Pakistan urges citizens to avoid travel to Iran amid ongoing Israeli attacks
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan's government this week warned its nationals against traveling to Iran 'for a limited period,' state-run media reported, amid Tehran's worsening conflict with Israel.
Israel and Iran launched fresh attacks on each other overnight into Sunday, stoking fears of a wider conflict after Israel expanded its surprise campaign against its main rival with a strike on the world's biggest gas field.
Israel's military said more missiles were launched from Iran toward Israel overnight, with direct strikes targeting its energy industry and Defense Ministry headquarters, while Tehran unleashed a fresh barrage of missiles blamed for the deaths of four people. The strikes late Saturday night represented the latest salvo since a surprise attack by Israel on Friday aimed at decimating Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program.
'The Government of Pakistan has issued a travel advisory urging its citizens to avoid traveling to Iran for a limited period due to the recent Israeli attacks,' the state-run Associated Press of Pakistan (APP) reported on Saturday.
APP reported that the government is closely monitoring the situation in the region. Citing officials, it said that the latest advisory has been issued to ensure the safety and security of Pakistani nationals.
'In line with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's directives, necessary steps are already being taken to ensure the safe return of Pakistani citizens currently in Iran,' APP said.
Pakistan on Friday advised its citizens planning religious travel to Iran and Iraq to reconsider their plans, citing security concerns after Israel launched strikes on Iranian military and nuclear facilities earlier in the day.
That advisory mentioned Pakistani 'Zaireen,' or Shia pilgrims who travel to Iran and Iraq to visit religious sites, particularly in Mashhad, Qom, Najaf and Karbala.
Pakistan's foreign ministry has established a 24/7 Crisis Management Unit to ensure the safety and security of Pakistani nationals and pilgrims in Iran.
Pakistan's Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif on Saturday vowed Islamabad would extend diplomatic support to Israel at international forums.
Pakistan has condemned Israel's strikes against Iran and said Tehran has the right to defend itself. Islamabad has also called on world powers to intervene through dialogue and diplomacy to resolve surging Middle East tensions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Pakistan forms committee to tackle possible economic fallout of Israel-Iran conflict — adviser
ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has formed a high-level committee led by the finance minister to monitor any possible economic impact of the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, a senior government adviser said on Sunday, as rising oil prices threaten to add new pressure on the South Asian nation's fragile economy. Oil prices have climbed about 7 percent since Friday, with Brent crude closing at $74.23 a barrel after hitting a session high of $78.50, amid fears of supply disruptions if Middle East tensions escalate further. 'The prime minister has constituted a committee under the supervision of the finance minister, which will monitor the situation,' Khurram Schehzad, an adviser at the finance ministry, told Arab News. 'The committee will assess the impact of the changes and volatility in oil prices on fiscal and external sides, and devise a strategy to pacify the impacts on Pakistan's economy.' Pakistan relies heavily on imported oil, and any sustained spike in prices could widen its current account deficit and push inflation higher at a time when the country is struggling with low foreign reserves and slow growth. Israel and Iran launched fresh attacks on each other overnight into Sunday, killing scores. The conflict started on Friday when Israel launched a massive wave of attacks targeting Iranian nuclear and military facilities but also hitting residential areas, sparking retaliation and fears of a broader regional conflict. A 909 kilometer (565 mile) long international boundary separates Iran's southeastern Sistan-Baluchestan province from Pakistan's southwestern Balochistan province. 'Israel-Iran conflict presents complex challenges for Pakistan as rising oil prices may increase import costs and inflation, influencing monetary policy and growth, while disruptions to key routes like the Strait of Hormuz can affect energy supplies and critical projects,' said Khaqan Najeeb, an economist and former finance ministry adviser. 'It can potentially affect consumer purchasing power and production costs ... Possible disruptions to shipping routes and higher freight charges might result in delays to imports and exports, thereby exerting additional pressure on Pakistan's external sector.' DIPLOMATIC BALANCING As the crisis deepens, analysts widely believe Islamabad should maintain 'careful diplomatic balancing' between its ties with Iran and its other partners in the Gulf, as well as the United States. 'Diplomatically, Pakistan has to navigate a balanced and principled stance, honoring its historic ties with Iran alongside its strategic relationships with the US and Gulf partners, emphasizing dialogue and regional stability.' Former Defense Secretary Lt Gen (retired) Naeem Lodhi said Israel was unlikely to target Pakistan directly but an expanding conflict could complicate matters for Islamabad, adding that it should remain vigilant but avoid 'deeper' involvement. 'If the war expands to include more Middle Eastern countries, some of which are friendly to Pakistan, then it would be a difficult proposition for Islamabad... whose side it takes,' Lodhi added. Former Foreign Secretary Aizaz Ahmed Chaudhry said Pakistan would respond 'forcefully' if directly targeted. 'Israel knows that Pakistan has the capacity to hit back hard,' Chaudhry said, referring to a May 2025 military confrontation with India in which Islamabad retaliated to New Delhi's strikes, taking down fighter jets and hitting airfields, air bases and other military facilities. Pakistan's former ambassador to Iran, Asif Durrani, warned that the crisis could spill over if not contained. 'Not only Pakistan, but the entire Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region can be engulfed if the ongoing spat between Israel and Iran turns into an all-out war,' Durrani said. However, he said the likelihood of a refugee crisis was limited unless the conflict escalated into a ground invasion. 'A refugee influx is possible if it becomes a full-fledged war, but Israel or the United States are unlikely to commit boots on the ground in Iran,' Durrani added. Qamar Cheema, executive director of the Sanober Institute think tank, said Pakistani security forces should increase patrols and surveillance in border districts as the conflict could impact militant groups operating along the Iran-Pakistan border region, such as Baloch separatists and other sectarian outfits. 'Whenever such a situation arises, separatist and sectarian outfits often try to take advantage of it, either by increasing their activities or by shifting them from their hideouts inside Iranian territories,' he said. 'Their movement is likely to intensify if the threat reaches the border region.'
Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Iran must ‘never have nuclear weapons': Merz
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Sunday that Iran must 'never have nuclear weapons,' his government spokesman said, as Israel continued a campaign of massive strikes targeting Tehran's nuclear program. The comment came in a conversation with the sultan of Oman, Haitham bin Tarik al Said, in which both leaders agreed on the need to 'prevent the conflict from spreading,' German government spokesman Stefan Kornelius said in a statement.
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
The regional implications of escalating Iran-Israel tensions
The new Israeli military strikes on Iranian targets did not catch many by surprise. Israel has been uncompromising in its enforcement of a zero uranium enrichment and even zero nuclear policy for Iran — an objective that lies at the core of its national security doctrine. Despite several rounds of US-Iran negotiations, including last month's fifth round that ended without progress, Iran has not conceded on this critical point. US President Donald Trump stated that he told Iran it should reach a deal within 60 days. Now, more than 60 days have passed without an agreement, largely due to Tehran's unwillingness to abandon its nuclear program, or at least scale back enrichment and accept stricter oversight. While Israel's actions were expected given its stated red lines, what has raised eyebrows is the apparent contradiction in the American position. The US administration has officially declared that it does not support further military escalation in the region. However, it is now clear that Washington was fully briefed in advance of the Israeli strike and the Israeli leadership was able to secure a green light and clear commitment of US support. This contradiction has prompted questions about whether America tacitly approved the operation, or even encouraged it, and participated in the deception plan that misled the Iranian calculation, despite public claims to the contrary. Iran has long boasted of its military strength and ability to deter threats and retaliate against them. The second key question, therefore, is how far is Iran prepared to go in escalating the confrontation and does it have the capability to sustain a high-intensity conflict? While Israel can continue targeting Iranian assets, doing so at scale requires American support in intelligence-sharing, resupply of munitions and diplomatic backing. Iran still has tools at its disposal. One of the more dangerous would be a return to asymmetric warfare and covert operations Dr. Abdulaziz Sager Iran still has tools at its disposal. One of the more dangerous would be a return to asymmetric warfare and covert operations, similar to tactics used in the 1980s, when Iranian-linked groups targeted US and Israeli interests across the region. This scenario is not hypothetical — it is one of the reasons Israel has temporarily closed embassies considered to be at risk of reprisal. There have been discussions about whether Russia could play a mediating role by taking custody of enriched uranium as a confidence-building measure. While Iran may see this as a way to retain its leverage, neither the US nor Israel is likely to support any arrangement that allows Tehran to preserve control over its sizable stockpile of highly enriched uranium, which it accumulated illegally over the past few years. The Arab Gulf states find themselves in a highly precarious position. Geographically and economically linked to Iran, they are deeply vulnerable to the fallout of escalating tensions. Their top priority is to avoid being dragged into the conflict, either as a battleground or as an indirect target of retaliation. A regional war would pose severe risks to the security of their territories and populations, critical infrastructure and economic prosperity. Thus, beyond the fundamental issue of security, there are also deep implications for economic prosperity and development. Gulf economies are fundamentally tied to stability, open trade routes and investor confidence, and any disruption, whether from attacks or threats to energy infrastructure, could have immense repercussions. The Gulf states have consistently upheld a policy of neutrality and noninterference, seeking to balance relations with Iran, Israel and the US. They have condemned Iran's involvement in Arab affairs and its ambitions of regional dominance, while also rejecting Israel's use of force and its disregard for international norms. Similarly, they oppose US policies that violate international law, particularly those that appear to enable further escalation. The Gulf's diplomatic stance is rooted in a principled call for respect for sovereignty, nonaggression and adherence to international law and human rights. With the conflict now transitioning into a broader military confrontation, the balance of power becomes the determining factor. In this respect, the Israeli-American alliance holds overwhelming superiority in terms of firepower, intelligence capabilities and strategic depth. Iran, under increasing pressure both domestically and externally, is showing signs of fatigue and attrition. This raises a third critical question: Will Iran's leadership come to terms with the realities of its disadvantage and move toward de-escalation? Or will it continue down a path that could lead to further destruction, isolation and internal collapse? In the coming weeks, the answer to the questions posed above will not only shape the future of Iran, they will also define the contours of regional stability. For the Gulf states, the imperative remains: stay out of the crossfire, safeguard national security and uphold the norms of international legitimacy that offer the only sustainable path out of this crisis. • Dr. Abdulaziz Sager is chairman of the Gulf Research Center.
