
'A national treasure': Ribbon-cutting marks completed Cheyenne Depot renovations
CHEYENNE — Local leaders hope that newly completed renovations to the historic Cheyenne Depot will bring in more local residents and encourage tourists to spend more time downtown.
The project was completed only a few months after being approved in September, and was celebrated with a ribbon cutting on the newly updated pedestrian patio on May 13.
'These renovations will help ensure the Depot continues to meet modern needs while retaining its importance as a major historic building in Cheyenne,' said Jason Sanchez, Community Recreation and Events director.
Sanchez and his team were major contributors to this project, and have handled several other beautification projects in town. He noted that most buildings experience wear and tear over time, later requiring repairs.
By focusing on restoring original features and repairing attractive features, he hopes more people will use the building.
'This is a national treasure here,' Sanchez said. '... With the support of the taxpayers, to get ($1.4 million) to do this renovation, it was exciting to be able to bring something kind of back to life.'
The project, approved by City Council in September 2024, was allocated funding from sixth-penny sales tax funds earmarked for projects in downtown Cheyenne. The sixth-penny tax is approved by voters, with the funds allocated to specific projects.
Mayor Patrick Collins noted in his speech before the ribbon cutting that the voters who saw value in refurbishing downtown made this project possible.
'We have a beautiful downtown, we have beautiful bones,' Collins said. 'But we have curbs and gutters that needed work, we had garbage cans that needed to be worked on. We had this beautiful building that needed to be refreshed, and (voters) saw that vision.'
The $1.4 million project updated the patio on the southwest side of the depot, adding brick pavers, shade structures, tables, benches and an ornamental fence replacing the older chain link fence that used to separate the patio from the rail yard.
Renovations have also been made to the first-floor restrooms, the main lobby doors were repaired or replaced, and the kitchen has been updated to accommodate catering or concessions.
One of the major changes is the new ornamental fence that should provide security to the patio while allowing visitors to observe the rail yard.
'With people sitting out back, I didn't want them looking through a chain link fence anymore or barbed wire, so we put this ornamental fence up,' Sanchez said. 'It's a tourist destination. We're a few feet away from a rail yard, and not many people can boast that. It's a cool amenity for Cheyenne, and I think it'll boost our tourism dollars.'
The depot is designated a National Historic Landmark due to its status as a former Union Pacific train station. Its construction began in 1886, and after it was built, the Depot served as the main passenger station for Cheyenne.
The depot's role in the history of the transcontinental railroad, transportation in the West and the influence of the Union Pacific Railroad make it a prime tourist destination.
In the 1990s, after passenger service ended at the depot, the Union Pacific donated the building to the city of Cheyenne. After a decade or so of renovations, the Cheyenne Depot became a focal point in downtown Cheyenne and was declared a National Historic Landmark.
'We have people that come to Cheyenne, and they know about rail heritage,' Collins said. '... I think people want to come out here on this patio to watch the trains. And it wasn't a very hospitable place. Now, you look around, and it's gorgeous.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sanitation fee passes, begins July 1
The sanitation fee resolution, which caused many conversations and criticisms within Lebanon, was passed by the City Council in a 4-2 vote during Tuesday's meeting. The structure of the fee will be $20 for residential customers and $40 for business customers. The city's sanitation department does not pick up dumpsters used by businesses, only bins specifically used for the city service. Geri Ashley and Camille Burdine, Councilors for Ward 2 and 3 respectively, stuck to their votes against the fee for the second reading. Both raised concerns of how residents at or below the poverty line or seniors on fixed incomes may be impacted by the $20 per month fee. Questions regarding how the sanitation department is funded were asked as confusion rippled through the community. 'This was an unadvertised discussion in a work session. It was a 15-minute discussion,' Ashley said. 'I still don't have all my questions answered. I don't feel like I have the economic information.' 'I think that we should, as a City Council, have spent more time talking about it and seeing if we could come up with any other solutions,' Ashley added. 'If in fact we are paying for garbage in our city's taxes, and now we're incorporating a fee, then what happens next year when we get our taxes? Are our taxes going to be reduced at that point, because that is a double dip.' On Wednesday, Burdine reiterated her thoughts that the city should be more proactive in studying the impact on the citizens before a fee was implemented. She said the response to rising costs caused the city to be 'reactive instead of proactive.' Burdine said she is not opposed to a sanitation fee, but feels that more time should have been spent researching it. Also on Wednesday, Ashley called the fee a 'knee-jerk reaction' and likewise felt that not enough research was done. She also said instead of a flat fee, a property tax increase would take into account the property values and Wards 1, 2 and 3 would not have to deal with a monthly fee which might be a burden. Ashley said she wants to see if the sanitation fee will disappear from the property taxes. Ward 1 Councilor Joey Carmack said he supported the fee because it's a flat fee that all residents pay, which doesn't fluctuate. 'I do not feel it's fair for the sanitation fee to be a property tax,' Carmack said. 'A property tax would be unfair, because for example, person one has a $1 million house, and [may] only have one can of trash. They would pay more taxes than person two [who has] a $350,000 home.' 'We dump the trash from the city at Walter Hill (in Murfreesboro), which has been in the news about closing soon,' Carmack added. 'When that does happen, we will be paying even more to dump trash.' Middle Point Landfill has been working with Rutherford County to increase fees for 'out-of-county' tipping fees, as well as downsizing the number of counties allowed to dump there. During a meeting earlier this year, it was proposed to double the fees for non-Rutherford County clients from $1.20 per ton to $2.50 per ton to generate more revenue for that county. The town meeting hall had more residents in attendance than usual, which was commented on by the Councilors, who expressed gratitude for the increased attendance. Burdine, Chris Crowell, Councilor for Ward 4 and Phil Morehead, Councilor for Ward 6, particularly welcomed the attendance and interest in city business. During the public comment period, nearly a dozen people spoke to the City Council. One resident, Stephen Lawson, said he and others should have the option to opt out of the fee, and that he would rather pay a private company $30 to support that business than give the city $20. He also asked if there were other landfills which could be used. 'I thought there was a landfill in Wilson County. Is that one full?' Lawson asked. 'That's owned by the Wilson County government, and it's just open to construction materials,' Mayor Bell responded. 'It's not open to us.' Alex Buhler, former Ward 1 Councilor who stepped-down in 2012, also spoke. 'They should have that option to opt out,' Buhler said. 'If a thousand people opt out, that's a thousand houses you don't have to go to.' Bell responded by saying that wouldn't save as much money as people think because the sanitation trucks will still be driving by those houses anyway. Some of the Councilors said they don't know if private companies would have the same quality of work that the city does, as officials believe sanitation is a public health matter which the Council 'takes seriously.' Another resident wondered if the sanitation fee would lead to the start of 'nickel and diming' the residents of the city. Glenn Denton, County Commissioner for District 20, which covers the downtown Lebanon region of the county, criticized the growth of the city, which he thinks sparked the need for growing services and the fees to pay for them. 'Enough is enough. We have overbuilt in our city beyond what our infrastructure can handle,' Denton said. 'When do we stop building to where we cannot service and when we cannot pay for the infrastructure around it?' Nearly an hour and a half was spent discussing the sanitation fee and budget for the next year. With the passing of the resolution, the sanitation fee goes into effect July 1.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Salt Lake City considers raising costs of metered parking, minimizing free time
SALT LAKE CITY () — Parking in downtown Salt Lake City may start making a bigger dent in your wallet. As part of the city budget for the 2026 fiscal year, the Salt Lake City Council is considering changing the hourly rates for metered parking throughout the city, as well as the collection days and hours. Currently, metered parking is available at just $2.25 an hour. The city collects this fee between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday. On Saturday, the parking is free for two hours, while on Sunday, parking is free for the whole day. Carp chaos at Utah Lake as carp overpopulation becomes serious problem Under the proposed changes, the hourly rate for metered parking would rise to $3.50 an hour. The proposal would also take away the two free hours on Saturday and extend the collection hours from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Sunday would keep its free parking. The Salt Lake City Council will next meet on Tuesday, June 10, at 1 p.m. for a work session, where the calendar includes considering unresolved issues. A formal City Council meeting will be held at 7 p.m., where council members will consider adopting the proposed budget. Escape today to OUTRIGGER Ka'anapali Beach Resort Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump Salt Lake City Mission hosting pickleball event to help kids, change lives Elevate your outdoor adventure with the 2025 Forest River Rockwood Roo 17E Trump administration faces growing bipartisan pressure over Job Corps Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Portland breaks ground on new Kiwanis Pool expected to open in 2026
Jun. 6—The city of Portland broke ground on the construction of a new Kiwanis Pool on Thursday. Replacing the 60-year-old pool, the new facility will include a splash pad, waterslides, a lawn area, ADA accessible pool entry and lap lanes. The new pool will accommodate up to 400 swimmers at a time, about four times its previous capacity, according to a press release from the city. The updates to the Kiwanis pool, which first opened in 1961, have been in the works since 2019. But last August, when the pool closed for construction, the city was still short more than $5 million in funding needed to complete the project, a gap the city attributed to rising material costs. In the fall the City Council voted unanimously to allocate $4.6 million in American Rescue Plan Act dollars to the project to help fill that gap. Since then, the Portland Parks Conservancy has been raising money to come up with the remaining funds. The new pool is expected to be complete by summer 2026. Copy the Story Link We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others. We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion. You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs. Show less