The view from isolation: Amid the relentless ill tidings, at least the faithless fairy wrens make sense
The United States, having given itself over to the absurdly erratic Donald Trump and his cabinet of lickspittles, was proving it could no longer be counted on for almost any major decision that lasted more than a blink.
Loading
Tariffs in Trump's hands had become a global pea-and-thimble trick. His promise to bring international peace was proving not worth an Israeli shekel, a Gazan child's life, a Ukrainian hryvnia, a Russian rouble or now, an Iranian rial.
His latest effort, to demand via text on his Truth Social the ' unconditional surrender ' of Iran, came barely a nanosecond after indicating he wanted to stay out of the Israel-Iran mess.
Oh, and who might have imagined, before it came to pass, a president deploying 4000 National Guard troops and 700 US Marines to quell what were relatively low-level protests by civilians against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) brutes?
Why, it was only a few months ago Trump himself had pardoned all those who had been indicted or found guilty of attacking the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Unsurprisingly, polling by the Australian foreign affairs think tank the Lowy Institute revealed this week that almost two-thirds of Australians now hold little to no trust in the United States to act responsibly in world affairs.
The only surprise is that 36 per cent of Australians still hold some form of trust in the Trump outfit.
Watching the fairy wrens bobbing around the lawn, I recalled my first trip overseas, a study tour to the US in the 1970s. I stayed with a series of hosts who proved unfailingly hospitable and generous.
A couple of my American hosts tried to persuade me that the disgraced ex-president Richard Nixon wasn't really a bad person, and was the victim of a witch hunt.
We cordially agreed to disagree, and I never once felt that expressing a view could get me into any sort of strife. Free speech seemed genuinely treasured, and the perspectives of those from across the oceans seemed welcome.
It was, I reflected, so very long ago.
What had happened to those mild Americans of half a century ago?
Muttering something unkind about Trump these days could get you deported or worse, your university could lose its funding or your law firm could be locked out of government contracts.
While I pondered the menace in these developments, Trump's defence secretary, the greasy-haired ex-Fox News host Pete Hegseth – who would barely appear out of place in the sales office of a backstreet used-car yard – was hectoring Australia over its defence expenditure.
We may, of course, need to seriously review our defence capabilities, and it's nothing new for the US to press us on the military's share of GDP. Back in 2013, Richard Armitage, the former deputy secretary of state in the George W. Bush administration, called Australia's defence spending inadequate and accused Australia of wanting a free ride on the US.
Armitage, however, was a serious man of vast experience. Is there any pressing reason we should listen to a fellow like Hegseth, who is so lacking in smarts that he was caught out sharing on a leaky chat group the details of a US strike on Yemen?
Why, this defence secretary couldn't organise America's immense military machine to turn on a stupendously expensive birthday parade for Trump that was much more than a sad-sack march-past.
As for Australia's spending, did Hegseth even send a receipt for our $500 million down payment this year on the $3 billion Australia has promised to prop up the US' submarine industry?
Has an acronym ever sounded quite as ugly as AUKUS?
Back home, what was supposed to be Australia's federal opposition – having been eviscerated at the recent election after its brains trust thought it was smart to assume a MAGA-lite approach – was meaninglessly splitting itself asunder before hurrying back to a shaky coupling of convenience.
Even closer, what is supposed to be the Victorian Liberal Party was tearing itself to shreds. Again.
The forces for and against offering bankruptcy relief to former leader John Pesutto, spurred by factional hatreds old and new, were still furiously facing off at the time of writing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
35 minutes ago
- ABC News
Trump considers options in Israel-Iran conflict
The Wall Street Journal has reported that Donald Trump has approved attack plans against Iran. But that doesn't mean the attacks will be carried out, and they may just exist as an option for the US to consider. Steven Simon is a former US National Security Council senior director for the Middle East and North Africa, and now a senior research fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. He told ABC NewsRadio's Sarah Morice that it may just be a tactic to buy time for Iran to offer its surrender.

Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
What Putin's ‘Rasputin-like mystical influence' over Trump means for the world
When Donald Trump cancelled his meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese this week and left the G7 Summit early, it became clear the billionaire businessman's second presidency was facing a key test. As the Situation Room debated the critical question of the United States' direct involvement in the rapidly escalating Israel-Iran conflict, an unlikely candidate for mediation emerged: Russian President Vladimir Putin. Speaking with Chris Paine on The Morning Edition podcast, our international and political editor Peter Hartcher delves into Putin's 'Rasputin-like mystical influence' over Trump, and what it means for foreign policy. Click the player or watch the video below to listen to the full episode, or read on for an edited extract of the conversation. Paine: So the big question then is, what is America, and specifically, Donald Trump's role in all of this? As we record this in the middle of the day, Wednesday Australian time, the US has not been involved in any strikes thus far. What is Trump saying? He's long sworn himself against wars like this. He's also touted himself as 'The Peacemaker'. What kind of test is this for Trump? What will he do? Loading Hartcher: It's a huge test for Trump. Until Thursday last week, he was presiding over negotiations with the Iranians to try to get them to cease and desist from their nuclear program, and telling Netanyahu that he did not want an Israeli attack right up until the hour before the attack occurred ... This is a war he didn't want. And as you say, Chris, he sees himself as a peacemaker. He's made no secret that he wants to get a Nobel Peace Prize. He promised to end the war between Ukraine and Russia within 24 hours. Four and a bit months later, that's raging and has escalated. He promised to fix the Gaza war. No dice. And now, while he's trying to come to a nuclear arrangement with Iran, a new war has broken out there as well. So that's three strikes and you're out. So his peacemaker credentials are looking pretty tatty. Now, what's he going to do with this war under way? He's got conflicting political demands in his own constituency, the MAGA, Republican, national security constituencies in the US. He's got the restrainers and the prioritisers. And that's a big chunk of the MAGA movement, the MAGA policy, military impulse. Their thinking is the US should just simply keep out of the Middle East altogether, 'It used to be important. We used to need the oil. We don't now, let it go, let it rip. Let the Israelis tear the Iranians to pieces, and the Iranians do what they can.' Hartcher: Then you've got the internationalists and the traditional Republicans who say: 'No, this is a critical area of the world. We must protect Israel. We must protect our oil access, and we must do what we can to limit the power of the Iranian regime, but without causing a major world war.'

The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
What Putin's ‘Rasputin-like mystical influence' over Trump means for the world
When Donald Trump cancelled his meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese this week and left the G7 Summit early, it became clear the billionaire businessman's second presidency was facing a key test. As the Situation Room debated the critical question of the United States' direct involvement in the rapidly escalating Israel-Iran conflict, an unlikely candidate for mediation emerged: Russian President Vladimir Putin. Speaking with Chris Paine on The Morning Edition podcast, our international and political editor Peter Hartcher delves into Putin's 'Rasputin-like mystical influence' over Trump, and what it means for foreign policy. Click the player or watch the video below to listen to the full episode, or read on for an edited extract of the conversation. Paine: So the big question then is, what is America, and specifically, Donald Trump's role in all of this? As we record this in the middle of the day, Wednesday Australian time, the US has not been involved in any strikes thus far. What is Trump saying? He's long sworn himself against wars like this. He's also touted himself as 'The Peacemaker'. What kind of test is this for Trump? What will he do? Loading Hartcher: It's a huge test for Trump. Until Thursday last week, he was presiding over negotiations with the Iranians to try to get them to cease and desist from their nuclear program, and telling Netanyahu that he did not want an Israeli attack right up until the hour before the attack occurred ... This is a war he didn't want. And as you say, Chris, he sees himself as a peacemaker. He's made no secret that he wants to get a Nobel Peace Prize. He promised to end the war between Ukraine and Russia within 24 hours. Four and a bit months later, that's raging and has escalated. He promised to fix the Gaza war. No dice. And now, while he's trying to come to a nuclear arrangement with Iran, a new war has broken out there as well. So that's three strikes and you're out. So his peacemaker credentials are looking pretty tatty. Now, what's he going to do with this war under way? He's got conflicting political demands in his own constituency, the MAGA, Republican, national security constituencies in the US. He's got the restrainers and the prioritisers. And that's a big chunk of the MAGA movement, the MAGA policy, military impulse. Their thinking is the US should just simply keep out of the Middle East altogether, 'It used to be important. We used to need the oil. We don't now, let it go, let it rip. Let the Israelis tear the Iranians to pieces, and the Iranians do what they can.' Hartcher: Then you've got the internationalists and the traditional Republicans who say: 'No, this is a critical area of the world. We must protect Israel. We must protect our oil access, and we must do what we can to limit the power of the Iranian regime, but without causing a major world war.'