Nevada could soon charge DUI drivers who kill with second-degree murder
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — A proposal to toughen Nevada's DUI laws could lead to murder charges for an intoxicated driver who kills, according to the bill's sponsor.
Senate Bill 304 would amend the state's vehicular homicide law to include all DUIs involving death, its sponsor, Republican State Sen. Jeff Stone, of Clark County, told a legislative committee Thursday.
The bill was stuck in a finance committee because the Nevada Department of Corrections estimates it will add more than $2 million to its budget due to the additional time offenders could serve in custody.
Stone's original proposal would have amended the law to lower the previous number of DUI convictions a person needed on their record for prosecutors to charge a driver with vehicular homicide. Under the proposal, on Thursday, prosecutors would be able to charge any DUI driver who kills with vehicular homicide.
The proposal would carry a possible sentence of 10 to 25 years or 10 to life, the same as the state's second-degree murder statute, said John Jones with the Nevada District Attorneys Association.
'It is the position of DAs across the state that getting behind the wheel of a motor vehicle while intoxicated and proximately causing the death of another person meets this threshold,' Jones said Thursday.
Nevada prosecutors, including the Clark County District Attorney's Office, have tried to charge DUI drivers who kill a person and who speed and who drive with no care for another person's life, with murder, but the Nevada Supreme Court has ruled the DUI with death law is more appropriate.
Should the bill pass, Nevada would have a clear distinction between vehicular homicide and DUI resulting in substantial bodily harm, Jones and Stone said.
A second proposal, Senate Bill 457, which is part of Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo's crime bill, would also amend the law to charge DUI drivers who kill with second-degree murder.
Representatives for Senate and Assembly Democrats previously told 8 News Now that both proposals remain under consideration.
The legislative session ends June 2. Lawmakers will not reconvene, except for special circumstances at the request of the governor, until February 2027.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Judiciary panel approves controversial concealed weapons bill
(Photo by Aristide Economopoulos/NJ Monitor) The North Carolina House Judiciary 2 Committee voted 6-5 along party lines Tuesday to pass a bill to allow the permitless carry of concealed firearms, one of the most controversial topics of the current legislative session. Senate Bill 50, 'Freedom to Carry NC,' would allow individuals who are U.S. citizens, at least 18 years of age, and not otherwise prohibited by law, to carry concealed weapons without applying for a permit. It's backed by Republican leadership and would make North Carolina the 30th state to approve of so-called 'constitutional carry.' Having previously cleared the Senate, the bill now proceeds to the House Rules Committee for further consideration. Though the Judiciary 2 Committee has only 10 members — six Republicans and four Democrats — House Minority Leader Robert Reives II (D-Chatham, Randolph) took the unusual step of using his position as a committee 'floater' to attend the meeting and narrow the margin. 'Nine states have allowed constitutional carry at age 18, North Carolina would be the 10th that this bill became law,' primary sponsor Rep. Danny Britt (R-Hoke, Robeson, Scotland) said. One amendment to the legislation increases the public safety employee death benefit to $150,000. Another calls for the University of North Carolina Board of Governors to develop a scholarship program for any child of a law enforcement officer, correctional officer, or first responder who is permanently and totally disabled as a result of a traumatic injury sustained in the line of duty. These scholarships would be available for children between the ages of 17 and 28. The bill received opposition from a several lawmakers and members of the public. No one other than Britt spoke in favor of the measure. Rep. Ya Liu (D-Wake) is the mother of two teenagers. She said there's a huge difference between individuals at the age of 18 and 21. At schools, students like Liu's son conduct drills for active shooter and lockdown situations. 'Our children are scared,' Liu said. 'We shouldn't accept it as a way of life, that they have to live with this.' Rep. Laura Budd (D-Mecklenburg) said this morning she told her 15-year-old son on the way to school that SB 50 was on the committee hearing docket today. He was shocked that an 18-year-old at his high school, potentially his classmate, would be allowed to buy a gun, according to Budd. She added that 18-year-olds in the United States can't drink a beer or rent a car. 'But yet, when it comes to something as a lethal as a gun… we want to lower the age and remove more restrictions,' Budd said, pointing out the irony. Anne Enberg, a local legislative leader for Moms Demand Action, said bills like SB 50 won't make communities safer. Enberg brought up a poll conducted by Everytown for Gun Safety in September that found 77% percent of likely North Carolina voters were against removing permit requirements from concealed carry laws. 'We should be looking for solutions that make us safer, not bills that would push crime and public safety's staff in the wrong direction,' she said. John Vanmeter-Kirk is a rising second-year student at North Carolina State University, a volunteer with Students Demand Action, and a lifelong Raleigh resident. He said he was speaking in front of the committee because SB 50 would put his home and community in danger. On Sunday, Vanmeter-Kirk noted, two North Carolina communities experienced mass shootings: one in Hickory and one in Asheville. 'Two innocent North Carolinians are dead, numerous injured, my community torn apart by senseless gun violence that could've been prevented,' Vanmeter-Kirk said. 'Even after two North Carolinians are dead, you're considering this incredibly dangerous bill that will only lead to the loss of more North Carolinians, dishonoring the memory of those we lost two days ago.'
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump DOJ reviewing Biden pardons
The Department of Justice is reviewing pardons doled out under former President Biden, citing concerns about whether Biden himself was making decisions about clemency power, a senior administration official confirmed to The Hill. The official told The Hill that pardon attorney Ed Martin will lead an independent review to determine if 'unelected staffers' took advantage of Biden when it came to pardons and commutations. 'The American people deserve to know the extent to which unelected staffers and an autopen acted as a proxy president due to the incompetence and infirmity of the previous president,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement. 'President Trump was elected to restore the integrity and transparency of the office, and answering the question of who was actually running this country for four years is well within the president's rights.' Martin was originally Trump's choice to serve as the top prosecutor in the District of Columbia. His nomination was dropped in the face of Republican opposition in the Senate over his ties to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. The pardon review comes as fresh reporting and new books, including 'Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,' have reignited debate about Biden's mental acuity while in office and whether he experienced cognitive decline. It also comes as Jesse Jackson Jr., Michael Cohen and others who were denied pardons under Biden have called on Trump to re-examine the cases of those who did not have their applications approved during the previous administration. A Biden spokesperson told The Hill that the former president and his team thoughtfully reviewed requests for pardons and commutations and pointed to Biden issuing more than 2,500 individual acts of clemency. Biden allies have more broadly pushed back on claims that the former president was not carrying out his duties while in office. Biden issued more than 80 pardons during his four years in office, and he commuted the sentences of thousands of people. The vast majority of his acts of clemency were granted to nonviolent offenders, including numerous individuals who had been charged with nonviolent drug offenses. But some of his more controversial uses of the pardon power came toward the end of his term. Biden granted a full pardon to his son, Hunter Biden, who had been found guilty on federal gun charges and pleaded guilty to federal tax charges. Hunter Biden had been a political target for Republicans throughout his father's time in office. The 46th president also granted blanket pardons in the final moments of his term to five family members and several former government officials who had been the targets of political attacks from Trump and his allies. Reuters, which first reported the investigation, reviewed an email from Martin saying he was directed to launch the probe, though did not specify by whom. The outlet reported that Martin would focus on the family pardons as well as death row clemencies. On his last day as interim U.S. Attorney for D.C., Martin said that he would give particular scrutiny to pardons given to Biden family members. 'They need scrutiny because we want pardons to matter and to be accepted and to be something that's used correctly. So I do think we're going to take a hard look at how they went and what they did,' Martin said at a press conference last month. Martin is not only the pardon attorney, but was also tapped to lead the Weaponization Working Group, a new task force established by Attorney General Pam Bondi. Trump's actions have further exacerbated questions about presidential clemency power and how it can disproportionately benefit those with connections to the administration. Trump during his first term used clemency powers on political allies such as Paul Manafort, Steve Bannon, Roger Stone and Michael Flynn. Trump also pardoned nearly all Jan. 6 defendants on his first day back in office this year. Updated 2:23 p.m. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Police: Former Lebanon city mayoral candidate charged with domestic assault and harassment
A former Lebanon city mayoral candidate has been charged with domestic assault after a physical altercation with his girlfriend in March, according to the Lebanon City Police Department. Scott Hawryluk, also known as Scott Church, was charged with simple assault (domestic violence), and harassment after police responded to a disturbance in the 400 block of Chestnut Street at 9:06 p.m. March 31. According to court documents, police met with Jennae Hamid, who reported her boyfriend, Church, had grabbed her by the sweatshirt and threw her back and forth. Police said that Hamid, also known as Jennae Tropea, went to the Good Samaritan Hospital for severe pain to her lower back that she sustained "from a physical altercation." According to court documents, the two were in a romantic relationship for nine months, and living together at the Chestnut Street address. "Hamid also advised Hawryluk was looking around for her gun, and kept stating 'Go get the gun and shoot me in the face,'" police said in court documents. "Hamid said she feared for her life." Church, a photographer, announced Jan. 16 that he planned to challenge incumbent Lebanon City Mayor Sherry Capello for the Republican nomination in the primary election. Church was removed from the ballot in March, after Capello said Church had 107 deficiencies in the signatures obtained for his candidate petition. County election officials told the Lebanon Daily News that Church had picked up a packet to run as a Libertarian candidate for the Lebanon city council race in November. Church has not filed that petition or filed his financial disclosure forms for his mayoral campaign as of June 3. Church has a preliminary hearing scheduled before Magisterial District Judge Maria Dissinger at 8 a.m. June 12. Matthew Toth is a reporter for the Lebanon Daily News. Reach him at mtoth@ or on X at @DAMattToth. This article originally appeared on Lebanon Daily News: Former Lebanon PA mayoral candidate charged with domestic assault
