Rockford ComEd users may soon have to pay higher monthly fees and here's why:
ROCKFORD, Ill. (WTVO) — The City Council is split over whether or not to agree to ComEd's cost increase for 11th Street Reconstruction plans.
Back in 2024, the city agreed to pay $4,460,362 to ComEd for Phase 1 of the 11th Street Reconstruction Plan. This plan includes the relocation of utility poles underground.
City officials said ComEd was 60% of the way complete with Phase 1 when members approached Council and asked for a cost increase of $9,300,000, nearly double the original agreement.
Third Ward Alderman Chad Tuneberg is a member of the Finance and Personnel Committee and said the idea to put these poles underground is a good one.
'I think everyone would appreciate power lines being buried not only cosmetically, aesthetically, but also for the power outages that that may not occur with power lines buried,' the Alderman said.
But Tuneberg said the cost increase would impact ComEd the monthly fees for ComEd users.
'Each and every resident of Rockford would be affected by this,' Ald. Tuneberg said. 'Small, mid and large businesses would be really affected by it. We just could not put that on the backs of our residents and our businesses within our city.'
George Gaulrapp is the External Affairs Manager for ComEd and released a statement saying, 'ComEd is committed to working with municipalities as they develop plans to improve their communities,' he said. 'Per our process, we provided a preliminary, initial estimate prior to a robust engineering design process that resulted in a revised estimate. We are continually reviewing and improving our internal processes to ensure we provide more accurate cost estimates for our customers. We are dedicated to working with Rockford to bring this project to fruition.'
The vote Monday was to deny this cost increase request from ComEd. If the Council had approved that denial, construction would have continued and the power lines would have remained above ground.
The Council voted 7-5 in favor of the denial. Then, Alderwoman Janessa Wilkens retracted her vote, which made it a 6-6 tie. Mayor McNamara was tasked with the tie-breaking vote, and he voted against the denial, resulting in a 6-7 vote and a failed approval of the denial.
This means that an Ordinance on this item will be written for the Council to vote on at the meeting on June 16th. If the Ordinance gets eight votes in favor of it, the monthly fee increases will take effect.
Tuneberg said he is concerned with how Phases 2 and 3 of this project could impact Rockford residents.
'We're looking at businesses that would be paying thousands upon thousands of dollars a month each month during the duration of this project,' Tuneberg said. 'I don't know how we can ask them to do that.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Unintended consequences': Austin reworking affordable housing incentive program
AUSTIN (KXAN) — For months, residents at Acacia Cliffs Apartments — near MoPac and Far West Boulevard — have been fighting a rezoning request from the building's owners that would result in the demolition of the aging complex to rebuild a newer, taller apartment complex. For Eric Gomez, who has lived at Acacia Cliffs since 2016, it could mean he'll no longer be able to afford living in a spot that allows him to easily get to work, the grocery store, the library and a nearby hospital. He's one of the residents showing up at city hall regularly, asking city council members to shut down that rezoning request. But what the residents may not have known at first is that — for now — city council has tied its hands on what it can do in cases like this one. The options here: Approve the rezoning request under Austin's DB90 program, which only requires developers to commit to a certain number of affordable units in exchange for loosened height restrictions, or don't approve the rezoning request and allow the developer to demolish the complex anyways, rebuild it under the same zoning structure and commit no affordable units to the city's pipeline at all. 'DB90 has been an unhappy experience. Even with Council's well motivated goals for DB90, this density program, as currently created, is proving to be divisive, difficult to utilize, and ultimately too far from achieving the goal of Council to provide more housing by allowing more density,' Austin Mayor Kirk Watson wrote. He continued, 'The unintended consequences we're seeing need to be addressed.' That's why Austin City Council is voting on changes to DB90 Thursday in an attempt to close those loopholes. One group of council members — Jose Velasquez, Chito Vela, Zo Qadri, Mike Siegel — and the mayor are proposing the city's density bonus programs be reworked entirely. 'The main thrust of the resolution is creation of a hierarchy of density bonus paper districts that include both lower and higher heights than DB90. This is a critical necessity in our code, as this provides options that may allow for better outcomes,' Watson said. Meanwhile, Mayor Pro Tem Vanessa Fuentes said she wants the city to prioritize a one-for-one unit replacement. And Austin City Council Member Marc Duchen is looking to fund a new preservation program altogether — modeled after other cities like Dallas. 'This would give us another enormous tool in our arsenal that could start working in as little as three months to start buying down the affordability and making sure that we are extending the life of these properties,' he explained of his proposal. You can see all of the proposals from Austin City Council members on this message board heading into Thursday's council meeting. Gomez said he'll be there Thursday, asking for a solution that lets him stay where he is, at a price he can afford. 'Everyone needs to be made aware of it and make sure that the policies that the city council members create are actually indeed doing what they're supposed to be doing and not the opposite,' he said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Conneaut council passes two ordinances at special meeting
CONNEAUT — City council passed an ordinance to issue and sell $225,000 in bonds to pay a portion of costs of work on Broad Street at a special meeting Monday. The work on Broad Street will extend from just north of the Norfolk Southern underpass to Route 20 and is being paid for by the Ohio Department of Transportation and the city. Council had passed a similar ordinance issuing and selling $175,000 to pay for the project at a March 24 meeting. Conneaut City Manager Nick Sanford informed council at an April 28 meeting they would need to pass another ordinance for bonds after bids for the project came in higher than expected. There will also be work on Broad Street from Liberty to Route 20 as part of the city's 2025 road projects. Sanford does not expect work on Broad Street to affect the Soapbox Derby, he said at a work session. 'The contractor for that project is at least four to six weeks out on expected delivery of precast inlet basins for the storm sewers,' he said. 'We don't expect to see any activity on that site for a while.' Sanford estimates the project may start around July or August. He added at a work session, the city sent out the first advertisement for bids Friday for the 2025 road projects. The second round of bids go out Friday. Bids open June 12, Sanford said. Alongside Broad Street, there will also be bids for Main Street from Mill to Harbor streets, Salem Street from its eastern terminus to Rowe Street and Day Street from Lake Road to Erie Street. There are also an alternate bids to chip and seal South Ridge Road West from Route 7 to the Kingsville Township line and for additional asphalt paving. Council passed a Community Housing and Preservation Partnership Agreement with the Ashtabula County Board of Commissioners. Sanford said the agreement is a partnership with the county that the cities of Geneva and Ashtabula also participate in and relates to the state's Community Housing Impact and Preservation Program. 'It's a very fast turnaround process,' he said. Sanford said at a work session he is reaching out to CSX about the company's railroad underpass on Broad Street. 'I've requested any and all documentation that the railroad may have inspection wise,' he said. Sanford said he is not sure if the company will fulfill the request. 'I want to get ahead of this, because I know it's been a hot topic in the city of Ashtabula,' he said. Recently, Ashtabula city residents have raised concerns at Ashtabula City Council meetings and on social media about the conditions of the CSX underpass on Lake Avenue. Sanford said Conneaut's CSX bridge does not appear in the same condition as the one on Lake Avenue in Ashtabula. Councilperson-at-large Mariana Branch brought up the topic of increasing wages for council members. The wage increase could only go into effect in 2026 if it was passed this year, she said. A wage increase for 2026 could not be voted on in 2026. The city has received a bid from one firm out of Cleveland to conduct a utility rate study, Sanford said. 'They proposed a pretty nice task breakdown,' he said. 'Total fees and expense just under $43,000.' Sanford said last weekend's city clean up went well, and the city might have a second tire amnesty in the fall. Second Ward Councilperson Chris Castrilla raised concerns about Rockwell Street, asking city employees to take a look at it. Sanford requested the city have a public safety committee meeting. Committee members at the work session decided to have the meeting before the city council meeting June 23.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Restaurant owners, workers hold competing rallies over potential repeal of Initiative 82
WASHINGTON () — Wednesday, business owners and workers held competing rallies outside the Wilson Building, as the D.C. Council considers the fate of Initiative 82. Initiative 82 was passed in November of 2022 and implemented the following Spring. The voter backed law eliminates the tipped minimum wage by gradually raising wages over the next several years. But that law is now in question, as Mayor Muriel Bowser proposed repealing I-82 under her 2026 budget. 'The economy we're dealing with, the environment for restaurants is vastly different than the economy and the environment that restaurants were operating in when this ballot measure was advanced,' said Bowser back in May. It's a proposal some restaurant and bar owners support. 'It's been a pretty tremendous impact to our payroll,' said Diane Gross, co-owner of Cork Wine Bar and Market. 'With rising costs, federal workers losing their jobs, tariffs, it's all made it much, much harder to actually make any money in our business.' Gross said the impacts ultimately hit the employees. 'In order to make the numbers add up for us and to stay open we've had to cut jobs, we've had to cut hours, we've had to take employees off of certain shifts,' she said. She and others are calling on the Council to repeal I-82. 'We're hurting. This was not what was happening in 2022 when this passed, it's a totally new normal,' she said. DC Council votes to pause July 1 wage bump under Initiative 82 The plea from restaurant owners comes one day after the Council the next pay raise allocated under I-82. This, as they consider how to move forward all together. Alexis Zosel, a barista in Mount Pleasant, called any repeal a 'slap in the face' to workers. 'Respect the will of the voters. These are the same voters who voted you into office,' she said. Zosel said she's seen her pay increase as a result of I-82. Initially, she said her employer raised her pay from $9 an hour plus tips, to the full citywide minimum wage of about $17 an hour. To address the rise in costs, a service fee was instituted on all checks. However, she said that led to confusion and a drop in tips. Her employer ultimately removed the service charge and opted to raise menu prices. 'Since then, I've seen my wages raise 18%. People are tipping more and it's not confusing,' said Zosel. 'People are okay with paying the higher prices. I think they understand there's inflation, there's rising costs and labor and goods, things like that.' She also noted that I-82 has made her income more stable. 'Tips aren't secure. They vary by what position you might have. They vary by what restaurant you work in. There's discrimination,' she said. 'There's just a lot of things at play that can affect those things so just asking for the full minimum wage feels like the bare minimum.' The Council has had mixed reactions to both a pause and potential full repeal. Though Ward 4 Councilmember Janeese Lewis George said there should be no confusion on what to do. 'I'm just incredibly frustrated that we are as a city, relitigating what has been litigated for the last couple of years again,' she said. 'The residents of this city have voted overwhelmingly twice that they believe that tipped workers deserve to have a minimum wage just like every other worker in the city.' She does not support a pause or repeal. 'The timeline has been known since this was enacted. We've known for two years, this July 1, this next increase was going to come,' said the councilmember. 'So I don't know why we need to pause while we're contemplating the budget of all things right now.' The Council will spend the next month debating the budget, which includes the repeal of I-82. It's scheduled to take its first vote on the budget on July 14. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
