Pharmacies pause action while they examine Government funding deal
Pharmacies across England have paused taking action such as cutting opening hours while they look at a new funding deal from the Government.
The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has promised to 'rebuild community pharmacy' as it announced it had reached an agreement with Community Pharmacy England for a funding increase over two years.
The National Pharmacy Association (NPA), which represents 6,000 independent community pharmacies, has previously warned that pharmacists were facing a 'financial cliff edge'.
It said the effect of National Insurance and National Living Wage rises would mean pharmacies in England faced £250 million of unplanned costs and recommended its members took collective action from the start of April if there was no sufficient package agreed with the Government.
On Monday, the DHSC said it had agreed to a final funding settlement for 2024/25 worth an extra £106 million compared to the previous year, and a further £375 million for 2025/26.
It said a further £30 million had also been freed up by devolving funding for blood pressure and contraception services to pharmacies and that it would write off £193 million of debt for community pharmacy owners.
The NPA said planned collective action was now paused while it consulted members and worked through the details of the deal.
Nick Kaye, chairman of the NPA, said: 'After a decade of 40% cuts to their funding that has left the pharmacy network on its knees, it is good to see a concrete sign that ministers want to support pharmacies.
'No one wants to reduce services through protest action so we'll look carefully at the detail and consult our members, who are facing substantial cost increases from April 1, to understand what this means for the future of their services so we can recommend next steps.
'The Government inherited an intolerable situation after more than a decade of real-terms cuts and today's settlement is a step forward.
'However, the truth is that because of a decade of neglect, it also falls a long way short of the NHS's own estimates of the true cost of providing pharmacy services.'
The DHSC also announced a series of reforms alongside the funding boost, including making the morning-after pill free at NHS pharmacies and boosting financial incentives for pharmacists to identify patients with undiagnosed high blood pressure to take pressure off GPs.
Health Minister Stephen Kinnock said: 'We're working to turn around a decade of underfunding and neglect that has left the sector on the brink of collapse.
'This package of record investment and reform is a vital first step to getting community pharmacies back on their feet and fit for the future.'
Community Pharmacy England chief executive Janet Morrison said: 'As highly trusted and accessible healthcare locations, community pharmacies have so much to offer patients and the NHS to help shift more care into communities.
'But we came to these negotiations as a sector in crisis – with the impact of a decade's worth of real-terms cuts to funding leaving pharmacy businesses fighting to survive, and closures continuing at an alarming rate.
'We are pleased that this settlement takes a positive first step in the right direction for pharmacies, towards stabilisation and a better future.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
7 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
John Swinney visits GP in Glasgow's Easterhouse for project
Oakwood Medical Practice in Easterhouse is one of 12 deprived areas across Glasgow taking part in the Whole Family Support in General Practice project, which takes a preventative approach to family wellbeing. It uses GP appointments to identify wider support needed to help families in poverty and at risk of poor health outcomes. READ MORE: 'Completely unacceptable': John Swinney condemns unofficial Celtic title party The First Minister will visit today, and hailed the 'collaborative, preventative work' which has received a combined £3.5 million from the Scottish Government since 2023. Each of the practices has a family wellbeing worker who can provide advice on the right kinds of support and the partner service best placed to help. The project also supports outreach work with families who might benefit from further engagement with primary care services to address complex health needs. The three-year project is led by Glasgow City Health and Social Care Partnership, supported by more than £1.5 million in Scottish Government funding for 2025-26. READ MORE: Gangland violence 'out of control' John Swinney is told after Spain shootings READ MORE: 'We never gave up': Family's heartbreaking tribute as body of missing teen found Speaking ahead of the visit, he said: 'Scotland's GP practices are right at the heart of our communities where they help local people and their families on a daily basis. We recognise them as trusted and established services providing crucial medical advice and care. 'It is precisely this trust that means GP surgeries can be places where people start to get a wider variety of help that will allow them to overcome the challenges of everyday life, tackle poverty and address further risks to their health and wellbeing. 'Eradicating child poverty and improving public services are two of my main priorities as First Minister. Along with economic growth and tackling the climate emergency, they are the key areas where I want to see delivery of real improvements. 'I've spoken often about how these priorities don't exist in isolation – there will be lots of different connections between them. 'The Whole Family Support In General Practice project is exactly the sort of work I had in mind – collaborative, preventative work that will deliver clear benefits for people in Scotland.'
The Herald Scotland
8 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Around 1,000 doctors urge MPs to vote against ‘unsafe' assisted dying Bill
But in a letter, published this week, doctors from across the NHS have urged lawmakers to listen to those 'who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill'. They warn the Bill 'poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'. In its current form the proposed legislation, which applies only to England and Wales, would mean terminally ill adults with only six months left to live could apply for assistance to end their lives, subject to the approval of two doctors and an expert panel. Last month, MPs approved a change in the Bill to ensure no medics would be obliged to take part in assisted dying. Doctors already had an opt-out but the new clause extends that to anyone, including pharmacists and social care workers. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. The letter to MPs said: 'As experienced medical professionals who regularly work with dying patients and who have reviewed the worldwide evidence on assisted dying, it is our opinion that this Bill poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce, and we urge you to vote against it. 'We are concerned that the private member's Bill process has not facilitated a balanced approach to the collection of evidence and input from key stakeholders including doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups. 'This Bill will widen inequalities, it provides inadequate safeguards and, in our collective view, is simply not safe. 'This is the most important piece of healthcare legislation for 60 years and we urge you to listen to the doctors who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill.' Sir Ed Davey welcomed the letter on Monday, telling Sky News he had 'real concerns'. 'I have voted against this assisted dying legislation, as I did on previous occasions,' the Liberal Democrat leader said. 'I have real concerns about the pressure on individuals, that they will put on themselves, if they think they are a burden on their family, so I welcome this letter.' He added: 'I hope, as time has gone on, as the arguments have been better exposed, that MPs will switch sides and join the side that I and many MPs are on.' But Sir Chris Bryant said he would be voting in favour. The technology minister told Sky News: 'The Government doesn't have a formal position at all and individual members are free to choose how they vote. 'I'm not going to hide my own personal preference. I abstained on the first time round, I decided I wasn't going to vote because I wanted to hear the debate. 'I have listened to a lot of the debate. Of course, I don't want anybody to feel that they are a burden on society and that should lead them towards taking their own life, but I also have heard the cries of people who are absolutely miserable, and that's why I will be voting for the Bill.' Some of the Bill's opponents have urged MPs to focus on improving end-of-life care rather than legislating for assisted dying. Ahead of last month's Commons debate on the Bill, two royal medical colleges raised concerns over the proposed legislation. The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) said it believes there are 'concerning deficiencies', while the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) said it has 'serious concerns' and cannot support the Bill. People with terminal illnesses, surrounded by loved ones, display their dying wishes on tags outside the Palace of Westminster in London to urge MPs to support the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Jas Lehal/PA) Opinions among members of the medical profession remain varied, with TV doctor Hilary Jones describing assisted dying for the terminally ill as 'kind and compassionate', adding that he would help a patient to end their life if the law was changed. The GP, often seen on ITV's Good Morning Britain and the Lorraine show, told the PA news agency he believes medicine will go 'back to the Dark Ages' if proposed legislation being considered at Westminster is voted down. While Friday is expected to see debate on further amendments to the Bill, it is thought a vote on the overall legislation might not take place until the following Friday, June 20.
Scotsman
10 hours ago
- Scotsman
23-year-old elite athlete denied new brain tumour drug shows depth of NHS's problems
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Perhaps the thing that surprises me most about the state of the NHS in Scotland is how little the problems it faces shock me anymore. Figures published by the Royal College of Radiologists revealed a 25 per cent shortage of radiologists and a 19 per cent shortage of oncologists, with both expected to increase in the coming years. This newspaper reported warnings that this shortage could create a ticking time bomb for cancer patients in Scotland. A worse situation than in any other part of the UK. I should have been rocked to the core by that news, but no. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Instead I found myself sighing in anger, resignation and not a little fear. Anger that those in charge have let it become so bad, and resignation in the knowledge that whatever I try to do will be met with excuses and blame deflection by the Scottish Government. That would, however, be no excuse for me or any other public servant to just sit back and accept that we cannot help. If anything it should, and does, push us on to greater effort. John Swinney and the Scottish Government need to act with greater urgency to fix the NHS's many problems (Picture: Lesley Martin/pool) | Getty Images Drug inhibits tumour's growth I recently met representatives of a medical charity who told me that a breakthrough treatment for a life-limiting illness is not available to patients in Scotland. Those who qualify have to travel to a clinic in Sheffield which is now at full capacity. And it's not just specialists, but access to drugs. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A few weeks ago, I spoke in parliament about the research and treatment of brain tumours. I had been contacted by a constituent, a 23-year-old elite athlete, training for the Commonwealth Games and Olympic trials. He was diagnosed with an inoperable, IDH-mutant, low-grade glioma – a rare form of brain tumour that disproportionately affects younger people. A recent breakthrough should have been good news. There is a highly promising drug. So promising, I am told, that the trials were stopped midway through and those on the placebo were given the drug, because it was proving so successful in inhibiting the growth of the tumour. It is already available to eligible patients through a named patient programme, free of charge. But only, in Scotland, in the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Tayside areas. Not in NHS Lothian. Even though its health board took part in the original trials, my constituent has been denied it. Apparently, the ongoing costs of regular checks make it too expensive. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Angry and frustrated I understand the pressures on public finances, on resources and on the NHS. But that must not mean a limit to our ambition in what we can do for those who are suffering. It certainly should not mean sitting back and accepting that we cannot help when it comes to health, or that we should talk about saving money when we should talk about saving lives. Since then I have spoken to a UK Government minister who assured me that this particular drug could soon be licensed. In England. In Scotland it has proved much more difficult to get a positive response from ministers. I like to think it's because they are as angry and frustrated as the rest of us. But they at least have had the ability, many of them for almost two decades, to do something. Time is running out.
