Raced based Super is a terrible idea
The Herald reported:
Te Pāti Māori has for some time believed eligibility should be race-based. It explained in statement:
'Te Pāti Māori is clear – our people should be able to access superannuation seven to 10 years earlier than the rest of the population.
'Māori life expectancy is significantly lower, and many of our people work in physically demanding jobs that take a toll well before retirement age.
'It is unacceptable that Māori contribute to the system their whole lives but die before they can benefit from it in the same way as others.
Maori don't die earlier because they are Maori, and that there is something in their genetic code than makes them die early.
They die earlier because of health and socio-economic factors. The focus should be on reducing the prevalence of those factors.
As there is no significant genetic link to dying early, giving NZ Super to anyone who has a fraction of Maori DNA would be a very bad policy. Why should David Seymour get NZ Super at 60 because of his ancestry?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
No handouts: We lived on a tight budget and managed to buy a home
The idea that living frugally is boring. There are heaps of interesting free or cheap activities, from reading library books to picnicking at the beach to walking in the bush to playing board games. Or you can share meals with friends. Or grow your own fruit and vegetables for fun as well as saving money. Your conclusion. You seem to imply that nobody should need government support. Of course it's great if you can get through life without it. But that requires not only hard work but also good luck. it's not so easy for people with physical or mental health issues, or difficult childhoods – or any number of other hurdles. Sure, be proud of your independence. But please don't lose your compassion. 'We don't spend less' Q: You have said that 'people tend to spend less as retirement progresses'. I don't think this is correct. We have been retired for 14 years. Some expenses have certainly dropped – saving (for retirement) and mortgage repayments, eating out, clothing. Some things have roughly stayed the same – groceries, power, internet, phones, insurance, rates, maintenance and holiday travel in New Zealand. One thing has gone up hugely – health! Even though we are both relatively healthy, there have been significant costs – and these will grow. Firstly, there are things not covered by public health – hearing, eyesight, dental, non-life-threatening conditions. Secondly, things that should be covered by public health, but don't seem to be – the waiting is so long that you either pay for it, or suffer. We are lucky to have pension income, in addition to New Zealand Superannuation, plus enough saved. This year, I have spent $8000 on skin cancer, $23,700 on stomach surgery and $5700 on hearing aids, plus small amounts on dental repairs, GP visits, and prescriptions – although we've spent less in other years. A: Health costs can indeed soar as we get older. And you've had a tough run lately. But the data on spending in retirement show that, despite this, most people spend less as they age. As you say, you're lucky you can cover your costs. Read on for another way to cope. 'Very good life' on NZ Super Q: You have published a number of letters on living on NZ Super. I am single and fast approaching 80. I have chosen to live in a small, one-bedroom, low-maintenance house. I drive a hybrid vehicle, but prefer to travel by bus, cycle or walk. My NZ Super is just over $1000 per fortnight. Of that, $400 covers power, phone, rates and insurance plus Netflix and Spotify. I spend $200 at the supermarket. I don't eat much meat, preferring fruit and vegetables, plus a couple of bottles of wine. I give $100 to charity. This leaves $300 per fortnight. Vehicle expenses, hairdresser, doctor, dentist and lunch out with friends are all covered by this $300. I have a very good life. I am fortunate to keep good health. If at some future time I need a new knee or hip, that is where a reverse mortgage would be of use. A: Well done! And good to read that wine and lunches out feature in the budget. I like your reverse mortgage plan for covering a major health cost. It's an excellent use of all that money you have tied up in property. We've covered reverse mortgages in depth in the column lately. But I'll just repeat my three 'rules', and add a fourth. Try not to get a reverse mortgage before 75 or 80 – to limit compounding growth of the loan. Spend most of your retirement savings first, except for emergency money. Don't get a lump sum unless you need it. You'll pay high interest while the money sits around. You can set up regular payments – and the ability to borrow more if you need to. Consider rates postponement first, if you qualify for what your council offers. You postpone paying part or all of your rates until you sell the property. The interest rate is usually considerably lower than on a reverse mortgage. Note that neither Heartland Bank nor SBS will let you have both a reverse mortgage and rates postponement. And Lifetime has a similar rule with its home reversion. But you can pay off the rates postponement debt with part of your new reverse mortgage or home reversion money. Next week, we'll look at health insurance for the retired. A revised and updated edition of Mary Holm's book Rich Enough? A laid-back guide for every Kiwi. This week, and for the next two weeks, this column will include excerpts from Mary's revised and updated No 1-bestselling book Rich Enough? A laid-back guide for every Kiwi, published by HarperCollins Aotearoa New Zealand. Not planning on home ownership You don't have to ever own a home to be financially well set up. This goes against the grain for many New Zealanders. We've been raised to dream of having a place of our own. But house prices – despite recent price falls – are still out of whack with incomes, and out of reach for many would-be first home buyers. It won't always be that way. How do I know? Just by looking at history. From the 1950s to the late 1980s, the average New Zealand house price was two to three times the average annual household income. Then house prices gradually rose, to 6.5 times income in 2008. They then dropped, but have since risen fast to a peak of 10.4 in December 2021. In late 2024, they were back at 7.9. But that is still way out of line. Generally, around the world, houses cost about three times household income – as they did here for 30-odd years just a few decades ago. Who knows what will happen next? But I would be surprised if we don't see a long-term further decrease in the price-to-income ratio. In the meantime, rather than complaining, if you feel shut out of the housing market, think in terms of getting on with your life as a renter – and possibly staying that way for the rest of your life. You can always change your mind later. Many people in Europe rent for life. In Germany, the home ownership rate is just over 50% – and in Switzerland, it's lower still. And they are not poor countries – far from it. These Europeans are happy to remain as tenants, usually with very long-term leases. It's not uncommon to live in the same rented property all your adult life. The people treat their rented accommodation as their homes in a way that only home owners usually do in New Zealand. The circumstances in those countries are quite different from here. For one thing, the law tends to favour tenants more. Still, the tide might be turning in New Zealand. In a Consumer NZ survey of people who were renting accommodation, 64% said they rented because they can't afford to buy. But another 26% said: 'It suits my lifestyle right now.' And 5% said: 'I like the flexibility of renting.' It would be great if some landlords offered tenants longer-term leases – perhaps after a trial tenancy of, say, a year. That could suit both sides. Weighing up the finances Despite what your parents and others might say, renting for life doesn't have to be a bad decision financially. Key message: you can do fine as long as you reach retirement with lots of extra savings – preferably several hundred thousand dollars – to cover the costs of your accommodation for the rest of your life. That might sound difficult – saving a whole lot more than people who own a home – but it doesn't have to be. Generally, it costs considerably more throughout life to own a home than to rent accommodation of a similar standard. Not only do you have to pay mortgage interest, but also rates, house insurance and maintenance. If you save the difference, and invest it wisely over the years, you might even end up better off than your home-owner friend on about the same income as you. How do you know how much to save? Ask how much your friend spends on having her or his own home. I've seen various calculations of who becomes better off – the home owner or renter. The answer always depends on the assumptions you make. We could make one set of reasonable assumptions about house prices, mortgage interest, insurance, rates, maintenance, rent and returns on savings, and the home owner would win. But with another set, the renter would win. One thing is certain – if you're a renter, you won't win unless you are: • Disciplined about saving. It's not clever to live the high life because your accommodation costs are cheaper. The best way to keep the savings rolling in is to set up an automatic transfer every payday. • Willing to make higher-risk investments with your savings, so they get higher returns on average. A good choice would be a KiwiSaver or non-KiwiSaver growth or aggressive fund, which holds mostly shares. As you know by now, with these investments, your balance will sometimes fall, but you need to stick with it through thick and thin. You can probably transfer your savings directly from your bank account into a growth fund or, if the provider doesn't take small, regular savings, into a savings account, which you empty into the growth fund every now and then. One clear financial advantage for the renter over the home owner is that your savings can be more diversified. If you're in a growth fund, you will be in a wide range of shares and probably also some bonds and other assets. Also, in a non-KiwiSaver fund, you can access your savings relatively easily if you need to. Weighing up other issues An obvious negative of renting is that your landlord can kick you out. That would be especially bad if you have children – although longer-term leases could help reduce that risk. Also, in most cases you don't get to choose the carpets, paint colours, curtains and so on – although, again, you might with a longer lease. There may be similar issues with the garden. If you're a keen gardener, you'll want some kind of guarantee that you won't be asked to move out just when the veges are coming into their own, or the hedge is getting bushier. And if you enjoy DIY or renovation projects, you can't build up value in the property by adding a deck. Also, over the longer term, you won't have a property for your children to inherit. And there's less security for your retirement in a rented property, although you could perhaps use your savings to buy a small home at that stage. But there are some big advantages to renting: • You don't have to worry about maintenance and other responsibilities that can sometimes weigh heavily, both financially and psychologically, on a home owner. As I once heard someone say, 'Did you have a good weekend, or do you own your own home?' If you're renting and the roof starts to leak, you just call the landlord. • It's often easier for a renter to live close to downtown, which can be a big plus in these times of terrible rush-hour traffic. • You can move house much more easily and cheaply than a home owner. • If you want to set up your own business, you could use some of your savings to do that, whereas a home owner may have to raise a loan by adding to their mortgage. For some people, none of this is as important as the pride of home ownership and the fact that you have more control over your living environment. But for others, the freedom that comes with renting is a big attraction. * Mary Holm, ONZM, is a freelance journalist, a seminar presenter and a bestselling author on personal finance. She is a director of Financial Services Complaints Ltd (FSCL) and a former director of the Financial Markets Authority. Her opinions do not reflect the position of any organisation in which she holds office. Mary's advice is of a general nature, and she is not responsible for any loss that any reader may suffer from following it. Send questions to mary@ Letters should not exceed 200 words. We won't publish your name. Please provide a (preferably daytime) phone number. Unfortunately, Mary cannot answer all questions, correspond directly with readers, or give financial advice.
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
The calm after the trauma
There's more to bush lawyer than the scars. Bush lawyer, it will find you and it won't let you go (much like those American lawyers who hang on tight once they have their hooks into you, only letting go when they've extracted as much money as possible). Bush lawyer is more into blood than money. Bush lawyer is a relative of the blackberry ( Rubus family), roses are in this family too and it is their evil thorns they have in common. It is a climbing/rambling plant so will be hanging across other plants just waiting for an exposed bit of skin to hook on to. Nasty. Early Europeans in Aotearoa must've been desperate for jam as they used to pick the tiny little raspberry-like fruits and make jam out of them. I don't think I've ever seen a ripe bush lawyer berry (they are yellow to red in colour when ripe) as the rats and birds eat them before we even see them. And then imagine trying to pick them with all those thorns, bugger that. The goodish news is that the green berries, when boiled, taste sweet, so if you are in the bush, hungry, lost and desperate, and have a pot, water, dry firewood and a handful of bush lawyer berries, you are in for a sweet treat. Tātarāmoa is the original name for bush lawyer. Māori had many uses for this plant, but the one that most excites me is its sleep-inducing properties. It also reduces anxiety and is good for headaches and migraines. The guy I saw recommending it on Facebook suggested making tea with two or three leaves (fresh or dried) and steeped in a cup of boiling water for five to 10 minutes. It doesn't taste bad. However, the tea is not recommended for pregnant women. While poking round the internet for information on this, I found a lovely website called Awhi Ora Rongoa, which provides information and products for sale, for use in rongoā medicine. They sell an oil made from tātarāmoa, or a tincture. The oil is massaged into your temples and neck for a good night's sleep. People were raving about it in the comments section. I ended up buying some of the tincture to see if it is worth my while risking getting scratched to bits making my own version. My insomnia is famously hard to cure, but it will be worth a try, and, if it fails for me, I will have helped a small New Zealand business run by Māori women. I thought there was heaps of tātarāmoa in the Orokonui estuary track bush, but a friend and I walked the whole track with eyes on full forage mode, and found nothing. But on a trip to Christchurch, I was taken for a walk around Pūharakekenui/Styx River catchment, which is an extraordinary piece of urban ecology, with native plantings, citizen science studies, river management, and planting of loads of trees and plants treasured for rongoā medicine. I found some tātarāmoa/bush lawyer growing there, so have done a wee experiment. It is indeed calming and relaxing so would be worth a try for anyone with mild anxiety or sleep problems. Watching the news is enough to give a person anxiety these days, so it will be a very useful plant. There is definitely plenty of tātarāmoa out there somewhere in local bush, just waiting to get its hooks into you. Note: Do not use in pregnancy.
RNZ News
17 hours ago
- RNZ News
Alarm as whooping cough runs rampant in Bay of Plenty
Rotorua Hospital paediatrician Dr Danny de Lore says children most at risk were those living in communities where the immunisation rates were low. Photo: 123RF Doctors are alarmed by high rates of whooping cough (pertusssis) in Bay of Plenty and Lakes districts, with one in ten patients ending up in hospital. Since the national whooping cough epidemic was declared late last year, there have been more than 300 reported cases across the wider region, with more than 30 people hospitalised. Rotorua Hospital paediatrician Dr Danny de Lore said children most at risk were those living in communities where the immunisation rates were low. "The continued spread of whooping cough is deeply worrying, especially for pēpi under one year's old," Dr de Lore said. "We're seeing preventable hospitalisations. We know immunisation is the most effective protection, particularly for young children and hapū māmā." Pregnant women, babies and Māori whānau are being "disproportionately affected", with multiple babies needing continued hospital care. Dr de Lore said the best protection for babies was for their mother to get vaccinated during pregnancy, and for them to get their childhood vaccinations on time from six weeks to ensure ongoing protection. Infants and children: Vaccinations at 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, and again at 4 years. A further booster is given at age 11 years (school year 7. For more information: Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
