Giants say they had no conversations with Donald Trump about Saquon Barkley
During Monday's visit by the Eagles to the White House, President Trump said that he tried to get the Giants to not let running back Saquon Barkley get away. The Giants, before clamming up on the issue entirely, refuted the President's claim.
'I was with the Giants and the head coach and some people and I said, 'Do anything you have to, but don't lose Saquon.'' Trump said during the Monday event in the Rose Garden. 'They lost Saquon. That was not good. I called that one. That was an easy one to call because he played damn well for the Giants, I can tell you that.'
Via Ryan Glasspiegel of FrontOfficeSports.com, Giants spokesperson Pat Hanlon said the team had 'no conversations' with Trump about Barkley. Other outlets, including TheAthletic.com, tried to confirm that claim (folks, on-the-record quotes do not require confirmation, just attribution) and the Giants pivoted. They are now declining comment.
Before the Giants clammed up, Hanlon took to Twitter to say this: 'With all due respect, stop yapping. Be the leader we all want you to be. And my 401K wants you to be. I'm trying to retire!!'
Suddenly, and despite my vow to get tattoo of John Mara's face on my arm if they got 17-0 so that Russell Wilson can reach his maximum earnings in 2025, I'm rooting for the Giants to win the next Super Bowl and visit the White House next year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
21 minutes ago
- Forbes
3 Key Takeaways From The CBO's Report On The One Big Beautiful Bill
WASHINGTON - JUNE 5: The U.S. Capitol is shown June 5, 2003 in Washington, DC. Both houses of the ... More U.S. Congress, the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives meet in the Capitol. (Photo by) The CBO estimates that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will add $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade. While these are only estimates, the group's analysis is responsible for helping shed light on the economic impacts of proposed legislation. However, many do not know what this group is and what exactly their estimates mean. This comes as Trump publicly disagrees with the estimate and questions the groups assumptions and qualifications. This article discusses what is the CBO. It then provides three key takeaways from their latest report estimating the economic impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The CBO was established under the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. A primary focus of this group is to 'provide objective, nonpartisan information to support the Congressional budget process and to help the Congress make effective budget and economic policy.' The office works with Congressional committees, particularly the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee, to help determine the economic impact of their bills. Each year, the CBO produces about a thousand cost estimates and publishes reports about the economy and economic-related issues. The office employs approximately 275 individuals who often have significant work experience and skills in economic forecasting and modeling. While Congress sets the CBO's priorities, the group prides itself on being objective, impartial, and nonpartisan. It does not make any policy recommendations and employs a rigorous set of checks and balances to ensure its estimations are fair and unbiased. As ABC News reported, the headline of the CBO's report was that the impacts of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion. The way that this works is that the CBO estimates that tax revenues will decline by $3.7 trillion due to, among other things, the renewal of the tax provisions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, as well as enhanced deductions like a higher state and local income tax deduction for individuals. Despite these lower tax collections, the CBO estimates that the bill will not pay for itself as spending will only decrease by $1.3 trillion. Many of these spending decreases are coming from making cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, as I previously discussed on Forbes. The combination of the $3.7 trillion in lost tax revenues and the $1.3 trillion in lower expenses leads to the CBO's estimate of the $2.4 trillion net effect on the deficit. The CBO estimates the impact over the next decade for major budgetary legislation like the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. While a $2.4 trillion net impact may seem large, it is important to point out that the projected impacts are over many years. The reports generated by the CBO also break down the impact by provision, allowing policymakers and taxpayers to understand the impact of specific pieces of legislation more directly. For instance, the CBO estimates that the lost tax revenues from not taxing tips will be about $39 billion, whereas the lost revenue from not taxing overtime will be about $124 billion. While many pieces of this legislation will be costly, the provisions that appear to have the most significant price tag are those extending the tax cuts for individual taxpayers that were passed as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, and the estimated impact can be seen in their report each year over the next 10 years. According to The Hill, the administration believes the CBO underestimates the economic growth among bills like the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. In particular, Trump has criticized the CBO for using a 1.8% growth rate, and he even publicly suggested that the group should be using a rate up to five times higher than that. If the CBO underestimates growth, tax revenues may not decline as much as estimated, resulting in a more favorable set of economic outcomes than the CBO predicted. However, not everybody feels as positive about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act's financial prospects as Trump. Newsweek reports that Senators like Chuck Schumer and Jodi Ernst have given the bill the nickname the We're All Going To Die Act (in reference to the removal of many key healthcare programs). Even Trump's associate, Elon Musk, took to X to call for the bill to be voted down due to its costs, as reported by The New York Times. Thus, while Trump disagrees with the estimate, it appears as though there are plenty who are looking at the CBO report with heightened skepticism about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act's prospects.
New York Times
26 minutes ago
- New York Times
What to Know About Trump's New Travel Ban
President Trump on Wednesday announced a travel ban on citizens of 12 countries, mostly in Africa and the Middle East, aiming to prevent or severely limit their entry to the United States. The policy is similar to a ban that Mr. Trump implemented in 2017, during his first term. It is the latest move in the administration's crackdown on immigration, and was set to take effect on Monday. What countries are on the list? A full travel ban will affect citizens of the following countries: Afghanistan Chad Republic of Congo Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Haiti Iran Libya Myanmar Somalia Sudan Yemen Partial restrictions will apply to citizens of other countries, meaning they cannot come to the country permanently or apply for certain visas. They are: Burundi Cuba Laos Sierra Leone Togo Turkmenistan Venezuela What is the administration saying? Mr. Trump, who announced the ban in a proclamation, said it was intended to protect 'the national security and national interest of the United States and its people.' It is his latest effort to further restrict immigration since returning to office in January, coming after his administration blocked asylum seekers at the Southern border, barred international students from Harvard University and ordered immigration raids across the country. Cabinet officials in April had identified a list of countries where vetting and screening information surrounding visa applicants was 'deficient' enough to warrant a full or partial suspension, the action said. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Is Reworking Subsidy Awards to Chipmakers, Lutnick Says
(Bloomberg) -- US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the Trump administration has been reworking agreements forged with semiconductor makers under the 2022 Chips Act to secure what he called better terms aimed at generating additional domestic investment. ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract The Global Struggle to Build Safer Cars NYC Residents Want Safer Streets, Cheaper Housing, Survey Says The Buffalo Architect Fighting for Women in Design Lutnick cited the decision in March by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., a recipient of $6.6 billion in Chips Act grants, to boost its US investment commitment. The company is adding $100 billion to a previous $65 billion pledge, but without any additional funding from the government, Lutnick said. 'Are we renegotiating? Absolutely, for the benefit of the American taxpayer, for sure,' Lutnick said Wednesday at a Senate Appropriations Committee. 'We're getting more value for the same dollars.' The Commerce secretary even suggested the administration may not follow through on some of the planned awards. 'You will see that all the deals are getting better, and the only deals that are not getting done are deals that should have never been done in the first place,' he said. Read: US Chip Grants in Limbo as Lutnick Pushes Bigger Investments (3) Trump has urged Congress to repeal the 2022 Chips and Science Act that was a centerpiece of President Joe Biden's domestic agenda, though Republican and Democratic lawmakers have little desire to revoke a bipartisan law promising $52 billion in subsidies. Lutnick has previously signaled that the Commerce Department might withhold Chips Act grants to press companies to follow in TSMC's footsteps and expand their planned domestic semiconductor projects. During his nearly two-hour appearance before the panel, Lutnick addressed a range of issues essential to the semiconductor industry, including the administration's push to bring to the US more chips-related investment. He defended artificial intelligence deals with the United Arab Emirates unveiled last month during President Donald Trump's trip to the Middle East, saying the accords were crafted to spur complementary levels of spending in the US. The path for those AI agreements in the Gulf was opened by the administration's decision to revoke a regulation launched during President Joe Biden's final week in office that had drawn strenuous objections from US allies and companies including Nvidia Corp. and Oracle Corp. The so-called AI diffusion rule — aimed at denying China access to advanced semiconductors via third parties — would have taken effect last month and created three broad tiers of access for countries seeking AI chips, an approach that Lutnick assailed a 'illogical.' In its place, the Trump team is moving toward negotiating individual deals with countries while maintaining security guarantees designed to prevent Chinese companies from obtaining AI chips. 'Our view is we are going to allow our allies to buy AI chips, provided they're run by an approved American data center operator, and the cloud that touches that data center is an approved American operator,' Lutnick said. Tensions over US efforts to rein in China's tech ambitions have deepened the conflict over trade between the world's two largest economies. Trump and Chinese officials have accused each other of violating the spirit of recent negotiations in Geneva, with leaders in Beijing objecting to American chip export controls and their counterparts in Washington expressing concerns over a crackdown by China on sales of critical minerals. The US has moved to pressure allies against adopting Huawei Technologies Co.'s new Ascend chip, warning that any use risked violating export controls imposed by Washington. The Commerce Department said last month that it was issuing guidance to warn the public about 'the potential consequences of allowing US AI chips to be used for training and inference of Chinese AI models.' Lutnick insisted that China still lacks the capability to produce high volumes of sophisticated semiconductors, a sign that US export controls have limited China's technological progress. He estimated that China could probably produce about 200,000 advanced chips, like the kind used to train artificial-intelligence services or run smartphones, a tiny number compared with the country's demand. 'They say they are making them and they are not,' he said. --With assistance from Jamie Tarabay, Lynn Doan, Peter Elstrom and Debby Wu. (updates with more comments from Lutnick in the fourth paragraph.) Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
