logo
‘Good' Technology Can Help Us Adapt To A Changing World

‘Good' Technology Can Help Us Adapt To A Changing World

Forbes05-06-2025

Basic 'people skills' are becoming less prevalent in today's early-career workers, who will be ... More tomorrow's managers and leaders.
The antidote to bad tech is good tech. That line comes from the new movie Mountainhead, the latest from Succession showrunner Jesse Armstrong.
I've been thinking a lot about that statement since I heard Armstrong repeat it in a recent interview. Armstrong's observation landed with me because I've been spending a lot of time lately worrying about technology's impact on young people and how those effects will play out in business and society.
Although I've worked in technology for my entire career, people will tell you I'm a salesperson, manager and leader at heart. I'm at my best when interacting with others, learning about their lives, their businesses and their needs, and working to create partnerships that deliver mutual benefits.
Over the past several years, I've observed that these basic 'people skills' are becoming less prevalent in today's early-career workers, who will be tomorrow's managers and leaders. We've probably all noticed that young people have become programmed for overstimulation and are less engaged with real-life interactions. Younger employees and colleagues almost always default to text or email, rarely leave a voicemail (although neither do I), and sometimes seem uncomfortable on the phone or in face-to-face conversations.
It appears that some combination of instant messaging, text abbreviations and emojis is robbing the next generation of at least some human interaction skills. That's a problem for business leaders. In the end, winning in business is all about convincing the people who make up your team that your strategy is right, and motivating them to execute. Try doing that via SMS.
Much of this change in human behavior can be attributed to the way new technologies have made us more efficient, yet less human. Mobile phones, social media, text apps, artificial intelligence and other popular innovations have made us more productive but less social. For many younger people, these effects were amplified by the pandemic (sorry to remind you), which forced us to replace classes, meetings and other physical gatherings with virtual meetings and digital communication. These changes have found their way into the business world, where companies and workers alike are wrestling with difficult questions about how to adapt and whether or how much to push back.
We won't be able to put the genie back in the bottle. So what's the answer? That's where the Mountainhead quote comes in: The antidote to bad tech is good tech. In the film, the line is meant to portray what Armstrong sees as the technology industry's insular and even arrogant nature. But there is also truth to the statement. As individuals and organizations, we need to accept that technology has changed society, business, and even people themselves in ways that won't be reversed. Whatever problems technology is creating, it's highly likely that the solutions we create will also be tech-based.
What good technology can we apply as an antidote to the 'bad?' In my area of expertise, there is no shortage of options. Fintechs and other technology providers have created a host of tools that leverage digital interactions in place of in-person interactions as a means of building and maintaining business relationships. New platforms can identify prospects and clients that best align with company products and strategies, increasing the likelihood that the prospect will respond favorably to any outreach, whether digital or in person. Other products use artificial intelligence to pinpoint the precise needs and interests of prospects and clients. Increasingly, these platforms can act on their own to initiate conversations by providing targets with a steady stream of highly relevant and actionable content.
That content is becoming more sophisticated and personalized. For example, new platforms enable anyone to make high-quality, professional videos quickly and cheaply. These platforms eliminate the need for extensive production teams and expensive equipment, with AI 'coaches' helping to perfect lighting, placement and other technical factors for optimal visual and production quality. Innovative avatar-based video technology allows users, after an initial recording session, to roll out a steady stream of new content in which their avatars speak directly to any target audience. Financial advisors and other professionals are using these new capabilities to interact with clients and prospects digitally without ever having to appear on camera.
All these are examples of digital technologies that can be used to replace some of the in-person interactions that have long served as the foundation of relationship-building. However, person-to-person conversation will always be essential. In fact, in an increasingly digital age, old-fashioned people skills might well become the ultimate competitive advantage.
To that end, 'good technology' can be used to free us from routine daily tasks and create more time for us to get out there and mingle. In my own corner of the world, I've seen solutions like Broadridge's OpsGPT and BondGPT eliminate hundreds of hours of operational and research work. At a broader level, virtual assistants, AI-powered apps that can write emails and create presentations, and other digital personal enhancement tools can untether workers from their keyboards and allow them more time in the real world—if we can convince them to take that leap!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wikipedia Tries to Calm Fury Over New AI-Generated Summaries Proposal
Wikipedia Tries to Calm Fury Over New AI-Generated Summaries Proposal

Gizmodo

time36 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Wikipedia Tries to Calm Fury Over New AI-Generated Summaries Proposal

The denizens of the open web don't want anything to do with AI. The Wikimedia Foundation, the organization behind Wikipedia, made the unfortunate decision to announce the trial of a new AI-fueled article generator this week. The backlash from the site's editors was so swift and so vengeful that the organization quickly walked back its idea, announcing a temporary 'pause' of the new feature. A spokesperson on behalf of the Foundation—which is largely separate from the decentralized community of editors that populate the site with articles—explained last week that, in an effort to make wikis 'more accessible to readers globally through different projects around content discovery,' the organization planned to trial 'machine-generated, but editor moderated, simple summaries for readers.' Like many other organizations that have been plagued by new automated features, Wikipedia's rank and file were quick to anger over the experimental new tool. The responses, which are posted to the open web, are truly something to behold. 'What the hell? No, absolutely not,' said one editor. 'Not in any form or shape. Not on any device. Not on any version. I don't even know where to begin with everything that is wrong with this mindless PR hype stunt.' 'This will destroy whatever reputation for accuracy we currently have,' another editor said. 'People aren't going to read past the AI fluff to see what we really meant.' Yet another editor was even more vehement: 'Keep AI out of Wikipedia. That is all. WMF staffers looking to pad their resumes with AI-related projects need to be looking for new employers.' 'A truly ghastly idea,' said another. 'Since all WMF proposals steamroller on despite what the actual community says, I hope I will at least see the survey and that—unlike some WMF surveys—it includes one or more options to answer 'NO'.' 'Are y'all (by that, I mean WMF) trying to kill Wikipedia? Because this is a good step in that way,' another editor said. 'We're trying to keep AI out of Wikipedia, not have the powers that be force it on us and tell us we like it.' The forum is littered with countless other negative responses from editors who expressed a categorical rejection of the tool. Not long afterward, the organization paused the feature, 404 Media reported. 'The Wikimedia Foundation has been exploring ways to make Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects more accessible to readers globally,' a Wikimedia Foundation spokesperson told 404 Media. 'This two-week, opt-in experiment was focused on making complex Wikipedia articles more accessible to people with different reading levels. For the purposes of this experiment, the summaries were generated by an open-weight Aya model by Cohere. It was meant to gauge interest in a feature like this, and to help us think about the right kind of community moderation systems to ensure humans remain central to deciding what information is shown on Wikipedia.'

Treasury Yields Fall Amid Concerning Labor Data, Mild Inflation
Treasury Yields Fall Amid Concerning Labor Data, Mild Inflation

Wall Street Journal

time36 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Treasury Yields Fall Amid Concerning Labor Data, Mild Inflation

0900 ET – U.S. labor and inflation data deepen a decline in Treasury yields. Weekly jobless claims were unchanged from the previous week's upwardly revised pace, at 248,000. Economists surveyed by WSJ expected 246,000. Continuing claims, a measure of the unemployed population, was 1.96 million, the highest level since November 2021. May's wholesale price inflation was 0.1%, accelerating from April's 0.2% deflation and below consensus of a positive 0.2%. The combination of slower-than-expected inflation and concerning labor data underscores bets that the Fed may need to change its hawkish position. Yields were already declining and fell further after the data. The 10-year Treasury yield is at 4.360% and the two-year at 3.891%. ( @ptrevisani) 0614 GMT – A downside surprise in U.S. CPI data gave only a small boost to Treasurys, probably because tariff-driven price hikes still look imminent, says Capital Economics' James Reilly in a note. That said, these price hikes look discounted in markets, shielding Treasury yields from rising pressure, the senior markets economist says. 'We don't expect much upwards pressure on Treasury yields even as the inflationary impact of tariffs eventually feeds into U.S. consumer prices,' he says. Capital Economics expects core inflation to rise in coming months but it thinks that investors are already braced for a broadly similar outcome on tariffs, he says. (

iOS 26 Is About To Save You Money On Your Energy Bill
iOS 26 Is About To Save You Money On Your Energy Bill

Forbes

time37 minutes ago

  • Forbes

iOS 26 Is About To Save You Money On Your Energy Bill

Apple hasn't given the smart home much love on stage at WWDC 2025 this week, but if you dig a little deeper into the dev sessions you'll find a feature that could actually make a dent in your energy bill. Dubbed EnergyKit, it's coming as part of iOS 26, which will arrive later this year. It's all a bit technical right now, but it points toward eventually turning your Apple Home system into a money-saving energy manager for your house. I say system, rather than app, because it sounds as if Apple is going to allow app developers to bake this tech into their own apps, even if those device types aren't currently supported. EnergyKit is a developer framework lets apps tap into Apple's Home energy data, and things like your rate plan and a forecast of when the grid is running cleaner or cheaper, which it will use to shift when your devices draw power. For example, it could allow your EV charger to schedule itself to run when grid rates are low or solar energy is peaking, or have your smart thermostat pre-cool your house before prices spike. If you're hooked up to PG&E (the first and only energy provider supported so far), your Apple Home app can already show this kind of info, but EnergyKit will supercharge things and open it up to developers to build smarter automations on top. Apple says the framework is aimed at residential use, for things like HVAC systems and EV charging. In a video introducing the new tools, we're told that EnergyKit can provide personalized guidance for when to use electricity based on environmental impact and cost. Apple is actually pretty late to the smart energy party, with platforms like SmartThings and Homey pushing energy optimization for a while now; and devices from the likes of Ecobee, Eve and Tado already doing this kind of thing on their own. But this feels like Apple finally putting down a foundation to make its Home app more than just a pretty interface for turning off your lights. The Cupertino tech giant doesn't actually support energy monitoring or EV chargers natively at the moment, but obviously Matter makes this sort of thing easier. If you're a dev, you can read more technical info on EnergyKit over on the Apple Developer website.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store