Carl Bildt: Sweden should help migrants who wish to leave after integration failures
Europe has not integrated its recent immigrant population well enough, former Swedish prime minister Carl Bildt told The National.
In an interview in Abu Dhabi on Tuesday, which took place on the sidelines of the Raisina Middle East forum in Abu Dhabi, Mr Bildt also shared his views on the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, the growing importance of artificial intelligence in public policymaking and the role of social media in the western political discourse.
In Sweden, where the government in September announced it plans to offer more than $34,000 to migrants who want to return to their countries of origin, Mr Bildt says there is a growing 'recognition that [immigration] went somewhat too fast'.
'Integration takes time, and we didn't give it the attention that we should have.'
Mr Bildt also attributed a rise in criminality and gangs in Sweden to these policy failures. 'And that has led to a political reaction…You see it in all European countries.'
On Sweden's financial offer to incentivise migrants to return, Mr Bildt says 'there are quite a number of people who want to go back' – particularly Syrians, many of whom he says want to return even in spite of Sweden's foreign ministry advising against travel to Syria.
"I think it is fair enough that we give them some help," he said.
Critics of the plan say it could hinder efforts to encourage integration among immigrants further by sending a message across society that non-native Swedes do not belong.
'The key thing,' Mr Bildt says, is that 'this is a voluntary arrangement'.
'If they don't want [to leave]…then integration is the name of the game.'
Throughout Europe, some far-right politicians have mooted ' remigration ', in which governments ought to try to repatriate immigrants to their country of origin, in some cases even after they have acquired European citizenship. The idea has picked up steam in populist circles, including within Germany's right-wing party Alternative fur Deutschland (AfD).
While Mr Bildt acknowledged far-right 'tendencies' in Europe, he said he was more worried about trends in American society.
'If you look at opinion polls in the US, you have roughly 70 per cent of people who have been saying consistently for years that the country is moving in the wrong direction,' he said. 'If you put the same question to people in Europe, those figures are much lower.
'There is a distinct difference between what we see in Europe and the intense polarisation of American society.'
Last week, American billionaire Elon Musk addressed an AfD campaign event in Germany via video link, where he warned that multiculturalism 'dilutes everything'.
'I'm interested to see how it works out in Germany,' Mr Bildt said. 'Whether Elon Musk's intervention has a positive or negative effect, because there could also be a backlash against it. I mean, Americans coming in and preaching to the German electorate is not necessarily something that is appreciated. Could be. Remains to be seen.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
19 minutes ago
- Gulf Today
Trump approves Nippon Steel's $14.9 billion purchase of US Steel
US President Donald Trump approved Nippon Steel's $14.9 billion bid for US Steel, capping a tumultuous 18-month effort by the companies that survived union opposition and two national security reviews. Trump signed an executive order saying the tie-up could move forward if the companies sign an agreement with the Treasury Department resolving national security concerns posed by the deal. The companies then announced they had signed the agreement, fulfilling the conditions of Trump's directive and effectively garnering approval for the merger. 'We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again,' the companies said in the statement, thanking Trump. They added the agreement includes $11 billion in new investments to be made by 2028 as well as governance, production and trade commitments. Nippon Steel will buy a 100 per cent stake in US Steel, a spokesperson for the Japanese company in Tokyo said on Saturday. The steelmakers provided no detail on the 'golden share' they pledged to issue to the US government, raising questions about the extent of US control. ' 'US Senator David McCormick of Pennsylvania, where US Steel is headquartered, said last month the golden share would give the government veto power over key decisions relating to the American steel icon. Reuters has reported that Nippon Steel would invest an additional $3 billion for a new mill after 2028. The takeover will set up the ailing US firm to receive the critical investment, allowing Nippon Steel to capitalise on a host of American infrastructure projects while its foreign competitors face steel tariffs of 50 per cent. The Japanese firm also avoids the $565 million in breakup fees it would have had to pay if the companies had failed to secure approvals. For Nippon Steel, the world's fourth-biggest steelmaker, securing a foothold in the US is key to its global growth strategy. The US steel market, including high-grade steel, Nippon Steel's specialty, is growing amid rising global trade tensions. Still, some Nippon Steel investors are concerned about short-term financial pressure due to the scale of the additional investment commitment. The Japanese government, rushing to try to secure a trade deal with the US by the time Trump and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba meet at the Group of Seven summit starting on Sunday, applauded the Nippon-US Steel agreement. 'The government of Japan welcomes the US government's decision, as we believe this investment will enhance innovation capabilities in the US and Japanese steel industries and further strengthen the close partnership between our two countries,' Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Yoji Muto said in a statement on Saturday. Friday's announcement was hardly guaranteed, even if many investors had seen approval as likely after Trump headlined a rally on May 30 giving his vague blessing to an 'investment' by Nippon Steel, which he described as a 'great partner.' Shares of US Steel had dipped earlier on Friday after a Nippon Steel executive told Japan's Nikkei newspaper that the takeover required 'a degree of management freedom' to go ahead after Trump said the US would be in control with the golden share. The bid has faced opposition since Nippon Steel launched it in December 2023. After the United Steelworkers union came out against the deal last year, both then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, and Trump, a Republican, expressed their opposition as they sought to woo voters in the presidential campaign in the swing state of Pennsylvania. Shortly before leaving office in January, Biden blocked the deal on national security grounds, prompting lawsuits by the companies, which argued the national security review they received was biased. The Biden White House disputed the charge. The steel companies saw a new opportunity in the Trump administration, which opened a fresh 45-day national security review into the proposed merger in April. But Trump's public comments, ranging from welcoming a simple 'investment' in US Steel by the Japanese firm to floating a minority stake for Nippon Steel, spurred confusion. While many investors saw approval as likely after Trump headlined a rally on May 30 giving his vague blessing to an 'investment' by Nippon Steel, which he described as a 'great partner', Friday's announcement was hardly guaranteed. The bid, first announced by Nippon Steel in December 2023, has faced opposition from the start. Both Democratic former President Joe Biden and Trump, a Republican, asserted last year that US Steel should remain US-owned, as they sought to woo voters ahead of the presidential election in Pennsylvania, where the company is headquartered. Reuters
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel opens fire on Palestinians seeking aid, as UN warns of relief obstruction
Israeli attacks have killed at least 15 Palestinians and wounded many others waiting to receive aid in central Gaza in the latest assault on aid seekers in recent weeks. According to local sources, Israeli forces opened fire on Palestinians as they gathered around relief distribution points operated and organised by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The GHF was launched at the end of May after Israel imposed a total blockade on all supplies to Gaza for nearly three months, which the United Nations says pushed the enclave's 2.3 million people to the verge of famine. Since its operations began, more than 274 Palestinians have been killed and hundreds more wounded while seeking food at distribution sites, which are guarded by US private military contractors and overseen by Israeli forces. The UN and aid organisations have accused the US and Israel-backed GHF, which employs private American security and logistics workers, of militarising humanitarian aid. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Jens Laerke, spokesperson for the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Ocha), told reporters on Friday that aid distribution and delivery have been stalled as a result of the organisation. 'GHF, I think it's fair to say, has been, from a principled humanitarian standpoint, a failure. "They are not doing what a humanitarian operation should do, which is providing aid to people where they are, in a safe and secure manner.' Meanwhile, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (Unrwa) described the US-Israeli distribution model as a "recipe for chaos", noting that it is "also a distraction from the ongoing atrocities and a waste of resources". "It is weaponising aid and resulting in fear, discrimination, and growing desperation," it added in a post on X. Unrwa urged for the blockade on the Gaza Strip to be lifted and for the UN to resume operations, stressing that "aid must be delivered safely and at scale". Gaza foundation is a humanitarian face to mask Israel's genocide Read More » In another post, the agency warned that restrictions and hostilities continue to "obstruct humanitarian aid deliveries in #Gaza". Israeli forces have killed more than 55,297 Palestinians in Israel's ongoing war on Gaza, which several countries, as well as many international rights groups and experts, now qualify as a genocide. Since the early hours of Saturday, Israeli shelling has killed more than 23 Palestinians across the Gaza Strip, with the Wafa news agency reporting the heaviest bombardment in the central region. In Gaza City, several were killed and wounded after a strike hit a tent sheltering displaced Palestinians near al-Khaldi Mosque. Meanwhile, artillery shelling was reported in al-Tuffah neighbourhood, in Gaza's Old City. Reports from the south of the enclave noted that at least three Palestinians were killed in a drone strike near the Islamic University in Khan Younis. In the same governorate, Israeli troops launched attacks targeting the Hamad City residential towers and the Asdaa area, with tanks opening fire on displaced Palestinians.
Gulf Today
5 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Trump's tax-cut bill could hold back projects
US President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill would make it harder for American critical minerals companies to compete with China because it eliminates a tax credit for boosting domestic production of nickel, rare earths and other materials used in advanced electronics and weaponry, reported Reuters. With Trump and Republican lawmakers aiming to cut government support for green energy projects, the US House of Representatives passed a version of his "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" last month that eliminates the so-called 45X credit. The Senate is now debating the bill. Former President Joe Biden's 2022 climate change law, the Inflation Reduction Act, created the 10% production credit — a reduction in corporate taxes for critical minerals extraction and processing. The tax break also covers solar, battery and wind projects. The version of the bill that passed the House treats government incentives for wind turbines the same as those for mining projects that many view as crucial for national security. Critical minerals companies now say their projects are collateral damage to the political feud over renewable energy. The tax credit is already law and part of the current federal budget. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which scores the cost of legislative proposals when asked by Congress, has not studied how much would be saved by removing the credit. The Republican majority in Congress is seeking savings to fund other priorities such as tax cuts, defense and balancing the budget. This month, the hard-right House Freedom Caucus said it "will not accept" attempts to "water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation." Miners, though, say they need the credit to compete with China. Beijing has halted exports of some critical minerals, used its control of rare earths to strike a trade agreement with Washington, and flooded global markets with cheap supply of nickel, cobalt and lithium. The traditionally conservative mining industry now finds itself in the unusual position of needing Washington's support to grow and, in some cases, survive. The owner of the only US cobalt mine went bankrupt this year after Chinese miners depressed global prices of that metal. "If we do not have that tax credit, critical minerals producers in the U.S. are at risk of succumbing to closures," said KaLeigh Long, founder and CEO of Westwin Elements, which is building the country's only commercial nickel refinery. Westwin might not be able to service its debt without the tax credit, Long said, noting the company's loans were modeled using the expectation it would be permanent. Last month, Long wrote a letter asking the Senate to keep the credit. It was co-signed by 30 industry executives. Any changes the Senate makes to the bill must be reconciled with the House version before being sent to Trump, observed Reuters. Several House members have admitted they did not read the entire bill before voting for it, including Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green, a Georgia Republican, and Congressman Mike Flood, a Nebraska Republican. The House version does include $2.5 billion to fund a critical minerals stockpile and $500 million for a Pentagon mining loan program, although large mines often cost far more, noticed Reuters. House Democrats unanimously voted against the bill but their criticism has focused on tax cuts they say will widen the deficit while requiring cuts in health care, food assistance, education, scientific research and other programs. "There's so many issues right now under consideration in Congress and this one isn't breaking through, but it will certainly break through when we have a shortage of minerals in five years," said Jeff Green, a critical minerals industry consultant.
