
James Toback Is Ordered to Pay $1.7 Billion in Sexual Assault Case
A jury in New York awarded $1.7 billion in damages to 40 women who sued the former movie director and writer James Toback over allegations of sexual assault, lawyers for the plaintiffs said.
Mr. Toback, once a Hollywood fixture known for writing 'Bugsy' and directing 'The Pick-up Artist,' had been defending himself against the lawsuit for a couple of years but more recently had stopped participating in the case. He has denied the allegations against him.
A judge entered a default judgment against him in January and a jury trial was held to determine how much money Mr. Toback would owe each plaintiff. On Wednesday, the jurors arrived at $42 million each, said Brad Beckworth, one of the lawyers who represents the women.
Mr. Toback, 80, has described himself in court papers as being 'financially destitute,' and it is unclear how much of the judgment he will be able to pay.
The women's allegations span from the late 1970s to the mid-2000s. Many of their accounts involve Mr. Toback approaching them in public, setting up meetings to discuss potential acting roles and then assaulting them at the meetings.
Mr. Toback, who was accused in a Los Angeles Times article of being a serial harasser toward the start of the #MeToo movement in 2017, declined to comment in a text message on Thursday. He had been representing himself in court, including taking depositions of accusers himself. But he wrote in court papers last year that persistent health problems had made it difficult for him to keep up with the case.
Mr. Beckworth said that during the weeklong trial to determine the financial damages, held in New York State Supreme Court, jurors heard the accounts of all 40 women, either in live testimony or from video depositions. Mr. Toback was not in the courtroom.
One of the plaintiffs, Marianne Hettinger, said in court papers that in 1988, when she was about 25, Mr. Toback approached her on the street and said he wanted to cast her in a movie, showing his Directors Guild of America card as proof that he was a filmmaker. At a meeting at his apartment, according to court papers, he held her in place as he masturbated, and then forced her to touch his penis and humped her leg, telling her it was his 'process' as a director.
Another plaintiff, Mary Monahan, had a similar account. She said that in the late 1990s, Mr. Toback approached her on the street in New York and invited her to audition for his next film. At the meeting, according to court papers, Ms. Monahan took off her clothes after Mr. Toback requested it, calling it a 'trust exercise.' The lawsuit said he then proceeded to hump her leg and ejaculate.
In a statement after the verdict, Ms. Monahan said: 'This verdict is more than a number — it's a declaration. We are not disposable. We are not liars.'
In 2017, shortly after the revelations about Harvey Weinstein's sexual abuse, allegations of sexual harassment against Mr. Toback were reported in The Los Angeles Times. He told the newspaper at the time that he had never met any of the accusers or that if he did, it 'was for five minutes and have no recollection.' He later gave a combative interview to Rolling Stone in which he was confronted with a couple of the specific accusations and replied: 'These are people I don't know, and it's things I never would have done. And it's just not worth talking about. It's idiotic.'
In 2018, prosecutors in Los Angeles said they would not file charges against him in five cases in which he had been accused of sexual abuse because the statute of limitations had expired.
The lawsuit in New York against Mr. Toback was filed after state legislation, called the Adult Survivors Act, gave plaintiffs an opportunity to sue over sexual abuse allegations even if the statute of limitations had passed. The suit included accusations from 45 women but five withdrew before the trial.
The suit initially named the Harvard Club of New York City as a defendant because five plaintiffs said Mr. Toback had sexually assaulted them there. The suit accused the club, which terminated Mr. Toback's membership in 2017, of allowing abuse to go on 'unchecked' for decades. The club denied that accusation and last year, the plaintiffs removed the club as a defendant.
Last year, Mr. Toback sought to significantly delay the court proceedings because of his health but was unsuccessful.
'The effort to move this case forward, despite my inability to appear to defend myself, flouts any common understanding of fairness,' he wrote in a June 2024 filing.
Mr. Beckworth said the jury awarded the plaintiffs $280 million in compensatory damages for their suffering and $1.4 billion in punitive damages, which required a finding that the conduct was 'wanton and reckless, or malicious.' He said the next step would be assessing Mr. Toback's assets, saying, 'We'll try to get these women as much as we can.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Witness accusing Sean Combs of sexual assault defends online posts of 'great times'
The defense for Sean "Diddy" Combs on Friday used upbeat social media posts to attack the credibility of one of the women accusing the music mogul of sexual assault during his federal trial in New York. "Isn't it true that Mr Combs never had unwanted nonconsensual forcible contact with you?" lawyer Brian Steel said to a former Bad Boys Records assistant testifying under the pseudonym Mia, during questioning that included displays of her personal social media posts. The testimony came as US President Donald Trump pondered aloud if he would offer 55-year-old Combs a pardon during a press conference at the White House Friday, saying "I don't know, I would certainly look at the facts." The facts are still unfolding in a trial that is expected to last into summer, in a case that revolves around Combs's relationship with his former girlfriend, singer Casandra "Cassie" Ventura. Earlier in the trial Ventura detailed years of alleged abuse and coercive, drug-fueled sex marathons with male prostitutes known as "freak-offs." This week, Mia described how her job between 2009 and 2017 became a nightmare as she worked to protect Ventura from Combs's fits of rage, or care for her after the attacks, tending to "busted lips," "bruises" and "a black eye." Combs would tell Mia to "go take care of her," adding that "we were not allowed" to go out until her injuries healed enough to conceal, Mia testified Thursday. She also testified that she personally endured abuses, including rapes, while working for Combs, recounting the painful and traumatic episodes with her head bowed. - Instagram vs reality - During cross examination on Friday, Steel confronted Mia with her social media posts, where she presented a much more positive image of her relationship with her boss. On a courtroom screen displaying Mia's Instagram posts, she called Combs "an extraordinary cultural phenomenon" and shared affectionate messages on his birthdays. Steel asked how she could publish such posts about a man she now accuses of sexual assault. "Of course you post the great times," Mia said. "Instagram is a place to show how great your life was even if it's not true." After Mia read her posts aloud, Steel questioned Mia's allegations, to which she replied twice "everything I said in this courtroom is true." "Ask any abuse victim's advocate and they could explain it to you much better than I could." On Thursday, Mia testified that Combs subjected her to "sporadic" instances of sexual violence, including at the artist's 40th birthday party at the Plaza Hotel in New York and his private residence in Los Angeles. "I just froze, I didn't react, terrified and confused," Mia said about one of the assaults. "He was the boss or the king, very powerful person," she said. "This is years and years before social media, Me Too, or any sort of example where someone had stood up successfully to someone in power such as him," she added. At the conclusion of the court's proceedings, jurors will have to determine whether that Grammy-winning artist and producer has used his fame, wealth and influence in hip-hop to support a criminal enterprise and sexual trafficking. arb/sla/jgc

Miami Herald
11 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Federal judge dismisses lawsuit over Flamin' Hot Cheetos origin story
A federal judge this week dismissed a lawsuit filed by the man who says he invented Flamin' Hot Cheetos. Richard Montañez had sued Frito-Lay and its parent company PepsiCo last year, alleging they defamed him and hurt his career by denying his role in creating the popular snack. Federal Judge John W. Holcomb of the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles wrote in his Wednesday ruling that Montañez's accusations of fraud and defamation were insufficient or lacked "factual support." But the battle over the origin story of the spicy junk food will remain in play for now. Montañez will have the opportunity to amend his lawsuit because "he may be able to cure the deficiencies in his pleading by alleging additional facts," the judge wrote. Montañez will have until June 13 to submit an amended complaint. His lawsuit came in the aftermath of a 2021 Los Angeles Times investigation that questioned his rags-to-riches story that had long circulated the internet and captured the hearts of fans of the snack and immigrant communities. The story goes that Montañez was working as a janitor at Frito-Lay's Rancho Cucamonga plant when he dreamed up a version of the Cheeto that would appeal to the Latino community and had the gumption to pitch his idea to an executive. The Times article cited chronological inconsistencies in Montañez's story, archival proof of the release of test products and comments by Frito-Lay executives. According to Montañez's lawsuit, he grew up in a Southern California migrant labor camp sharing an 800-square-foot, one-bedroom apartment with his parents and 10 siblings. He got the janitor job in the mid-1970s, and a decade later he and his wife experimented in their kitchen to create the new snack. In his lawsuit, he explained that he met resistance working with the research and development team while creating a spicy seasoning for mass production. "Dissatisfied that Mr. Montañez - a poor, uneducated Mexican plant worker and janitor - had successfully developed a new product, Frito-Lay's R&D personnel completely shut out Mr. Montañez from the development process," the lawsuit said. Montañez climbed PepsiCo's ranks, becoming the company's vice president of multicultural marketing and sales before retiring in 2019. In his lawsuit, Montañez said that the companies had sent him touring the country delivering inspiring talks in elite academic and business settings, and that as a result PepsiCo had "reaped tremendous benefits by affirmatively holding (Montañez) out as the inventor of Flamin' Hot Cheetos." But Holcomb, the judge, wrote that Montañez could not argue that PepsiCo and Frito-Lay's profiting off the premise that he invented the snack was unjust since Montañez "mutually benefitted from Defendants' decades-long support." Montañez's attorneys did not immediately respond to a request for comment. (Los Angeles Times staff writer Sandra McDonald contributed to this report.) Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Letters to the Editor: Why should a 4-year-old face deportation while Trump pardons criminals?
To the editor: If Deysi Vargas could afford a million-dollar-a-plate dinner at Mar-a-Lago, she might be able to save her daughter, like the mother of the tax criminal Paul Walczak ('4-year-old Bakersfield girl facing deportation could die within days of losing medical care,' May 27). He was pardoned after his mother bought a seat at President Trump's recent dinner. If her daughter were a Republican governor convicted of campaign finance fraud like former Connecticut Gov. John Rowland, she could be pardoned ('Trump issues pardons for politicians, reality TV stars, a union leader and a rapper,' May 29). If her daughter were a rioter who tried to overthrow the peaceful transfer of our democracy like the Jan. 6 criminals, she could be pardoned. But Vargas' daughter is simply a 4-year-old of Mexican descent who needs the lifesaving medical treatment she can obtain in the United States. Her daughter, by her innocence and lack of affluence and without allegiance to Trump, is apparently too much of a danger to remain free in the U.S. Fred Burgess, Camarillo This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.