries: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, according to CBS News. The entry of people from seven other countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela, will be partially restricted, according to the media outlet. During his first term in office, Trump announced a ban on travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations, a policy that went through several iterations before it was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. Former President Joe Biden, a Democrat who succeeded Trump, repealed the ban in 2021, calling it "a stain on our national conscience.' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.