Academic freedom in the US is under threat – universities of the world, unite!
In western academia, everything began with philosophy. Ever since, especially since the Enlightenment and the scientific revolution of the 17th century, there has been a long, centrifugal process, with discipline after discipline making its distinctive contribution and marking out its methods and its domain of inquiry. Raphael's painting The School of Athens displays this perfectly, with the two great philosophers Plato and Aristotle in the centre. Yet even here, Raphael points at the specialisation of knowledge that is about to explode. Plato points upwards, symbolising his interest in the timelessness of metaphysics. Aristotle gestures downwards, emphasising his interest in the empirical.
Today, at university, students and researchers focus on a single sub-branch of, say, modal logic, labour economics or organic chemistry. Knowledge has accumulated and fragmented. Renaissance men (or women) are almost nonexistent.
Hand in hand with this, especially in the last century, we have seen ever more rigorous academic standards and an ever sharper emphasis on evidence and logic, and the importance of separating these from opinions. As a senior member of Oxford University put it to me recently, from the start he was taught to distinguish the positive from the normative, and that, in the words of his tutor, 'we only do the positive'.
This is correct 99% of the time, and the new chancellor of Oxford was fully on target when he said a university did not need a foreign policy. However, the central question about universities – all universities – is whether they can be and should be neutral with respect to everything. Should we avoid the normative all the time? Absolutely not.
Return to the Raphael painting. Aristotle and Plato have different approaches, but they are entirely agreed about one thing: the subject of their inquiry is the cosmos. Or, as Ludwig Wittgenstein put it, 'The world is all that is the case'. We in universities, in every discipline, have an interest in investigating the universe as it is. This can and should include writings about human imagination or our dreams or fantasies. But our investigations cannot take seriously claims about the world that we know not to be the case. Evolution and creationism are not to be compared, one with the other, any more than we should take someone seriously who believes the Earth is flat. In universities, beliefs are to be examined, not taken as God given.
None of this means that there is anything as simple as the truth. The truth is almost always partial, debatable and context dependent. Yet, as Bernard Williams argued so convincingly in Truth and Truthfulness, academics must be truth-tellers. We cannot be neutral with respect to fake news, misinformation or outright lies. No matter where these come from, they must be called out. If a university does not believe this and does not act accordingly, it does not deserve to be a university.
With Columbia having capitulated, and with Harvard and Princeton under pressure to follow suit, every university, not just across the US, but around the globe, must unite in standing up for truth-telling.
Andrew Graham is a political economist, former master of Balliol College, Oxford and former director of the Scott Trust
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
13 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Hotel stay in Oxford boutique hotel for Tánaiste and delegates cost €4,200
A single night hotel stay for Tánaiste Simon Harris along with Ireland's Ambassador to the UK Martin Fraser and a group of six public servants cost the taxpayer nearly €4,200. The room for then-Taoiseach Simon Harris at the five-star Old Parsonage Hotel in Oxford cost €563 for just one night of accommodation last year. Advertisement The hefty bill was run up when Mr Harris met with UK prime minister Keir Starmer and attended a meeting of the European Political Community (EPC) in Oxfordshire last July. The boutique Old Parsonage is one of the best-known hotels in the university city and prides itself on being 'a luxury home-from-home with impeccable hospitality". The Department of Foreign Affairs said the booking was made when rooms were in short supply because of a large number of visiting delegations. They said: 'Accommodation for one night, 17 July, was booked on the basis of location, availability and quoted costings in a period of high demand in Oxford. Advertisement '[There were] forty plus Heads of State and Government and their delegations also in attendance at the EPC conference.' Other more junior officials – who were also in attendance – stayed at a nearby Premier Inn where the overnight rate was nearly €275. The bills were among tens of thousands of euros of expenditure charged to diplomatic credit cards at Ireland's embassies in London and Paris over the course of a year. In Paris, the embassy ran up significant bills during the Rugby World Cup and Olympics with €2,800 spent on temporary accommodation for one member of staff. Advertisement There was also an Airbnb bill of €5,576 for an official at the 2024 Olympics, where Ireland claimed a record-setting haul of medals. A further charge of €2,090 with Airbnb covered the cost of a group of Irish artists visiting Paris at the time of the Rugby World Cup in 2023, according to records released under FOI. Other bills on the card included €620 for four rugby match tickets as part of 'political engagement' by the Embassy. There was a charge of €250 for promotional pins for the Rugby World Cup, a €2,900 bill at the Tsuba Hotel in Paris for a political delegation, and around €230 for Irish cheese. Advertisement Other more mundane costs on the credit card included €36 for door wedges, €21.50 for electric light bulbs, and €1,317 for a replacement grill. At the Embassy in London, among the charges listed were four umbrellas for drivers costing a combined €105, tea towels from John Lewis costing €144, and €138 worth of Christmas tree lights from Amazon. A new fridge cost €1,317 while €105 was spent on a congestion charge penalty under the road charging scheme in the UK capital. There was also a bill of around €2,150 at the Pullman Hotel for a visit by Minister Paschal Donohoe and four officials in August of last year. Asked about the spending in France, the Department of Foreign Affairs said: 'Tens of thousands of Irish citizens travelled to France for the Rugby World Cup (2023) and Paris Olympics and Paralympics (2024). 'In advance of these tournaments, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade reinforced its operations in France, to provide expanded consular services for traveling fans.'
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Botley West campaigners join national walk against solar farms
Campaigners against plans to build one of Europe's largest solar farms have joined a nationwide community walk to protest against the potential impact of the West Solar Farm could cover about 1,000 hectares (2,471 acres) of countryside at three sites in west Oxfordshire if Photo Vault Development Partners (PVDP) say large-scale solar energy is crucial to meet the UK's climate targets, with the site capable of producing enough to power the equivalent of 330,000 those opposed to the scheme say the plans are "not necessary" and not "in the interests of the local community". Rosemary Lewis, who is part of the Stop Botley West campaign, told the BBC during the walk that solar energy "isn't the best solution for this country"."It [the proposal] makes me feel very sad - not just for our generation, but for future generations because solar [power] has almost begun to have its day," she added that the proposal had "not really been thought out carefully enough" by PVDP, as within the next 40 years solar power would be "obsolete technology". A fellow campaigner on the walk said: "Most of the land that those panels will be covering is good agricultural land, and its just not right - we need solar panels on roofs of new houses, not on the fields.""There's a right place for these sorts of things, and a right size - and this [proposal] just isn't it," another £800m farm would see panels installed in countryside north of Woodstock, west of Kidlington and west of been designated as a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project, the proposals are currently being evaluated by the director Mark Owen-Lloyd previously told the BBC: "We are confident this project will make a significant contribution towards the UK's ambitious solar generation targets."Addressing concerns around the site's scale and visibility, Mr Owen-Lloyd previously said the solar farm would be hidden in fields and behind hedges, and that people "would not notice it is there". You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
Linda McMahon says Harvard and Columbia making ‘progress' to meet Trump's demands to stop antisemitism
Trump's Education Secretary, Linda McMahon, praised the administration for pushing Harvard and Columbia University to make 'progress' on tackling campus antisemitism. "I have seen progress. And you know why I think we're seeing progress? Because we are putting these measures in place, and we're saying we're putting teeth behind what we're looking at," McMahon told NBC News. 'They talk a lot about it, but I think we really started to see a lot of their actions once we were taking action," McMahon added. The comments come as the administration continues its unprecedented campaign to force changes at both universities, on allegations that they didn't do enough to combat campus antisemitism during contentious protests surrounding the Israel-Hamas war. In April, the administration froze more than $2.2 billion in federal funding to Harvard after it refused to comply with a series of sweeping on-campus changes the administration demanded, prompting the university to sue. The Trump administration also imperiled $400 million to Columbia in March, though the New York university has taken a different tack than its Massachusetts peer in the Ivy League, largely agreeing to administration demands to restore the funds. Both schools were making concerted efforts to address antisemitism on campus before Trump took office. Columbia created an antisemitism task force in 2023, while Harvard followed suit in 2024, and the schools have worked to reform student training practices, disciplinary policies, and protest rules prior to Trump's crackdown on the universities beginning. Harvard also settled a major antisemitism suit from students and adopted a new campus definition of antisemitism in January, right as Trump took office. However, once the administration was underway, the universities have taken sharply divergent approaches, though neither has spared the Ivy League universities from scrutiny from the administration. In April, the administration demanded that Harvard institute unprecedented changes, including ending all diversity policies, cooperating with federal law enforcement, and subjecting itself to a 'viewpoint diversity' audit, among other reforms. The university declined, and soon after the administration froze the $2.2 billion in grants and contracts, prompting Harvard to sue. Since then, the administration has continued to ratchet up pressure on Harvard, attempting to strip its ability to enroll international students and threatening to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status. In March, Columbia largely acceded to the administration's requests, instituting changes like empowering a new campus police force to arrest students, committing to hiring faculty with greater 'intellectual diversity,' partially banning face masks at protests, and restructuring Middle East-focused university departments. Nonetheless, on Wednesday, the Department of Education claimed that Columbia was 'in violation of federal antidiscrimination laws and therefore fails to meet the standards for accreditation.' Harvard President Alan Garber has accused the administration of trying to unconstitutionally interfere with the university's affairs and choosing punishments that have little to do with tackling antisemitism. 'The sanctions that the government chose to impose against us — having to do with cutting off federal support at Harvard — those are not sanctions that will particularly aid us in the fight against antisemitism,' Garber told alumni in April. The administration has at times struggled to explain its own education policies. During a hearing in the House on Wednesday, McMahon appeared unable to answer questions about whether teaching students about the Tulsa race massacre or the fact that Joe Biden won the 2020 election would amount to ' illegal DEI,' a practice the administration says should bar schools from receiving federal funds. When asked about whether the administration's push to force universities to hire more ideologically diverse staff meant Harvard had to hire people like Holocaust deniers, McMahon responded and said, 'I believe that there should be diversity of viewpoints relative to teachings and opinions on campuses.' Officials have also spoken openly about their desire to police student opinion and political activity. 'It's very important that we are making sure that the students who are coming in and being on these campuses aren't activists, that they're not causing these activities,' McMahon added in her NBC News interview.
