
Apple can inch toward India and Vietnam, but it can't leave China, with or without tariffs
HighlightsApple Inc.'s technology transfer to China has significantly contributed to China's emergence as a leading global tech power, as detailed in Patrick McGee's book. The manufacturing ecosystem that Apple built in China, characterized by skilled labor and efficient production, is unlikely to be replicated in the United States despite political pressure from former President Donald Trump. Apple's reliance on China for high-tech manufacturing poses a strategic challenge, as the company faces increasing competition from homegrown firms like Huawei Technologies Co.
During US President
Donald Trump
's first term, he famously toured a Texas factory and claimed credit for bringing
Apple Inc
. production back to America. Except the plant had been running long before he took office. And it was an 'unmitigated fiasco.' Workers in
China
had to be flown in to help fix the mounting manufacturing issues encountered in the US heartland.
This telling anecdote from
Apple
in China, a gripping read by former Financial Times journalist Patrick McGee, shows how the tech giant became beholden to America's biggest geopolitical adversary. Up until this point, the book recounts how Apple flew engineers from California to China to train and collaborate with local workers to manufacture its most iconic products.
Now, it seems, the tables have irreversibly turned.
McGee argues that the technology transfer facilitated by Apple to China, via small decisions compounding over decades, ultimately made it the biggest corporate investor into Made in China 2025, President Xi Jinping's bold plan to end reliance on Western technology. 'Here was America's most famous tech giant volunteering to play the role of Prometheus, handing the Chinese the gift of fire,' McGee writes.
Yet the overarching argument of the book — that the US company made China into the tech behemoth it is today — begs the question of why Apple didn't make the same kind of investment in the US. And amid Trump's second term, when he has repeatedly threatened tariffs on the company if it doesn't onshore manufacturing, this query has new urgency.
But the reality is that Trump's nagging will never be able to recreate the ecosystem that local governments in China, with the help of Taiwanese suppliers such as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., created to lure Apple. A simplistic answer from a scholar early in the book is that China was a 'low wages, low welfare and low human rights' nation. Suppliers could exploit a massive underclass of migrant workers, and local authorities could quickly suppress any labor unrest or media reports of it.
If there were any voices I wanted to hear more of in the book, it wasn't the dozens of Cupertino, California, engineers but these Chinese workers who turned Apple into the $3-trillion-dollar company it is today. (Apple has publicly called claims in the book untrue and full of inaccuracies.)
But if there's a lesson for Trump — or American consumers — here, it is that electronics manufacturing jobs can come at a high cost for workers. It's hard to imagine that these are the kinds of positions Trump's base is hoping for, in an area where automation would be welcome.
China is hardly a low-wage manufacturing base anymore. Apple Chief Executive Officer
Tim Cook
acknowledged this before, saying that his company produces in the country not because of labor costs but because of its legions of skilled workers.
McGee argues that this upskilling is now being used to fuel innovation at homegrown tech giants such as Huawei Technologies Co. — and a direct result of Apple's investments. While the
iPhone
maker was chasing short-term profits, savvy suppliers in Asia were playing the long game.
We've all heard about the legendary union between founder Steve Jobs and designer Jony Ive that made the iPhone a unique product. But the partnership that made it a revolutionary one, owned by more than a billion people, was between Cook and 'Uncle Terry,' McGee argues. Terry Gou, the founder of Hon Hai (better known as Foxconn), was the hyper-efficient manufacturing genius who brought the iPhone to the masses.
Gou was described as obsessed with cutting costs — even if that meant diluting hand soap in factories with increasing amounts of water. One source in the book described him as worth billions in 'nickels and dimes.' But Gou recognized the value of working with Apple wasn't just profits: It was the tacit knowledge that he and his team would receive from the engineers shipped over from California to help set up and run the factories. This learning was invaluable, Gou understood, and made even losing money to get Apple orders worth it.
Ultimately, the high-tech manufacturing ecosystem built up in China took decades, marked not just by the factories producing its iconic goods but by the creation of sub-suppliers nearby and an army of skilled engineers. It will be nearly impossible for Trump to try to recreate this during his four-year term. The US could start by focusing investments in vocational education and engineering, but policymakers should recognize that catching up now requires a strategic long game.
And all the years it took to develop a reliance on China means it's not Trump's tariff threats that pose the biggest existential threat to Apple. It's Beijing. Uncoupling too fast risks angering local authorities, but not doing so quickly enough makes it even harder for it to inevitably be done.
As this book convincingly argues, Apple can inch toward India and Vietnam, but it can't leave China anytime soon.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
35 minutes ago
- News18
Did This Mysterious 'X' Account Stop Elon Musk And Donald Trump's Ugly Spat?
Last Updated: A mysterious account was hailed as hero for possibly saving space explorations after Elon Musk exploded on US President Donald Trump and threatened to decommission Dragon aircraft. An X account with barely any followers is being hailed as a hero for possibly helping Elon Musk cool down during his ugly spat with Donald Trump. For the uninitiated, the two powerful men had a dirty public fallout after the US President publicly criticized the world's richest man and his former pal at a White House press briefing, backing legislation that could severely impact the electric vehicle industry. Musk owns Tesla. This did not sit down well with the Teslaman for obvious reasons. Logging into the website he owns, Musk took to X and responded to the President he sounded 'ungrateful" after the techie backed Trump both strategically and financially during the 2024 US Presidential elections. One thing led to another and Musk had a meltdown of epic proportions online for the world to witness. Several political and personal attacks were directly aimed at Trump but at some point in the day, Musk had a divine intervention. A Shame An X user who goes by the handle @Fab25june responded to one of Musk's (deleted) posts stating that the Tesla chief had to stop the back and forth. The unknown X user was responding to Musk's threat to 'decommission" SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft that carries astronauts and essential supplies to the International Space Station. For context, Musk's post was in response to Trump's threat to chop federal contracts with his companies. The X user, tired of the standoff between the two powerful men, came in to save the day. 'This is a shame this back and forth. You are both better than this. Cool off and take a step back for a couple days," the user wrote. Musk, realising that his retaliation could have a major impact on space exploration with NASA being directly affected by his actions, took a breather and called it a day. 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon," a humbled down Musk wrote in response. (X Screengrab) 'Saviour Of Space Exploration" As news websites across the globe reported about Musk dropping the insane plan of decommissioning the Dragon spacecraft, folks on the X platform quietly thanked the soul for possibly saving the future of space travel. Shoutout to this guy with 17 followers for saving space exploration — greg (@greg16676935420) June 6, 2025 'Never think your voice doesn't count," wrote one. 'Haha oh man. This is why I decided to mostly ignore today's drama and come back to see what filters out. Good on Alaska." 'This man really walked into the Elon drama like: 'Guys, stop fighting" — and they DID." The account, for obvious reasons, experienced a massive jump in its followers count, taking them from a couple of hundred followers to over 6K in a single day. Also Read: 20 Memes On 'X' That Sum Up Elon Musk-Donald Trump's Messy Public Breakup Meme Day Friday turned into a meme day as users on 'X' grabbed their tubs of popcorn and watched the two most powerful men of the US battle it out in the mud. The funniest possible outcome is definitely Trump deporting him.— Franklin Leonard (@franklinleonard) June 5, 2025 This is the day I knew the relationship wouldn't last. — Alex Cole (@acnewsitics) June 5, 2025 today is the greatest day in american political history and I don't think it's even close— america's laziest lounge singer (@KrangTNelson) June 5, 2025 What's Cooking? Musk seems to have cooled down or that is what his current social timeline suggests. 'Fair enough," Musk responded to a video of Trump stating that he would look at Tesla chief's contracts and treat the tech mogul fairly. 'We'll take a look at everything. He's got a lot of money. He gets a lot of subsidy, so we'll take a look at that only if it's fair for him and for the country. I would certainly think about it yeah but it has to be fair," Trump said. top videos View all Upon being asked if he was thinking about Musk, Trump said that he was caught up with 'China", 'Russia", and 'Iraq" but wished Musk well. Responding to the video, Musk wrote: 'Likewise". About the Author Anurag Verma Anurag Verma, News Editor at works independently for the Viral section. Bollywood, Cricket, Science, Tech, YouTube, Reddit, Meme Origins and everything Pop-culture are his forte. He covers More Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : donald trump elon musk Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 07, 2025, 13:06 IST News explainers Did This Mysterious 'X' Account Stop Elon Musk And Donald Trump's Ugly Spat?


Mint
39 minutes ago
- Mint
Vivek Ramaswamy's photo with kids faces racist slur again: 'Why don't Americans deport this Indian?'
A heartwarming picture of Indian-origin Republican leader Vivek Ramaswamy was bombarded with racist and anti-immigrant comments by X users, as the MAGA world imploded with Donald Trump and Elon Musk attacking each other in public. Vivek Ramaswamy was closely aligned with the MAGA movement until Christmas 2024, when he criticised aspects of American culture and strongly reaffirmed his support for the H-1B visa programme. At the time, he was serving as co-chief of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. While Musk initially backed Ramaswamy's stance on H-1B visas, he reportedly disapproved of his subsequent actions. As a result, Ramaswamy stepped down from DOGE even before Donald Trump's inauguration. Ramaswamy had also put his hat in the ring for the US presidential polls but later withdrew from the race, despite backing from both Musk and Trump. As the two heavyweights locked horns on social media, Ramaswamy posted a photo carrying his two children — Karthik and Arjun — and wrote: "It's why we do it." The post had no connection with the MAGA crisis but was still met with vicious trolling. However, the comment section quickly turned hostile, with many users mocking Ramaswamy — some pointing out that 'Americans wear socks inside shoes,' likely referencing an earlier interview where he appeared barefoot. One user even asked Grok to change the background of the photo to a 'garbage-filled street in India.' "Why don't Americans deport this Indian?" one asked. "Is there a scientific reason as to why I find this photo repulsive?" a third user said. "Send him back to India... In the name of Jesus Christ," another wrote. "Do it in India," a hater said. Some X users pressed Ramaswamy to share his views on the Trump–Elon Musk feud, urging him to take a clear stand. While a few praised him for 'seeing it all much ahead of time,' others were curious about the extent of his falling out with Musk before he was shown the door at DOGE. One user questioned the MAGA movement's double standards, asking why it embraces Elon Musk — who wasn't born in the US — but not Vivek Ramaswamy, who was born in Cincinnati.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
41 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Democratic states strengthen laws to counter Trump's immigration crackdown
As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let any aggrieved person sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the US Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of sanctuary jurisdictions obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. States split on whether to aid or resist Trump Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the US illegally and detain them for potential deportation. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools, churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey, alleging their policies violate the US Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to USD 50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a sanctuary state, asserting that law officers remain deeply committed to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws, Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 US Supreme Court decision. Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Legislation supporting immigrants takes a variety of forms Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or exigent circumstances. Maryland Del Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community regardless of their background feel safe and comfortable, Williams said. Many new measures reinforce existing policies Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome, said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible. Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all, Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was injecting partisan immigration policies into schools. We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away, said state Sen Marie Alvarado-Gil. Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)