logo
The Biggest Soup Recalls In US History

The Biggest Soup Recalls In US History

Yahoo24-05-2025

Soup has always been a comforting staple in American households, offering warmth and nourishment across generations. Whether it's a steaming bowl of chicken noodle soup to nurse you back to health on a sick day, or a hearty tomato bisque out of an iconic red-and-white can, this dish is often associated with safety, simplicity, and nostalgia. But despite its wholesome image and trusted reliability, even this beloved meal hasn't been immune to being taken off shelves for the general public's protection.
Over the years, various soup products have been recalled due to contamination, mislabeling labels, and other hazards, sometimes leading to serious health risks — and even death — for consumers. These recalls have affected products across the board — from mass-market brands like Campbell's and Trader Joe's to regional and specialty food producers. While some soup recalls were due to typical reasons like the presence of foreign objects or mislabeling, one incident involving insects found in the soup can be considered among the strangest food recalls in U.S. history. These cases also cast a spotlight on how even trusted brands can fall short when safety protocols are breached.
Read more: Campbell's Chunky Soup Flavors, Ranked Worst To Best
For many, a warm bowl of tortilla soup has the perfect blend of comfort and spice that's hard to resist. But in April of 2025, that comforting feeling was interrupted by an unsettling discovery in a batch of tortilla soup: wood fragments. The source of the contamination was traced to cilantro in the soup that had been contaminated by an extraneous material — specifically, small pieces of wood that could pose a choking or injury hazard.
The affected soups were distributed in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio, much of it through food-service channels such as cafeterias, hospitals, and institutional kitchens. That meant consumers might not have purchased these soups directly, but they could still have unknowingly consumed them in a meal.
While no injuries or illnesses were reported at the time of the recall, the incident shows that even a minor ingredient like chopped cilantro can have major consequences when quality control breaks down. Campbell's was one of the brands affected by the recall, along with Life Cuisine, Molly's Kitchen, Sysco, Verve, and Crafted Market. Anyone who encountered the affected product was advised to discard it or return it to the place of purchase.
Trader Joe's is known for its quirky branding and cult-favorite snacks — but in July of 2023, the grocery chain faced an unusual issue that it probably wishes had stayed under wraps. Its Unexpected Broccoli Cheddar Soup was recalled after multiple reports of insects discovered in the frozen broccoli florets used in the product. The soup had been distributed widely, reaching store shelves in Florida, Illinois, California, Texas, Washington, Pennsylvania, and Connecticut. In total, 10,889 cases were affected, making this one of the biggest recalls in Trader Joe's history.
This incident raised eyebrows among even the brand's most loyal fans, with some even pointing out the coincidental link between the product name and the recall: unexpected. While the FDA actually specifies that small amounts of insect parts are allowed in food sold to the public, this level of contamination was too much for TJ's customers to stomach. The recall raised questions about supplier oversight and whether inspection protocols were thorough enough at the point of packaging. Trader Joe's encouraged customers to return the product for a full refund, but the damage to consumer trust was significant. This high-profile case shows that quality issues aren't limited to mass-production brands, and that smaller labels must also hold themselves to high food safety standards.
When consumers open a soup container, they expect to find savory ingredients — not fragments of a nitrile glove. But in August of 2021, a huge batch of chicken tortilla soup was recalled after reports of gray glove pieces in the product. The product, manufactured by Blount Fine Foods, was at the center of a recall that affected more than 6,300 pounds of soup. Sold in 16-ounce containers with a "Use By" date of September 9, 2021, the soup had been distributed to retailers in Arizona, Florida, Georgia, and Texas. One of the retailers affected was Panera Bread.
The contamination likely occurred during the packaging process, raising concerns about employee safety protocols. Consumers who bought these products were advised not to eat them. Instead, they were instructed to discard the items or return them to the store where they were purchased.
No injuries or illnesses connected to this soup were reported at the time of this recall, but the visual shock of finding glove pieces in their food probably left many consumers unsettled. An incident like this could lead people to try making their own homemade versions of their favorite products — our copycat recipe for Panera's chicken noodle soup would a good place to start if you're interested in trying this.
In early 2020, Kettle Cuisine Midco faced scrutiny after recalling some 200 pounds of soup due to misbranding and undeclared allergens. The product in question? A toddler-targeted lentil and beef soup, which turned out to contain noodles made with egg and wheat, two common allergens that weren't listed on the label. Packaged in 7-ounce containers emblazoned with a cute cartoon cow and colorful veggies, the soup had been sold online and shipped to customers in Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C.
For health-conscious parents seeking allergy-safe options for young children, the mistake was a major concern. Even though the volume recalled was relatively small, the potential impact was significant. The mismatch between the product's intended demographic and the seriousness of the mislabelling made it especially troubling. This recall highlighted the importance of applying extra care when it comes to foods sold specifically for children, and provides an example of the need for enhanced controls when allergens are involved.
When it comes to ready-to-eat pantry essentials, Campbell's Homestyle soups are considered as dependable and comforting choices. But in April of 2017, that reputation took a hit after a labeling mistake took a toll on the canned food giant. Nearly 4,200 pounds of soup cans labeled as Homestyle Healthy Request Chicken with Whole Grain Pasta were found to contain a completely different product: Homestyle Healthy Request Italian-Style Wedding Spinach & Meatballs in Chicken Broth soup — which, to make matters even worse, contains milk.
Milk is one of the major allergens that must be declared on food labels under the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA). The recalled cans of Campbell's soup — all produced on February 13, 2017 — bore a "Best By" date of February 13, 2019, and were shipped to retailers in Florida. Campbell's urged consumers to return the affected products or dispose of them. Luckily, no adverse reactions were reported when the recall was declared, but the risk of an allergic response earned this recall Class I status — the most serious level, indicating the potential for life-threatening health consequences.
Consumers assume that the food they buy has passed rigorous safety checks — but in October of 2015, Rustico Foods reminded Americans that sometimes, even after all the supervision stages have been passed, errors can happen. The company issued a recall for some 2,659 pounds of poultry-based soup products after it was discovered they had been produced without federal inspection. The recalled soups were comfort-food staples like chicken matzo ball, turkey chili with beans, and chicken vegetable. These items were produced over nearly a monthlong period — during 2015 from September 24 through October 21 — and distributed to retailers in California.
At the time of the recall, no negative health impacts were reported from consumers eating these soups, but the revelation that these products bypassed inspection stirred up more than just broth — it raised serious questions about oversight and accountability. Federal inspection isn't just red tape; it's the backbone of food safety, ensuring that products are hygienic, accurately labeled, and free from contaminants. Without it, consumers are left to play a dangerous guessing game. Considering the tragedies that occurred because of the most deadly recalled foods in U.S. history, it's understandable that brand trust can evaporate overnight when safety protocols slip.
In August of 2012, Blount Fine Foods found itself in hot water (pun intended) after a food safety issue led to the recall of varied types of soup, including its Italian wedding soup with meatballs and its chicken and dumpling soup. The Class II voluntary recall stemmed from consumers discovering plastic fragments in these prepackaged soup varieties, which were sold under the Wegmans supermarket chain's private label.
Investigators determined that the plastic pieces likely entered these products during the production of their containers. Such a mistake can pose serious health risks — foreign objects such as plastic, metal, and wood fragments can cause choking or internal injuries. With a total of 4,100 pounds of these soups recalled, a considerable amount of the affected products reached Wegmans shelves and the kitchens of shoppers, but fortunately the soups caused no reported injuries at the point when the recall was announced.
Labeling errors might seem like minor slip-ups — but when allergens are involved, such mistakes can become potentially life-threatening to many consumers. In April of 2011, Bay Valley Foods had to recall 188,181 pounds of cans that were labeled as containing reduced sodium chicken noodle condensed soup, because it was discovered that some of those cans actually contained cream of chicken soup. Since the latter soup variety contains milk, and this ingredient was not listed on the label, the potential severity of this situation prompted a Class I recall notice.
For people with dairy allergies or severe lactose intolerance, consuming the mislabeled cream of chicken soup could have led to dangerous reactions. The recall affected soup produced for Walmart's Great Value private label, and it was distributed across 36 states and Puerto Rico. Although no allergic reactions related to the soup had been reported when the recall was initiated, at least one customer complained that the product was improperly labeled, indicating that a significant amount of the recalled soup cans may have reached the homes of consumers before this colossal food-safety mistake was discovered and rectified.
In February of 2005, New Jersey-based Aunt Kitty's Foods found itself in the middle of a huge safety scare when it voluntarily recalled its Wedding Bell Soup with Meatballs and Chicken, due to the presence of undeclared dairy ingredients. For many consumers, especially those who are lactose intolerant or who suffer from a milk allergy, this was more than just a labelling error — it was a serious health hazard.
The soup — a hearty blend sold under the World Classics brand in 19-ounce cans — was suspected of containing cheese among its ingredients, a dairy-based food that was not disclosed on the label. A total of 4,275 pounds of this product was distributed to retailers in Connecticut and Massachusetts, and all of it was subjected to this Class I recall. Unfortunately for the producer (and for consumers of its products), this would not be the last time that Aunt Kitty's Foods would be subjected to a recall — in 2023, the company was caught up in one of the biggest chicken pot pie recalls in U.S. history.
Being in business for over 150 years, Campbell's is undoubtedly a food-industry giant. Nonetheless, a wide variety of its products have been caught up in the biggest recalls in Campbell's history. In February of 2003, the company issued a recall of its Italian Sausage with Pasta and Pepperoni Soup due to the presence of an undeclared dairy ingredient. The product contained Romano cheese, which was not listed on the label, and the concern was serious enough to warrant federal attention with a Class I recall. In total, 56,000 pounds of soup were pulled from shelves to keep consumers safe.
The soup was produced in a Campbell's plant located in Napoleon, Ohio, and it had been distributed to Costco locations in Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Washington. Complicating the incident, this Italian Sausage with Pasta and Pepperoni Soup was packaged in variety-pack cartons along with cans of a chicken-based product that was not subjected to any recall. This massive mistake showed that safety gaps can occur even amid facilities operated by well-established food producers.
Thanks to the work of Andy Warhol, cans of Campbell's soup transcended the kitchen to become American pop culture icons, highlighting a simple, reliable, and comforting image. But in 2002, the company had to issue a recall that shook consumers' confidence. The problem was that nearly 20,000 cases of its classic tomato soup — with a dozen 18.7-ounce cans in each case — were found to contain undeclared milk and soy.
The mix-up was traced to a single day's production of this soup variety, which resulted in a small amount of soup that contained milk and soy being packaged in containers that did not list these ingredients on the label. Distributed across at least 37 states from coast to coast, the reach of the affected product was extensive. Luckily, after receiving customer complaints, Campbell's acted quickly, initiating this recall and issuing a public warning to prevent any harm to its customers. Anyone who bought the soup was encouraged to return it to the point of sale for a full refund.
In December of 1992, Campbell's Soup Company faced a major recall involving both soups and frozen dinners — which is a reminder that there are numerous red flags to look out for when buying frozen foods. The issue this time involved the presence of glass shards that had accidentally found their way into the products during production.
The recall affected some 423,000 cans of soup and around 332,000 frozen dinners, leading to a widespread advisory to all areas where these products were distributed — including at least 33 states, as well as Guam and Mexico. Campbell's soup varieties that were impacted by the recall included chicken with rice and chicken gumbo.
The glass pieces were found in bags of rice that were sourced from an external supplier, but used in varied Campbell's products. Thankfully, despite the huge risks, at the time of the recall there were no reports of injuries caused by the sharp shards.
One of the most infamous soup-related recalls in American history dates back to 1971, when a can of Bon Vivant's vichyssoise soup became the focal point of a deadly botulism outbreak. After a couple in New York consumed the soup, the husband died within hours, and his wife was hospitalized in critical condition. Laboratory testing later confirmed the presence of botulinum toxin, a deadly pathogen that can be introduced to foods due to improper canning processes.
Fearing widespread contamination, the FDA moved to recall all soups, sauces, and canned foods produced by Bon Vivant, which was based in Newark, New Jersey. Further investigation revealed that defective cans were found in multiple product lines offered by Bon Vivant — which included numerous foods sold under different brand names.
This incident sent shockwaves through the industry and the nation. It was no longer just a health crisis — it also became a turning point for changes in food safety regulations, particularly for canned goods. It also ultimately led to the company's downfall, as consumer trust evaporated almost overnight. More than 50 years later, the vichyssoise tragedy still serves as a sad reminder of how poor food safety practices can be lethal, and why regular inspections and safety checks are needed.
Read the original article on Mashed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2025 produce ‘dirty dozen,' ‘clean 15' revealed
2025 produce ‘dirty dozen,' ‘clean 15' revealed

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

2025 produce ‘dirty dozen,' ‘clean 15' revealed

Spinach takes top dishonors in the 2025 'Dirty Dozen' list of nonorganic fruits and vegetables with the most pesticide contamination. The "2025 Shopper's Guide to Pesticides in Produce" is an annual report by the Environmental Working Group. The group also on Wednesday released its 'Clean 15″ list, noting 60% of those are 'free from harmful pesticides.' Nine in 10 samples on the dirty list contained pesticide residue, the group said. Per the news release, 'The overall toxicity is one of four factors EWG used to assess pesticides on produce. To calculate the overall pesticide toxicity for produce, EWG compared the average concentration of pesticide detected on fruits and vegetables to toxicological reference values – levels below which health harms are not expected." 'The updated methodology reflects important aspects of pesticide exposure for people,' said Dayna de Montagnac, an EWG associate scientist. 'Our research takes into account the potency of each chemical and can help shoppers reduce their overall pesticide burden.' The list has been produced annually for decades, but is not without critics. The Alliance for Food and Farming, which represents organic and conventional produce farmers, sent out a news release noting that the 'dirty dozen list recommendations cannot be substantiated.' 'There is growing concern about the impact of inaccurate safety fears becoming a barrier to increased consumption of produce,' the alliance said. 'One peer-reviewed study found that when low-income consumers were exposed to 'Dirty Dozen" list messaging, they stated they were less likely to purchase any produce — organic or conventional." Alexis Temkin, EWG vice president of science, told CNN the goal is not to get people to skip eating fruits and vegetables, which are important to a nutrient-rich diet. Rather, it's to help families decide whether to buy organic versions of certain fruits or vegetables. 'The guide is there to help consumers eat a lot of fruits and vegetables while trying to reduce pesticide exposure,' Temkin said. 'One of the things that a lot of peer-reviewed studies have shown over and over again (is) that when people switch to an organic diet from a conventional diet, you can really see measurable levels in the reduction of pesticide levels in the urine.' The group said it analyzed 47 items to come up with the 12 it called most contaminated by pesticides. EWG also noted that the analysis didn't include risk assessment, weighting all pesticides equally, nor did it 'factor in the levels deemed acceptable by the EPA.' Spinach Strawberries Kale, collard and mustard greens Grapes Peaches Cherries Nectarines Pears Apples Blackberries Blueberries Potatoes The group said the average American eats about eight pounds of strawberries a year. Blackberries made their debut this year on the dirty dozen, as did potatoes, which are the 'most consumed vegetable in the U.S.' As for No. 1, according to EWG, 'Spinach is a nutrient-rich vegetable, making it a staple for healthy eating. But it also has more pesticide residues by weight than any other type of produce — three-fourths of non-organic, or conventional samples are contaminated with a neurotoxic insecticide, permethrin, which is banned from use on food crops in Europe." EWG said it used tests conducted by the Department of Agriculture to rank the fruits and vegetables. It notes the most recent tests of spinach, however, were conducted in 2016. Asked if that was correct, an EWG spokesman reiterated for Deseret News the methodology in the report: 'This year's guide incorporates data from a total of more than 53,000 samples of 47 fruits and vegetables. EWG uses USDA data for non-organic samples of fruits and vegetables from the most recent sampling periods, which typically spans one to two years for each item. For example, to analyze residues on spinach, we used 1,295 samples the USDA collected between 2015 and 2016, as that's the most recent data range for that type of produce.' EWG also pointed out that most of the pesticides found on conventional spinach samples were 'sanctioned as legal and safe' by the Environmental Protection Agency, but note that permethrin at high doses creates health risks, including increased chance of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. The items with the least amount of pesticide in the EWG report were: Pineapples Sweet corn (fresh and frozen) Avocados Papaya Onion Sweet peas (frozen) Asparagus Cabbage Watermelon Cauliflower Bananas Mangoes Carrots Mushrooms Kiwi The alliance reported that 'the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Pesticide Data Program consistently finds that over 99% of foods sampled had residue levels well below EPA safety standards with 40% having no detectable residues at all." Still, public health experts say fresh produce should be cleaned, including the fruits and vegetables that have peels that will not be consumed. Advice from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for safely consuming produce: Wash your hands for 20 seconds with warm water and soap before and after handling fresh produce. Cut away damaged or bruised areas before preparing or eating. Rinse produce BEFORE you peel it. Otherwise, that knife could transfer contamination. Gently rub produce while holding under plain running water. You do not need to use soap. Use a clean vegetable brush to scrub produce such as melons and zucchini. Dry produce with a clean cloth or paper towel. That can remove even more bacteria. Remove the outermost leaves of cabbage or lettuce, which are potentially exposed to more contamination. The alliance said not to use soaps or detergents, which can create their own issues.

New paper sheds light on experience of Black prisoners in infamous Stateville prison malaria experiments
New paper sheds light on experience of Black prisoners in infamous Stateville prison malaria experiments

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New paper sheds light on experience of Black prisoners in infamous Stateville prison malaria experiments

Much has been said and written over the years about controversial malaria research conducted on inmates at Illinois' Stateville Penitentiary starting in the 1940s. But at least one part of that story has been largely ignored until now: the role of Black prisoners in that research, which helped lead to the modern practice of using genetic testing to understand how individual patients will react to certain medications, according to the authors of a newly published paper out of the University of Utah. 'We want to highlight the stories of Black prisoners that participated in this prison research in the 1950s onward and give them their due,' said Hannah Allen, a medical ethicist and assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, and first author of the paper, which was published as an opinion piece Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association. 'They haven't been properly acknowledged in the past, and their participation in these studies was really foundational in launching the field of pharmacogenetics and, later on, precision medicine,' said Allen, who recently completed her doctorate at the University of Utah. Starting in the 1940s, researchers infected inmates at the Joliet-area prison with malaria to test the effectiveness of drugs to treat the illness as part of a U.S. military-funded effort to protect American troops overseas, according to the paper. A University of Chicago doctor was the principal investigator. The inmates consented to being part of the studies and were paid for their participation. At first, the research was greeted with enthusiasm. In 1945, Life magazine ran a spread about it, featuring a photo of a Stateville inmate with cups containing malaria-carrying mosquitoes pressed against his bare chest. The first line of the story reads, 'In three U.S. penitentiaries men who have been imprisoned as enemies of society are now helping science fight another enemy of society.' But as the years passed, attitudes began to shift. Questions arose about whether inmates could truly, freely consent to participate in medical experiments or whether they felt coerced into them because of their often dire circumstances. At the Nuremberg trials, defense attorneys for Nazi doctors introduced text and images from the Life article about Stateville prison, though an Illinois physician argued at the trials that the prisoners in Stateville consented to being part of medical research whereas Nazi prisoners did not, according to the JAMA paper. In the mid-1970s, news broke about a study at Tuskegee, in which Black men with syphilis went untreated for years — news that raised awareness of ethical problems in medical research. News outlets also began publishing more stories about prison research, according to the JAMA article. The Chicago Tribune published an article in 1973, in which an inmate participating in the Stateville malaria research said: 'I've been coerced into the project — for the money. Being here has nothing to do with 'doing good for mankind' … I didn't want to keep taking money from my family.' The experiments at Stateville came to a halt in the 1970s. A number of protections and regulations are now in place when it comes to research involving prisoners. Since the 1970s, the Stateville research has often been discussed and analyzed but little attention has been paid to its Black participants, said James Tabery, a medical ethicist and philosophy professor at the University of Utah who led the new research, which was funded by the federal National Institutes of Health. For a time, Black prisoners were excluded from the studies because of a myth that Black people were immune to malaria, Tabery said. Later on, once scientists had pinpointed the drug primaquine as an effective medication for malaria, they turned their attention to the question of why 5% to 10% of Black men experienced a violent reaction to the drug, according to the paper. Ultimately, the scientists were successful, finding that the adverse reaction was related to a specific genetic deficiency. 'There are people all over Chicago today that are getting tested, that clinicians are recommending they get a genetic test before they get prescribed a drug because they want to make sure that their patient isn't going to have an adverse reaction to the drug,' Tabery said. 'It's really sort of powerful and interesting that you can trace that approach to doing good clinical medicine right back to this particular moment and place and population.' But Tabery and Allen also found that the Black prisoners were not treated the same as the white prisoners who participated in research at Stateville. For one, they weren't paid as much as the white prisoners, the rationale being that the white prisoners were infected with malaria, whereas the Black prisoners were given the drug but not infected with the disease — though some of the Black prisoners got very ill after taking the medication, according to the paper. Also, researchers didn't protect the Black participants' privacy as well as they did for other participants. They published certain identifying information about the Black participants, such as initials, ages, heights and weights, whereas participants in the previous research were represented with case numbers, according to the paper. Researchers also recruited the Black prisoners' family members for the study, which they didn't do with earlier participants, according to the paper. 'You see them just doing things with the Black prisoners that they're not doing with the white prisoners,' Tabery said. Also, though scientists made an important discovery through the research on Black prisoners, the episode also highlights the difficulty that can occur in translating discoveries into real life help for patients. Though the World Health Organization now recommends genetic testing to protect people who are sensitive to antimalarials, many of the people who would benefit most from such testing still don't receive it because of financial barriers, supply chain issues and a lack of training, according to the paper. 'What we found is when you sort of shift to what was happening to the Black prisoners, these other lessons you hadn't thought of as being derivable from Stateville suddenly do become apparent,' Tabery said.

Opinion - We're cancer doctors. Here's why Medicare Advantage fails America's elderly.
Opinion - We're cancer doctors. Here's why Medicare Advantage fails America's elderly.

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - We're cancer doctors. Here's why Medicare Advantage fails America's elderly.

'It's nothing,' Tom, a retired firefighter from rural Texas, thought when he had persistent stomach pain. After shedding 30 pounds in three weeks, his family physician ordered a CT scan. Tom was not concerned — after all, the 65-year-old had gotten Medicare Advantage earlier that year. Like millions, Tom switched his insurance after he was solicited by a broker who promised low premiums and a gift card. Absent from the sales pitch was the fact that Medicare Advantage plans — privately run and separate from government-funded traditional Medicare — often delay and deny coverage. One of us met Tom nearly three months after his CT scan, and his doctor discovered the abdominal mass. The job as the first oncologist he had been able to see after months of jumping through hoops was to get initial scans, identify an in-network provider, wait for further referral and approval processes and finally schedule and complete a biopsy. The delays became a death knell. Tom was diagnosed with Stage 3 pancreatic cancer. Tom's first question was, 'It's going to be fine, right?' Despite the urge to reassure him, Tom's life and treatment options were not up to a doctor. They were up to his insurance. The same insurance that delayed urgent testing and care. By definition, Medicare Advantage is meant to support elderly medical care and increase efficiencies; in function, it is a business model that allows the American government to decrease its liability for sick seniors. Instead of absorbing and managing costs, the responsibility is outsourced to third-party operators, such as UnitedHealth Group, Humana and CVS Health. While Medicare Advantage provides excellent coverage if you never get sick, this insurance can quickly become a precursor to medical bankruptcy if the patient develops a deadly disease, a highly probable outcome when you consider that nearly 40 percent of Americans get cancer in their lifetime. After nearly two decades of experimentation and $450 billion of taxpayer money, Medicare Advantage has proven porous in terms of corruption, fraud and abuse. Yet, 32.8 million elderly Americans (54 percent of the eligible Medicare population) are currently enrolled in Medicare Advantage. In 2023 alone, Medicare Advantage plans fully or partially denied 3.2 million prior authorization requests. No one, especially among folks facing the daily drudgery of fighting cancer, truly understands how the cogs within the insurance machine work. Few of our elderly patients fight the goliath institution, and many succumb to poorer health outcomes in their quest for lifesaving treatment. Last year, countrywide and across disease groups, 79 percent of patients who experienced a delay or denial of coverage paid out of pocket for medication at least sometimes. Unsurprisingly, more than 100 million Americans are in medical debt. Of those who appealed between 2019 and 2023, over 80 percent were approved, implying that the initial claims were valid. This game of attrition directly contradicts Medicare Advantage's promise to provide efficient, patient-centered healthcare. These denials are not just medically dangerous because they enable deadly diseases to progress unchecked. They are also emotionally erosive. Daily, we see patients shrink in the face of denials, unable to emotionally navigate the complex Medicare system and the immense pain, isolation and depression resulting from this behemoth that stands between their disease and their hope to be free of it. During one of Tom's chemo visits, with thousands of dollars worth of IVs in his veins, his skin pale and translucent, he realized he was begging his insurance at every turn to support him. Stories like Tom's reveal the truth: Medicare Advantage is unapologetically failing its elderly cancer patients. Sick American seniors deserve more than insurance coverage in name only. We advise our patients to avoid Medicare Advantage. The better choice is traditional Medicare, plus a secondary or supplemental insurance. Often, people do not enroll in supplemental insurance because they do not understand its importance, believe they will never get sick, miss the deadline for approval without a medical exam (you must do this within three months before or after your 65th birthday), or think it is too expensive. Although supplemental insurance costs nearly $500 a month (exact amounts vary based on age and income), choosing this add-on — and paying roughly $6,000 a year — is much more affordable than Medicare Advantage's yearly out-of-pocket (potentially adding up to $8,500) and fighting for approvals for basic treatment. On Medicare Advantage, Tom quickly reached his maximum yearly out-of-pocket of $8,500, but then it reset on Jan. 1. After four months of treatment, he was responsible for paying $17,000 for 16 months of care, on top of his insurance premiums, simply to receive standard care. Of course, if you are one of the fortunate few to have never experienced illness — and we hope you are — Medicare Advantage can be a cheaper option. The question is, how can we make Medicare Advantage advantageous for the vulnerable? There is a bipartisan opportunity to change the narrative around this insurance model. During his confirmation hearing as the head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Mehmet Oz criticized Medicare Advantage insurers for some of their practices. Strategic change — omitting out-of-pocket costs for cancer patients, curbing insurance companies' rights to deny claims submitted by doctors and speeding up the process — along with more rigorous oversight of the program are worthwhile goals the Trump administration and Congress should take on. While Democrats and Republicans disagree on many issues, we believe we can all agree that people like Tom — and the millions of other Americans enrolled in Medicare Advantage — deserve comprehensive and just care. Dr. Pramod Pinnamaneni, MD, MBA, and Dr. Nitya Thummalachetty, DrPH, are founders of the Nau Project, a start-up dedicated to helping everyday Americans navigate the complexities of our healthcare system. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store