logo
Bill could provide up to $100K for improvements at Stutsman County Fairgrounds

Bill could provide up to $100K for improvements at Stutsman County Fairgrounds

Yahoo15-03-2025

Mar. 15—JAMESTOWN — A bill in the North Dakota Legislature could provide up to $100,000 for improvements at the Stutsman County Fairgrounds.
The Stutsman County Fairgrounds' facilities are aging and there are challenges in maintaining and improving the infrastructure to meet the needs of the community, wrote Rod Wilhelm, Stutsman County Fair Board member, in his testimony supporting House Bill 1591 that would create a grant program for county agriculture fair associations. He wrote that some of the most important needs at the Stutsman County Fairgrounds include bathrooms that are compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act, a storm shelter, agricultural educational facility, roof repairs, concert stage, grandstand and concession updates.
"A long-term goal would be a year-round arena to be used for livestock, horse, Ag Expo, and other events," Wilhelm wrote.
HB 1591 — sponsored by Reps. Mitch Ostlie and Bernie Satrom and Sens. Cole Conley and Terry Wanzek, all R-Jamestown — would create a one-to-one matching grant program and appropriate $3 million to the agriculture commissioner to provide grants to county agriculture fair associations for the planning, design and construction of infrastructure projects from July 1 (2025???) to June 30, 2027. No more than $100,000 can be awarded to a county agriculture fair association.
A grant recipient would be required to provide local matching dollars from nonstate sources for every dollar provided by the agriculture commissioner through the program.
The grant program would be funded one time and ends on June 30, 2027.
HB 1591 passed the House on a 74-16 vote. The bill is now in the Senate.
Ostlie said he noticed that the Stutsman County Fair Association might have some projects dealing with infrastructure needs.
"Then as I was doing some research around the state, many other fair associations were in a similar boat. So I thought this would be a good opportunity to get all entities involved," he said.
Ostlie said there are approximately 32 county agriculture fair associations in the state.
"That's where we come up with those dollars for approximately up to $100,000 and then a $3 million overall maximum budget item," he said.
He said the Office of the Agriculture Commissioner would develop the criteria for the application process for the grant program. He also said the North Dakota State Fair would not be eligible for the funds because it has its own budget under the agriculture commissioner's budget.
Ostlie said he worked with the Office of the Agriculture Commissioner to come up with an appropriation for the bill. He said Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring is on board with HB 1591 as well as many appropriators on the front end.
"I have received very little, if any, opposition to the intent of this grant program," he said. "The main issue really ... is coming down to money, how much assistance people think that we should give."
Wilhelm wrote that agriculture plays an essential role for the Stutsman County Fair, which showcases the state's agricultural diversity.
"From livestock competitions to crop displays and 4-H achievements, the Stutsman County Fair directly connects our community to the vital work happening on farms and ranches across our region," Wilhelm wrote. "The improvements made through this grant would not only ensure the fair continues to thrive but would also allow us to better support future generations of agricultural leaders and innovators."
He wrote that the Stutsman County Fair has an attendance of about 20,000.
"This event celebrates our agricultural history by bringing thousands of families together through 4-H, FFA (Future Farmers of America), Rodeo, show casing their livestock, horses, rabbits, chickens, art, flowers and baked goods," Wilhelm wrote. "The attendees and exhibitors support local businesses from gas stations, to restaurants, hotels, and retail shops."
The economic impact of the Stutsman County Fair is $3.25 million if each attendee spent $130, said Emily Bivens, executive director of the Jamestown Area Chamber of Commerce and Jamestown Tourism, in an email to Wilhelm. She said the economic impact is based on a 2023 study by North Dakota Tourism that says per-visitor spending was reported as $98 per day for each visitor and $203 per day for each overnight visitor for an average of $130 per day for each visitor.
Ostlie said HB 1591 could potentially have an economic impact of $200,000 for each county with the dollar-for-dollar match.
"It certainly doesn't address all of the infrastructure needs, but it's a nice little shot in the arm potentially," he said.
Bivens wrote in her testimony supporting HB 1591 that a maximum grant of $100,000 for each county fair association would have a direct impact by improving fairgrounds, enhancing visitor experiences and supporting local economies.
"Investing in county fair infrastructure is an investment in North Dakota's future. We respectfully urge this committee to give House Bill 1591 a 'DO PASS' recommendation and support our state's agricultural fairs as they continue to grow, educate, and bring communities together," she wrote.
Stutsman County Commissioner Amanda Hastings wrote in her testimony supporting the bill that the passage of HB 1591 in the House is a crucial step toward strengthening local fairs.
Hastings also wrote that she has concerns regarding a revision requiring a dollar-for-dollar matching fund requirement.
"While I understand the importance of ensuring that grant recipients have a vested interest in these projects, a strict one-to-one match could inadvertently limit the ability of smaller county fairs to fully benefit from the program," she wrote. "Many smaller fairs operate on tight budgets with limited fundraising capabilities, making it difficult to meet such a high matching threshold. As a result, this well-intended grant program may become inaccessible to the very communities that need it the most."
She also wrote that the Legislature should consider a tiered or reduced matching requirement that allows for flexibility on the size and financial capacity of each county fair association.
"This would ensure that all county fairs, regardless of their financial standing, can access funding to improve facilities, enhance programming, and continue serving their communities," she wrote.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla Tumbles After Musk Escalates Attacks on Trump Tax Bill
Tesla Tumbles After Musk Escalates Attacks on Trump Tax Bill

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla Tumbles After Musk Escalates Attacks on Trump Tax Bill

(Bloomberg) -- Tesla Inc.'s shares sank as Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's simmering feud devolved into a public war of words between two of the world's most powerful people. ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn The Global Struggle to Build Safer Cars Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World Trump on Thursday said he was 'very disappointed' by the Tesla chief executive officer's criticism of the president's signature tax policy bill. Musk fired back on social media, saying it was 'false' that the Tesla CEO knew the plan would unwind EV tax credits that benefit Tesla's business. Musk followed up with several more sharply worded posts, including saying Trump showed 'such ingratitude' for the help the billionaire entrepreneur has provided to Trump's administration. Tesla's shares fell as much 9.2% to an intraday low as the two traded barbs. The spat highlights how policies advanced by Trump and Republican lawmakers put billions of dollars at risk for Tesla. Trump's massive tax bill would largely eliminate a credit worth as much as $7,500 for buyers of some Tesla models and other electric vehicles by the end of this year, seven years ahead of schedule. That would translate to a roughly $1.2 billion hit to Tesla's full-year profit, according to JPMorgan analysts. After leaving his formal advisory role in the White House last week, Musk has been on a mission to block the president's signature tax bill that he described as a 'disgusting abomination.' The world's richest person has been lobbying Republican lawmakers — including making a direct appeal to House Speaker Mike Johnson — to preserve the valuable EV tax credits in the legislation. Separate legislation passed by the Senate attacking California's EV sales mandates poses another $2 billion headwind for Tesla's sales of regulatory credits, according to JPMorgan. Taken together, those measures threaten roughly half of the more than $6 billion in earnings before interest and taxes that Wall Street expects Tesla to post this year, analysts led by Ryan Brinkman said in a May 30 report. Tesla didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The House-passed tax bill would aggressively phase-out tax credits for the production of clean electricity, and other sources years earlier than scheduled. It also includes stringent restrictions on the use of Chinese components and materials that analysts said would render the credits useless and limits the ability of company's to sell the tax credits to third parties. Tesla's division focused on solar systems and batteries separately criticized the Republican bill for gutting clean energy tax credits, saying that 'abruptly ending' the incentives would threaten US energy independence and the reliability of the power grid. The clean energy and EV policies under threat were largely enacted as part of former President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. The law was designed to encourage companies to build a domestic supply chain for clean energy and electric vehicles, giving companies more money if they produce more batteries and EVs in the US. Tesla has a broad domestic footprint, including car factories in Texas and California, a lithium refinery and battery plants. With those Biden-era policies in place, US EV sales rose 7.3% to a record 1.3 million vehicles last year, according to Cox Automotive data. --With assistance from Kara Carlson, Keith Laing, Josh Wingrove and Kate Sullivan. (Updates shares, adds Trump, Musk comments starting in the fourth paragraph.) Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Musk goes nuclear: "Without me, Trump would have lost the election"
Musk goes nuclear: "Without me, Trump would have lost the election"

Axios

time27 minutes ago

  • Axios

Musk goes nuclear: "Without me, Trump would have lost the election"

Elon Musk declared all-out war on President Trump Thursday, writing on X: "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate." Why it matters: The public breakup between Trump and Musk — who spent nearly $300 million to support the president's campaign and served in his administration until this week — has escalated dramatically.

Trump says he and Elon Musk 'had a great relationship,' but it might be over now
Trump says he and Elon Musk 'had a great relationship,' but it might be over now

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says he and Elon Musk 'had a great relationship,' but it might be over now

Trump responded to Elon Musk's criticism of the "Big Beautiful Bill." "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship," he said. "I don't know if we will anymore." "Such ingratitude," Musk, who spent nearly $300 million to elect Trump and other Republicans, wrote on X. President Donald Trump is finally responding to Elon Musk's criticism of his "Big Beautiful Bill." "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship," Trump said in the Oval Office on Thursday. "I don't know if we will anymore." Trump told reporters that Musk's criticism of the bill likely stemmed primarily from the phase-out of the electric vehicle tax credit, which would likely impact his company, Tesla. "You know, Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate… which was a lot of money for electric vehicles," Trump said. "And they're having a hard time, the electric vehicles." "Elon knew this from the beginning," Trump added. Musk fired back minutes later, saying that while he thought the EV phase-out was unfair, he was more concerned about the "MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill." He later wrote on X that without him, Trump would have lost the election, Democrats would have gained control of the House, and Republicans would've had a smaller majority in the Senate. "Such ingratitude," wrote Musk, who spent nearly $300 million to elect Trump and other Republicans last year. In the Oval Office, Trump also said that Musk was lashing out because he "missed" being in the White House. "I'll be honest, I think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden, he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office," Trump said. "I'll tell you, he's not the first. People leave my administration, and they love us, and then at some point, they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it." The tech titan first unleashed on the "Big Beautiful Bill," which is set to serve as the centerpiece of Trump's legislative agenda, on Tuesday. He's kept up his criticism ever since. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk wrote on X on Tuesday. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination." Musk main criticism has been of the bill's projected impact on the federal deficit. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that in its current form, the bill would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years, while the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has said that number would be $2.5 trillion. Musk previously said that the bill undermined the work of DOGE, which has sought to cut billions of dollars in federal spending. Republicans on Capitol Hill have largely brushed off Musk's criticism. House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Wednesday that Musk is "flat wrong" about the bill, while Senate Majority Leader John Thune said that the tech titan is "entitled to that opinion," but "we're going to proceed full speed ahead." Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store