logo
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Menendez brothers' move, Alex Murdaugh's accomplice, Luigi Mangione's charges

Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Menendez brothers' move, Alex Murdaugh's accomplice, Luigi Mangione's charges

Fox News18-04-2025

LAST-MINUTE MOVE: Los Angeles DA asks for delay before high-stakes hearing in Menendez brothers resentencing
CRASH COURSE: Karen Read judge sets last-minute deadline on crash reconstruction experts central to her defense
'BLINDSIDED': Menendez brothers' family accuses DA of violating victim protection law after showing graphic photo in court
HIRED GUN: Tennessee mom tried to hire hit man to kill former TV anchor ex-husband, put him 'underground': docs
INDICTED: Accused CEO assassin Luigi Mangione indicted on federal charges
RESIDENT EVIL: New England serial killer: CT River Valley survivor stabbed 27 times warns locals to remain 'vigilant'
MEET THE KOHBERGERS: Idaho judge issues order on Kohberger's bid to have his family guaranteed courtroom seating
GUILTY PLEA: Alleged accomplice accused of helping disgraced lawyer Alex Murdaugh enters plea deal
FIGHTING WORDS: Wildest moments in court so far for 'Doomsday mom' Lori Vallow's Arizona murder conspiracy trial
SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER
'RED FLAGS': 'Slender Man' stabber to be released as state warns of 'red flags'
DISARMING THE DEFENSE: Karen Read prosecutor wants to block defense from blaming after-party guests, pet dog in opening statement
'BIGGER PICTURE': Luigi Mangione assassination case signals DOJ shift on death penalty in blue states, expert says
SERIAL KILLER FEARS: New England serial killer fears merit 'review and investigation' after remains found across 3 states: expert
SEEING THE LIGHT: Amanda Knox says Catholic priest 'saw my humanity' in prison, helped restore faith in herself
SEEING EYE-TO-EYE: Idaho judge denies Bryan Kohberger's 'bushy eyebrows' motion
SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER
NO MORE 'DRAMA': Unfazed Karen Read stares down lingering questions about 'dog bites,' texts with retrial ready for kickoff
PRISON PEN PAL: Rosie O'Donnell says convicted killer Lyle Menendez is first 'straight man' she can 'love' and 'trust'
CHAOS IN COURT: Trans 'Zizian' cult suspect dragged from court after shouting allegations of de-transition, murder: report
LIKE WHAT YOU'RE READING? FIND MORE ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

With reporters shot and roughed up, advocates question whether those covering protests are targets
With reporters shot and roughed up, advocates question whether those covering protests are targets

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

With reporters shot and roughed up, advocates question whether those covering protests are targets

More than two dozen journalists have been injured or roughed up while covering protests against immigration raids in Los Angeles, leading press freedom groups to question whether law enforcement has been deliberately targeting reporters on the story. Journalists have been pelted with rubber bullets or pepper spray, including an Australian TV reporter struck while doing a live shot and a New York Post reporter left with a giant welt on his forehead after taking a direct hit. A CNN crew was briefly detained then released on Monday night. The advocacy group Reporters Without Borders said there have been at least 27 attacks on journalists — 24 from law enforcement — since the demonstrations started. The Committee to Protect Journalists, the First Amendment Coalition and Freedom of the Press Foundation were among the groups to express concern to Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem. In a letter, they said 'federal officers appear to have deliberately targeted journalists who were doing nothing more than their job covering the news.' Noem hasn't replied, David Loy, legal director of the First Amendment Coalition, said Tuesday. A Noem spokesperson didn't have an immediate comment for The Associated Press. Experts say the apparent hostility toward journalists, or a disregard for their role and safety, became particularly apparent during demonstrations following the death of George Floyd in 2020. A troubling indication of a decline in press freedom is the rapid escalation of threats journalists face in the United States, said Bruce Shapiro, executive director of the Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma at Columbia University. While most journalists covering wars receive training and safety equipment, it is apparent that many — particularly freelancers — don't have similar protection when assigned to events like the Los Angeles demonstrations, he said. 'It's not like covering a war zone,' Shapiro said. 'But there are some very specific skills and strategies that people need to employ. The First Amendment is only as strong as the safety of the journalists covering these events.' On Sunday, Australian journalist Lauren Tomasi was shot in the leg by a rubber bullet while reporting live, with a microphone in her hand, from protests in downtown Los Angeles. Widely circulated video shows her crying out in pain and clutching her lower leg as she and her camera operator quickly move away from a police line. She told 9News later that she was safe and unharmed. New York Post photographer Toby Canham was overlooking the 101 freeway when he was hit. He spent Monday in the hospital with whiplash and neck pain, and left with a red mark on his forehead. Shortly before he was shot, he said he saw someone throwing a water bottle with liquid at authorities. 'I completely understand being in the position where you could get injured,' Canham said. 'But at the same time, there was no justification for even aiming the rifle at me and pulling the trigger, so I'm a bit pissed off about that, to be honest.' Ben Camacho, a reporter at the local news website The Southlander, reported being shot twice. 'Unsure of what hit me both times but they hit like a sledgehammer and without immediate warning,' he wrote online. 'Elbow is wrapped with gauze and knee is weak.' Photojournalist Nick Stern was standing near some people waving a Mexican flags when he was shot in the thigh. He later had emergency surgery. 'I thought it was a live round because of the sheer intensity of the pain,' he told the AP. 'Then I passed out from the pain.' Lexis Olivier-Ray of L.A. Taco, an alternative independent media platform, thought he was safely positioned with some television crews but instead had pepper balls shot at him. Some reporters may have taken less care: one posted a clip from film he shot about 10 yards (9.1 meters) from a police officer with a rifle pointed at him. Not all of the incidents involved law enforcement. AP photographer Jae Hong was kicked and hit with sticks by protesters on Monday, his protective gear enabling him to escape injury. A Los Angeles TV reporter and her crew were forced away by demonstrators, one loudly yelling, 'get out of here.' CNN aired video of its correspondent, Jason Carroll, and his crew with their hands behind their backs being led away from a protest by officers. They were later released. In many past conflicts, journalists had a measure of protection because opposing sides wanted them to record their side of the stories, Shapiro said. Now many journalists are seen as superfluous by people who have other ways of delivering their messages, or a target by those who want to spread fear, he said. It illustrates the importance of proper training and protection, he said. For reporters in the middle of the story now, they should plan carefully — being aware of exit routes and safe zones, working in tandem with others and in constant communication with their newsrooms. ___

‘It's church with butt jokes': Kevin Smith looks back as ‘Dogma' turns 25
‘It's church with butt jokes': Kevin Smith looks back as ‘Dogma' turns 25

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘It's church with butt jokes': Kevin Smith looks back as ‘Dogma' turns 25

More than a quarter of a century after its release, Kevin Smith's Dogma remains one of the most ambitious and inventive films about spirituality Hollywood ever made. Smith's fourth film, it took the signature, wisecracking verbosity of Clerks, Mallrats, and Chasing Amy and combined it with the filmmaker's interpretation of the Catholic beliefs by which he'd been raised. 'Woke' before the term existed, Dogma featured a female God, a Black Jesus (at least, according to a Black Apostle), and a series of increasingly unconventional portrayals of other divine figures. Yet armed with a killer cast that includes Matt Damon, Ben Affleck, Linda Fiorentino, Alan Rickman, Chris Rock, Salma Hayek, and Alanis Morrissette (as God, naturally), today the film has endured as a surprisingly reverent — and to many viewers, relatable — portrait of religious faith, interrogated and restored in a journey that culminates in the filmmaker's hometown of Red Bank, N.J. More from GoldDerby 'Raw nerve fear': 'The Boys' team open up about filming the final season while ice skating Gary Oldman on 'Slow Horses' being 'an extraordinary show to work on' and 'one of the highlights of my career' Michelle Williams and Jenny Slate on playing best friends in 'Dying for Sex': 'It was love at first sight' For better or worse, it was also the third of Smith's films distributed by Miramax Pictures, who retained ownership even after cofounder Harvey Weinstein was sentenced to 23 years' incarceration for rape. After several failed negotiations, event cinema and distribution company Iconic Events acquired the rights to Dogma and announced a limited theatrical rerelease for this month. Ahead of the repertory screenings across the U.S. and Canada, which began June 5, Smith spoke to Gold Derby about the experience of reclaiming one of the biggest films of his career. In addition to discussing the necessary change to Dogma's credit block (now, minus Weinstein) he made for its resurrection, Smith recalled the momentary combination of critical and commercial muscle that led to it getting made, the influences (liturgical and cinematic) that inspired him during production, and its impact and legacy on his work and career. (For good measure, he also addressed Kanye West sampling Smith's dialogue for the 2024 song 'Back to Me,' and waxed philosophical about exhibition now that he owns a movie theater of his own in Jersey. Gold Derby: As heretical as George Lucas' Special Edition cuts may have been, when you were able to reclaim ownership of , did you think at all about any changes or new edits you might like to make? Kevin Smith: There was a question of, do we include cut footage? There's a sequence where Silent Bob sang the theme to Fat Albert, and there was another sequence about Azrael, the Jason Lee character. But ultimately, we defaulted on the side of "let's show them the movie they remember." When we go to home video and we do a steelbook and stuff, that's when we can absolutely integrate the scenes again — if folks want that. I'm personally always of the mind that, whatever went out, that was the director's cut, and I didn't want people to be sitting in the theater going, "I don't remember this." Quentin Tarantino called your previous film, , a great leap forward for you as a director. Did that reaction embolden you as you started making this film? Dogma was always more ambitious than the talent behind the film, i.e., myself. I started writing it before Clerks, and it was called God — very ambitious. It was the movie that I always knew we were going to have to do a bunch of stuff before this ever happens. You needed some money to tell that story. I remember when I shared it with Affleck, he came down here to Red Bank to hang out and then he was like, "Can you drive me home to Boston?" I was like, "No, you can take a train." He goes, "But I don't have nothing to do on the train." And I was like, "You got 60 pages of that Chasing Amy script you could read — that I wrote for you." And he's like, "Yeah, but that ain't gonna last me to Connecticut. What else you got?" So I said, "Well, I got this old script called Dogma that I wrote and it's 250 pages." When he got home, he called me up. I was like, "How was Chasing Amy?" He goes, "Guy falls in love with a lesbian? Great. But this Dogma movie, man, that's pimp. Can I be Bartleby? And I said, "The only way that movie gets made is if we cast a major movie star. There's no way they let you play Bartleby." So we went and made Chasing Amy and then we also co-executive produced Good Will Hunting, me and Scott Mosier, and that worked out like crazy. And since Ben and Matt wanted to do Dogma next, that was the only time I had enough juice and influence and cast to pull the trigger on that movie and have somebody finance it. And I'll never forget the first day we were shooting with Ben — right before we roll, he looks over at me and goes, "I guess I'm a major movie star now." It sounds like producing opened a lot of the doors that didn't. It was always going to be an uphill battle getting it made — never mind the content — just in terms of it was beyond my directorial abilities. We were supposed to do it for $4 million, but because Good Will Hunting had done so well, we were able to talk Miramax into upping it to $10 million. So, by that point, even though people like Quentin said nice things about Chasing Amy, having been to both sides of the spectrum, I never even believed the good stuff on Clerks. Thank God, otherwise, I would have been suicidal after the bad stuff on Mallrats. So, it was just me going, "We've got to go for it now, whether I'm ready for it or not." You had made your debut at a similar time as Quentin and other indie upstarts. Were you comparing notes at all? I'll be honest with you: a month before we made the movie, I called up Robert Rodriguez and I was like, "Would you direct Dogma for me?" I was like, "I'm not good enough to make this movie." And Robert's big advice was like, "Kevin, you got this. Just don't stand people against a wall this time." And thank God we had Robert Yeoman, you could do worse for a world-class DP, for heaven's sakes. Even a year later, I don't think I would've had the juice to do it. Thanks to the success of Dogma, then I had juice — and I chose Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back. I don't know if that's a waste of my chits, but I stand by them. You've got to understand, I had no plan. Somebody on the road during the Q&As was like, "What's your endgame?" And I was like, "Honestly, I just wanted to make Clerks.' I wish somebody had told me, this is the beginning of a 31-year journey. I would have been more prepared! But I've just been making it up as I go along, and in retrospect, that was the moment that put a lot of wind in my sails for the next 10 years. Because after Dogma, I started making movies that everyone hated. Not everyone but critics were just not in my corner as much. It was back to the Mallrats days. Rewatching , it occurred to me how much the beginning feels like where Bartleby and Loki are just going around killing people. Were there films, in either structure or substance, that inspired you as you were writing it? Oddly enough, there are movies that I'll point to and it'd be like, "That's a model for Dogma?" But they were the movies that made it possible. Number one and probably the biggest influence is a movie called Foul Play, with Chevy Chase and Goldie Hawn. The whole third act of Dogma is predicated on their third act, and that movie also deals with religion in a controversial way — which I didn't think we were doing. I didn't think we were making a controversial movie! It turned out to be, but I thought it was a pretty reverent flick. But going into it, Pulp Fiction was a massive model because we had just seen it in Cannes. In fact, that's when it went from God to Dogma, after I saw Pulp Fiction and I was like, "You can switch tones on a dime like that." I remember being like, "I can't wait to go home and redraft Dogma." So it went from being God to Dogma, it became more violent and also [had more] tonal shifts. So, it owes a lot to Pulp Fiction — the bravado, the bravery of what Quentin did with his storytelling in that movie. I'm trying to think what other movies ... A Man for All Seasons, the Fred Zimmerman movie. Honestly, I never knew this but Linda Fiorentino pointed it out when we were making the movie, she was like, "Kevin, structurally, it's absolutely The Wizard of Oz." And I'm not an Oz kid and I have nothing but appreciation for it, but it was undeniable when she said it, whether I knew it or not. Iconic Events The film offers a sort of 'legalese' version of scripture and religious beliefs. Roger Ebert had said, 'You don't need a catechism to see the movie, but it really helps.' It's crazy, this is a movie that unveiled a lot of Catholic school kids across my life. Roger Ebert was definitely one. Years later when I was on The Colbert Show, [Stephen] Colbert came in and started quoting the movie and knew it fairly well. But the weirdest person that ever reached out to me was a guy who was like, "I know your buddy Affleck and he gave me your email address and I saw your movie Dogma because of him. I thought it was absolutely wonderful, but I need to know what Jesuits you studied under because, clearly, this is the work of Jesuit teaching. Please get back in touch with me. Signed, Tom Clancy." How much of that approach was born of your own growing skepticism about religion? Interestingly enough, I've been watching it every night because I'm on tour with the movie, and what I love about the movie is it plays like a prayer, like a child's prayer — or a stoner child's prayer, to say the least. And I tell the kids every night, "This was the young me's version of expressing his faith." I'd sat in church my whole life and nobody seemed to celebrate their faith, they all seemed to be mourning it. This is my idea of what church could be: church with butt-f--king jokes in it. So, when I watch it, I see what the kid who made it, who wrote it and directed it was after, this was his prayer. And I remember making the movie and [George] Carlin, we're the third act and it's outside the church when all hell's about to break loose. So, right before we go, Carlin, a good old lapsed Catholic himself was like, "Hey, man, what is the plot here?" And I'm explaining the whole thing to him and he's looking at me the way an adult looks at a kid when a kid overexplains Star Wars. And finally he goes, "You really believe in all this shit, don't you?" And I was like, "Yeah, I was raised Catholic. You were raised Catholic, you don't?" And he goes, "No, I'm smarter than that." And so, that was the beginning of the end. I'm certainly not laying my lack of faith at Carlin's feet but, when the smartest person you ever met starts asking you questions like that, it was tough to hold up in the face of that scrutiny. You mentioned the inspiration of Tarantino and the bravado of . But so much of the violence takes place off camera. Not enough talent to pull off good violence. John Woo, once you see a John Woo scene, once you see even a Robert Rodriguez action scene, I'm like, "I can't do that." So, most of the movie, all the violence happens off camera because, well, I can't make it look cool. But it is a movie that purports to contain dialogue but, really, it's just a bunch of characters monologuing at one another, constantly expository. Everyone is explaining this movie to everyone else in the movie. As I watch it every night, I'm like, "My God, they're talking a lot," and that's because somebody always has to be explaining what's going on. I think, if I were to do it now, I wouldn't feel the need to overexplain things, particularly because we live in the age of information. But we were in a pre-internet age. I was like, "I'm really going to have to explain all this Catholicism stuff for people that don't know about it." But the audience largely wound up being people who are like, "Been there." You mentioned Robert Rodriguez's advice going into this. How have you felt your own visual style has evolved, and was this film an important exercise in that trajectory for you? Yeah. The camera moved more than it ever had previously in a Kevin Smith movie and so, because of that, today I can recognize like, "Oh, that's when I started taking seriously the craft of filmmaking." Prior to that, I was very Hal Hartley influenced, Jim Jarmusch — one shot, mise-en-scène, let's let all the acting happen in front of the camera to show off how good the actors are. And then you grow up and you realize, "It's more cinematic if I cut to somebody else and then cut back." Clerks or Mallrats, even Chasing Amy, they're more hangout movies. But Dogma is, from the jump, we're all rushing to get to a place and there there's going to be a third act and stuff. So, based on that alone, it also changed my storytelling. And even somebody who's the world's biggest Kevin Smith critic — and that would be me — can see I grew as a filmmaker. It's not like between that movie and now, I have become Chris Nolan. But I certainly started paying more attention and treating it more seriously. Once again, I wasn't prepared for the ride to go on that long so didn't know I'd have to learn my lenses or anything like that. Iconic Events You have a murderer's row cast in this, including Damon, Affleck, Carlin, Linda Fiorentino, Salma Hayek, Jason Lee, Alan Rickman, and Chris Rock. At the time or in retrospect, who was the linchpin you knew the rest of the movie could congeal around? Rickman was a huge get for us — and we didn't reach out for Alan. I never would have been so presumptuous as to think that Rickman would ever work with me. But I got a call from John Gordon who worked at Miramax and he goes, "You'll never believe who came in today: Alan Rickman." I said, "Hans f--king Gruber was in the building, man? Did he blow it up and shit?" And he goes, "No, we were trying to talk him into being in this new Merchant Ivory movie, but all he wanted to do was talk about whoever made Chasing Amy." And I was like, "Bro, he would be amazing as the voice of God. Could you imagine, Alan Rickman?" And so, we sent it to him, fastest yes I ever got from an actor outside of Jason Mewes. And when we had that guy, we were like, "What else is possible?" So, emboldened, I reached out for George Carlin. It sounds like he didn't sign on as quickly. We called his manager Jerry, I said, "Hey, man, I'm Kevin Smith. This is Scott Mosier. We made Chasing Amy." He goes, "I don't know what that is." I said, "We co-executive produced a movie called Good Will Hunting. We're making the new Ben and Matt movie, man, and we want George to be in it." And he goes, "You want George to be a comedian in a Ben and Matt movie?" I said, "No, we want him to be an actor, he would be playing a Catholic cardinal." He goes, "F--k, George will love that sh-t." So, I was supposed to meet George that night on Late Night with Conan O'Brien, we were both going to be on the show. So, Jerry was like, "Bring the script. I'll introduce you." But between the time I hung up and the night we were going to do the gig, [George's] wife passed away. So I told Jerry, "Here's the script. Give it to him when you can, no rush whatsoever. Please pass on my condolences." And the next day Jerry called up and he was like, "Can you meet with him Friday at the Four Seasons for lunch at noon?" I was like, "God, yes." And when he came in, I said, "I'm a massive fan." He goes, "I can tell, because I read your script." I was like, "What'd you think?" and he goes, "I kind of feel responsible for it." I was like, "Well, yes, you're a very big influence." He goes, "Influence? Kevin, there are some scenes I think I deserve co-screenwriting credit." Iconic Events However serious Carlin may have been, was it smooth sailing from there? I was like, "If you come do the movie with us, I'd be happy to talk about [screenwriting credit]." And he goes, "Well, we got a bit of a problem. … I'd love to do a movie that fucks with the church, but, as you know, my wife passed away recently." I was like, "I know, I'm so sorry." He goes, "Me too. She was a cool lady, I'm going to miss her. For that reason, I'm not ready to take off my wedding band. And I know I'd be playing a Catholic cardinal so I can't be wearing a wedding band in your movie. So we're at an impasse." He's going, "Then I thought, if I put a band-aid around my wedding band, then I could be in the movie. What do you think?" I was like, "This is the most beautiful shit I ever heard. You could wear as many band-aids as you want." And he came in and joined us, man, and gave us a killer performance. He was such a method actor, it was crazy, he treated it so seriously. When I mentioned I was doing this interview, my wife immediately said, "The greatest choice that he ever made was casting Alanis Morissette as God." Originally, it was going to be Emma Thompson. When we first got Alan Rickman, he goes, "Oh, my friend would have a blast doing this. Can I ask her?" I said, "Who's your friend?" He goes, "Emma Thompson." I was like, "Oh, my God, yes. Do you have other friends? Bring them all." So, for a red-hot minute, Emma Thompson was our God, so much so that there's a ShoWest Reel that has a cast list before we shot a single frame of film made up of footage from other movies and stuff — and at the end it says '…and Emma Thompson as God.' Emma Thompson eventually pulled out, and then I had reached out to Alanis because Alanis, early on, after I made Chasing Amy, I had asked her if she wanted to be in the movie and she went off to India. When she came back, she called me up and said, "I'm back from India. I'm writing an album, and I remember you asking me to be in your movie. So if there's anything left in the movie, I would love to come play with you." And I said, "Well, there's one small but crucial role that's left wide open: You play God." And she goes, "Why?" And I was like, "I always believed that God would be Canadian." So, she was absolute bliss, man. There's a photo I have of me and Alanis Morissette standing in front of Jay and Silent Bob's Secret Stash, I'm smoking a cigarette, and it's the most '90s photo I have. Iconic Events The characters all can't seem to agree on how to describe God as male or female. How strategic was that? Well, we always knew that God was going to be a female. If God starts the movie in the form of a male [played by Bud Cort], having the characters play fast and loose with the pronouns was by design because we knew, eventually, we were going to introduce God and it is going to be a woman. And it's so weird because people come out after me on what used to be Twitter, calling me woke and stuff. It's like, "Have you seen Dogma, made in 1999, or Chasing Amy made in '97?" A movie with God as a woman and talking about Jesus being Black could easily be accused of being woke. We made it in '98, but I started writing it in '92. Can you be woke in 1992? I don't know. What epiphanies about faith happened to you as a result of making the film? Or as a result of its endurance as one of your most beloved films? The endurance is the thing that is surprising and wonderful. I thought this movie was so inside baseball — and then you realize a lot of us play baseball, so it can be inside. Just like when I made Clerks, I couldn't understand for years, "I get that it's funny, but why are people liking it?" And it took me decades and I realized everybody has had a shitty job that they hate, so, that movie, you can identify with even if you've never lived a New Jersey life. And it's the same with Dogma. There's a universality to those of us who are members of the Catholic Church and, beyond that, even members of any faith whatsoever. And as my career has gone on, it's diminishing returns, according to some, so it's nice that Dogma is still beloved so much so that we could take it out and tour it. It is a beautiful little victory lap I wouldn't count on by any stretch of the imagination, but it's not one I deserve. The other Kevin Smith, the one who believed in all this, he's the one who should be taking this victory lap. But since he's not here, I get to take it for him. In your language and in your self-portraiture, there's so much self-deprecation. But you have had a successful career. Has it been tough to find a healthy balance in being able to go, "Well, not everybody likes everything I did, but I'm content with what I've accomplished over my 31-year career?" Yeah, absolutely. You get a lot of perspective along the journey and 31 years in, I've met so many people who tell me what my dippy movies mean to them. So, you realize that, as much as you diminish it, honestly how I feel is I got myself in on one of the greatest scams in human history, which is I get to stay an eternal adolescent and make pretend and that's my job. My father, if he was still alive, would be like, "Oh, my God, you beat the system." So, there's an element to it that keeps one absolutely young but, once you start this, you dance as fast as you can because, for the rest of your life, you will chase relevancy. I'm not a drug person, I used to smoke a lot of weed back in the day, but, in terms of things that can make one high in this life, having total strangers be like, "I'm invested in your life and your work and your opinion," well, you don't want to let it go. So, I understand that what I do has value. I diminish it a lot because it is frivolous, and I'm not a serious person. Forgive me for making a goofy pivot, but one person to whom the movie definitely seems to mean something is Kanye West. What a pivot that was, but go ahead. He samples Jay's speech about beautiful women in 'Back to Me.' I'm curious what you thought of the song as a meditation on the actual dialogue that you wrote? I didn't go that deep with it, I'll be honest with you. It came to my attention thanks to the internet, and the first thought I had was, nobody asked for permission. I guess you could just do that. Eventually, I think they wound up paying the people that own Dogma now, but look, it's always nice when the culture notices your work. The timing of this probably could have been better, but I never heard the song. I know Jason Mewes got a few bucks off of it, and that made me happy for him. Dogma was a scale plus 10 movie, so I bet you Jason probably made more of Kanye West using his clip of dialogue than he ever did on anything Dogma related. Iconic Events Notwithstanding Kanye, you have spoken about the Harvey Weinstein of it all several times in the past. How have you been able to reach a sense of peace or separation between what you've created and some of the people who you worked with who history has borne out in less positive ways? Back when the New York Times article happened and the world was introduced to the real Harvey Weinstein, instantly, I put out a tweet about it. All my dreams came true with Clerks, and so, suddenly, I had to know that as much as I benefited, so many people did not. I remember when it happened going, "I guess I have to give up all my movies that had his name on it." And I was prepared to do that in terms of, they're things of the past. But the movie don't belong to the filmmaker. Movie don't belong to even the studio that finances it. Ultimately, the movie belongs to the audience and the audience decides how they feel. So there has been no people being like, "I can't watch this anymore because that dude was involved at one point or something like that," mercifully. But as we head into Dogma, which was a movie that took a long time to wrest from his control, you try not to change anything, but we took his name off. That felt justified. I never thought I'd be the person that stripped somebody's credits from them, but I think he stripped them from himself. Iconic Events You've done a lot of four-walling for your movies over the last 20 or so years. What are your thoughts are about exhibition these days when theaters are struggling and there's so many things competing for audience attention? I play the hand I'm dealt, and I don't make very popular movies because I make Kevin Smith movies — so that means you've got to help. So I accompany my movies out in the world. Now, for that, I get to upcharge ridiculously. They're paying 50 bucks to go watch Dogma and me afterwards too. But you're getting a two-hour movie and a two-hour Q&A so I guess pound for pound, you're getting some money's worth and stuff. But it became a joy because you're in a room with the audience who are overly, vocally, loudly appreciating your work. Now, can every filmmaker do that? Absolutely not. Can most? Yes. Because at the end of the day, people are always curious about who's behind stuff. You just have to be willing to put in the time. Now, I'm an exhibitor as well. So as somebody with skin in the game, we went nonprofit because it's tough out there, really tough. The theatrical model from my point of view is still broke. I was doing some box-office updates last month and the week that The Minecraft Movie came out, we did 435 tickets in the five days ... we're open five days a week. Mondays and Tuesdays we're closed. So that included our opening weekend and stuff; 435 in an AMC in New York City is one movie theater. That was our entire week. So I can upcharge, I can fill a theater and stuff, but I can't do that for normal ass movies, so then I'm at the mercy of what the studios are putting out there, just like everybody else. So when it comes to showing actual movies that I have nothing to do with, it's hard out here for an exhibitor. This interview has been edited and condensed. Best of GoldDerby Stephen King movies: 14 greatest films ranked worst to best 'The Life of Chuck' cast reveal their favorite Stephen King works, including Mark Hamill's love of the 'terrifying' 'Pet Sematary' From 'Hot Rod' to 'Eastbound' to 'Gemstones,' Danny McBride breaks down his most righteous roles: 'It's been an absolute blast' Click here to read the full article.

Trump administration asks federal court not to dismiss charges against Milwaukee County judge
Trump administration asks federal court not to dismiss charges against Milwaukee County judge

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration asks federal court not to dismiss charges against Milwaukee County judge

Protesters gather outside of the Milwaukee FBI office to speak out against the arrest of Milwaukee Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan (Photo by Isiah Holmes/Wisconsin Examiner) Prosecutors for the Trump administration filed a brief Monday requesting that a federal judge not dismiss the government's indictment against Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan. Dugan faces criminal charges after Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, along with agents from the Drug Enforcement Agency and FBI, arrived in the Milwaukee County Courthouse April 18 to arrest 31-year-old Eduardo Flores-Ruiz for being in the country illegally. Flores-Ruiz was set to appear in Dugan's courtroom that day for a status hearing on misdemeanor charges against him. When Dugan learned that the agents were outside her courtroom, she confronted them and learned they only had an administrative warrant, which was issued by an agency official and not a judge. An administrative warrant doesn't allow agents to enter private spaces in the courthouse such as Dugan's courtroom. Later, while the agents were waiting for Flores-Ruiz in the hallway outside the main courtroom door, Dugan sent him and his attorney out a side door into the hallway. One of the agents rode down the elevator with Flores-Ruiz and he was later arrested on the street. Dugan-DOJ-Filing Dugan was charged with concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, and obstruction, which is a felony. Last month, Dugan's attorneys filed a motion to dismiss the case against her, arguing she was acting in her official capacity as a judge and therefore immune from prosecution for her actions and that the federal government is impinging on the state of Wisconsin's authority to operate its court system. The case drew national attention, with Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and FBI Director Kash Patel both making public statements about Dugan's arrest before she'd even been indicted. Legal experts have questioned the strength of the federal government's case and accused Trump officials of grandstanding to make a political point. In the Monday filing, federal prosecutors argued that dismissing the case would ignore previously established law that allows judges to face criminal charges. 'Such a ruling would give state court judges carte blanche to interfere with valid law enforcement actions by federal agents in public hallways of a courthouse, and perhaps even beyond,' the prosecutors argued. 'Dugan's desired ruling would, in essence, say that judges are 'above the law,' and uniquely entitled to interfere with federal law enforcement.' Dugan is set to appear for trial on July 21. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store