logo
What message does Ukraine's Operation Spider's Web send to Russia and US?

What message does Ukraine's Operation Spider's Web send to Russia and US?

Al Jazeera2 days ago

Eighteen months in the making, Ukraine's Operation Spider's Web saw hundreds of AI-trained drones target military aircraft deep inside Russia's borders.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says Sunday's attacks will go down in history.
He followed them up with a proposal for an unconditional ceasefire as the two sides met in Istanbul.
The European Union is preparing its 18th package of sanctions on Russia, while US President Donald Trump has threatened to use 'devastating' measures against Russia if he feels the time is right.
So, is the time right now?
And after the audacious attack, does Zelenskyy finally hold the cards?
Presenter: Dareen Abughaida
Guests:
Hanna Shelest – Security studies programme director at the Ukrainian Prism think tank
Pavel Felgenhauer – Independent defence analyst
Anatol Lieven – Eurasia programme director at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why did the Dutch government collapse and what's next?
Why did the Dutch government collapse and what's next?

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

Why did the Dutch government collapse and what's next?

The Dutch government collapsed on Tuesday after far-right politician Geert Wilders pulled out of the right-wing coalition after a dispute over anti-immigration measures his party had proposed. Wilders' decision prompted the Dutch cabinet and Prime Minister Dick Schoof to resign. Here is what triggered the government's collapse, and what happens next: Wilders announced the withdrawal of his right-wing party, the Party for Freedom (PVV), from the 11-month-old right-wing Netherlands coalition government. Wilders said the other three parties in the coalition had failed to back his plans to crack down on asylum for refugees. 'No signature under our asylum plans. The PVV leaves the coalition,' Wilders wrote in an X post on Tuesday after a brief meeting in parliament with party leaders. Besides PVV, the coalition comprised People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), the Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB) and the New Social Contract (NSC). On May 26, Wilders announced a 10-point plan to extensively slash migration, deploying army officials at the Dutch land borders and rejecting all asylum seekers. Wilders threatened, back then, that his party would pull out of the coalition if migration policy was not toughened. The four parties cumulatively held 88 seats in the country's 150-seat House of Representatives. The PVV won the latest November 2023 election with 23 percent of the vote and 37 seats, the highest number of seats in the parliament out of all parties. The majority mark in the House is 76 seats. The withdrawal leaves the coalition with only 51 seats. After Wilders announced the withdrawal, an emergency cabinet meeting was called. After this, Schoof announced that he would step down, hours after the PVV withdrawal. 'I have told party leaders repeatedly in recent days that the collapse of the cabinet would be unnecessary and irresponsible,' Schoof said in the emergency cabinet meeting. 'We are facing major challenges both nationally and internationally that require decisiveness from us.' Other leaders in the coalition called Wilders 'irresponsible' and blamed him for putting his own political interests ahead of the country. 'There is a war on our continent. Instead of meeting the challenge, Wilders is showing he is not willing to take responsibility,' said Dilan Yesilgoz, leader of the VVD, which has 24 seats in the the House. 'It is irresponsible to take down the government at this point,' NSC leader Nicolien van Vroonhoven said about Wilders. The NSC has 20 seats. Head of the opposition GreenLeft-Labour alliance Frans Timmermans said he could 'see no other way to form a stable government' than early elections. Schoof will now formally submit his resignation to the head of state, Dutch King Willem-Alexander. After this, elections are expected to be called. It is likely that the election will be held sometime in October or November, based on previous cycles. As of May 31, polls show that Wilders' PVV has lost a little of its support, from 23 percent in the 2023 election to 20 percent. This brings the party almost at par with the GreenLeft-Labour alliance, which has 19 percent of support and 25 seats in the lower house of parliament, the second highest number of seats after the PVV. The fragmented politics of the Netherlands makes it difficult to predict which party will win the election. It is unlikely for a single party to win the 76-seat majority and it takes months for a coalition to form. According to the Dutch election authority's data, no single party has ever won a majority since the first direct elections in 1848. Schoof has said he and the other ministers of the coalition will continue with their positions in a caretaker government until a new government is formed after elections. The political crisis comes as the Netherlands is scheduled to host a summit of NATO leaders at The Hague on June 24-25. Mark Rutte, the current secretary-general of NATO, was the prime minister of the Netherlands from 2010 to 2024. Rutte was affiliated with the VVD. Schoof had also been involved in European efforts to provide support to Ukraine in its war against Russia. In February, the Dutch PM was present at a meeting with other European leaders in Paris where the leaders pledged to provide Ukraine with security guarantees.

UK prepares for war: How much will it cost?
UK prepares for war: How much will it cost?

Al Jazeera

time2 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

UK prepares for war: How much will it cost?

The United Kingdom has announced a major investment in defence in response to a 'new era of threats' driven by 'growing Russian aggression'. The UK's Strategic Defence Review (SDR), unveiled on Monday, includes new investments in nuclear warheads, a fleet of new submarines and new munitions factories. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the SDR would bring the country to 'war-fighting readiness'. 'The threat we now face is more serious, more immediate and more unpredictable than at any time since the Cold War,' Starmer said as he delivered the review in Glasgow, Scotland. The SDR described Russia as an 'immediate and pressing' threat, and referred to China as a 'sophisticated and persistent challenge'. European nations have rushed to strengthen their armed forces in recent months, following Trump's repeated demands that Europe must shoulder more responsibility for its security. The defence review, the UK's first since 2021, was led by former NATO Secretary-General George Robertson. Among the 62 recommendations in the SDR, all have been accepted by the government. Starmer said the measures recommended in the review would bring 'fundamental changes' to the armed forces, including 'moving to war-fighting readiness', re-centring a 'NATO first' defence posture and accelerating innovation. 'Every part of society, every citizen of this country, has a role to play because we have to recognise that things have changed in the world of today,' he said. 'The front line, if you like, is here.' Based on the recommendations in the review, the government said it would boost stockpiles and weapons production capacity, which could be scaled up if needed. A total of 1.5 billion pounds ($2bn) will be dedicated to building 'at least six munitions and energetics factories', with plans to produce 7,000 long-range weapons. In turn, UK ammunitions spending – just one component of overall military spending – is expected to hit 6 billion pounds ($8.1bn) over the current parliamentary term, which ends in 2029. There are also plans to build up to 12 new attack submarines by the late 2030s as part of the AUKUS military alliance with Australia and the United States – equivalent to a new submarine every 18 months. This accounts for nearly half the projected spending outlined in the SDR. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) also said it would invest 15 billion pounds ($20.3bn) in its own nuclear warhead programme. The SDR recommended procuring new F-35 fighter jets and the Global Combat Aircraft Programme, a sixth-generation fighter produced jointly with Japan and Italy. The target size of the army will remain roughly the same, but the SDR recommended a slight increase in the number of regular soldiers 'if funding allows'. There are currently about 71,000. Instead of a dramatic increase in troop numbers, the SDR recommends using technology, drones and software to 'increase lethality tenfold'. To do this, the MoD plans to deliver a 1 billion pound ($1.35bn) 'digital targeting web', an AI-driven software tool designed to collect battlefield data and use it to enable faster decision making. More details about the SDR will be provided in the upcoming Defence Industrial Strategy, expected in the coming weeks, but UK defence companies will be among the big winners from the new SDR. Though supposedly a 10-year review, past SDRs suggest its shelf life might be more limited. The last SDR was published in 2021 and recommended 'a strategic pivot towards the Indo-Pacific region to counter China's influence and deepen ties with allies like Australia, India, and Japan', in line with strategic priorities of the time. This SDR, undertaken in the wake of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, has re-oriented the UK's geographical priorities. In the coming years, those could change again. Proposals to prepare the UK's armed forces to be 'battle ready' will cost at least 67.6 billion pounds ($91.4bn) through to the late 2030s, according to costings and estimates provided in the SDR. Before Monday's announcement, the government had already pledged to increase spending on defence from 2.3 percent currently to 2.5 percent by 2027, an increase of about 6 billion pounds ($8.1bn) per year. This would raise 60 billion pounds over 10 years – a bit shy of the cost projected by the SDR. The government has said it will cut overseas aid to fund that 0.2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) rise in defence spending. Critics say this will not be enough and that the measures outlined by the SDR will cost more like 3 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, said the 'authors of the strategic defence review were clear that 3 percent [not 2.5 percent] of GDP 'established the affordability' of the plan.' In February, the Labour government said it had 'an ambition' to raise defence spending to 3 percent in the next parliament (after 2029), but Cartlidge said: 'That commitment cannot be guaranteed ahead of the next general election.' According to researchers at the Institute for Fiscal Studies – an independent, London-based research organisation – raising defence spending to 3 percent of GDP by 2030 would require an extra 17 billion pounds between now and then, which the government has not yet accounted for. But the UK could be required to raise spending even more than this. In discussions taking place in advance of the NATO summit in The Hague later this month, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte is understood to be pushing for member nations to commit 5 percent of GDP towards defence-related spending. Rutte has proposed that NATO's 32 members commit to spending 3.5 percent on hard defence and 1.5 percent on broader security, such as cyber, by 2032. 'At this Ministerial, we are going to take a huge leap forward,' Rutte stated before a meeting of defence ministers in Brussels on Thursday this week. 'We will strengthen our deterrence and defence by agreeing ambitious new capability targets.' He specified air and missile defence, long-range weapons, logistics, and large land manoeuvre formations as among the alliance's top priorities, according to a briefing note from NATO on Wednesday. 'We need more resources, forces and capabilities so that we are prepared to face any threat, and to implement our collective defence plans in full,' he said, adding: 'We will need significantly higher defence spending. That underpins everything.' On Monday, Starmer refused to rule out another raid on the aid budget to fund higher military spending, and signalled that he was hopeful the extra investment could be supported by a growing the economy and generating more taxes to pay for defence. After the SDR's announcement, Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, warned that the prime minister will need to make 'really quite chunky tax increases' to pay for the plans. Alternatively, increased defence spending could be siphoned off from other parts of the budget – for instance, through reduced state spending on areas like transport and energy infrastructure.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store