
That sinking feeling: Australia's Limestone Coast is drying up
Graham Kilsby, a fourth-generation farmer, is surveying the Kilsby sinkhole, a popular freshwater diving site on his property south of Mount Gambier.
The gin-clear waters provide visibility of up to 65 metres. But, as he inspects the sinkhole when Guardian Australia visits, alarm bells ring. Water levels dropped 1.5 metres between January and March 2025.
Lake George at Beachport. The drainage system that cuts through the region ends here, with flood water released into the sea. Here the drainage system is bone dry
It's a long-term decline, made worse by South Australia experiencing one of the driest years on record since 1900. And it's not confined to Kilsby's property: the entire vast groundwater network in the limestone crust that straddles the border between South Australia and Victoria – an area of such agricultural richness that it has been dubbed the Green Triangle – is in decline, thanks to decades of over-extraction and declining rainfalls. Monitoring of 181 groundwater wells by SA authorities shows a consistent decline since 1993, with some, particularly in areas of intensive irrigation and forestry developments, dropping by several metres.
We're here to explore the sinkhole alongside a group of experienced freedivers. And, as Kilsby says, to 'see it before it's gone'.
It's reckoned to be one of the best dive sites in the world to descend on a single breath. By day, divers move through brilliant shafts of light piercing the cave. By night, glow sticks are their only markers, 25 metres below.
Free divers join a rare night dive at Kilsby sinkhole
It's a remarkable experience – one Kilsby wants protected.
'We need an independent review of currently available [water use] data, as well as a moratorium on any new bores,' he says.
A free diver at Kilsby
'It's not something we can look at in three years and everything will be OK. If we don't change what we're doing, I think we've destroyed it and it won't be coming back.'
One month before diving at Kilsby sinkhole, we're at Little Blue Lake, a large freshwater sinkhole a 15-minute drive south of Mount Gambier. It's a 35C day in January and the lake is buzzing with swimmers seeking relief in waters that remain 14C year-round.
People wait to leap into Little Blue Lake, a freshwater sinkhole on the Limestone Coast
The once crystal-clear lake now often appears steel-grey or green, its water quality compromised by persistent algae blooms caused by excess nutrients in the water from agricultural runoff and wastewater. Waste from the lake's thousands of visitors also built up, with some guests reporting seeing human faeces littering its perimeter before a portable toilet was installed in January.
Sign up for a weekly email featuring our best reads
Teenagers gather at the rim, waiting to take the 'leap of faith' – a 12-metre drop that's a local rite of passage. The crack and thud of awkward landings echoes off the deep walls. The leap has grown riskier as water levels hit historic lows. 'See that ledge the kids are sitting on? That's new,' one local remarks.
A young boy dives deep at Little Blue Lake
An underwater view of the aquatic plants lining Ewens Ponds, open for a brief period in January before being closed due to low flows
Closer to the coast are a series of karst rising springs, wetlands formed by groundwater rising to the service under pressure, creating a permanently saturated peat soil. That water then feeds the region's most well-known sinkholes, the Piccaninnie and Ewens ponds.
But both are now closed due to low flows and algae outbreaks. Piccaninnie Ponds, a Ramsar-listed wetland of international importance, has been closed since 2022 and snorkelling and diving at Ewens Ponds was suspended in February.
Piccaninnie Ponds, a Ramsar-listed site of international importance that has been closed since 2022
Mount Gambier residents Maddy and Hamish share a moment during a swim in a runoff channel at Piccanninie Ponds
The ponds rely on constant, fast-moving groundwater flow. Claire Harding, a conservation ecologist at the SA National Parks and Wildlife Service, says water flows at Piccaninnie and Ewens have reduced by 62% and 25% respectively since the 1970s.
'Anything that affects groundwater is going to also impact Piccaninnie and Ewens,' Harding says.
In 2020 both Picanninie and Ewens were listed as nationally endangered ecosystems.
Uncle Ken Jones, a Boandik community elder, dives deep at Ewens Ponds
In January the SA lieutenant governor, Dr Richard Harris, an anaesthetist and experienced cave diver who received international acclaim for the crucial role he played in the rescue of schoolchildren trapped in a cave in Thailand, conducted a dive at Piccaninnie with the National Parks and Wildlife Service to help guide any potential reopening.
'What I saw earlier this year when I did that dive was shocking,' Harris says. 'It's a real disaster unfolding.'
The lush pastures and usually high rainfall of the Green Triangle make it a highly productive agricultural region. The Limestone Coast produces a third of SA's agricultural output, despite being just 2% of its landmass. Across the border in Victoria there are 1,000 dairy farms in the south-west alone, producing 2bn litres of milk – 23% of all national production – each year.
The South Australian Dairyfarmers Association chief executive, Andrew Curtis, says any cuts to water allocations could impact dairy businesses.
The less-successful dairy farms are slowly being bought up by forestry interests, increasing an already vast expanse of blue gum and radiata pine plantations. The fast-growing trees drink up the groundwater and absorb runoff, causing aquifer levels to plummet. A 2009 report by the SA Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation found that hardwood and softwood forests cut water recharge to the aquifer by 78% and 83% respectively, when compared with dryland agriculture.
An aerial view of Hell's Hole, part of the network of sinkholes and caves on the Limestone Coast
Since the mid-1990s, groundwater levels in heavily irrigated areas have also declined. Conservation advice provided in 2020 to the federal government on the karst springs' endangered listing under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act linked that decline in part to the use of centre-pivot irrigation, which consumes much more water than other forms of irrigation.
There are now 3,000 water licences allowing irrigators and landowners to draw groundwater from the region for non-domestic use.
About 100km north of Mount Gambier are the Bool and Hacks lagoons. The seasonal, interconnected wetlands earned Ramsar status in 1985 and were once famous for flocks of migratory birds.
Marion Patterson with some of the 600 taxidermised birds collected by her father
'Dad used to say Bool in flood was better than Kakadu,' says Marion Patterson, a fourth-generation Bool local.
Patterson is speaking from the bird room, a collection of 600 taxidermised birds and 350 fauna specimens put together by her father, the duck hunter turned conservationist and master taxidermist, Jack Bourne. It's open to the public via appointment.
Many of the birds here were once regular visitors to the lagoon. There's a brolga that hit a power line and started a fire, several birds of prey, smaller wrens and a little grebe.
Bool and Hacks are fed by Mosquito Creek, a once-permanent source of water which is now dry. Dr Matt Gribbs, a CSIRO hydrologist, says the creek began to dry up at the end of the 1990s and now 'there is only flow for 15-20% of the time'.
Centre-pivot irrigation next to the Bool and Hacks lagoons
The collapse of the lagoons is a slow-moving crisis, and the regulatory response has been even slower. A plan to reduce water allocations in high-risk areas, recommended in 2013, was put on hold in 2018 when Steven Marshall's Liberal state government blocked any changes, instead calling for an independent review of the science underpinning the proposed cuts.
That review was published in 2019 and described ongoing 'catastrophic consequences' to Bool and Hacks lagoons, and to the karst springs farther south, due to intensive land use and historical drainage in both areas. That warning was consistent with the 2013 plan.
The Landscape Board – a body set up in 2019 to manage SA's landscapes – told Guardian Australia the warnings have been around for 'decades'.
In 2024 an extensive review of regulations noted: 'The overall scheme of management has not changed significantly since 2004.' The water allocation plan is not due to be updated until December 2027. A SA government spokesperson said decisions would be made on the best available science.
A water-hungry blue gum plantation near Naracoorte
Despite the acknowledged decline, there has been no official report to Ramsar on the Bool and Hacks lagoons since 1998, and no report on Piccaninnie Ponds since 2012. The Ramsar convention requires governments to make a report if the ecological character of a site changes or is likely to change due to human activities.
A spokesperson for the SA government said the department was 'documenting information about the current status of Bool and Hacks lagoons and Piccaninnie Ponds, in line with the requirements of the EPBC Act and the Ramsar Convention'.
Ewens Ponds was open for a few fleeting weeks early in the new year, before being closed in February. In that brief window, a Boandik (Bunganditj) man, Uncle Ken Jones, who runs a tourism business on the Limestone Coast, steps into the cool water, taking a deep breath before diving into blue. 'It's just magic,' he says, resurfacing with a grin.
Jones snorkels at Ewens Ponds
His joy is precarious, resting on the health of a dying ecosystem.
'If we don't do something about it in the next few years, it rests upon our soul,' he says. 'We really should have spoken up and influenced some people to care for it a bit better rather than just take, take, take.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
New EU-Ukraine agri trade quotas to be 'in between' current deal and wartime exemptions
BRUSSELS, June 6 (Reuters) - The European Union and Ukraine are negotiating a new deal that will set import quotas on agricultural goods from Ukraine somewhere "in between" current levels and the temporary exemptions granted after Russia's 2022 invasion, the EU's agriculture commissioner told Reuters. The EU temporarily waived duties and quotas on agricultural products in June 2022 after Russia's full-scale invasion to help Ukraine compensate for the higher costs of its exports, after Russia threatened its traditional Black Sea shipping lanes. Those tariff suspensions expired on Thursday. The EU and Ukraine reverted to the pre-war regime of trade quotas on Friday, while the two sides negotiate a new longer-term deal - in which Brussels is seeking to strike a balance between supporting Ukraine in its war with Russia, and heeding European farmers' concerns about cheaper Ukrainian imports. "What will be negotiated will be something in between the quotas under the existing DCFTA and the autonomous trade measures, the volumes that have been exported there," EU agriculture commissioner Christophe Hansen said in an interview with Reuters on Thursday. The DCFTA refers to Ukraine and the EU's pre-war trade deal. The EU's "autonomous trade measures" temporarily suspended quotas on Ukrainian imports from 2022. Ukraine's farm minister Vitaliy Koval told Reuters this week that Kyiv was pushing for an agreement on higher quotas than it had before the war. EU farmers have complained that large shipments of cheaper Ukrainian sugar imports under the wartime tariff exemptions have undercut local supplies. The EU triggered "emergency brakes" to re-impose quotas on products including sugar and eggs in the past year, in response to surging imports. The EU's Ukrainian sugar imports soared to 400,000 tons in the 2022/23 season and over 500,000 tons in 2023/24, far exceeding the pre-war quota of 20,000 tons. Hansen said the new quotas on sugar would be "significantly higher" than those under the pre-war arrangements. "I think we can absorb a certain amount of those products," he said, while noting sensitivities around sugar, poultry and eggs. Negotiations on the new EU-Ukraine deal started on June 2. Hansen said it was feasible a deal could be reached by summer. "It depends now on both sides, I think technically that could be feasible," he said. Agricultural goods accounted for about 60% of Ukraine's total exports last year, with the EU buying around 60% of those goods, worth about $15 billion. A senior Ukrainian lawmaker said last month the loss of tariff-free access to the EU market could cost the country 3.5 billion euros ($3.99 billion) in annual revenue. "Our solidarity with Ukraine is as firm as ever, and therefore we are very committed to deliver this agreement as quickly as possible," Hansen said. The pre-war quota regime, which applies as of Friday, also includes lighter rules on import licenses for some goods like poultry and eggs, where instead of requiring licenses, quotas will be allocated on a first-come, first-served basis. ($1 = 0.8763 euros)


Daily Mail
11 hours ago
- Daily Mail
TOM UTLEY: Mrs U has a self-imposed hosepipe ban. But I don't know why she bothers when Thames Water wastes more than half a BILLION litres every day
When it comes to conserving water, my darling wife is a veritable eco-fanatic. She can't bear to see a single drop go to waste. To take one example: the hot tap over our kitchen sink runs cold for about 30 seconds before the warm water reaches it from the tank in the airing cupboard upstairs. But rather than let the water run down the drain until it warms up, as many of us would (I must plead guilty there), she collects every last teaspoonful in a jug. She then pours this into a bucket, which she keeps on the floor by the sink. As the bucket fills up in the course of the day, she takes it outside to water her beloved garden, which has been having a hard time of it lately (though the unusually long dry spell appears at last to have come to a sopping wet end). As for the reeled hosepipe I bought for her years ago, perish the thought that she would ever use it! Out of the goodness of her heart, she labours under a permanent, self-imposed hosepipe ban. All very virtuous, no doubt. But (don't tell her I said this) I reckon it's also completely futile – as she ought to have learned from something she experienced only last Sunday. Having gone through that jug-bucket rigmarole in the morning, she set off for church in the car, only to find herself stuck in a traffic jam just around the corner from our house. For the umpteenth time, Thames Water was digging up the road, at the very same junction where the company seems to have dug it up every few months since we moved to our South London suburb in the late 1980s. Temporary traffic lights were in operation, yet again, and water from a burst main was gushing in torrents down the road, as it has so often in the past. I can't say exactly how much was going to waste, but it was certainly enough to fill Mrs U's jug in the kitchen many millions of times over. What I do know is that the latest figures I can find say water companies in England and Wales lost more than one trillion litres through leaks in 2023. Meanwhile, Thames Water was named and shamed as the worst offender, having contributed 570,400,000 litres per day to that shameful total. To be fair, Thames is by far the biggest water firm in the country. It is also true that it inherited a great deal of crumbling Victorian and Edwardian infrastructure at the time of privatisation in 1989. It was only to be expected, therefore, that it would top the table for leaks. But there my sympathy runs dry and cold fury takes its place. For under a series of rapacious foreign owners and private equity firms, out to make a fast buck, Thames Water has made such a disgraceful hash of serving its customers that it has achieved what many of us might have thought impossible: along with other privatised water companies nationwide, it has succeeded in becoming more unpopular even than the banks, whose greed brought the country to the brink of ruin during the credit crunch. When there's too much rain, they pump revolting raw sewage into our precious rivers. When there's too little, they simply preach to their customers about the need to save water, imposing hosepipe bans (of the non-voluntary variety). Meanwhile, our bills go up and up. I note, incidentally, that this year's race to become the first company in the country to impose a hosepipe ban was won this week by Youlgreave Waterworks, which serves a mere 500 households in Derbyshire. But at least Youlgreave can argue that it's served by a single natural spring, which tends to dry up in sunny weather, as does the back-up supply from a disused mine. There's no such excuse for Thames, with its multiple reservoirs, which would have plenty of water to go around if only it didn't allow so much of it to leak away. So greedily has the firm behaved, indeed, that for decades it has poured into the pockets of its executives and shareholders the millions that should have been spent on preventing those leaks, keeping bills down and our rivers clean. In the process, it has accumulated staggering debts, variously estimated at between £15 billion and £20 billion, while picking up the odd fine and penalty from Ofwat, the regulator – the most recent being a record £123 million for pollution and paying excess dividends. But nothing seems to make a blind bit of difference to its conduct. With that mountain of debt hanging over the company, it's no wonder that potential rescuers have looked at the books and decided that it's not for them. On Tuesday, indeed, the American private equity firm KKR became the latest to pull out, abandoning its plans to inject £4 billion into Thames to keep it afloat. It's said that after ten weeks of due diligence, including several visits to wastewater treatment works, the firm found that the state of some of the Thames assets was worse than it had initially imagined. It was also nervous about the political risks associated with any deal, such as the possibility that the public's anger would lead to a stricter approach from Ofwat and the Government, with massive fines wiping out any potential financial gain. Quoted in The Guardian, a ministry spokesman says: 'The Government makes no apology for tackling the poor behaviour we have seen in the past, where too many people were rewarded for failure. But we welcome investors who want to work with us to rebuild this vital sector and clean up our rivers, lakes and seas.' Well good luck with that. After the depredations brought about by its owners, Thames Water looks to my untrained eye like a most unattractive prospect for any private buyer. God knows, I'm no fan of nationalisation. Indeed, among its many egregious sins, I count the fact that Thames has given capitalism a bad name among the firm's most grievous. But from where I'm sitting, ignorant as I am of high finance, I see little alternative to forcing the company into administration, which is after all a temporary form of takeover by state appointees. If so, it's true that many of its creditors – some of whom bought Thames debt at a discount in the hope of making easy profits – are likely to get their fingers seriously burnt. But I can't see Thames Water customers shedding too many tears for them. Whatever happens next, I dare say Mrs U will carry on saving every last drop of water she can. But with all those billions of gallons draining away, don't the few pints she saves look as pathetic as the Government's ruinous efforts to reduce our paltry emissions of CO2, while China and India belch ever more billions of tons into the atmosphere?


Times
13 hours ago
- Times
Bosses at six UK water companies face ban on bonuses
Bosses at six water firms including Thames Water will be banned from receiving bonuses this year because of serious environmental pollution and other failings. It is the first time water chiefs have been banned from receiving such financial incentives, which are worth hundreds of thousands of pounds. The scale of incentives paid to water leaders, totalling more than £112 million over the last decade, stoked public anger as sewage spills hit record levels. Labour's manifesto promised to ban them for water companies that missed standards. Senior executives at Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities, and Southern Water will now be barred from receiving bonuses for the 2024 to 2025 financial year. The move was made possible by a law passed in February, the first step in the government's reforms of the sector. Louise Beardmore, CEO of United Utilities, which caused more raw sewage spills than any other water firm in 2024, will be blocked from taking her bonus, which was £440,000 last year. Thames Water CEO Chris Weston, who recently defended taking his £195,000 bonus last year, will also miss his. Leaders of three companies escaped the ban, as they avoided serious shortcomings on environmental, financial and customer performance. Those include the sector's highest paid leader — Liv Garfield, the Severn Trent CEO, who earned £3.2 million last year including a £584,000 bonus. Susan Davy, CEO at South West Water, will also be able to take hers, despite the outbreak of a parasite in Devon that caused drinking water contamination in May 2024. Caroline Voaden, the Lib Dem MP for South Devon, said: 'It's hard to think of a company more deserving to have its boss's bonuses banned than South West Water. The company's absence is baffling and throws the validity of the entire policy into doubt.' Liv Garfield, the Severn Trent CEO, last year defended her multimillion-pound pay package and claimed that Severn Trent had made 'massive progress on river quality' DAVE BENETT/GETTY IMAGES FOR VEUVE CLICQUOT Heidi Mottram, the Northumbrian Water CEO who took a £234,000 bonus last year, will also be eligible to take one. Her company was fined £15.6 million this week by Ofwat for excessive sewage spills. There are fears that bosses' salaries will simply be raised to compensate for any missed bonuses. 'Any attempt to inflate base pay as a workaround must be stamped out,' said James Wallace, CEO of the charity River Action. A government source vowed to take more action in future if companies tried a workaround. Were a banned company to flout the ban when company reports are published this summer, regulator Ofwat has powers to claw back the money. Thames Water was hit by a ban because it was responsible for seven of the most serious pollution incidents last year — category one — from the Chilterns to London. It also failed to clear the bar on financial stability, because its credit rating was downgraded to an unacceptable level in April 2024. Southern Water, Anglian Water, United Utilities, and Yorkshire Water were all banned for a single category one pollution incident. Yorkshire also failed on consumer standards, while Wessex Water failed because of a criminal conviction after sewage killed thousands of fish. GETTY However, the CEO of Wessex will be able to take a bonus, as will the chief financial officer at Anglian, because of when they were appointed. The ban is time-limited. If the nine utilities perform satisfactorily this year, bosses will be eligible to take them next year. Two years ago, some chief executives voluntarily waived their bonuses in the face of public anger over environmental failures. The Times's Clean it Up campaign has been calling for stronger regulation to help Britain's rivers and seas. Steve Reed, the environment secretary, said: 'I applaud The Times for shining a light on the payment of unfair bonuses to water bosses. We promised to take action — and this historic ban comes into force today.' The bans come days after Thames Water's rescue creditor pulled out, increasing the risk of the debt-saddled company collapsing into nationalisation. A government-appointed commission said this week the water industry was suffering 'deep-rooted' issues that would require wide-ranging regulatory reforms to solve. driest springs on record. Reservoirs in England were 77 per cent full at the end of May, compared with 85 per cent at the end of May 2022, a year which saw widespread drought. The average for the end of May is 93 per cent. Drought has been officially declared in the northwest. The northeast, Yorkshire and east and west Midlands are classed as in 'prolonged dry weather', the final stage before drought. Youlgrave Waterworks, a tiny water firm which serves 500 homes in Derbyshire, has introduced a hosepipe ban, with other companies keeping them under review. In a sign of the escalating risk of restrictions on water use, the drought group will now meet monthly.