Iran's top diplomat says talks with US 'complicated' by American strike on nuclear sites
Iran's top diplomat said the possibility of new negotiations with the United States on his country's nuclear program has been "complicated" by the American attack on three of the sites, which he conceded caused "serious damage."
The U.S. was one of the parties to the 2015 nuclear deal in which Iran agreed to limits on its uranium enrichment program in exchange for sanctions relief and other benefits.
That deal unraveled after U.S. President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out unilaterally during his first term. Trump has suggested he is interested in new talks with Iran, and said that the two sides would meet next week.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Contribute ToGau Seva At Hare Krishna Mandir
Hare krishna Mandir
Donate Now
Undo
In an interview on Iranian state television broadcast late Thursday, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi left open the possibility that his country would again enter talks on its nuclear program, but suggested it would not be anytime soon.
"No agreement has been made for resuming the negotiations," he said. "No time has been set, no promise has been made, and we haven't even talked about restarting the talks."
Live Events
The American decision to intervene militarily "made it more complicated and more difficult" for talks on Iran's nuclear program, Araghchi said.
Israel attacked Iran on June 13, targeting its nuclear sites, defense systems, high-ranking military officials and atomic scientists in relentless attacks.
In 12 days of strikes, Israel said it killed some 30 Iranian commanders and hit eight nuclear-related facilities and more than 720 military infrastructure sites. More than 1,000 people were killed, including at least 417 civilians, according to the Washington-based Human Rights Activists group.
Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of which were intercepted but those that got through caused damage in many areas and killed 28 people.
The U.S. stepped in on Sunday to hit Iran's three most important strikes with a wave of cruise missiles and bunker-buster bombs dropped by B-2 bombers, designed to penetrate deep into the ground to damage the heavily-fortified targets. Iran, in retaliation, fired missiles at a U.S. base in Qatar on Monday but caused no known casualties.
Trump said the American attacks "completely and fully obliterated" Iran's nuclear program, though Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Thursday accused the U.S. president of exaggerating the damage, saying the strikes did not "achieve anything significant."
There has been speculation that Iran moved much of its highly-enriched uranium before the strikes, something that it told the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, that it planned to do.
Even if that turns out to be true, IAEA Director Rafael Grossi told Radio France International that the damage done to the Fordo site, which was built into a mountain, "is very, very, very considerable."
Among other things, he said, centrifuges are "quite precise machines" and it's "not possible" that the concussion from multiple 30,000-pound bombs would not have caused "important physical damage."
"These centrifuges are no longer operational," he said.
Araghchi himself acknowledged that "the level of damage is high, and it's serious damage."
He added that Iran had not yet decided upon whether to allow IAEA inspectors in to assess the damage, but that they would be kept out "for the time being."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump dominates NATO summit: 3 takeaways from the meeting
United States President Donald Trump dominated the discussions during this year's NATO summit, which concluded on Wednesday (June 25). He returned to Washington after what he saw as a symbolic victory — the NATO members agreement on increasing their defence spending to 5% of their gross domestic product (GDP). Here are key takeaways from the summit. The 5% defence spending target Trump called the summit 'a very historic milestone' as Nato allies (the member nations) made the ambitious 5% GDP defence spending target. He said the consensus was 'something that no one really thought possible. And they said: 'You did it, sir, you did it'. Well, I don't know if I did it … but I think I did.' Of the 5% figure, 3.5% would be achieved entirely through core defence spending and weapons. The remaining 1.5% can be put towards 'defence-related expenditure', broadly referring to such infrastructural spending to 'protect our critical infrastructure, defend our networks, ensure our civil preparedness and resilience, unleash innovation, and strengthen our defence industrial base'. Allies (NATO members) would need to submit plans to meet the 5% figure annually and follow a 'credible, incremental path', with a review on progress expected after the 2029 US presidential election. The 3.5% core defence spending target itself will be out of reach for several NATO countries, which have hovered around the previous 2% target. The US spent 3.2% of its GDP on defence spending in 2024, according to NATO estimates. Only three countries exceeded this share – Poland (4.1%), Estonia (3.4%) and Latvia (3.4%). Spain, which had allocated 1.24% of its GDP in 2024 to defence spending, announced it would not adhere to this target, earning Trump's ire and the potential for Spain-specific trade sanctions. Article 5 in the spotlight Article 5, or the collective defence clause, serves as the bedrock of NATO's existence. It says an attack against even one of the members would be considered an attack against all members. It also says that in the event of such an attack, each member would individually and collectively take 'such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.'' This 'One for All, All for One' principle has helped the organisation attract more members over the years. As the Russia-Ukraine War broke out in 2022, the historically neutral nations of Finland and Sweden made a bid to join it. During his presidential campaign, Trump revived his criticism of the organisation, saying the US under his presidency would choose not to defend a member under attack if it spends less than the agreed targets. On Wednesday, he was among the NATO allies who underlined their 'ironclad commitment' to come to each other's aid if attacked. 'They want to protect their country, and they need the United States, and without the United States, it's not going to be the same,' he told reporters. 'I left there saying that these people really love their countries. It's not a rip-off. And we're here to help them protect their country,' he said. Focus away from Ukraine Since 2022, every NATO summit has committed to aiding Ukraine in its war against Russia. Most NATO countries view Russia as a direct and immediate threat. The 2024 summit saw Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy be feted by then-US President Joe Biden and secure an assurance from NATO President Mark Rutte that Ukraine's path to NATO membership was 'irreversible'. This policy has been largely upended by Trump's return to the White House this January. Since his first term (2017-21), Trump has remained cordial with Russian President Vladimir Putin, reversing decades-long animosity between the US and Russia. In his second term, the Trump administration has ruled out the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO, lashed out against Zelenskyy for being 'ungrateful', and has paused US military aid to Ukraine in its war against Russia. This set the stage for the NATO summit, as the Ukraine issue was relegated to the backseat. Unlike last year, when the NATO declaration took note of Russia's 'brutal war of aggression', the statement this year mentioned 'long-term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security' without specifically condemning Russia.
The Hindu
37 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Indian team in U.S. for last attempt at trade deal before July 9 deadline
A team of negotiators from India is in the U.S. for at least a two-day trip to conduct final negotiations for a 'mini trade deal' before the July 8 deadline elapses, The Hindu has learnt. The top items on the agenda, and the main hindrances to an agreement, are the entry of genetically-modified (GM) crops and cow milk into India, and the removal of the reciprocal tariffs imposed by the U.S.. This comes soon after U.S. President Donald Trump on June 26 hinted at a 'very big' deal coming up with India. 'We're having some great deals. We have one coming up, maybe with India, a very big one, where we're going to open up India,' Mr. Trump said during an event at the White House promoting passage of the GOP's tax and spending cuts legislation on June 26, 2025. July 8 marks the last day of the 90-day pause Mr. Trump had allowed on the 'Liberation Day' higher tariffs he had imposed on imports from other countries, including India. If that date elapses without either an extension or a trade deal between India and the U.S., then Indian exports to the U.S. will be subject to 26% tariffs. According to sources aware of the negotiations between the two countries, the U.S. and India are currently at loggerheads over the issues of the import of GM crops and cow milk into India. 'Both of these issues are very sensitive for India,' the source explained. 'GM crops will be a big hit to our domestic farmers, and cow milk is a cultural-religious issue.' India has not opened up either of these sectors in any of the free-trade agreements it has so far signed. Also Read | India and U.S. can only finalise 'mini' trade deal this year: Sources The Indian, on the other hand, will be trying to push the U.S. to waive the Liberation Day tariffs for India, and also reduce the increased tariffs it had levied on steel and aluminium imports. Overall, the U.S. is seeking duty concessions on certain industrial goods, automobiles, especially electric vehicles, and wines, petrochemical products, dairy, and agricultural items such as apples, tree nuts and genetically modified crops. India's broad demands are concessions for labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, garments, plastics, chemicals, shrimp, oil seeds, grapes, and bananas. Budget 2025 already saw India reducing tariffs on a wide variety of items such as shrimp and shrimp paste, high-end motorcycles and automobiles, and some types of electronics. (The article has been edited to correct a factual error)
Mint
43 minutes ago
- Mint
‘Is Giorgia Meloni okay?': Internet reacts as Italian PM's facial expressions at NATO Summit go viral
The 2025 NATO Summit, held recently in the Netherlands, saw world leaders come together to discuss urgent global issues. However, it was Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni who unexpectedly became the centre of attention on social media — not for her political remarks, but for her expressive facial gestures during a press interaction. A short video of Meloni went viral online, showing her making dramatic and seemingly involuntary facial movements while speaking to reporters. The clip quickly spread across X (formerly Twitter), with users reacting with humour and curiosity, wondering what may have prompted her exaggerated expressions. "What's going on with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni?" one user questioned, while another commented, "Is Giorgia Meloni okay?" A third wrote, "How do you explain Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's facial expressions here?" The video fuelled more speculation, with comments like, "Too much caffeine?" and "She had a flashback of Macron whispering in her ear." One user even joked, "Some powerful cocaine." Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump made headlines for a different reason. He earned a new nickname — 'Daddy' — during the summit, thanks to a comment made by NATO Secretary-General and former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte. The moment followed Trump's remarks on the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict. In a now widely-shared video, Trump likened the situation to a schoolyard brawl, saying, 'They've had a big fight, like two kids in a schoolyard. You know, they fight like hell. You can't stop them. Let them fight for about two, three minutes, then it's easier to stop.'* Rutte responded with a playful comment, 'And then Daddy has to sometimes use strong language.' The White House quickly joined in on the viral moment, posting a polished video montage of Trump's arrival at the summit set to Usher's track 'Daddy's Home.' The video included clips of Trump greeting leaders, including Rutte, adding to the meme's popularity online. Though the summit focused on serious matters, it was these light-hearted moments that grabbed the internet's attention.
