logo
Walmart has a 'fantastic' cordless screwdriver on sale for just $22, and shoppers say it's 'compact yet powerful'

Walmart has a 'fantastic' cordless screwdriver on sale for just $22, and shoppers say it's 'compact yet powerful'

Yahoo28-02-2025

Autoblog aims to feature only the best products and services. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission.
When it comes to household chores and repairs, we all want to save as much time and energy as possible. That's why you need the proper devices and tools to help you along the way. For those who are constantly reaching into their toolbox, we've found an awesome deal for you.
Right now, the Worx 4V 3-Speed Cordless Screwdriver is on sale at Walmart for just $22. This electric device is more efficient and precise than your manual screwdriver, and can replace several tools that you already own.
Using an electric screwdriver will help reduce strain on your hands and wrists, while also speeding up the process. This device comes with 12 accessory bits that fit securely into the magnetic chuck, and can be used for most common household tasks. It features three speed settings, a reverse button, and a dual LED work light to illuminate dark spaces and increase visibility.
One shopper wrote, "Love it, compact and easy to use. Works great, plenty of attachments. The one tool to keep around the house. Way better and more compact than my last electric screwdriver.""Fantastic tool", wrote another customer. "I have used this for multiple tasks. It's very portable and powerful enough to tackle many tasks. Don't let its size fool you."
This screwdriver is equipped with a lithium-ion battery that can be fully charged in just 90 minutes. It weighs only 2.5 pounds and features a compact design and soft grip that fits comfortably in your hand and allows you to move it into tight and small spaces.
A third shopper said, "A compact yet powerful screwdriver that helps you get into hard to reach places with its flexible extension. Comes equipped with several everyday bits."
Save space in your toolbox with this $22 cordless screwdriver. It will easily become your new go-to tool due to its versatility and ease of use.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Walmart sends a hard-nosed message to employees
Walmart sends a hard-nosed message to employees

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Walmart sends a hard-nosed message to employees

Walmart (WMT) , the largest retail chain in the U.S., has sent a harsh message to employees after a controversial U.S. Supreme Court ruling. For years, President Donald Trump has promoted his plan to secure the U.S. borders and conduct mass deportations of immigrants who are in the country illegally. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter "Illegal immigration costs our country billions and billions of dollars each year…And I will therefore take every lawful action at my disposal to address this crisis," said Trump during a briefing in the White House in 2018. Related: IRS sends stern warning to employees after layoffs Shortly after Trump was sworn in for a second term as president in January, he signed several executive orders focused on cracking down on illegal immigration. Some are targeted at increasing border security, reinstating "enhanced vetting" of visa applicants, and adding limits on birthright citizenship. Last week, the Trump administration gained major ground in its immigration agenda when the Supreme Court gave it the green light to cut a humanitarian program that granted temporary U.S. residency to over 500,000 immigrants from Haiti, Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. The decision comes after the court ruled in another case that the administration could also remove temporary legal status from roughly 350,000 Venezuelan migrants. Shortly after the Supreme Court's latest ruling, Walmart reportedly informed its stores nationwide to identify workers who will lose their work authorization due to the ruling, according to a recent report from Bloomberg. Related: Walmart suffers another major boycott from customers The retailer also fired an unknown number of workers in Florida and Texas who will soon lose temporary legal residency in the U.S. Walmart even warned employees in at least two Florida stores that they will be let go if they don't get new work authorizations. Walmart's move follows in the footsteps of Disney, which reportedly warned its Venezuelan employees in Florida that their jobs are at risk after the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to cut protections for thousands of Venezuelans last month. On May 20, Disney placed those employees (45 cast members) on a 30-day unpaid leave and told them they would be fired if they did not obtain new work authorization by the end of the 30-day period. So far, since Trump took office on Jan. 20, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have arrested over 100,000 immigrants. ICE is reportedly arresting up to 2,000 immigrants a day. Last year, under the Biden administration, ICE was making 300 daily arrests. The dramatic increase in arrests comes after the Trump administration's "Border Czar" Tom Homan warned in an interview last year that the U.S. will soon see a "historic deportation operation." More Labor: Amazon CEO gives hard-nosed message to employeesIRS has an alarming solution to a growing problem after layoffsJPMorgan Chase CFO issues stern warning to employees These efforts have so far sparked controversy on social media and massive protests in a few cities across the nation. The Trump administration's deportation plan can also have a major domino effect in workplaces across the country, as immigrants make up a significant portion of the U.S. workforce. Out of the roughly 169 million workers in the U.S., over 32 million are immigrants, which is about 19% of the workforce. Many industries in the U.S. have also relied on the employment of undocumented immigrant workers. According to a report from the American Immigration Council last year, the U.S. is estimated to have over 7.5 million undocumented workers in various industries. Construction is the top industry with the most undocumented workers, who make up about 14% of its workforce. Following construction is the agriculture industry, where almost 13% of its workforce is made up of undocumented workers. The hospitality industry comes in as No. 3, as undocumented workers make up about 7% of its workforce. Related: Dollar General suffers major boycott from customers The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

This $30 Google TV box is the closest thing to a true Chromecast successor I've found so far
This $30 Google TV box is the closest thing to a true Chromecast successor I've found so far

Android Authority

time2 hours ago

  • Android Authority

This $30 Google TV box is the closest thing to a true Chromecast successor I've found so far

Onn 4K Plus The Onn 4K Plus is the closest thing to a Chromecast successor. It's very affordable at just $30, and delivers the Google TV experience with little fuss. The Onn 4K Pro adds a few more features for only $20 more, but if you want an even cheaper Google TV box with a little extra performance, the Onn 4K Plus is a great buy. When the Onn 4K Pro arrived in 2024, I felt it was a superior choice to the since-retired Chromecast with Google TV in many ways. And even with the arrival of the Google TV Streamer as a pseudo Chromecast replacement, Onn's most expensive model remains a strong budget streamer, boasting a few advantages even over Google's latest device at less than half the price. While the Pro likely won't see a direct successor for another year or so, that hasn't stopped Walmart's in-store tech brand from introducing new streaming hardware. Enter the Onn 4K Plus, an even cheaper alternative priced at just $30 that wants to take the place of the departed Chromecast as the cheap Android TV streamer of choice. I decided to give the new unit a test drive to see how the Onn 4K Plus compares to other budget streaming devices powered by Android and topped by Google TV, like the Chromecast with Google TV or the Onn 4K Pro. Should you trust a product from Onn? As I mentioned during my review of the Onn 4K Pro, store brands can have a mixed reputation. However, I've found Onn to be reasonably reliable for items like keyboards, cables, USB hubs, and similar accessories. I've used the Onn 4K Pro as my primary living room streaming device since my initial review and have enjoyed the experience overall, despite a few minor glitches related to the remote and other small annoyances. With budget brands like the Walmart-associated Onn, however, it's important to remember that its primary focus is mass production over rigorous quality control. Such brands also tend to use multiple factories or manufacturing partners, leading to variable long-term reliability. Personally, I've owned Onn products that lasted for years, but I've also encountered at least one USB hub that failed within a day, requiring a return. My advice is to know what you're getting into, and be aware of the return policy of the store you buy it from, just in case. What is the Onn 4K Plus, and how does it compare with the 4K Pro? Andrew Grush / Android Authority The Android 14-powered Onn 4K Plus is Walmart's latest streaming device, acting as a direct successor to the 2023 Onn 4K rather than competing directly with the still-available 4K Pro. The Pro featured premium capabilities like hands-free voice control, a remote finder, and a full USB 3.0 port for connecting external drives and wired controllers. All of these features are notably absent on the 4K Plus. Instead, the 4K Plus offers a much smaller form factor, making it easier to conceal behind your TV. The remote closely resembles the Pro's remote, aside from its white color and minor button layout adjustments, including a new 'Free TV' button placed just below the Home key. Andrew Grush / Android Authority Despite missing out on some of the Pro's special features, the Plus does have a significant advantage: a faster processor. The Pro used the older Amlogic S905X4, whereas the 4K Plus upgrades to the newer S905X5M. This updated processor outperforms the 4K Pro, Chromecast with Google TV, and even the Google TV Streamer in terms of benchmark performance. Although benchmarks don't always translate directly to real-world use, the new chip is clearly up for the job based on my experience. Of course, the Plus does sacrifice in terms of RAM and storage as you get just 2GB of RAM and 16GB of storage, versus 3GB of RAM and double the storage on the Pro. Thankfully, you won't notice these limitations during typical streaming sessions. I found the Onn 4K Plus handled the UI smoothly and quickly loaded apps, often feeling more responsive than the Pro in daily use. The Onn 4K Plus and Pro offer a fairly similar experience, though the smaller dongle has a slightly faster processor and ditches some of the Pro's higher-end features. While I never felt my Onn 4K Pro was slow, sometimes certain menu options would see minor pauses and stutters. At the time, this wasn't a big deal because I experienced worse lag with the Chromecast with Google TV. Now that I've used the Plus, I find myself noticing little performance hiccups on the Pro that weren't apparent when pitting it against the older Chromecast. Be aware that the differences are subtle, though, so don't expect a night-and-day difference here. Is the Onn 4K Plus worth picking up over the competition? 0 votes Yes, at $30 there's really no risk to giving this one a try. NaN % No, the Google TV Streamer is worth the added cost for its improved features and reliability. NaN % No, the Onn 4K Pro is a better deal for just $20 more! NaN % Not sure / other (Tell us more in comments) NaN % I would also argue that the Plus might end up holding up better as well, as most of the glitches around my Pro have been related to hands-free voice and the remote finder, both of which are absent on the Plus, regardless. Still, the Pro performs well, just maybe a hair slower than the Plus in some tasks. It might not be quite as fast in the processing department, but the Pro is still better suited for DIY tweaks, gaming, basic emulation, and other extended uses. I attempted to sideload a few games and utilities on the Plus, and while it was still possible by using a hub to extend its built-in USB-C port, the experience just wasn't the same. For one, the USB-C port is just 2.0, so that's already a limiter over the faster full-size port on the Pro. Games and other utilities also tend to be more RAM-heavy, which was another bottleneck I ran into when stress testing the Onn 4K Plus. How does the Onn 4K Plus compare to the Google TV Streamer and Chromecast? Ryan Haines / Android Authority Considering it's even cheaper than the Onn 4K Pro, it's shouldn't come as a surprise that the 4K Plus doesn't compete directly with Google's premium streamer in terms of features, even though its newer Amlogic processor can theoretically outperform Google's MediaTek MT8696 chipset. However, if you're simply looking for a straightforward streamer with Google TV without added frills, the daily experience on the 4K Plus is comparable to the more expensive Google device — minus the advanced smart hub, increased RAM, and expanded storage. Given that Google's latest streamer is twice the Chromecast's original price, the Onn 4K Plus nicely fills the vacuum left by the Chromecast's discontinuation. The Onn 4K Plus is the closest thing to a modern Chromecast you're likely going to find. The Plus mirrors the Chromecast's streamlined approach: no full USB port, remote finder, or hands-free control here. Its compact design and simple functionality align closely with the Chromecast, albeit packaged in a small box rather than a dongle. Performance-wise, the Plus clearly outpaces the aging Chromecast with Google TV, boasting a faster CPU, GPU, and double the storage. Both devices are limited to just 2GB of RAM, but I honestly never felt like the Onn 4K Plus was slow while streaming, and everything I did felt much smoother than it did on the aging Chromecast. Onn 4K Plus review verdict: Is Walmart's latest streamer worth it, or is there a better option? Andrew Grush / Android Authority With the Chromecast brand now retired and no direct, official successor on the horizon, the Onn 4K Plus fills a niche as an excellent replacement for the Chromecast with Google TV if you're primarily satisfied with basic streaming functionality in 4K quality. The Plus feels faster and smoother without dramatically altering the line's basic Google TV user experience. At $30, it's also very budget-friendly, saving you around $20 compared to the Onn 4K Pro or $70 over Google's Google TV Streamer. On the flipside, if you felt like the Chromecast with Google TV was missing functionality, the Onn 4K Pro ($49.88 at Walmart) adds hands-free voice, more storage, a full USB port, and several other upgrades that make it feel like more than just a 'faster Chromecast in a new form factor.' Personally, I'd go with the Pro simply because the price gap is very small here. The no-frills Onn 4K Plus fills the gap left by the Chromecast and all for only $30. The Onn 4K Plus has a faster GPU and CPU, which makes it a bit snappier in some use cases, but the 4K Plus' superior performance is also mostly limited to streaming apps anyway due to its less robust hardware and lower RAM total. Once a program starts, you won't be able to see any performance differences in your shows and videos, and if you really want a powerhouse streamer, you'll want to look at something like an NVIDIA Shield TV ($149 at Amazon) instead. Of course, if you still want Google TV and all the extra frills of the Google ecosystem, the Google TV Streamer ($99.99 at Best Buy) is still the best bet as its smart home hub functionality adds a ton of value. Onn 4K Plus Extremely affordable • Smooth performance • Compact form factor MSRP: $29.99 The closest thing to a Chromecast successor. The Onn 4K Plus is a $30 Google TV streaming box that wants to take the place of the departed Chromecast as the cheap streamer of choice. See price at WalmartSee price at Amazon Positives Extremely affordable Extremely affordable Smooth performance Smooth performance Compact form factor Compact form factor Simple remote Simple remote Google TV ecosystem Cons Limited RAM Limited RAM Only USB-C 2.0 Only USB-C 2.0 No Hands-free voice control No Hands-free voice control Pro model has more features for only $20 extra

Should You Invest $1,000 in TGT today?
Should You Invest $1,000 in TGT today?

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Should You Invest $1,000 in TGT today?

Target has struggled to meet the needs of cost-conscious customers. A turnaround could take several years to fully materialize. The retail giant's dividend is still ultra-safe. 10 stocks we like better than Target › Target (NYSE: TGT) is a passive income powerhouse with more than five decades of annual dividend raises and an enticing 4.8% yield. But even with the high payout, Target has lost investors money over the last five years while the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) has more than doubled with dividends included. Here's why Target is under pressure, and whether the dividend stock is a buy right now. Retailers like Target have been under pressure as consumers tighten spending amid inflation and economic uncertainty. Data from the University of Michigan shows that consumer sentiment is hovering around its lowest level since 2022. Some companies have capitalized on consumer needs by providing products and services consumers want at affordable prices. For example, Walmart and Costco Wholesale have steadily grown revenue while sustaining good margins despite macro challenges. Target has had some success with promotions and partnerships, but is still seeing an overall decline in foot traffic. The divergence between Target's stock price and Walmart's and Costco's over the last two to three years illustrates the degree to which investor confidence has weakened for Target relative to these other names. Target slashed its guidance in its most recent earnings announcement. The company is now on track for a third consecutive fiscal year of adjusted earnings-per-share (EPS) declines. With Target's sales and earnings falling, investors have understandably grown skeptical of the company's ability to execute. Target has built up a bad track record of overpromising and underdelivering, so it's hard to put too much faith in its guidance. To Target's credit, management acknowledged the poor results and is focusing on turning the business around rather than appeasing investors. The company plans to leverage efficiency improvements and a revamped product lineup to get customers in stores and return to meaningful sales growth. Target has the tools to pull it off, but the retailer has to manage costs better, align inventory with buyer behavior trends, and limit steep discounts that have crushed its margins in recent years. Target's flaws are glaring and ongoing, but it would be a mistake to overlook the qualities that could make the stock a good buy in June. Target's sales and earnings may be ticking down, but it is still a highly profitable business that generates cash flow. In fact, Target's EPS and free cash flow (FCF) per share remain significantly higher than its dividend per share, even though Target has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Typically, when a company's stock price tanks and its dividend yield goes up, it's because earnings are declining and the dividend begins to look unaffordable. However, Target is in a unique situation where its dividend is highly affordable despite the stock price being around six-year lows and the yield ballooning. Another good way of measuring dividend affordability is comparing the FCF yield to the dividend yield. FCF yield takes FCF per share and divides it by the stock price, similar to how dividend yield is dividend per share divided by the stock price. FCF yield basically shows the theoretical dividend a company could pay if it used all of its FCF on dividends. Target's FCF yield is a sky-high 8.2% -- much more than its 4.8% dividend yield. So while the company isn't growing, it is still a very profitable business that is well positioned to grow its dividend. Investing $1,000 in Target demonstrates a belief in management's ability to turn the company around and leverage Target's strengths rather than expose its weaknesses. The company's main weakness is that it can't compete with Walmart, Costco, or Amazon in terms of price, but it can find a happy medium centered around an enjoyable customer experience at a good value. The Target Circle loyalty program and Target's exclusive and limited-time partnerships will be instrumental in pulling off the turnaround. In the meantime, investors can rest easy knowing that the dividend is affordable, even with the high yield. A $1,000 investment in Target would produce about $48 in dividend income per year, which is significantly more than the $13 or so you could expect from an S&P 500 index fund. Add it all up, and Target stands out as a solid buy for value and income investors today. Before you buy stock in Target, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Target wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Daniel Foelber has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Costco Wholesale, Target, and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Invest $1,000 in TGT today? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store