Tracking The Disinfo On Macron's 'Cocaine Use' In Ukraine
Unsubstantiated claims of supposed cocaine use by French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on a train to Ukraine last weekend may have started from a French account.
One post, by a French far-right activist, quickly spread across the internet after being picked up by US conspiracy theorists and making its way to Russia's leadership.
The posts on various social media platforms shared actual footage of Macron, Merz and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in the Kyiv-bound train last Saturday.
As Merz and Starmer arrive in the compartment, Macron is seen removing a white tissue from the table. The posts claimed, inaccurately, that the tissue was a bag of cocaine.
Pictures and video taken inside the train by AFP and other media showed that the white object was a crumpled tissue.
The conspiracy-laden posts nevertheless accumulated tens of millions of views worldwide.
On Sunday, Macron's office dismissed the rumour as "fake news... being spread by France's enemies".
France has repeatedly warned about Russian disinformation campaigns in Europe that have grown in intensity during Moscow's war on Ukraine.
This latest attack built on previous claims among conspiracy theorists that Macron has a cocaine habit.
As Justin Poncet, a specialist in online analysis, told AFP, some of the accounts attacking Macron have nicknamed him "powdered".
One security source said that French-language accounts started the rumour before it passed to Russian-language accounts and was picked up by senior officials in Moscow.
US conspiracy theorists such as Alex Jones, with the large audience he commands, helped amplify the message.
Antibot4Navalny, an online collective tracking trolls farms that spread disinformation, conducted its own analysis.
"'Macron, Merz and Starmer were doing coke together on the train' is UNLIKELY a Russian disinfo campaign," the collective posted on X.
"Kremlin-aligned Telegram channels and online media did AMPLIFY it," it added. "But the earliest viral tweets were likely first published BEFORE that, by authentic users."
The attack on Macron was not one that was widely coordinated, said Poncet. But he added: "We're talking about several spheres" but only connected to each other in a fleeting way.
Together however, they turned online rumour into a "crowd phenomenon", he said.
Tracing any such viral smear to its source is difficult.
But one diplomatic source said that the French authorities had on Saturday found a comment on an X account under a video on Macron's train trip suggesting there were little white bags on the table.
That was reposted on French-language X accounts with screen captures of the video showing the three leaders, said one security source.
The spread of the rumour had picked up pace by Saturday evening.
At 7:46 pm the French-language RadioRoma account was sharing the video, asking about the "little white bag" Macron was "hiding from the camera".
A subsequent post from that account on the same subject picked up 3.4 million views and was shared 5,000 times over three days, AFP noted.
The account is owned by Louis Bopea, formerly a senior figure in France's far-right National Rally who is particularly active online.
Many of his followers helped spread the rumour.
By midday on Sunday, far-right French politicians such as Florian Philippot and Nicolas Dupont-Aignan had joined the hue and cry. ("What is Macron hiding?!" posted Philippot.)
In Moscow, foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova picked up the ball, as did Kirill Dmitriev, a senior envoy for Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Russia's news media, including the English-language site of Pravda.com, also ran with the story.
Jones was successfully sued for defamation by families of the victims of the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Germany: One in four immigrants doesn't want to stay – DW – 06/17/2025
Why are immigrants leaving Germany? A new study shows that other countries are more attractive to economically successful foreigners. Discrimination also plays a major role. The German economy is weakening — and yet many sectors desperately need skilled workers, including the medical professions, especially nursing, as well as IT, and construction. Germany also has a shortage of educators, cooks, and people who can drive trucks and buses. At the end of 2024, there were around 1.4 million unfilled positions in German companies nationwide. At the same time, more and more immigrants are coming to Germany to work. In 2024, the proportion of foreign employees was just over 16%. It has more than doubled since 2010. Employment in medical professions is disproportionately high. More than one in six doctors is a foreign citizen. In nursing, employment growth since 2022 has been exclusively attributable to foreign personnel. Currently, one in five workers in this sector is an immigrant. Thinking about leaving But do these people actually want to stay in Germany in the long term? The Institute for Employment Research (IAB) at the Federal Employment Agency has now presented a study on this issue , based on a representative online survey of 50,000 people born abroad who immigrated to Germany between the ages of 18 and 65. The survey excludes asylum seekers who do not yet have recognized residence status in Germany. The survey period ran from December 2024 to April 2025. "Twenty-six percent, or around 2.6 million people, say that they actually considered leaving Germany last year, i.e., they thought about leaving the country," said Yuliya Kosyakova, head of the Migration, Integration, and International Labor Market Research Division at the IAB, as she summarized the figures at the presentation of the study in Berlin. "Around 3%, or 300,000 people, already have concrete plans to leave." Skilled migration to Germany: Navigating the challenges To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany as a stopover About half of those who do not want to stay would like to return to their country of origin, while the other half want to move to another country. Poland and Romania are the most popular destinations among those who want to return. And for those immigrants who wish to move on to a third country, people expressed Switzerland, the US, or Spain as top envisaged destinations. "A key finding of our survey is that it is precisely those who moved to Germany to work or study, who are better educated or more economically successful and who have a better command of the German language, who are more likely than average to consider leaving or express concrete plans to emigrate," said IAB researcher Katia Gallegos Torres. Emigration is a risk for Germany Immigrants with a master's degree or doctorate and higher earners in particular have considered leaving Germany in the last twelve months. "In knowledge-intensive service sectors such as IT, finance, and business-related services, between 30% and 39% of those surveyed are considering emigrating," said Gallegos Torres. There are also "significant" emigration trends in healthcare, manufacturing, and logistics. "In summary, these are precisely the people that Germany urgently needs to secure its skilled labor force. This selective emigration poses considerable risks for Germany's economic future." High taxes and increasing discrimination But what are the reasons? Family reasons play a major role for those returning home, while immigrants who want to move to another country are primarily looking for better career opportunities and higher earnings. Taxes and social security contributions and too much bureaucracy in Germany are frequently cited reasons for leaving. Added to this are experiences of discrimination. "Almost two-thirds of immigrants report perceived discrimination, for example at work, on the housing market, in public spaces or in contact with the police," says Gallegos Torres. "A third of immigrants also feel either not at all or only slightly welcome. These are factors that significantly increase the tendency to emigrate." Political mood has a deterrent effect The study shows that the political atmosphere in Germany has also played a role. "In 2024, the debate was very much dominated by the issue of migration, and social acceptance was not particularly high," noted Kosyakova. Just over a quarter of people in Germany have some kind of a migration background. Some 21 million people have either come to Germany themselves since 1950 or have parents who did. Some 6.5 million people have come to Germany since 2015 alone. The largest groups among them are Syrians and Ukrainians. In the federal elections in February, the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), which advocates for the deportation of millions of people with non-German roots, became the second strongest political force in the country. Meanwhile, the conservative CDU won the election after promising a tougher immigration policy. Now in coalition with the center-left Social Democrats (SPD), the CDU's first migration policy measure was to extend border controls. Similarly, a plan to allow well-integrated immigrants to obtain citizenship more quickly, established by the last government, was immediately abolished. "These big debates about migration and migration policy have a negative impact on people, on the feeling of welcome, on experiences of discrimination," said Kosyakova. "These are reasons why people report thinking more often about emigrating or actually planning to leave Germany." One of the CDU's first acts in power was to make it more difficult to enter Germany Image: Pia Bayer/dpa/picture alliance Germany cannot afford emigration Experts consistently calculate that Germany needs around 400,000 additional immigrants per year who will stay permanently in order to maintain its labor force potential. This, they argue, is also the only way to balance demographic trends. Germany is an aging country. There are more and more pensioners and fewer and fewer people in work. This not only leads to a labor shortage, but also to a lack of government revenue to finance pensions. Against this backdrop, the IAB study shows that "not only immigration, but also the long-term retention of immigrants is a key challenge," according to Kosyakova. Motivating people to stay Overall, there are many indications that government measures such as reducing bureaucracy, simplifying the recognition of qualifications, increasing digitalization, and providing tax breaks could reduce the tendency to emigrate, especially among professionally successful immigrants, say the IAB researchers. However, they add that "broad and honest" social acceptance is also needed. Meanwhile, the CDU is now calling for foreign medical students not to be allowed to leave so easily after graduating. Anyone who studies in Germany should follow their studies by working as a doctor for at least five years — preferably in rural areas of Germany, where there is a growing shortage of medical professionals. "Those who do not want to do so must repay the costs of this first-class education," said Sepp Müller, deputy chairman of the CDU group in parliament. The Health Ministry, also run by the CDU, has welcomed the proposal. "We must attract young doctors to work in Germany instead of watching them leave," explained Tino Sorge, state secretary in the ministry. This article was originally written in German. While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter Berlin Briefing.
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Why Israel is hitting Iran's vital energy infrastructure – DW – 06/16/2025
As Israel and Iran attack each other with missiles, Israel is especially targeting key oil and gas facilities. That could have a major impact on Iran's economy. The escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, with both sides firing missiles and drones at each other, has unsettled global energy markets. Israeli attacks on Saturday targeted Iran's energy infrastructure, including vital oil storage sites, refineries and power stations. Among the locations targeted was the massive South Pars gas field, which is part of the world's largest reservoir of natural gas. It's located off Iran's southern Bushehr province and is the source of most of the gas produced in Iran. Iran shares control over the South Pars gas field with neighboring Qatar, which calls the reservoir under its control North Dome. The attack, which forced Tehran to partially suspend production at the field, raised the prospect that a widening conflict would threaten Iran's energy production and supply. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has slammed Israel for targeting South Pars, saying it was an attempt "to expand the war beyond" Iran. "Dragging the conflict into the Persian Gulf region is a major strategic mistake, likely deliberate and intended to extend the war beyond Iranian territory," the news agency AFP quoted Araghchi as saying during a meeting with foreign diplomats. Iran's heavy reliance on hydrocarbons Iran is a major player in the global energy sector, with the country home to the world's second-largest proven natural gas reserves, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). Data from the intergovernmental Gas Exporting Countries Forum show that Iran produced about 266.25 billion cubic meters (bcm) in 2023, with domestic consumption accounting for 255.5 bcm. About 15.8 bcm of natural gas were exported. Iran holds the world's third-largest crude oil reserves, about 9% of the total proved oil reserves worldwide. The country extracts about 3.3 million barrels of crude and another 1.3 million barrels of condensate and other liquids daily, of which it exports around 1.8 million barrels, according to the Belgium-based data analytics firm Kpler. Iran is the third-largest oil producer in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). The income it generated from energy exports account for a sizeable chunk of government revenues and foreign exchange reserves. A report by EIA suggests that Iran received $144 billion (€138.5 billion) in oil export revenues in the three years from 2021 to 2023. "Iran uses several obfuscation techniques such as turning off its ship identification signals, applying ship-to-ship transfers, or relabeling cargoes as originating from other countries for both crude oil and oil products, which increases the challenge of providing precise export data," according to the report. China remains a big importer of Iranian crude, importing 1.71 million bpd in March, up 20% from 1.43 million bpd in February, the news agency Reuters reported. Iran has been trying to obscure its oil export including by ship-to-ship transfers Image: picture alliance/ASSOCIATED PRESS The price of crude oil surged late last week after the Israel-Iran strikes began, but it has since decreased, with both main oil contracts dropping by over 1% on Monday. Should Israel intensify its targeting of Iranian energy facilities, however, it could trigger a spike in global oil and gas prices. Sanctions cripple Iran's economy Despite Iran's vast hydrocarbon reserves, much of its potential remains untapped. Iranian officials acknowledge that the country needs advanced technology and billions of dollars in new investment to modernize its oil and gas sectors. But the country is subject to one of the most stringent sanction regimes in the world, hampering its trade and investment opportunities. Though a landmark nuclear deal between Iran and world powers in 2015 promised sanctions relief in exchange for the country's restricting its nuclear activities, President Donald Trump, withdrew the United States unilaterally from the agreement in 2018 and reimposed sanctions during his first term in office. The sanctions, aimed at curbing Tehran's nuclear and ballistic missile programs, have targeted Iran's oil exports, as well as banking and shipping, among other sectors. They have also severely curtailed Tehran's natural gas exports in recent years. The measures have effectively crippled Iran's economy, which is currently reeling from a raft of crises such as soaring inflation and a collapsing currency. Israel pounds Iran from west to east To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Blackouts in Iran Decades of mismanagement and geopolitical tensions have compounded the economic problems. Despite its vast oil and gas resources, Iran has been struggling with energy shortages amid declining production, outdated equipment and a lack of investment in infrastructure. Iran relies heavily on natural gas for domestic consumption, particularly for electricity generation. Additionally, more than 95% of Iranian households are also connected to gas pipelines, and energy subsidies have resulted in overconsumption. In recent years, Iran's government has been forced to impose rolling power blackouts affecting both homes and factories to cope with spikes in electricity demand. In May, President Masoud Pezeshkian criticized what he called Iran's "excessive and inappropriate consumption" of electricity. Edited by: Uwe Hessler
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
What can governments do to stop extreme heating? – DW – 06/16/2025
Most countries globally have agreed to set their own goals to keep the planet from overheating. The pressure is now on for them to do so. At Kenya's Lake Turkana wind park, towering turbines line dirt roads as far as the eye can see. And this is just one of the sites that has turned the country into a renewables powerhouse. From generating approximately half of its electricity using sustainable sources such as geothermal, solar and wind power in 2000, Kenya has now increased that share to 90%. And it doesn't plan to stop there. As part of its new climate goals, the Sub-Saharan nation has pledged to be using 100% renewables by 2035. It's a show of force and proof of concept for other countries meeting in the German city of Bonn this week to hash out sticking points ahead of the November UN climate summit in Brazil. Discussions over how countries plan to reduce reliance on the fossil fuels that are heating the planet are not officially on the agenda. But experts say they are the elephant in the room. What are climate targets and why do they matter? Domestic climate targets — nationally determined contributions or NDCs, as they are known — are a key part of the international Paris Agreement. Under the accord, the world agreed to keep global temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) with efforts to limit it to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Even small temperature increases are connected to more frequent and intense irregular weather events such as storms, flooding, drought and extreme heat. As part of the accord, the 195 signatories are obliged to submit ambitious non-binding goals every five years. These should outline both how they plan to reduce their carbon emissions and how they will adapt to the impacts of climate change already being felt globally. "It's also an opportunity for all countries to, in one policy document, combine their own economic and prosperity plans with climate policy in an integrated way that's charting a path forward for a sustainable economy," said Steffen Menzel, program lead for climate diplomacy and geopolitics at climate think tank E3G. Countries all over the world have adopted solar and wind power in vital steps away from oil, gas and coal, which heat the planet as they are burned Image: NurPhoto/IMAGO Have countries already stated their aims? Nations should have filed their most recent climate goals to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in February. But so far, only 22 countries have done so. Among them are big emitters like the United Kingdom and Japan. The former Biden administration also submitted decarbonization plans for the United States, before President Donald Trump pulled out of Paris Agreement. But many countries are still solidifying their goals according to Jamal Srouji, associate in the Global Climate program at the research nonprofit World Resources Institute. "They want to make sure that their assumptions make sense and respond to the political realities and priorities of the country," Srouji said. "Countries are now most concerned about competitiveness, making sure they stay ahead or are part of the new technologies that are really going to be driving economic energy security, especially what we've seen in recent years, is actually the main driver for why now policymakers still consider the climate as an important agenda because it intersects so well," he told DW. Countries are limited by financial resources Nafkote Dabi, climate change policy lead at Oxfam International, said some poorer countries, for example least developed nations like Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Bangladesh, are wary of committing to ambitious goals on monetary grounds. "They are afraid that they're committing to something, but there's no finance to help them achieve what they have outlined," Dabi said, adding that wealthier countries have a duty to help. "It's not to put all the blame on rich countries, but it's about historical responsibility, financial capability, technological capability," she said. At the international climate conference in Azerbaijan last year, industrialized countries agreed to provide $300 billion (€258 billion) in funding for developing nations, promising to mobilize a total of $1.3 trillion, although it is unclear where the money will come from. Action from the biggest polluters While experts say climate targets need to come from all nations including low emitters like Kenya, it is action from the biggest states that will make the most difference. The G20 group of countries, which includes China, Germany, Australia, Russia and the United States, are responsible for around 80% of global emissions overall and Dabi says they are not doing enough to reduce their greenhouse gases. "Certain groups need to do more to reduce their emissions and that should not fall on the poorest communities because the transformation required is huge," she said. Still, almost a decade after the inception of the Paris Agreement, experts say that over time the targets have improved. "I don't want to say things are looking bright at this point in time... but I do think that the mechanisms we agreed to 10 years ago have made a big change globally and also in many jurisdictions around the world," Menzel said. Under Donald Trump, the US is rolling back climate regulations and betting instead on fossil fuels Image: J. David Ake/AP Photo/icture alliance Although pledges are non-binding, Srouji says that once a "country goes on the international stage and says, 'here's our plan', if they walk back on it, they are going to be getting a lot of international scrutiny." Edited by: Tamsin Walker Can villages help India achieve climate goals? To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
